Could Obama Be the Next Postmodern Hero?

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted May 13, 2008 | 05:04 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

There's no sure career path, no sure relationship, no sure cure, no sure safe-haven, and basically no sure bet. The postmodern era is about shades of grey on a daily basis.

A postmodern hero knows how to traverse this grey zone with the skill of a master surfer cutting through monster waves -- and even more importantly, coaxes us all into following along while at the same time reducing our anxiety about it. There is a good chance Barack Obama is our next postmodern hero.

Bill Clinton is our last postmodern fallen hero. He had a chance to be one of the greats because he played with ambiguity like it was sport. Not only did he have us questioning what "sexual relations" is, he actually had us questioning what "is" is. By toying with labels, Clinton was able to shape perception in his favor. He consistently glossed over defeat and scandal by claiming victory which sent his opponents into a rage.

At his best, Clinton was flexible in his thinking, stayed on course when it was important and knew how to change course when it was necessary. But then the switch flipped. His political agility started to get a subversive undertone to it -- more about covering up than doing good.

Bill Clinton was smart enough to know it and tried to pass the PM hero torch to Hillary, but at her core, Hillary Clinton is dogma. She was Barry Goldwater right dogma in her youth, and she's progressive left dogma now -- flip side of the same coin. Hillary Clinton is borrowing Karl Rove politics from the right to win on the left now -- flip side of the same coin.

Look into her eyes anytime her truth is questioned. There's an impassable, go-for-the-throat glare. She shut everyone out of health care the first go-around to avoid the inevitable compromise.

In a lot of ways, John McCain is like Hillary Clinton, maintaining a thin facade of flexibility, but underneath it's all black and white. Instead of looking into his eyes, look at his smirk and the anger underneath it the next time his truth is questioned.

For more than a few people, this black and white view of the world has an appeal. There seems to be less emotional wear and tear when right and wrong is definitive, truth is absolute, and you stick with a principle until you drive it into the ground.

John McCain is a modern war hero. He comes from the time when it was us versus them and we knew exactly who the them was. Maybe all the gaffs where McCain mixes up Sunnis, Shiites, and their relation to Al-Qaeda aren't senior moments. Maybe it's his subconscious need to return to a time of dualities -- good versus evil.

The problem is you can't put terrorism into a cold war rubric just like we can't go back to the 1950s. He's forcing a square peg into a round hole -- even if that feels good to you at the moment, there's gonna be a lot of pain afterwards.

McCain comes from a dynasty of warriors -- his father and grandfather both served as admirals in the U.S Navy. If you come from any military, political, or corporate dynasty, it's almost impossible to break tradition. Black and white is in their blue blood. Even though heirs may choose to rebel a little here and there, they go back to what they know is the established truth in the end. Creativity, new ways of looking at things, and a renewed sense of social conscience often pop out of what seems like nowhere, not out of a dynasty.

In the same way, the story of a postmodern hero isn't usually born out of the establishment; it comes from the margins. Barack Obama's youth is as marginal as it gets. From his Kenyan father to his Kansas born mother. From his stay in Indonesia as a child to growing up in the peripheral state of Hawaii.

From his family tree to his psychological makeup, Barack Obama is a one man melting pot who's grey to the core. Still, you have to learn to glide in and out of the establishment to affect change. Obama did that with his Ivy League education and he's doing it now with his politics.

In true postmodern hero form, Obama doesn't usually go for the knockout punch. On Hardball with Chris Matthews, Matthews wondered if Obama could win a battle against somebody where he can't knock them out? But Chris, as he often is (I say this affectionately), is back somewhere in the past. Surviving the grey zone means you don't always go for the knock out punch; you don't always go for the red-button kill.

Success comes from dodging a left hook. Throwing in a crafty right hook. Slowly wearing down your opponent. Outlasting your opponent. And in some cases, knowing when to postpone the fight. In the grey zone, you never let it get down to all-or-nothing when you don't have to.

Obama has the mental and physical toughness to stand in quicksand and come out of it a stronger man. Look at Obama's face the next time his truth is questioned -- instead of the evil eye or a deranged smirk, you get the sense that his whole being is absorbing the question.

Our potential postmodern hero, Barack, also knows how to make a good bet. The grey zone is about playing with probabilities, mastering the odds, and learning the appropriate, calculated risks to take. During the Pennsylvania primary debate with Clinton, Obama emphasized that in deciding to run, he was making a bet on the American people -- that they were tired of old-style politics and that they were ready for the project of changing this country.

Obama feels like he wagered well. He emphasized that "during the course of these last 15 months, my bet's paid off because the American people have responded in record numbers, and not just people who are accustomed to participating, but people who haven't participated in years."

