More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Carol Orsborn

GET UPDATES FROM Carol Orsborn
 

A Hope-Less Oscars: Two Generations With One Blow

Posted: 02/28/11 03:09 PM ET

When Bob Hope took the Oscars podium last night, the life of two generations passed before our eyes. Transmitted through the magic of black and white kinescope, his wry vitality cut through the sea of sparkly space-age metallic draped on dewy bodies, reminding me how much can be lost in the changing of the generational guard.

Last night, we all witnessed the unspoken ceremonial ordination of a new generation, with James Franco and Anne Hathaway as co-hosts of the awards, awe-inspiring in its audacious bravado. The timing is ironic, by the way, given that The New York Times had just run an article titled "Graying Audiences Return to Movies", reporting that the number of older moviegoers has risen 67% since 1995.

Audience members of all ages can appreciate that Gen X's James Franco and Gen Y's Anne Hathaway are delicious. They are shiny and scrubbed, sweet and humble. Given a chance, they will both age well, like fine wine gathering complexity, richness and depth over time. But they do not yet define reality.

Bob Hope, on the other hand, did. And not just for the couple of years most of today's
celebrities tend to hold sway, but for decades. As a Baby Boomer, I looked up to Bob Hope. Hope's comedic understatement simultaneously revealed the truth we all sensed while inviting us to be insiders in the joke. Even though we were young, we felt respected, important, elevated.

I never thought I'd have to say it but I miss Jack Nicholson, too, beaming like a wild man from the front row. As the years rolled on, we were aging, too, but we reveled in his dependability, promising to play with us forever with his irreverent dark glasses and irresistible smile.

I miss a huge swath of my own youth -- those many years in which I thought that the world of glamor was defined by movie stars from an older generation who loomed larger than life, infused with the aura of immortality. Barbara Stanwyck, Katharine Hepburn, Laurence Olivier: Who could have ever imagined an Academy Awards absent of their regal presence defining our hopes and aspirations?

And I never thought I'd say this either: I miss the entire generation. The Greatest Generation and now the disappearing generation. I miss Kirk Douglas in his prime, swinging his sword and sweeping leading ladies into his arms, but I am grateful for his appearance last night, even as a fragile whisper of the memory of a time when good always prevailed over evil, and some things seemed more than transitory.

Of course, by the time we Boomers were teenagers, we had already begun to realize that reality is both malleable and imperfect. But as members of the largest generation of youths in history, we at least thought that if reality were up for grabs, it would be we who would always be calling the shots.

Billy Crystal, in his brief return to the spotlight last night, reminds us of the fragility of our generation's audacious belief in the indisputability of our permanence. Meryl Streep, Susan Sarandon, Steve Martin: How could there be an Academy Awards without our generation's own icons giving out the awards, graciously accepting the regal statues, laughing intimately with one another on camera backstage?

Was it just last year that all these and more, planted so securely front and center, connected us to faith in our immortality? Yes, indeed. It was. Meryl, Billy, Steve and Susan, owning the room as if we would be forever. But with the Academy Awards 2011, the Greatest Generation is but a memory, and the Boomers are now suddenly the exception rather than the rule.

This was an awards season made poignant more by the unspoken silences and absences than the bright and sparkly special effects on the screen and women making their way in impossibly high heels down the red carpet.

We have, in fact, witnessed the clean sweep of not one but two generations. And at the very least, we owe it to ourselves to pay our respects. But note to the Academy: it would be well-advised to hope that we also continue to pay for tickets.

 

Follow Carol Orsborn on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CarolOrsborn

