TIME magazine's cover story, which hit the newsstand Thursday, argues that Latino voters will cast the deciding vote in the upcoming election.
After watching the Republican candidates lock the kryptonite that is the immigration issue around their necks during the Arizona debate, my bet is that President Barack Obama could win another term -- even if he loses key swing states such as Florida, Iowa, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin -- but he must make sure he accomplishes one thing first: Connect with Latinos.
Republicans have not connected with Hispanics; the candidates' approaches to immigration are not compelling and lack substance, from talk of double 30-foot electrified fences to anchor babies and self-deportation. In fact, it could very well be that the 20 Arizona Latino voters on the cover of TIME and half a million more will turn out to vote in Arizona and flip the state to Obama.
Obama comes into the election with 196 electoral votes from safe Democratic states. If he takes Arizona and if Hispanic voters help him flip Missouri, which McCain won by fewer than 4,000 votes, and help him retain Colorado, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico and North Carolina, then Obama wins with 279 electoral votes, nine more than the 270 needed. If he can retain Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia or Wisconsin, also populated with many Latino swing voters, then he could win in a landslide.
It is clear, then, that connecting with Latino voters could very well be a tipping point for the president; the question is how to make that connection.
In his book "The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation," Drew Westen convincingly argues that "people vote for the candidate who elicits the right feelings, not the candidate who presents the best arguments."
Beyond the shared concern for economic growth, jobs, education and health care, Latinos are focused on immigration because the majority of the undocumented workers living here are from Latin America. This is an issue that resonates at a deeply emotional level with Latinos, whether they are descendants of Spanish colonists or a recently arrived Mexican sleeping on a cousin's couch.
Thus to really, deeply connect with Hispanic voters, any candidate needs to address the immigration issue by supporting comprehensive immigration reform and the Dream Act, which would provide a path to citizenship for those who earn a college degree or serve two years in the military.
This is a vital first step to earning the trust of Hispanic voters, who understand that the country needs strong border security but also know that we need a fair way to deal with the nearly 10 million economic refugees who are working in this country and contributing to our society. It's a matter of respect.
So how does Obama -- who has a dubious record himself on immigration -- win the Latino vote?
First he wins the ground war in the battleground states, which is door-to-door combat.
Next he outspends Republicans in Spanish-language media, just like he did John McCain in 2008, by five to one. It's no coincidence that on Tuesday, Obama did an interview with L.A.-based "Piolin," the most influential Spanish-language radio personality in the country. The president reassured Latinos that he is strongly committed to passing comprehensive immigration reform and lambasted the Republican Party for its extreme views and intransigence on the issue.
Hispanics want to feel they are voting for an authentic leader. Hispanics don't have to agree with every position Obama takes, but they must believe in and identify with his worldview.
He needs to explain that the Democratic Party is a welcoming place for Hispanics, that his world view of America is that of a caring, responsible, family and that his political ideals are based on empathy and fairness. Getting these ideas across to Latinos is vital to securing their votes.
Once Obama has established a deep emotional connection with Latinos, he can connect directly to the heart of Latino voters with three simple messages:
1. The economy and jobs.
Under Obama's leadership, an economy that was losing 500,000 jobs a month in the final months of 2008 is now gaining more than 200,000 jobs per month. His policies are working; they just need more time.
2. Health care.
Despite unanimous opposition from Republicans, Obama fulfilled his promise of making health care available to all Americans. Now 32 million more Americans -- including Hispanics -- will be able to afford insurance for the first time.
3. Education.
The president doubled the government's investment in scholarships and financial aid, making college more affordable to millions of Americans. Now students from working-class Hispanic families can go to college and get good jobs.
On the contrary, Republicans may blow hard about their understanding and affection for Hispanics, munching on burritos in the barrio on the campaign trail, but the evidence of authenticity of leadership and the strong record crucial to the Latino vote are just not there.
The refusal of all the GOP candidates to really look at immigration and offer a plan -- despite the glad-handing and tepid avowals of commitment -- makes it clear that the GOP just doesn't have the deep connection with Latinos necessary to pull off a win in November.
