iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Carol Rasco

GET UPDATES FROM Carol Rasco
 

Presidential Candidates Should Debate Education

Posted: 10/02/2012 10:10 am

Believe it or not, it wasn't until the very last question of the very last debate when the 2008 presidential candidates were finally asked about education policy. At Reading Is Fundamental (RIF), we're urging the debate moderators to ask the question early and often.

Even though the lion's share of policy discourse is focused on other issues, a recent Rasmussen survey shows 61 percent of likely voters rate education as very important.

At the same time education is not being raised in election chatter, headlines related to this issue are grabbing our attention, like the one last week showing 2012 high school graduates scored lower in reading on the SATs than they have in four decades.

Study after study underscores the importance of adequately preparing students for success even before they enter a classroom, starting with reading at an early age. But there's been so little focus on this issue that most voters have no clue where the candidates stand.

At RIF, we're focused on ensuring children in need have access to the most basic tool for learning -- books. The Department of Education announced Friday that RIF will receive $4.18 million for a new program to help combat challenges around book access and the loss of reading skills during the summer months. The program will be based on work by researchers at Harvard University and the University of Virginia showing that with a fairly low-cost approach, big gains can be made to stem summer learning loss.

With the economy and unemployment at the center of this campaign, the electorate is looking for effective and efficient answers to the very issues they prioritize. Book access can be just that -- an answer with a high return on investment.

Consider this. A child in the U.S. without books is on his or her way to becoming:
• 1 of the 33 percent of 4th graders who cannot read at the basic level
• 1 of the 7,000 students who drop out of high school every school day
• 1 of the 40 million adults who cannot read

Imagine the difference we could make if education were a central focus of our domestic policy. Imagine the implications for unemployment and our global competitiveness; for our families and our communities; for our future.

While education is an important issue for voters, the number one issue in this election will be the economy and jobs. According to the CBC News/New York Times September poll of registered voters, the economy and jobs ranks 26 percent higher than any other issue when it comes to deciding how they'll vote for president. But how strong can our economy and workforce be if one in five adults in the U.S. is functionally illiterate?

The ties between education and the economy are clear. But will it be up to the candidates to raise it or will the moderators consider it as a key issue worth an honest exchange?

As the candidates take the stage Wednesday night and Jim Lehrer poses the first question, we'll be watching, waiting and listening.

Join RIF's petition to the moderators at http://www.causes.com/causes/668987-reading-is-fundamental-rif/actions/1687235

Rasco has been at Reading Is Fundamental, the nation's largest children's literacy organization, since 2001. In the organization's 45-year history, RIF has distributed more than 400 million free, new books to more than 35 million children.

 

Follow Carol Rasco on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CHRasco

FOLLOW EDUCATION
Believe it or not, it wasn't until the very last question of the very last debate when the 2008 presidential candidates were finally asked about education policy. At Reading Is Fundamental (RIF), we'r...
Believe it or not, it wasn't until the very last question of the very last debate when the 2008 presidential candidates were finally asked about education policy. At Reading Is Fundamental (RIF), we'r...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Earl Gray
Lighting up straw men everywhere
09:56 PM on 10/03/2012
Moments ago, during the Presidential Debate, Mr. Obama remarked (concerning Medicare) that "partial privatization" wouldn't work becasue insurance companies have higher overhead and need to turn a profit. He said that the inevitable result would be reduced care.

He's right.

I would like to see this philosophy applied to the runaway move toward charter schools.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceydouglas
outside the box
10:44 PM on 10/02/2012
Well that debate wouldn't last long because about the only thing keeping their education platforms from being identical is vouchers. Both candidates are privatizers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roaddawg31
07:39 PM on 10/02/2012
People,
Please think about what has changed since 2008? After you've thought, let me answer that question: NOTHING. Actually, the conditions (in the economy) have gotten worse--since we've made the debt (the primary problem) WORSE. Consumption probably has slightly decreased (though still, I don't think I see many people at all scaling back their lifestyles).

The main thing I'd like people to realize is that NOTHING HAS CHANGED. Obama was all about "CHANGE", yet nothing has. And this is not an attack on Obama. The other candidate (Romney) is even worse than him. I'm just highlighting how much actual CHOICE you have. You have NO CHOICE.
04:38 PM on 10/02/2012
Simpson's paradox. Similar thing happening with literacy.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Harold A. McDougall
04:02 PM on 10/02/2012
Great blog. I would like to see the education issue raised. I believe a comprehensive approach, at the level of a social movement, will be required to fix the problem. See my blog on Closing the Achievement Gap. We shouldn’t let the candidates off the hook on this one, even though we may have low expectations.
03:26 PM on 10/02/2012
Except the USA has the highest literacy rate in the world.
01:08 PM on 10/02/2012
Both presidential candidates favor failed educational policy that punishes the people working hardest to help kids for factors they can't control and hands our public schools over to private agencies, sacrificing educational quality to profitability. They differ a bit in the details. If you're looking for an education president, stay home on election day. There's no good option.
11:49 AM on 10/02/2012
Be honest, politicians just don't realize that the old education bureaucracy is just not equipped nor can it adapt to the new educational skills required for the revolutionary internet job marketplace which is decimating small businesses and employment because most graduates have wasted their youth in a dysfunctional old fashioned primarily liberal arts education system.
01:09 PM on 10/02/2012
That may be what you honestly think. It isn't factual.
06:06 PM on 10/02/2012
Politics does not deal with facts very often but is designed to appeal to the public with emotionally satisfying generalities.
11:17 AM on 10/02/2012
While it would be nice if education was a central issue in this election, neither party really differs in their views on education, both siding with more of a neoliberal and business influenced reform. Further, when they do talk about education they dont get into specifics, but often talk in the need to raise test scores to remain competitive, the need to be graduate more math and science majors, and the need to reform "for the kids". they often state this without any details of how such reforms are going to be accomplished. The debate format basically allows for only talking points to be conveyed on such issues. It is the job of the media outside of the debate to ask the tough questions and dig deep into each candidates perspectives on education. unfortunately, our media doesnt even discuss policy issues or ask the difficult questions, resulting in many americans not even knowing what each candidate stands for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Barnard
Noyce and ACS-Hach Scholar
10:46 AM on 10/02/2012
You do realize the lowering of SAT is because more people from a wider background are taking them?
10:30 AM on 10/02/2012
To be honest, I'd rather they did not talk about it. Neither of the candidates has an education policy that is good for kids. And talking about it is probably only likely to cause fewer people to vote.
NCLB expired 5 years ago. It hasnt been important enough for anyone in DC to bother re-authorizing (OR FIXING) it since then.
Education is a state issue and until the feds start talking about implementing something like a right to a quality education for all kids, as opposed to simply letting states decide what they can 'bear' year by year, then they have nothing useful to say. IMHO, of course...
10:37 PM on 10/02/2012
Only one question I want answered-Obama and Romney why do want to destroy public education?