When Bob Hope took the Oscars podium last night, the life of two generations passed before our eyes. Transmitted through the magic of black and white kinescope, his wry vitality cut through the sea...
When Bob Hope took the Oscars podium last night, the life of two generations passed before our eyes. Transmitted through the magic of black and white kinescope, his wry vitality cut through the sea...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 101
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:22 AM on 03/01/2011
I, too, cannot stand how my fellow young people are so RUDE and inconsiderate at the theaters now days. Well, hell, I actually have read BOOKS outside of a High School/College classroom(and not on Kindle either)...so I guess I'm a weirdo.
11:20 AM on 03/01/2011
As I sit here, listening to Pencil Thin Mustache by Jimmy Buffet, thinking about my Baby Boomer father who I lost a few weeks ago...I just have to shake my head at some of the hate on here from Millenials toward Boomers. I'm a Millenial who LOVES old black & white movies and the pop culture of the mid-20th century. Not every one of us is an ignorant, obnoxious, misspelling, Tweeting, ADD hater.
11:46 AM on 03/01/2011
Thanks for speaking up Alex .... sometimes it's too easy to use sweeping broad strokes when talking about gen-xers and millenials. I'm a boomer and I hate getting blamed for all the warts many boomers have displayed over the deades. I know that not all mils fall into the mil stereo-type.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
practiceempathy
Tolerance need not yield to willful ignorance.
12:40 PM on 03/01/2011
I'm sorry to read of your loss, Alex. Take good care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
11:16 AM on 03/01/2011
Wow, very sensitive moderation on this post. None of my innocuous comments are getting through.

I'll try one more time to make two main points.

1. No one likes the boomers. Neither the people older, nor the people younger. We are all very glad that boomers are fading from view.

2. Bob Hope was classy. Bob Hope was nice. Bob Hope was never, not even one time, for one moment, funny.
02:07 PM on 03/01/2011
Innocuous? How about pernicious and vainglorious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluegardenia
I intend to live forever, so far so good.
03:02 PM on 03/01/2011
ah so no one likes the boomers huh Jay? well without them YOU wouldn't be here and when we're nothing but a memory you will be a boomer too....and just pining for the days of Ashton Kutcher who has no class, isn't nice and sure as hell isn't funny.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
08:03 AM on 03/02/2011
I love how you keep throwing out Ashton Kutcher.

Let it be known I'm no great fan of my own generation, either, nor of Kutcher. I just like the boomers less.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yorkie
08:16 AM on 03/01/2011
Ah, to see the grown ups in the house again! Hope and Johnny Carson were great all time hosts,,had that class, style..and pizazz ,,,also they had some of the best comedy writers in the biz for years,,,,these hosts the other night have little experience,,poor planning , poor writing it seemed,,,,They need to revamp it again, have one host in their mid 30's or 40's and a great seasoned movie pro like Robert Osborne of TCM . Alec Baldwin is good also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
10:02 AM on 03/01/2011
You know, I'm actually a huge fan of classic film (mainly drama, I'll admit), but am I the only one who literally thinks that Bob Hope and Johnny Carson were NEVER funny? Like, I have seen endless video clips of both of them. They seem like very nice guys. They DO seem classy, no doubt. But funny? They don't even make me smirk, never mind laugh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluegardenia
I intend to live forever, so far so good.
03:03 PM on 03/01/2011
Have you given any thought to the possibility that Carson's humour just might have been over your head?
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
01:34 AM on 03/01/2011
Isn't the Baby Boom supposed to view Bob Hope with contempt, seeing as to how he took Playboy bunnies to Vietnam every year? I haven't seen any of his movies - unless you count his bit part in "Spies Like Us" - but I have seen the Vietnam War-themed documentary "Hearts and Minds" (an Oscar winner, by the way). One scene shows footage of Bob Hope performing in the White House right before Nixon makes a speech.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluegardenia
I intend to live forever, so far so good.
02:15 AM on 03/01/2011
Well I am a boomer and I didn't care about Bob Hope one way or another...however he was a big star when I was a kid so you grow up with these people....just like we grew up with the Beatles etc. Bob Hope was veiwed very postively for going for so many years to entertain the troops no matter where they were. The fact that he took "playboy" bunnies was always forgiveable as he entertained the troops which outweighed his use of women...but that's the way it was then in the 60's...until the women's movement got itself together.
03:03 AM on 03/01/2011
If you lived during the Bob Hope era ... you'd know that Hope transcended politics. Playboy bunnies? It was the 60's and early 70's ... and those bunnies were a much needed distraction for the men in uniform. Even if just watching them do a 15 minute skit with Hope. Even back then ... Bob Hope was thought of as a national treasure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colonelsun68
Ready! Fire! Aim!
11:34 PM on 02/28/2011
The Academy Awards were fun to watch when they had comedians like Hope, Crystal, Whoopie Goldberg, David Letterman, and Jon Stewart hosting. Last night's show was a pathetic bore. This is supposed to be entertainment, for crying out loud! Put some fun back into it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Quinxy von Besiex
My micro-bio is empty. :(
10:48 PM on 02/28/2011
I honestly wish I understood the fascination with the Oscars. I don't get it. Not at all. I enjoy movies at least as much as the average American, but for me the interest in Hollywood ends at the movie theater door. I go in, have a beautiful moment, and I leave. I don't care what kind of pancakes the celebrities like, I don't care how pretty their latest baby is, I don't care who they are sleeping with, and I don't care what their peers (or the general public) think of their talents. I don't quite get how it would matter to me what the Academy (or anyone else) thinks about a movie I experienced on my own? I totally get why you'd care if you worked in that industry, but if you're not then why do you feel emotionally involved or even mildly interested? I'm not trying to start an argument, I'm just genuinely trying to understand because it's lost on me, and I don't know what I'm missing. Can anyone explain it?
11:35 PM on 02/28/2011
Do you follow any football team, baseball, b-ball? I don't care what kind of pancakes they eat either .... but if you're talking about why does anyone care who "wins" an Oscar for some specific role .... then it's called competition. I don't play football, but I'm a Seahawk fan. I root for my team. I'm bummed when my team loses. I like Cate Blanchet ... I'd root for her if she was up for an Oscar. I'd be bummed if she lost. Is this what asking about??
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Quinxy von Besiex
My micro-bio is empty. :(
12:00 AM on 03/01/2011
Maybe that's it... good analogy. I can enjoy games, and I do take sides, but I don't religiously root for a specific team, or actively follow sports. And with actors/directors/etc. I do have strong favorites, but I guess for me it's more about the experience in the theater, and what happens outside just doesn't seem relevant. Thanks for helping me think it through.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
10:05 AM on 03/01/2011
The problem with that analogy is that sports exist SOLELY for competition. Furthermore, the competition in sports is strictly regimented with rules, codes, and governing bodies.

