iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Casey Sherman

Casey Sherman

Posted: January 19, 2010 11:29 AM

Martha Coakley: Democrat Doomed from the Start

What's Your Reaction:

She's Irish, she's a woman and she's a democract. In a left leaning state like Massachusetts, what's not to love about Martha Coakley? Everything it seems.

Voters in Massachusetts are finally getting to know Coakley en masse thanks to her now disastrous campaign to succeed the late liberal lion Ted Kennedy in the U.S. Senate. For much of this special election Coakley has kept a low profile - a strategy that has served her well throughout her career as a district attorney and now the attorney general of the Commonwealth.

Coakley has always been a go-along to get-along kinda gal. During her years as a prosecutor she kept Gerald Amirault behind bars for an extra three years in the notorious Fells Acres sex abuse case despite overwhelming evidence that he was innocent of the alleged crimes. She could not afford to look soft on crime.

The continued loss of Amirault's freedom was merely collateral damage in crafting Coakley's political future. Coakley also dropped the ball when prosecuting a 2005 child rape case involving a local police officer. Despite allegations that the suspect had assaulted a toddler with a curling iron, Coakley opted to let him walk out of jail on personal recognizance. Fortunately, Coakley's successor corrected her mistake and won a conviction and two life terms for the child predator.

When Coakley ascended to the Attorney General's office, she continued to take the easy route focusing her attention on garden clubs, non-kosher delis and lite-brite artists as opposed to chasing after real wrongdoers. When a chunk of a Big Dig tunnel collapsed and killed a motorist in 2007, Coakley chose to settle the case against contractors Bechtel/Parsons Brinkerhoff saying quote, "It was better than going to court." We will never know who was ultimately to blame because Coakley once again took the easy way out. When the going gets tough, Martha curls up in a fetal position.

Which brings us back to her battle with upstart Republican Scott Brown. Brown, a Massachusetts state senator blindsided Coakley with a strong, grassroots populist campaign. Coakley figured the race was in the bag and never reached out to the voters because she felt she didn't have to. Once again, running an actual campaign would have been the hard thing to do. And let's face it, Martha Coakley has never shown that she's had the stomach for it.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:36 PM on 01/20/2010
I think back to cases like the Matthew Eapen case where the baby was shaken to death and as recall Martha Coakley hardly took the easy way out.
01:25 PM on 01/20/2010
All true, and then some. Coakley has never reached out to voters. She rode in on the coattails of Reilly (who came in with Harshbarger) and her name has always been on the ballot in conjunction with other elections. She never could connect with blue collar workers, and never gave the impression she cared anything about them. This election is the shame of Coakley.

A recent poll of Mass voters strongly suggests this is a protest vote againat Obama. If Coakley had had the charisma and integrity of a Kennedy, people would have supported her. If a Kennedy had been on the ballot Scott Brown could go back to nude photo sessions for women's magazines and be forgotten.
07:49 PM on 01/19/2010
this column is premature
Jayne Stahl
Poet, essayist, playwright, screenwriter,
02:31 PM on 01/19/2010
In fairness to Coaxley, Sen. Kennedy is a hard act to follow. She might have fared better in election cycle than during this special election when higher octane was needed.

Keeping a low profile might work for the DAs office, but not in national politics, and whoever wins Ted Kennedy's seat is now in national politics.

One can only hope that Massachusetts voters think about the longterm consequences of their vote today instead of a Cosmo spread, or a vote in defiance of what they perceive to be the morass the current administration has created.

After all, it was under Mitt Romney, and George W. Bush, that working men and women were forced into bankruptcy, and foreclosure, and a vote for a Republican to replace Ted Kennedy will do little more than ensure even more economic misery for the state of Massachusetts, and the nation.
04:52 PM on 01/19/2010
Oh of course it isn't Massachusetts massive liberal entitlement programs and draconian corporate taxation that have bankrupted the state and destroyed free enterprise and forced into bankruptcy and foreclosure! It is those darn Republicans! Lady, I don't know what planet you have been living on but Massachusetts is the most blue, the most liberal state in the union and it is an abysmal and pathetic failure and the average resident there is sick and tired. To sit here and continue to try to thrust the blame for your party's failures on anyone else but yourselves is essentially elevating you to the position of laughing stock of the internet and the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Cox
10:13 AM on 01/20/2010
How do you explain all of the republican governors of the last 20 years or so in your bluer than blue, most liberal state theory? There is an independent streak here in Massachusetts that put Mitt Romney in office while simultaneously re-electing Kerry and Kennedy. Mitt Romney! And if you look at the most taxed states in the country, Mass ranks about the middle of the pack. It's easy to use broad strokes based on perception, myth or whatever.
01:31 PM on 01/19/2010
Coakley, bad as she may be, is not so bad that we'd be better of with the GOP holding that 41st vote in the Senate. You think the Democrats in DC are dysfunctional now, just wait until they have to face a GOP filibuster on every significant piece of progressive legislation we need to have enacted. All you'll get out of them for the next couple of years is milquetoast fluff at a time when America needs strong, forward-looking action to confront the multitude of problems with which Bush-Cheney left us.

I don't think Amy Klobuchar is all that bad either. Remember, Representative Mark Kennedy (her GOP opponent in 2006) was gung-ho for the invasion of Iraq. We certainly don't need any more like him in the U.S. Senate, and we certainly don't need Scott Brown up there. Ugh!!! Klobuchar is who she is, a mainstream, left-of-center DFL Democrat. Coakley may be a lifeless gray suit, but she would become an indispensable part of the Democrats' filibuster shield.

Could Minnesota do better than Klobuchar? Sure ... and fortunately they have. By a whisker they chose Al Franken over Norm Coleman in 2008. Good for them. Good for all of us!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Cox
01:16 PM on 01/19/2010
It's true she got some bad advice about running for the US Senate. She thought she could win Teddy Kennedy style; no engagement with the opponent (remember Jackie Robinson), no debates, just the name on the ballot with the letter D next to it. We know so called liberal Massachusetts has a decidedly independent/slightly to the right streak in it (see Weld, Cellucci, Romney, any and every radio talk show in town, including sports talk). Symbolically, a Brown win is a great republican talking point in the short term and a cautionary tale for future candidates of both parties. His potential win will probably trigger a quick vote on health care reform to negate his pledged no vote on this issue. So in a way Scott Brown could go down in history as a catalyst for health care reform.
12:55 PM on 01/19/2010
I've seen candidates like Coakley before. She appears to the type of candidate who wears black and gray suits because they match her soulless nature. Once these types of candidates are elected, they can often sit in a public office for years and years quietly doing all sorts of evil before they are finally booted out by someone young and idealistic. I am always struck with the fact that these soulless politicians favor black and gray like their counterparts in business do.

We have a similar senator from Minnesota, Amy Klobuchar, and she is one of the reasons the Senate health care bill is so bad, so very bad. It is interesting that many in MInnesota disliked Klobuchar before she was elected but held their noses and guts (they discouraage puking at the polls) and voted for her anyway. She is almost as bad as the Republican would have been.

I am a lifelong Democrat but my gut tells me that Coakley is so bad that we are better off with the Republican.
02:44 PM on 01/19/2010
Agreed.
leftcoastindy
Where did I put my MOJO
11:53 AM on 01/19/2010
A very simplistic point of view.
11:38 AM on 01/19/2010
This is what happens when they try to pass a 2000 page healthcare bill against the will of the people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John51
02:51 PM on 01/19/2010
.... and against the best interest of the people.