For Obama, beyond the bet, there are hope and faith -- two central themes in the grey zone. The definition of hope implies a sense of promise for the future and a belief in a positive outcome even though events may seem to be going in the opposite direction. The definition of faith is a belief in something for which you don't have definitive proof.

Hope and faith make change and political action possible in the face of uncertainty. Obama knows the, until recently, secret blend of hope, faith, and politics.

Barack Obama embodies the contradictions it takes to be a postmodern hero. There's substance behind the image, ideas behind the rhetoric, and a man behind the politician. So back to the question... could Obama be the next postmodern hero? Maybe, but then again, is it for sure?

 
 

Comments
31
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Here's what I listen to after an hour of media bloviacs slicing and dicing the man:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUJz6sU-zm0

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 05/14/2008

..is it for sure? Of course not.

But I would rather go with the hero we are not sure of, than the villains (both McCain and Hillary) that we can rely on to be their black and white selves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 05/14/2008

I couldn't agree more!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 05/14/2008

Uh, no...

.... unless you define Post Modern Hero as an empty suite elitist from Chicago who tends to vote "present", has a bitter millionare wife and a delusional preacher, hangs out with unrepentent domestic terrorists, and plans on subjecting our troops to a humiliating withdrawal from Iraq while he chats with Iran.

In that case, I guess that is a post-modern hero.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 05/14/2008

"That is my problem with Obama; chances are 50-50 that hope can go in either direction. He is asking the public to rely on hope, but what if he is relying on hope for his presidency if elected? Oval office decisions are black and white"

Is iraq black and white? what about social security? healthcare? mortgage crisis? affirmative action? illegal immigration? If these decisions were so black and white they would have already been solved. Each of these problems will take a nuance approach or they probably will not work. Obama appears to be very pragmatic and does not appear to go for the throat with his opponents, I think that will serve him well as president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 05/14/2008

Exactly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 05/14/2008

Well put!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 05/14/2008

Absolutely. I've thought this quite often in the last couple of months. Hillary and McCain are so very similar in so many ways. Dualistic perspectives. Traditional-Modern, old paradigm, mechanistic perspective, whatever one wants to label it.

Obama is the new paradigm master. Dialectic. Not negating modernism but transcending and including it. Post-modern, cultural creative, integral, systems perspective, whatever one wants to label it.

I've been watching very little television coverage of this primary because the corporate media is entirely missing this. They're still trying to fit new wine into old wineskins.

I hadn't expected such a thing to happen in politics for a while yet. I had had hopes for Clinton-Gore. But Clinton's own narcissism negated so many of his possibilities. And Hillary doesn't have them.

We have an enormous opportunity before us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 05/14/2008

The idea of "Not negating modernism but transcending and including it" is such an important notion--the past, present and future are all intertwined!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 05/14/2008

Excellent article! As citizens we need to have faith that change will get us back on track. Sometimes a new, fresh, clean idea is what is necessary to shake things up......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 05/14/2008

Thank you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 05/14/2008

You said:
For Obama, beyond the bet, there are hope and faith -- two central themes in the grey zone. The definition of hope implies a sense of promise for the future and a belief in a positive outcome even though events may seem to be going in the opposite direction. The definition of faith is a belief in something for which you don't have definitive proof.

That is my problem with Obama; chances are 50-50 that hope can go in either direction. He is asking the public to rely on hope, but what if he is relying on hope for his presidency if elected? Oval office decisions are black and white. As to faith; faith is a belief in something for which you cannot prove. There is nothing definitive about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 AM on 05/14/2008

Hope gets its power when it is combined with intelligence, persistence, character and strength--Obama has the combo!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 05/14/2008

I agree. We could use a level-headed guy like Obama in the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 05/14/2008

Faith comes from "credo" - it's not what one BELIEVES in it's what one COMMITS one's heart and soul to. We've got a goofy concept of faith in this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 05/14/2008

Kierkegaard's "Leap Of Faith," while one of my favorite philosophical texts of all time, did a lot to exacerbate this problem, because it emphasized the cognitive "leap" required to move from that which can be proven empirically to that which is "known" outside of reason. This has been simplified and/or distorted to mean "Faith is a belief in something which you cannot prove."

As you suggest, this places the emphasis on the wrong aspect of faith (namely, its irrationality). In our reason-obsessed culture, that which is apart from or not subject to rational explanation is more often than not condemned or ridiculed. But you are correct, the important part about faith is the commitment (the leap itself), despite what your rational thought processes might tell you about that commitment.