Films do not exist for the sake of competition. Film festivals often offer a competitive atmosphere, but the main purpose is exhibition, not competition. As for the Oscars...real competition has to be defined, not based on random votes by random anonymous people and based on absolutely nothing.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
01:31 AM on 03/01/2011
The Oscars are the Academy giving itself a rub down for another boring year that still made money at the box office.
People watch the Oscars for two reasons -- first to complain that last years was better, second to dis on people in clothes thay can't afford and couldn't fit into even if they could.
I have learned that any tv event such as this is a great time to run errands -- even Walmart is remarkably empty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluegardenia
I intend to live forever, so far so good.
02:17 AM on 03/01/2011
Actually you are quite wrong. There maybe SOME people who watch for those reasons but others watch because they enjoy film. They enjoy seeing those whose films they watch be recognized. I don't complain about how much better this years was than they years or do I give a damn about what people wear. I watch because I am a film lover. Period.
02:34 AM on 03/01/2011
That may be why you watch ... but I watch because I love motion pictures.
09:59 PM on 02/28/2011
Nice article, Carol. You put it all into words for me. I've watched the Oscars since 1965, when I was a kid - and for me, especially after watching last night - it's clear to me now, with the "unspoken ceremonial ordination of a new generation" ... the Oscars, have officially ... lost not only their heart, but their soul....and it sucks.
10:16 PM on 02/28/2011
Oh, and ... The Academy's attempt to attract the hip, younger set .... will never work. The majority of the young and hip don't have the same relationship with film that boomers have --- they (most) don't care about it's history, it's golden age, it's stars of the past. This is all ingrained in us - we grew up on movies. We were inspired by movies. The hip and young have grown up on twitter, facebook and The Kardashians. Heck ... they'd rather tweet about the Oscars than actually watch it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluegardenia
I intend to live forever, so far so good.
01:12 AM on 03/01/2011
I think you might just be right Tamara about this newer generation not having the same relationship with film that boomers have. My earliest film memory is going to see the Wizard of Oz...I was 8 yrs old. I loved the movies. I loved Cagney, Bogart and Bergman, Cary Grant, Judy Garland and Fred Astaire. I grew up on those films very early in life. I have been watching the Oscars since 1957. I can't ever remember missing a year. I love film. I don't care what they eat either. Or how cute their babies are. However, I do care about their art and how well they perform their craft. I do like to see them receive recognition for it. The Oscars are Hollywoods Super Bowl, THe World Series, The Stanley Cup, The Pulitzer Prize.
Now my idols have changed somewhat over the years while I might miss the Golden days of Hollywood I now cheer for Firth, Rush, Penn, Crowe, Blanchett, Mirren, Winslet and Decaprio. My heroes from my youth DeNiro, Pacino, Newman, Redford, Pfeiffer and Lang
are seldom seen anymore. But you are so right the young of today don't seem to want to watch the Oscars anymore...it's a shame really.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
01:41 AM on 03/01/2011
You are so full of yourself it makes me feel like taking a high colonic for you. Lets talk great boomer directors like Speilblagh who stole every trick in his book from Orson Wells, and did it quite poorly too. There are bright and talented gen x and y directors and actors that have suffocated under the boot of you "me" people because they wouldn't maximize corporate profits. Hathaway and Franco are banal at best -- guess who picked them, it wasn't me.
09:36 PM on 02/28/2011
I think what Carol Orsborn is feeling nostalgic for is perfectly legitimate: movie stars who were actually regal and knew how to carry themselves with dignity--and even glamour. I'm somewhere between Boomer and Gen X, but I miss that era too. No matter what your age, you have to admit that the Hollywood era of the 1930s-1960s had some fascinating characters, who really worked the fantasy aspect of their trade and were compelling to watch. In more modern times, that compelling quality was taken up by such amazing actors as Streep and Nicholson. They really did elevate the entire ceremony, in ways that James Franco or Jake Gyllenhaal never will. And yes, their absence was notable, and sad.
In contrast, Franco seemed to feel like he was perfectly entitled to show up both stoned and completed disinterested in working (other than smirking). It was like a bad Waldorf school, where he was just "special" for having shown up. Though I never particularly liked Bob Hope or Billy Crystal, at least you got the feeling they were legitimately trying to be present and make the evening a success.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftbehind2000
Occupy Your LIFE.
10:21 PM on 02/28/2011
Hope and Crystal were naturals. Comedic timing is a gift, and very few actors really have it - as is apparent if you watch any late night talk show. Rather than landing on demographics, the Academy should look at who connects with people. Good MCs know how to appeal to all ages. Anyone who ever watched George Carlin for any length of time knows that this is decidedly so.

