More

Chase Martyn

Chase Martyn

Posted: December 3, 2007 03:48 PM

Latest Iowa Power Ranking: Edwards On Top Again


The following piece is published on Iowa Independent as well as HuffPost's OffTheBus.

Today, Iowa Independent releases its second round of Democratic Power Rankings, seeking again to answer the question, "If the caucuses were held tonight, what would be the results?" Our hope is that although our methodology is notably unscientific, the list below will provide our readers one more point of reference while reading horse-race stories from day to day.

Although much has happened over the past two weeks, a lot has stayed the same. Polls, which fail to account for many important variables, continue to show the top three contenders in a dead heat in Iowa. Candidates have all spent significant amounts of time here at campaign appearances and forums. Field staff continue to make their calls, identifying new supporters and retaining as many previously identified supporters as possible.

Our focus in compiling these lists is largely on organization, one of the single most important indicators of caucus success. But this week, we have also added indicators of candidate momentum in the cases where we feel it is warranted. As history proves, momentum is as powerful a force as any other in the last month of the presidential campaign in Iowa.

First Place

John Edwards -- Although his endorsement from Congressman Bruce Braley did not come as much of a surprise (Braley was a strong Edwards supporter in 2004), it will certainly help assuage fears among his supporters that his candidacy has lost its momentum. And, as revealed Monday morning on a conference call, the former North Carolina senator has recruited multiple precinct captains in 87% of Iowa's precincts, demonstrating the continuing superiority of his grassroots organization.

Second Place

(tie) Hillary Clinton -- In our first Power Rankings, Clinton ranked third, but she has shown many signs of life recently that indicate she deserves a higher position. Her husband campaigned for her in Eastern Iowa last week, helping to shore up her supporters there; and she herself has spent time on the ground in less likely places reassuring leaners that she still takes Iowa seriously. Although her more aggressive attacks on Sen. Barack Obama may damage her already-low second-choice support, they should also reassure her supporters that she deserves their time and effort on caucus night. And the entree of Emily's List's new voter outreach program may be a help, as well.

(tie) Barack Obama --
Upward Momentum -- Polls have confirmed what we have felt anecdotally for a long time: that Obama's message resonates equally well among women as it does among men, and that's before Oprah Winfrey has even arrived. The gender and age gaps both show signs of closing, and his campaign's crowd-building skills are unparalleled. His subtle criticisms of Clinton over the past month have forced Clinton to issue less subtle criticisms of her own, perhaps demonstrating the direction her campaign sees the race heading. If any candidate will usurp Edwards's first-place position between now and January 3, Obama appears best positioned to do so.

Fourth Place


Joe Biden --
Upward Momentum -- Biden has mastered the art of retail politics better than perhaps any other candidate in the race, and it shows not just in his campaign events but also in his organization's ability to capitalize on social networks and the political capital of his endorsers. His base is more likely than any other candidate's to actually attend the caucuses, and his second-choice support continues to increase.

Fifth Place

Bill Richardson -- Richardson has a large staff that has been building lists since June, but he lacks support from traditional activists and politicos around the state, as evidenced by his very short list of state legislative endorsements. His staff will not be able to do all of the necessary work for getting out the vote alone. And although he is committed very seriously to grassroots campaigning, he is unpolished and inconsistent on the stump.

Sixth Place

(tie) Chris Dodd -- Dodd's campaign has been promising from the start, but his second-choice support still seems far stronger than his first-choice support. FIrefighters have been working diligently across the state to support him, but he will need a major shake-up in the race in order to advance. His focus on other candidates' votes on bankruptcy "reform" legislation is promising, but attacking Edwards, Clinton, and Biden may cost him more than he gets in return.

(tie) Dennis Kucinich -- Kucinich spent little to no time in Iowa in the first nine months of the campaign, but over the past week he has spent at least some time reaching out to his base of supporters from 2004. Although he has likely started too late in the game to build a strong organization, he may have shown enough signs of life here to reassure small factions of the electorate that he deserves their support.

Eighth Place

Mike Gravel

 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:27 AM on 12/08/2007
If John Edwards can get the Democratic nomination it may put some of the red States in play for him such as NC, SC, GA, FL, AL, MS and LA. Neither Clinton or Obama have a snowballs chance in hell of carrying any of these States.

If you add just a couple of these red States for Edwards it would negate Karl Rove's plan to have the CA electoral votes split.

Being an Independent in one of the red states I see that in my State at least many of the people who are presently registered as RepubliCONS were formally Democrats, and you may see many cross the line and vote Democratic since they can't get excited about voting for Romney, Huckabee or Guialiani.

Having lived in the south all my life I know that unless the registered Republicans are excited about a candidate they will either cross party lines, or they simply won't vote which would be good for the Democrats either way.

I know quite a few Independents such as myself who have re-registered as Democrats to vote in the primary, but will change their voter registration back to Independent after the primaries. The vast majority of Independents I talk to overwhelmingly support John Edwards.

~ GO JOHN GO ~
10:50 AM on 12/08/2007
JOHN EDWARDS IN '08! (The republiCONS worst nightmare)

~GO JOHN~
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pmorlan
09:02 PM on 12/06/2007
Great news for Edwards!