The word "faith" has been bound up in religious notions as well, to the point where it has nearly become synonymous with "Christian fundamentalism." Again, this is wrong. We all take leaps of faith, even atheists. Example? Falling in love. Your reason tells you that relationships statistically don't work, and your memory probably tells you that they result in emotional pain. And yet....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 05/14/2008

Do you have any idea what "postmodern" actually means?

As I've seen it used in literature and film, it is the subtle weaving of reality and non-reality in a way that makes it hard to distinguish where one ends and the other begins. For some strange reason, I do not believe this is the way in which you mean to use "postmodern" in describing either Obama or Bill Clinton. Or are you just attempting to be clever?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 05/14/2008

My definition of postmodern comes out of Jacques Derrida and deconstruction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 05/14/2008

Horsepuckey. Obama is Jefferson Smith in "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 05/14/2008

Obama is "Mr. Smith" with a twist--the twist being postmodern. Otherwise he wouldn't be resonating like he is right now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 05/14/2008

If Barack Obama runs this country like he has run his campaign, with the help of a solid democratic majority in both houses of congress (there is strength in numbers...the dems will find their back bones now). We all know the democrats are going to clean house on the November elections. I think that we have a bright future as a country after we clean up the mess that the republicans have left for all of us. And Barack will lead the way with his 50 state strategy. This is proof of his forward thinking that is not only for his own benefit, but for the benefit of the party as a whole. If he just keeps this up he might be on money some day. Perhaps the $250 bill (yeah, inflation sucks).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 05/14/2008

"There's substance behind the image, ideas behind the rhetoric, and a man behind the politician": technically, this is the antithesis of postmodernism. Complication is not necessarily contradiction, and postmodernism stands for the repudiation of correspondence claims about substance and image, ideas and words, persons and roles. Obama is a modern hero, a good old-fashioned, straight-up guy who is nonetheless navigating, as you rightly point out, very new territory. We may be postmodern, but not he.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 PM on 05/13/2008

He's post-post-modern. Or post-modern on its further (leading) edge. He's "integral" in the research/theory of spiral dynamics and integral theory.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 05/14/2008

"Is Obama tough enough?" I laugh when I hear the pundits ask this question. Ask any expert on political psychology to analyze this political phenomenon called Barack Obama!
Why can't he close the deal with middle class whites? Isn't it ironic that the MSM always focus on this question and never seem to focus on two other questions...... Why has Hillary Clinton lost the African-American vote? Why can't she close the deal with higher educated whites? Why isn't she doing better among young people having Chelsea as one of her key surrogates, who focus mainly on college campuses?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 05/13/2008

To hear the MSM tell it, the voters that clinton appeals to are too dumb - less educated - to keep up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 05/13/2008

They're more likely to be "concrete-operational" thinkers in general. Obama IS a more than a little beyond them in terms of cognitive development (which I'm elistist enough to desire in my presidents!) And he will get the knack of speaking concretely. I'm sure he "gets it" - but right now has more timely matters to attend to.

A young friend of our recently began his medial internship at an inner city Houston clinic. He learned very early on that he had to speak very concretely with his patients. He described his enthusiasm his first day. He went in to his first patient and breezily and cheerily asked, "What brings you in today?" The patient said, "My nephew." Our young friend tried his breezy approach with the second patient, asking the same question and the patient replied, "The bus."

He learned, that first day, that he had to interact with his patients very literally, very concretely, very specifically. And that's something Obama will master. I'm sure he's already learned that on the streets of South Chicago. But right now he's got a primary season to wrap up and a general to prepare for!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 05/14/2008

OMG, get a room! He's a dessert topping, no he's a floor wax. He is, by his own admission, merely a "blank screen" that you fill with your hopes. At this point, it is not Obama's fault that nobody takes him at his word about it. He has given the country fair warning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 05/13/2008

"nobody takes him at his word"

That's funny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 05/14/2008

Senator Obama represents the hope and we represent the power to change this beautiful Country,he is the one unifying this Nation beyond religion,race and politics...is up to US and not just up to him.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 05/13/2008

He is the best of the best. Thank you for showing how his 'weakness' is truly a strength unlike the warmongering false bravado of HRC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 05/13/2008

Yes he is and it is sure. A skinny guy with a funny name from the South side of Chicago has prevailed over the most prominent and well-known political btrand in America. Yes, Obama has the intellect, the zeal and the tenacity to deliver. He is the real deal. But he is not superhuman. He needs and will need all of us. That is why his message is about the We and US, not I as Hillary, Bush and McCain are used to saying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 05/13/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 
 
Related Tags