As far as Franco goes, you could be right, but I tend to feel a little more gracious about it all. I wonder if maybe he was just extremely nervous and ill-at ease.
09:30 PM on 02/28/2011
What was notable at these Oscars was that except for people in the nominated films, or people presenting awards, the ceremony was not the cool place to be. I hardly saw anyone else notable in the crowd shots. I don't even think the movie industry cares that much about the Oscars anymore.
09:27 PM on 02/28/2011
Truth, art,enlightenment, and grand entertainment rise from a historical continuum. It's not generational, although, many times, much the same symbols, myths, and ideas come to us over and over again. And then there are the breakthroughs that deepen culture. Unfortunately, in the U.S. today that culture is bottomline corporate and many Americans have no cultural memory or connection to history because of the present corporate fascism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenrynne
Smiling Skeptic, Former Senate & House aide.
09:04 PM on 02/28/2011
Also issue an Amber Alert for: Black Men. Where were Denzel? Jamie? Lawrence? yes brief Morgan on video w Boomer-American Alec Baldwin.
Mark from atlanta
Unity through Diversity.
09:01 PM on 02/28/2011
Every year these "live" shows get safer and safer (and more boring).

Why is everybody so afraid of risk?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tallulah Morehead
Award-Eligible Film Legend
12:28 AM on 03/01/2011
Because it's risky.
photo
camanokat
Outta this world
08:42 PM on 02/28/2011
What a drag it is getting old.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13olfeD026g

The Rolling Stones
photo
studioh!
just.words.
10:45 AM on 03/01/2011
just ask kirk douglas!
but please, don't ask him to present an award!
08:05 PM on 02/28/2011
I really don't care what "generation" is being more represented at the Oscars. Yeah, Franco and Hathaway are young, but they were dreadfully dull as hosts. I'd take a good old comedian any day over someone young and "polished". And this is coming from a Generation Y'er