iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Cathy Calfo

Cathy Calfo

Posted: August 7, 2009 04:56 PM

Last week, the conservative Fox News talk-show host Glenn Beck chose the Apollo Alliance as the target for his ongoing rants against the Obama administration. In the attack, Apollo, part of a "vast left-wing conspiracy," was accused of orchestrating a "centrally planned, organized massive mobilization to reorder society and take control of energy."

Beck's tirade would have been amusing if it weren't part of a larger pattern of increasing right-wing attacks aimed at derailing America's transition to a clean energy, good jobs economy. President Obama's green jobs advisor (and former Apollo Board member), Van Jones, has become the subject of right-wing blog frenzy, and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has decided to take on cap and trade as her first post-gubernatorial mission. The right has also mercilessly targeted U.S. Reps. John Boccieri and Zachary Space, both Ohio Democrats, for fighting for provisions that were included in the American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) Act that would boost domestic clean energy manufacturing and keep new green jobs in America.

So why all the right-wing hoopla? First, because putting our nation on the road to economic prosperity and climate stability is going to rock a few big ships. Yes, polluters are going to have to do business differently.

Second, because when we talk about green jobs, we are getting it right. The Apollo Alliance is calling for investment in the technological know-how, skilled workforce, and domestic manufacture of renewable energy systems and components that will make America a world-leader in the clean energy economy. We want to become energy independent and to create good jobs here at home. For some, that's a frightening proposition.

But for most Americans, this is the kind of challenge -- like that of putting a man on the moon -- that represents the best of who we are as a people -- a nation capable of coming together, committing itself to a common goal, and achieving it. Today we face economic and climate crises that we can solve in a uniquely American way.

This week, the Apollo Alliance, working with U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), announced the names of more than 150 U.S. businesses and manufacturers who have joined our diverse and unlikely coalition of business, labor, environmental and community leaders to support investment in the domestic manufacture of clean energy technologies. These businesses include light-emitting diode (LED) companies in Michigan, solar installation and distribution companies in Indiana, and wind turbine manufacturers in Nevada, among many others. These firms are taking arguments that new energy and climate policies will stall economic progress and turning them on their heads!

Today, despite some notable success stories, over 70 percent of renewable energy systems and components used in the U.S. are manufactured overseas, placing Sen. Brown's bill front and center in the climate and energy debate. The legislation -- which the Apollo Alliance believes must be passed along with climate and energy policies that increase demand for clean technologies -- establishes a $30 billion revolving loan fund targeted to small and mid-sized manufacturers for retooling their factories to produce clean technologies and to make their operations more energy efficient. The bill also increases support for Manufacturing Extension Partnerships (MEP's) that link smaller manufacturers to supply chains and markets for their goods.

This "Make it in America" legislation will create and retain more than a million jobs and help reverse declines in U.S. clean technology manufacture that began decades ago, as countries like Spain, Denmark, Germany, and most recently China, drew these jobs to their shores.

No, Glenn, it's not a vast left-wing conspiracy. We want to make clean energy as American as apple pie.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:23 AM on 08/29/2009
Sustainable Land Development Goes Carbon-Negative
SLDT Magazine - August, 2009
http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sldt/0809/#/18

Located in the headwaters of the Port Orford Community Stewardship Area in Southern Oregon, Ocean Mountain Ranch (OMR) overlooks the newly-designated Redfish Rocks Marine Reserve and the largest remaining old growth forest on the southern coast in Humbug Mountain State Park. OMR is planned to be developed pursuant to a forest stewardship management plan which has been approved by the Oregon Department of Forestry and Northwest Certified Forestry under the high standards of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). OMR is also serving as a pilot program and is expected to achieve carbon negative status through the utilization of low impact development practices, energy efficient buildings, renewable/clean energy systems, distributed waste management systems, biochar production, and other practices.

The land development industry is uniquely positioned to utilize best management practices to take advantage of emerging ancient and new biochar technologies to help address a multitude of pressing environmental, social and economic concerns by balancing the needs of people, planet and profit – for today and future generations.

Sustainable Land Development International - www.SLDI.org
03:57 PM on 08/11/2009
To me the most objectionable part of the W-M energy bill is that it taxes carbon based energy with the intent of eventually eliminating it, but it doesn't offer any concrete plans for it's replacement. In the mid 1900's, the environmentalists fought nuclear energy with no plan for a replacement. They "won", but all they got was a major expansion of coal-fired generation plants and new natural gas plants (i.e. an increase in CO2). That resulted in a major contribution to the pollution we are fighting today. Are we going down that same path?? And don't tell me we will replace over 50% of our power generation with "renewables" without a detailed national plan to do so. Maybe some of the $ Billions allocated to research could be used to develop a workable plan. Anything would be better that just throwing billions at political oriented research and hoping something desirable will result.
05:43 PM on 08/11/2009
ACES is also the largest new derivatives market in history. It's a banker bill, not a climate bill. It needs to die.