WATCH CNN INTERVIEW:
A version of this article originally appeared in CNN.
obama is a politician. no more no less. just like bush. just like clinton. just like carter. just like the next guy. he will tell anything to anyone to get elected.
The president would look foolish wasting his time at rthe generally ridiculous latino functions or debating on Univision unless it's done in english.
On immigration Senator Obama told McCain he would support McCain-Kennedy bill but he did not. Then he promised to pass reform within his first year and with 60 votes in the senate and super majority in the house, he did nothing!! He could have added the Dream Act to the healthcare bill, he did not!! Now he says with a possible republican majority in house and senate that he will pass reform bill!! Right!!
On jobs Hispanic unemployment is up since 2008 and worse than the general number. On healthcare, poor Hispanics get Medicaid (the worse insurance in the country) while white union members in the mid-West keep their Cadillac policies and tax deductions!!
Great record to run on. All he has is play to the fears of Hispanics. He is also increasing taxes for those making over $200k. Many hispanics own small businesses and pay as individual income and will get screwed royally!! Way to go Obama!!
And there's a clue: some people get bad business advice. Always keep your personal and business income taxes separate. Republicans always use this phony argument.
quote:
Obama joined all but four other Senate Democrats in voting for 2006 Senate immigration bill sponsored by Sen. John McCain, R- Ariz., and Sen. Edward Kennedy, D- Mass.
Last October, Obama, along with 37 Democrats, 12 Republicans and independents Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, voted to move to final vote on the “Dream” Act...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23276453/ns/politics-decision_08/t/what-obamas-senate-votes-reveal/
It was the party of RepubliCANTS that didn't and dont want to pass Immigration reform or anything else Obama suggests even if they also supported the same issue in the past. RepubliCANTS have admitted their first priority is to make sure Obama fails, not to govern as they are elected to do, even if they have to step all over the middle class and poor to get it done.
quote:
When it comes to immigration, Hispanics should also examine who they support for House and Senate seats, Obama said.
The president also said, "I would have only broken my promise if I hadn't tried" to get immigration reform bill. "But, ultimately, I'm one man." "You know, we live in a democracy. We don't live in a monarchy. I'm not the king. I'm the president. And so, I can only implement those laws that are passed through Congress." This statement holds true considering how the president can only enforce laws that Congress passes.
http://www.visalawyerblog.com/
But by 2016, it is very likely we will be way up compared to today. So unless the Democrat candidate blows it like Gore, a Dem should win again in 2016. My opinion, I could be wrong again.
I could have written the same exact words...thanks...
Obama can win just by winning FL (Romney supports the Ryan plan to end Medicare) and OH (Romney opposed saving GM) -- so I'd say the betting should favor Obama heavily. Plus Obama has many paths to victory involving Hispanics, for example, among whom Romney is viewed about as favorably as a vampire.
But I don't thinks it's very good strategy -- nor the right thing to do -- to pander to an ethnic group.
BO seems to have the black vote locked up, and I don't think that's a good thing for America or for blacks.
A better stratetgy would be to vote on the basis of what the parties stand for today. By voting 90% Dem, you allow the Dems to take your vote for granted and you wind up with virtually no sway in the debate.
you may not think 15 million is a problem because they are spread out but i can guarantee that they are as big a drain on the system as a city of 15 million appearing overnight would be to any one state...
They are already here, they are not going to appear overnight. They will not disappear either. If you were a realist, you would approve of an open border, so that temporary workers would not be prevented from crossing and returning.
Again, in 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower deported 13 million illegal Mexican nationals so that American World War II and Korean veterans could have a better chance at jobs. The full deportation took two years, but they did it.
If presidents could deport illegal aliens in the past, surely it can be done today.
ONE (Besides this sinking ship).
Name one modern country willing to take in over 10 million uneducated, unskilled peasants who cannot and will not speak the language of the host nation. ONE !
There are none.
If you want your kids' kids to live in a 3rd world enclave here in the US, keep voting for the Rebiblican Plutocracy.
Colorado and Nevada ?
This whole scenario is a push.
Is this a joke?
Most couldn't read a Taco Bell menu at the drive-up window without a Rosetta Stone course.