He was also endorsed by Harry Belafonte today! Harry Belafonte is such a class act. I'm so glad that he supports Edwards.

http://www.abcnews4.com/news/stories/1207/478529.html
09:18 AM on 12/05/2007
I'm half-excited to see a very positive Edwards post on HuffPo. I'm only half-excited, because it will be far less of a surprise when he trounces HRC and Obama in Iowa. Surprise means lots of press and lots of positive momentum going into NH.

Aside from getting his people out to the polls, which he should do very well at given his organization, the second biggest challenge is who gets the votes from the support of the second-tier candidates. I hope with 29 days and counting down, the Edwards camp has a plan for that...
10:54 PM on 12/04/2007
Despite being ignored by the M$M, Edwards' momentum is surging. Not only is he on top to win in Iowa, but his numbers are surging in NH and SC as people start getting serious about the impending election and looking at the candidates and the issues.

Edwards is the only candidate with guts--he has led by putting all his policies out there way before the others and has received the backing of Friends of the Earth, Iowans for Sensible Priorities, United Steelworkers, United Mineworkers, Transportation Workers of America, United Brotherhood of Carpenters, 12 SEIU state councils, Iowa Postal Workers (AFL/CIO), etc.

Why? Because Edwards has been fighting on behalf of working families against corporate abuse his whole life, and because he is the most electable Democrat.

My experience has been that Edwards has a wide appeal to Dems, Republicans, and Independents--they like his straight talk, his courage, and his strong stands for working class families.

He will make a great president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
champions1
Champion
06:11 PM on 12/04/2007
JOHN YOU ARE OUR PRESIDENT....OF CHOICE...GO JOHN GO...EDWARDS IN 08....YIPEE
02:03 PM on 12/04/2007
A Democrat is going to win next '08. We can win hard or well. In the latter case, John Edwards can win in a walk, on his accent alone. He will redefine the repulsive blue/red divisions that Karl Rove et al have used to control and deny us our votes. He will win by enough of a margin that the dirty tricksters will be put out of business. And more than that, as someone who has met him, I believe he is the most honest, genuine and enlightened of any current candidate and people of all backgrounds will respond. Who better to take on the entrenched power of this country. Give him the primary vote!

Hillary can win, but we'll all have to bleed to make it happen. Do we have that in us? Do the volunteers who will GOTV have that energy? It's not that she's not a good candidate, it's the nature of her enemies. Obama's rubbing a lot of Dems the wrong way, which is not a good harbinger that he can even win in the general.

Stop worrying about John Edwards not having the money to win in other states. John Edwards knows something none of the other candidates know how to do - play chess. He will win ya'all!!
11:53 AM on 12/04/2007
Yes, I agree with the staements uplifting Biden. The idea of an Edwards/Biden ticket sound good, but I would prefer a Biden/Edwards ticket. I doubt Edwards would want second place.

When I took that "test" on who is your fave candidate based on the issues, Dodd won by a big margin with me. I would consider him a good candidate as well.

If Biden were willing to be #2, his experience could be a help to a President Edwards. He could be another powerful VP.

But he is needed in the senate. Our most "senior" senator in experience and brains.
11:12 AM on 12/04/2007
The J.J. duo,John Edwards, Joe Biden that is the winning ticket.
11:04 AM on 12/04/2007
Assuming the "standings" as presented are a reasonably accurate representation of the opinions of Iowan Democrats, let me be the first to congratulate Iowans on not falling for the Right Wing push for Clinton and Obama (the two Democratic candidates the Right Wing feel are the most likely to be defeated in '08)

Hat's off, Iowa. Congratulations for thinking for yourselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wrabbitt
Soylent Green IS People.
10:25 AM on 12/04/2007
Every candidate has made promises that we know they won't keep.Why lie to us, tell us what the agenda is really going to be.Another four years of the same bullshit? the democrats made lots of promises to get elected didn't they? Did they end the war? Has congress changed? Has anything changed? The names are different but, the results are the same. Edwards has lots of great ideas but, without a congress that can accomplish something, nothing will get done again. Congress gets a payraise without even voting on it. With an approval rating that low something needs to change. pay for performance sounds good we will save lots of money.
10:08 AM on 12/04/2007
Chase, Are your rankings opinion and if not, then how did you arrive at them? Feedback from readers on your website, interviews, etc? I found it interesting and read it but I'm a bit confused on how you arrived at your conclusions...let us know!

thanks
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
09:56 AM on 12/04/2007
Anybody take a look at the track records of Iowa caucus winners over the past three decades? If anything, winning there seems to be a telltale symptom of peaking early.
09:41 AM on 12/04/2007
When all is said and seen, John Edwards stands out as the #1 and absolutely best candidate of all -

the only one who can really win the presidential election
the only one that people of both parties trust

a good man
09:36 AM on 12/04/2007
I don't dislike Edwards but I want someone other than Clinton and Edwards cannot compete with her after Iowa. He is a one state candidate with a strategy that looks like wishful thinking, in my opinion. I hope Iowans come around to supporting Obama and, to be honest, the reluctance to do so is entirely based on the misguided fear that a black candidate cannot win. A black candidate with $100 million is a stronger candidate than a white candidate with $10 million, which is probably all Edwards would have to spend after Iowa, having accepted public financing with its limits.