KISS:

1$ per ton net carbon emitted.

Plow that money into rooftop solar and biochar/biofuels of WASTE.
3 cent per KWH rooftop solar and close the resource cycle by converting all organic waste into fuels energy and carbon negative fertilizer using BioChar can supply all the world energy needs forever.

Cheaper, safe, closes the waste loop,

That's a plan.

see my profile for proof and links.
09:42 AM on 08/11/2009
Look, Cathy, I know you have a vested interest in getting WAxman passed so you can start vacuuming up all those federal bucks. But what drives conservatives crazy is that instead of a common sense solution that fixes many problems, Waxman creates a Rube Goldberg trading scheme that will cost taxpayers money, give more power to the federal government, and make Goldman Sachs rich.

Instead, if we were to attack the problem for the crisis it's supposed to be, we would put all our effort into the immediate conversion of all cars, trucks and buses to natural gas. There's an immediate 20-25% reduction in CO2, 99% reduction in particulates. The technology is here and available, and we have so much NG we can't even store it. We would create jobs in this country doing the coversions, building the conversion kits, building refueling stations. Nearly every home is already connected to NG, so refueling at home would require a very modest conversion. We would become energy independent. The money we're not sending to other countries for oil, that stays here, could then be diverted to R&D and infractructure development of alternative fuels, creating even more jobs, and preparing us for that moment 100 years from now when we run out of domestic natural gas.

Why not try that first? We get immediate benefits on CO2 instead of 10 years out with Waxman.... This seems to be common sense to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
07:34 PM on 08/10/2009
Vestas is the largest maufacturer of wind turbines in the world (#2 here in the US, behind GE). The company is located in Denmark. They are building four plants in Colorado as we speak, as the company plans to provide the US market with turbines made exclusively in the US by early next decade.

GE also has plans on the drawing board to increase manufacturing operations here in the US, and is expected to dominate the market. http://greenairradio.com/?tag=suzlon

Native Sun Energy, out of Austin, Texas has developed a hydrogen/oxygen steam-driven turbine technology for co-generation of wind power that will revolutionize the industry. The company plans to manufacture all of its OEM systems right here in America as well. http://whigsntories.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-recent-marriage-of-steam-turbine.html

Thanks to Cathy Calfo, and the Apollo Alliance for their continued efforts to move America towards energy independence, and a clean energy future.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:33 PM on 08/10/2009
Environmentalism should be the most American thing of all. That is, the original inhabitants of this land were the most environmentally sound people of all.
03:17 PM on 08/10/2009
We just did an article on how:
U.S. Businesses Can Shrink Energy Bills and Grow the Economy:
New Study Shows That Proposed Climate Change Legislation Can Cut Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gasses in Half
http://www.livinggreenmag.com/energy.html
08:42 AM on 08/11/2009
Why didn't you say anything about Light Pollution?
11:44 AM on 08/10/2009
I have been a proponent of clean energy for years now but I noticed when attacking Glen Beck about his piece on the Apollo Alliance you never said what that he was wrong about Van Jones being a self avowed communist and radical who spent time in jail. Was that incorrect?
10:17 PM on 08/09/2009
How can a job be totally green?
03:57 AM on 08/10/2009
They walk to work?
03:00 PM on 08/10/2009
Rooftop solar for electric, biochar carbon negative fuels. That's how. Forever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
07:46 PM on 08/10/2009
I was so fascinated by the phrase, "biochar carbon negative fuels" that I had to go look it up.

Carbon dioxide sequestration schemes make me laugh; I read a claim of one technology manufacturer that is actually deploying its technology (having found sufficient investors) that it is "zero-emissions" technology. On reading their plan, they make plenty of CO2 alright, they're just "hiding" it, pumping it underground.

Hiding the emissions, or in this case the carbon residue in the ground does not make it green. Just because my cat hides its poo under the kitty litter, doesn't mean he never goes to the bathroom!

With all due respect, sir, I offer you a new technology for you to research: http://whigsntories.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-recent-marriage-of-steam-turbine.html

This is a truly zero-emissions technology that promises great things for our clean energy future, particularly in the field of wind energy deployment.
08:43 AM on 08/11/2009
Not yet...not until it goes down in price...
Try $40,000 to $50,000 for starters.
03:57 PM on 08/09/2009
We should be pushing Rooftop solar at 3 cents per KWH, as the best investment anyone who uses expensive 13-200 cent/KWH electricity can make. See my profile for details. BioChar of all organic waste can supply all the fuel and energy that rooftop solar does not.