Carol Kellermann

Carol Kellermann

Posted: November 13, 2009 01:16 PM

New Priorities for Mayor Bloomberg's Third Term

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS
What's Your Reaction?

Mayor Michael Bloomberg is right when he says that, in the current fiscal crisis, it's crucial to avoid the mistakes of the 1970s. At that time, the City of New York continued to spend beyond its means and then was forced to dramatically cut the services and infrastructure maintenance that are critical to the city's competitiveness and appeal.

But if Mayor Bloomberg is to preserve the legacy of his first two terms, of which he is especially proud - declining crime rates and improvement in public education - then he must adopt fiscal policies different from those he has followed thus far. He must reduce the immense and escalating cost of the municipal payroll, as well as the enormous burden of municipal debt.

The Payroll. From fiscal year 2000 to 2009, the cost of compensating City employees, including pension and fringe benefits, skyrocketed by $15 billon or 80 percent. A recent report by the Citizens Budget Commission revealed that the average compensation of a New York City municipal worker exceeds $100,000.

To reverse this trend, the Mayor must adopt a two-fold strategy:

First, wage increases, which exceeded inflation in the past eight years, must be kept below inflation. Fringe benefits, which are exceedingly generous, must be reformed to be more in line with those of other public and private-sector entities. Every employee should contribute to his or her health insurance premiums; the retirement age should be increased for new employees, and they should contribute more to their pensions.

Second, the Mayor must find ways to do as much or more with fewer workers. During the fiscal crisis of the 1970s, the number of City workers was cut by nearly 20 percent through layoffs and attrition. From 2000 to 2009, the number of full-time municipal workers grew by 6,838 or about 2.5 percent. This trend must be reversed. A shift from a 35- to a 40-hour workweek is one way to start; there are scores of work rule changes and technological innovations that can be adopted to enable the City to operate as well as it does today while eliminating positions, largely through attrition.

The Debt Burden. The City also needs to borrow less money and reduce the amount of debt service paid out of its operating budget. Unless that debt is reduced, by 2013, interest on the debt will be $6.5 billion, or about 9 percent of the budget.

Debt is essential for making capital investments. Following the fiscal crisis of the early 1970s, the City's capital budget was practically shut down, and key infrastructure components were allowed to deteriorate.

The City should continue to invest in the maintenance of sewers, roads, bridges and schools. But current capital plans for less essential undertakings, such as poorly justified economic development projects, will have to be sacrificed. A smarter, rather than bigger, capital budget will focus on better use and maintenance of existing assets rather than ambitious plans for expansion.

Restoring the City's long-term fiscal health will require tough decisions. Mayor Bloomberg made the case during his re-election campaign that his unique management skills would be crucial in this economic down-turn - which is unlike anything experienced in nearly four decades. Now is the time to prove that.

In this economy, keeping New York City a vital and competitive place in which to live and work requires a relentless commitment to controlling both payroll and borrowing. Those whose interests lie in increased spending must be resisted in favor of the larger public interest of living within our means.

The author is President of the Citizens Budget Commission (www.cbcny.org)

 
Mayor Michael Bloomberg is right when he says that, in the current fiscal crisis, it's crucial to avoid the mistakes of the 1970s. At that time, the City of New York continued to spend beyond its mean...
Mayor Michael Bloomberg is right when he says that, in the current fiscal crisis, it's crucial to avoid the mistakes of the 1970s. At that time, the City of New York continued to spend beyond its mean...
 
Comments
3
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

I can't get passed "the average compensation of a New York City municipal worker exceeds $100,000." I have been a New Yorker for 30 years. I have had to deal with NYC employees for personal and professional matters. 100K? Assuming that's not a typo and i know it is not since I have colleagues who have gone to work for the city, this is simply ridiculous. Who has ever heard of bureaucrats earning that much for what they do - typically not much compared no non government employees... I am not speaking of first responders -police, EMT, fire dept people- they earn they keep in spades. But the others? With all our taxes among the highest in the nation and so many new Yorkers unemployed? My Bloomberg please do something.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 11/15/2009
- mikeodd I'm a Fan of mikeodd 4 fans permalink

I find it appalling that we're going to be subjected to another four years of this guys draconian B***s**t.
With that said, even I'll tip my hat to him if he does something, ANYTHING to expedite the rebuilding of the WTC site. If anyone can grease the wheels its the 16th richest person in the world who also happens to be the mayor of NYC. He speaks billionaire and must convince Silverstein that the only thing that belongs there is a memorial. Forget the office complex, the PATH hub, all of it. Memorial, memorial, memorial.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 AM on 11/14/2009

It was ludicrous to give Mr. Bloomberg -- who was responsible for much of the city's current financial mess, what with the raises he granted, the tax relief he provided to the very wealthy individuals and firms, etc. -- the chance to somehow make everything better during his illegal third term. It's like putting, say, the head of Goldman Sachs or Tim Geitner or Larry Summers in charge of correcting the problems that exist in the financial community.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 11/13/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect