iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Chevy Volt Gets New Support From Rogue Conservatives, Could Be Too Late To Save Car's Image

Posted: 03/31/2012 12:15 pm Updated: 03/31/2012 12:15 pm

Chevy Volt Haters
The Chevy Volt has drawn a lot of ire from conservatives.

Conservatives love to hate the Chevy Volt. The plug-in advanced hybrid car seems to annoy Republicans, Tea Partiers and Libertarians alike.

Then this week, one conservative went rogue. Lee Spieckerman, owner of SpieckermanMedia in Fort Worth, Texas, went on Fox News to say the Volt could be an important tool in boosting U.S. energy production and foreign policy efforts.

"There are probably 10 inventions over the past 150 years that were life changing for Americans, and I think the Volt has the potential to be one of those things," he told The Huffington Post. "I mean, a car that runs on American electricity derived from American sources. What will those crazy lefties think of next?"

He joined a wave of backlash within conservative groups against those in their political party who despise the Chevy Volt because of its perceived ties to President Barack Obama. The pushback started with a column a few weeks ago in Forbes magazine written by former General Motors board member and climate-change denier Bob Lutz, who said, "I am, sadly, coming to the conclusion that all the icons of conservatism are ... deliberately not telling the truth."

But it may be too late to save the Volt's image: Sales have been disappointing, selling just 7,671 in 2011, shy of its 10,000 goal. Many have argued that the Volt's sticker price is too high, but the constant hammering of negativity from the political right surely can't be helping sales. Disappointing sales figures prompted GM to close the Volt plant in Hamtramck, Mich., for five weeks starting in mid March. And a major auto industry conference on electric cars was canceled Wednesday due to lack of interest.

To many who've driven the car -- which, thanks to its advanced hybrid system, goes 40 miles on battery power before a gas engine kicks in -- conservatives' passionate dislike is puzzling. The car won both U.S. and European car of the year awards. It looks sleek and modern. Critics say it's fun to drive and it uses just a tiny amount of gas.

Angered by the $60 billion the government invested in GM to keep it from collapsing in 2009, some conservatives say they see the Volt as a symbol of policies they don't agree with being pushed on Americans.

You only have to take a look at Fox News to see how much disdain there is for GM's hybrid sedan. Lutz said he heard one Fox commentator call it an "exploding Obamamobile." The station aired a segment that claimed it ran out of power in the Lincoln Tunnel (it kicked over to gas power during the commute, as it's designed to do), and has said again and again that the car doesn't work, isn't worth the money, and costs taxpayers $250,000 per car in government subsidies.

Spieckerman, a lifelong conservative and sometimes commentator on Fox News, said he kept hearing this message about the Volt being the worst car on the road, and just couldn't take it anymore. He called producers at Fox News and asked if he could have some time on air defending the car. He wanted to explain why the car, and other cars like it, could actually advance many conservative ideals, like energy independence.

He appeared Monday, starting off his appearance telling viewers he loves oil and is a "drill baby drill guy." But then he said conservatives are twisting the facts, making it seem like a debacle when electric cars could really be considered a technology as cool as the iPod.

When the Volt is powered by the battery, the car is often running on American-made coal-powered electricity, he said. What's wrong with that?

Although his message caused a bit of a dust-up, resulting in dozens of news stories and blog posts pointing out how Fox News is now contradicting itself, he's planning on sending it again and again.

"I'll shout it from the rooftop of my house if I have to," Spieckerman told The Huffington Post. "I'll go anywhere to pound this message, because I think it's really important."

Spieckerman said he believes electric cars and plug-in hybrids like the Chevy Volt are vital to the nation's future, allowing the country to wean itself off oil and use homegrown fuel sources like coal, nuclear and natural gas to power electricity plants, which then would power cars. If you could do that while also expanding the production of oil in the U.S., he thinks that could even push down gas prices.

But he said he knows why many conservatives hate the Volt: Because Obama likes it.

"Almost anything President Obama and his administration endorses is up for criticism," he said. "But we have to decouple politics from what a great technology this is for America … If the environmentalists and Obama like the Volt, so what? Even a stopped clock is right twice a day."

It might be hard to change conservative minds, especially when the message is already so entrenched. On Wednesday, the Center for Automotive Research canceled its annual industry conference on plug-in cars, saying speakers and other participants said they decided to focus less on networking and more on quietly building their technology behind closed doors.

Brett Smith, co-director of conferences for CAR, said plug-in and electric cars are starting to lose their hype. That's partly because new technology trends in the auto industry are cyclical -- in the past decade, natural gas, ethanol, and electrification have all been hyped as the next big thing, only to quietly fade away.

But people are also losing interest because electric cars have gotten too politicized, he said.

"It went from being a political theme in 2008 to being a political football," he said. "People in the industry now are taking a breath."

And if sales of the Volt don't pick up, could GM discontinue it? "Cars go away, absolutely," Smith said. "That would be, in many ways, disappointing ... But certainly, if a car doesn't sell, it will go away."

GM has been fighting back against some of the criticism, trying to correct the record when it can and launching a blog to fight back against inaccuracies. "It's never easy breaking new ground," said Selim Bingol, GM's head of public relations.

The Volt has had a bumpy start. In late 2011, it faced a safety investigation from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, after one Volt caught fire following a crash test. NHTSA ended the investigation in January, saying the cars aren't at any greater risk of catching fire after a crash than gasoline-powered cars.

But conservatives have grabbed the fire issue and aren't letting go. Ben Howe, a blogger and video producer in South Carolina, latched on to the fires to poke at GM. He recently made a satirical video, voicing over a real Volt commercial, joking that the fire problem makes the cars safer because people want to get out of the way. His parody also said the cars are made in China (even though they're made in Hamtramck, Mich.), and said the car was made in conjunction with the Obama administration.

Howe said he knows all of that's not true. He's well aware that GM started development of the car in 2007, when George W. Bush was president. He knows they're assembled in the U.S. (but he suspects a large number of parts come from China.) And he knows the cars aren't flaming masses screaming down the street, but he's skeptical of the government's investigation.

Mostly, "I just wanted it to be funny," he said. "It's a parody."

To him, the car symbolizes the government overstepping its boundaries, first by bailing out GM and Chrysler, and then by offering tax rebates on the cars to buyers who don't really need any financial help (the average Volt buyer makes more than $170,000 a year but gets $7,500 off the $40,000 sticker price.

"It's a great example of when the government believes they know what the market should be, and then they try to force that to happen," he said. "I'm against government meddling in the markets."

If GM wants the criticism to go away, Howe said the solution is easy: Pay the government back for the bailout.

"When you're on your own dime, do what you want," he said. "If they didn't have the bailout money, I don't think I would have anything to say."

Click on the video below to see Howe's parody of a Volt ad:

FOLLOW BUSINESS

Conservatives love to hate the Chevy Volt. The plug-in advanced hybrid car seems to annoy Republicans, Tea Partiers and Libertarians alike. Then this week, one conservative went rogue. Lee Spiecker...
Conservatives love to hate the Chevy Volt. The plug-in advanced hybrid car seems to annoy Republicans, Tea Partiers and Libertarians alike. Then this week, one conservative went rogue. Lee Spiecker...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,887
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (75 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
philinmedford 10:01 AM on 04/01/2012
"...the average Volt buyer makes more than $170,000 a year but gets $7,500 off the $40,000 sticker price."

That's the reason that people don't buy Volt's.Don't blame conservatives for that. Why would anyone spend $30k more for a car so they can save $1 per gallon?

It also doesn't save you money all the time. For example I'm going to drive to Vegas for my daughter's wedding. Well, I'd run out  Read More...
08:44 AM on 05/04/2012
Why the heck would ANYONE buy a Volt?? Unless you just have 40 grand that you have nothing else to do with, I just don't see the appeal.....................what a dud!
03:35 PM on 08/06/2012
Not $40 grand - Volt is $31,645 after incentives (who would not take the incentives? That's why this is the price that matters.)

Some versions of the most popular vehicle on the road - the Ford F-150, approach $50 grand. Yet I don't see incessant whining about this "unaffordable" vehicle.

In fact, F-150's 17 MPG mileage costs thousands more per year than Volt's electric drivetrain to fuel.

To borrow your phrasing, I just don't see the appeal of wasting so much money on gasoline.
03:49 PM on 08/06/2012
I wouldn't buy a new F-150, either. I do have an older model, but I got a deal on that and it's paid off, so anything I get out of that is a bonus. For my commuting vehicle, I just opt for a Toyota Corolla or Honda Civic. these cars have been very efficient and I haven't had to waste all that much money on gasoline to operate them. I'm just not sold on the Volt, or any other electric car at this time. When it becomes more cost effective and convenient to own one, I might change my tune...........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarcia
04:55 PM on 08/09/2012
I am leasing one out the door for $300 and used to pay over $350 a month on gas. When your boys bomb Iran and the price of gas goes to $8 you can cry me a river. Cuz I am using U.S energy instead of middle eastern or Venezuelan oil, and I will still be paying $1 for 40 miles of driving. In addition there are about $9k in rebates authorized by George Bush of all people???
03:01 PM on 08/10/2012
yeah, but my yearly pay raises should cover the gas price increase, so why get a volt?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wstepp2250
12:09 PM on 04/14/2012
It is a shame in this Country which claims to be for the TRUTH and FREEDOM of Speech so many of the Publicly Elected Officials could tell so many Lies and be allowed to get away with it. Then we have Wealthy individuals who spend tons of money to get Hate spewing Conservative Talk Show Host that Brain wash people who listen to them and think they're telling the truth but later discover they were getting Paid lots of money to broadcast the Lies. Then tell the public Lies and untruths about the President because he is of a different Color Skin than the ones intended to keep telling the Lies to gain nothing more than the Power they can't handle once they get it? We are worse than the worst Countries we criticize when we allow Jerks to continue Distributing Hate through the AIR WAYS. THE LIKES OF STATIONS LIKE ABC 7:90 A. M. RADIO in Los Angeles with SEAN HANNITY, MARK LIVEN, LARRY ELDER, and the Hiding the hand and throwing the Stone Host like JOHN PHILLIPS, DOUG MC INTYRE, and many others on Conservative Talk Show Stations fabricating Lies about whatever they are told by their Wealthy Brain Dead Supporters. Why do the Sponsors support them? Your Products will sell without sponsoring the Hate, because people are going to realize the truth and stop using your products too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard58
08:30 PM on 04/14/2012
Why so many people lap up the the Faux News garbage has me mystified. One would think people would be proud of an American company with world leading technology. But conservatives would rather see American General Motors fail, than acknowledge the fact that our President did the right thing, by helping GM and saving millions of jobs. It`s another reason Republicans make me want to puke.
03:50 PM on 04/10/2012
I only became aware of the Volt "controversy" recently, as I don't listen to conservatives. It's a shocking hit job against an American company and American workers by republicans. You can see how they operate with this example. They use the same tactics against Obama - by encouraging failure abd spreading lies about success. In the article you have conservative Volt defender admitting that the reason for this orchestrated campaign is "because Obama likes the Volt". That pretty much says it all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
06:08 PM on 04/07/2012
The Right Flames the Volt

"...What is the connection between President Obama and the Volt? There is none. The car was the brainchild of Bob Lutz, a legendary auto executive who is about as liberal as the Koch brothers. The tax credit — which is part of the reason conservatives hate the car — became law during the Bush administration.

“It’s nuts,” said Lutz, when I spoke to him earlier in the week. “This is a significant achievement in the auto industry. There are so many legitimate things to criticize Obama about. It is inexplicable that the right would feel the need to tell lies about the Volt to attack the president.”

...Not to worry, though. With seven months to go before the election, Cavuto and his Fox News brethren will have plenty of opportunities to denigrate an innovative car, employing American technology and creating American jobs, in order to besmirch a president who had nothing to do with it.

It is, after all, what they do."

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/07/opinion/nocera-the-right-flames-the-volt.html?hp
08:19 AM on 04/07/2012
Got my Volt 10 days ago, and It is an amazing feat of engineering. The fit/finish on this vehicle is superb. I am very pleased with its handling, performance and the fact I have only used 3 gallons of gas and have 430 miles on it so far.

I would have spent over $60 in gas to power my previous car; when I calculate the electricity used I am still AHEAD by $40. Oh yes, my insurance rate is lower and my monthly payment is less too.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
01:12 AM on 04/05/2012
The numbers are in!

2282 Chevy Volts sold in march.

A record.

Employees coming back to the line a week early.
11:04 PM on 04/05/2012
What's amazing is that sales number beats almost every hybrid car model on the market today (except Prius, of course.)

See for yourself - some example monthly hybrid sales numbers are here:

http://green.autoblog.com/2011/10/03/hybrid-vehicle-sales-slip-in-september-2011-prius-tops-chart-ag/

Considering the Volt's sales price, that's quite a remarkable achievement. It handily beats any sales number the Leaf has ever posted.

It could be, as P.T. Barnum once said "There's no such thing as bad publicity". Keeping the Volt in the spotlight, even with an endless string of poorly founded slurs, is doubtless helping the Volt's profile.

Keep it up, Volt haters!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JACK DOYLE
12:36 PM on 04/04/2012
The GOP hates Obama so much they would campaign against apple pie and Mother's 's milk.Conservative ?
Q"When you talk to one ask them the last time a Republican president passed a balanced budget.
A.Ike barely -.2 years of 8 in office
Q.Who bankrupted America?
A. Bush,see Paulson's speech in 2008.
Q. Who tripled the deficit and first caused America to owe over three Trillion dollars.
A. CONSERVATIVE ICON REAGAN
This wil lmake you popular with your Republican friends..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
11:34 PM on 04/03/2012
Here the charging rate (10 pm-6 am) is 5 cents a kilowatt hour (kwh).
Volt low battery to full charge is 13 kwh or 65 Cents.

That will get you 40 miles til the generator starts.

Less than 2 CENTS A MILE.

Exxon/Koch are Very Afraid!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who wants to Know
How did I get any fans with the posts I put up???
07:36 AM on 04/04/2012
in the northeast price is closer to 0.12 per KWh but you are not paying what it WILL cost if we ever really convert to electric.. We will need to rebuild our power generation and distribution network to handle the load and electric cost will multiply... don't forget that the government will add taxes to replace the taxes on gas (more than 2/3 the current price)... YOU DO NOT GET SOMETHING FOR NOTHING!!! where the price will end up I do not know but we are going to pay the price and it will be more than what we currently pay.
12:24 PM on 04/04/2012
Yes, it's 12 cents in MI here as well - but what the poster is referring to is an off-peak rate for charging overnight. My utility has this too, about half the normal electricity price.

Most of us can convert to electric without affecting capacity precisely because of this - there's lots of off-peak capacity overnight - enough to convert over 70% of US cars, according to studies.

The 2 cents per mile it costs to drive my Volt on electricity is cost-equivalent to about 200 MPG (2 cents divided into the $4 cost of a gallon.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
02:25 PM on 04/04/2012
Solar power plants, once built, have almost zero operating costs. And the prices does not increase over time (1% a year)
01:05 PM on 04/03/2012
and since my post was cut off...here's the rest of it.
I see a lot of comments on here that it is a piece of junk. I have to wholeheartedly DISAGREE. I've owned many nice cars and one of the last ones I owned, a Mercedes C230 Kompressor is an easy comparison to the Chevy Volt. The inside of the Volt is comfortable, I have the leather option, heated seats, backup camera, etc. All comparable to the Mercedes. The Volt is even similarly sized to the C230 - about the same amount of space in the backseat. I have a 3 1/2 year old who is in a full size car seat that fits in the back seat and she has plenty of leg room. The car handles well and is really peppy, especially in sport mode. If you've never sat in one and you are calling it junk, then I just take that as an uneducated comment and therefore, ignore it.
Oh, and as for politics, I would consider myself an independent. I don't vote based on political party, I vote based on who I think would do the best job leading this country forward. Do I agree with the bailout of GM? No. Do I think they should pay the government back? Absolutely. What I do agree with is companies developing new technologies to move this country forward and reduce our dependency on foreign oil. I think the Volt is positive start.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who wants to Know
How did I get any fans with the posts I put up???
07:39 AM on 04/04/2012
good fit and finish do not make it a better overall idea... it keeps up with the Mercedes for about 20 miles of snappy driving and then you are driving a slug..
12:26 PM on 04/04/2012
The performance of the Volt is snappy on both electricity and gasoline. You haven't a clue what a Volt it.

Go get a test drive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
02:27 PM on 04/04/2012
Wrong again...it's an electric car with a gas generator.

You have NEVER driven one....

You don't even understand how it works....

Your post is a total lie.
01:00 PM on 04/03/2012
Wow, there are a lot of VOLT haters commenting on this story. I have to say, I hadn't really thought about getting a Volt until my company offered a commuting trial with our company Volts and I signed up. I loved the car! I could go to work and back (about 35 miles round trip) running on pure electricity. On an empty battery it only took between 13 and 14 kwh to recharge the battery. Let's see at $0.12 a Kwh, that's only $1.68 a day to charge my car compared to $50-$60 a week to fill up my Ford Edge (which I loved by the way!). That's filling up my car with American made electricity and not foreign oil, which is also a plus in my book.

Needless to say, I got one on 3/17/12. Now, I didn't buy it - the lease deal was great and made more sense to me because the leasing company passes the tax credit back to the consumer (in the form of a lower payment). The residual for the car is 61% which is great. With the money I put down and my trade in, my payment was only about $20 more than my Ford Edge payment and I'm not spending $200 - $250 in gas a month or more. And I bought an American made car and didn't send my money overseas to some foreign car maker.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who wants to Know
How did I get any fans with the posts I put up???
07:44 AM on 04/04/2012
they are great for your 17 mile commute... but for anything else you are car-less... BTW... one day of leaving it uncharged and the battery-pac is trash... oh but I'll charge it every day.. until a blackout and then bye bye battery...
12:28 PM on 04/04/2012
The Volt has a far greater range than "17 miles". It's got a gas tank, too.

And no, you won't "trash the battery" by leaving it unplugged.

Why do people who know nothing about this car feel compelled to make up nonsense about it?
05:01 PM on 04/18/2012
WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM?? Do you just like looking ignorant in public????
11:59 AM on 04/03/2012
Concerning Volts bursting into flames, here is a link for everyone.

Driver escapes injury in Toyota Prius fire

http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20100424-NEWS-4240319
12:14 PM on 04/03/2012
On average a (conventional gas fueled) car bursts into flames somewhere about every two minutes, on average.

While the media hyperventilated about the Volt's wimpy fire (which started after the battery endured a short circuit for three whole weeks), two Toyota models were being recalled for much more serious fire-related issues.

But flaming Toyotas aren't news. Exploding cars are just everyday occurrences with gas-fueled vehicles.
12:45 PM on 04/03/2012
Driving a car with 12 gallon of gasoline is dangerous and the engineers have minimized this risk. Same goes for the Volt, a 16 Kwh battery can be hazardous and the engineers will reduce these risk. The GM Spark will use phosphate-based lithium ion batteries from A123.

This whole Volt fires issue is pure politics from the right. Now the Cruz is under attack.

A great way to attract independent voters, attack an American company. The GOP is braindead doing this.

But a couple more links if I may.....

Feds Say To Park Recalled BMWs Outside Due to Fire Risk

http://www.flickr.com/photos/diversey/1623358150/

http://www.insideline.com/bmw/5-series/feds-say-to-park-recalled-bmws-outside-due-to-fire-risk.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who wants to Know
How did I get any fans with the posts I put up???
10:20 AM on 04/03/2012
I love how they tout that it was car of the year...they don't mention that it "won" the award before it was even available for testing (award bought and paid for by the Obama energy dept)... When the hype is obvious and manufactured government produced propaganda it is doomed to failure. Even if the car is not as bad as the critics say it is (the ones who would really judge it for an award) the stink of manipulation is reason enough to never buy it.
I worked for an Exide Battery representative as a motive power applications engineer years ago and I can tell you that batteries will NEVER compete with the ICE (internal combustion engine)... and in general, batteries are an environmental disaster..
The funny thing about all of the energy efficiency hype.. the Geo Metro had better mileage and performance than all of the hybrids including the Prius.. it was a dog of a car but the handling and cosmetic issues would have been easy to address.
This government directed tech stuff just doesn't work.. solar electric is a total waste of time and resources... the rest of the world has been using solar for years.. to heat water..it works and it is very efficient (several times more efficient than solar electric will ever be unless some totally new electro-physical process is discovered)
12:28 PM on 04/03/2012
This is the first time I have ever heard the charge that somehow the US Dept of Energy somehow "bought out" all 59 judges at the European Geneva Auto Show to get the :Car of the Year" award for the Chevy Volt.

Do you have any documentation? Any source? I'll be honest, it's a pretty far-fetched idea. I suspect you made it all up.

Did the same thing happen with all the other awards the Volt has won? Like the "Best Engineered Car" of 2011 from SAE?

How about the perfect 5-star safety awards from safety agencies NHTSA, IIHS and Euro NCAP? IIHS is run by the insurance industry. So I imagine ALL the insurance companies had to be bought out, right? Must have been quite a payout, they named Volt a "Top Safety Pick".

Here's a tough one. Volt won first place in Consumer Reports Buyer Satisfaction survey. It must have taken quite a bit of money and perseverance to buy off several hundred voters - and then to keep them all quiet! You think they're still being paid today?

Here's a better theory: You've never been near a Volt, never sat in one, never test drove one, and haven't a clue what the car is or how it works. You're probably angry that you have to keep buying gasoline as it approaches $5/gal, and a few lucky people don't.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who wants to Know
How did I get any fans with the posts I put up???
01:24 PM on 04/03/2012
did you read.. the car was not available for testing prior to it winning the awards..there were dozens of articles at the time with this information and I do not remember any articles or press releases to the contrary..To answer all of your questions.. YES there was government pressure and interference in ALL of the awards it won (all for the same reason, there was no car available when the awards were issued.)(Do you really think SAE is independent of GM.. lol).. the only honest rating was the safety rating because there were actual tests done... .. the fact that you buy into all this BS tells me you are quite the the little cool-aid drinker... read my post, I worked for the largest battery manufacturer in the world as a motive power applications engineer (that is moving vehicles for those who do not know what motive power is).. there are some very good applications for battery power such as forklifts and short distance tuggers but we all knew back then that even with major advances like lithium batteries that the tech wold always be bettered by ICE technologies. That is why no one ever brought one out until there were government incentives..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who wants to Know
How did I get any fans with the posts I put up???
01:27 PM on 04/03/2012
how does a car with under 8000 sold will the buyers satisfaction award (especially since most were sold at the end of the year to government sponsored fleets and many of the private sales were returned to GM)
From Motor trend
In round numbers, Chevrolet says, the 3895 Volts sold through the end of September logged 10 million miles, 7 million of them pure battery-powered miles. That comes to 2567.4 miles on the average Volt, 1797.2 pure battery. GM's OnStar kept tabs on all Chevy Volt miles logged, and we had hoped to crunch all those numbers until the OnStar scandal broke about keeping track of owners' data even when they quit the service... but it still won consumer reports satisfaction survey.. get a brain and start thinking for yourself
08:39 AM on 04/07/2012
So, you worked for Exide "years ago".......I believe there have been significant changes in battery technology and engineering since then can you at least agree?

Your post reads like you are comparing the technology of "years ago" as though nothing has has changed today.

May I also add that many of the incentives for alternate fuel vehicles were implemented years before you or any of us even heard of Obama. The Volt in particular was funded and developed BEFORE GM's BANKRUPTCY.

What proof do you have that none of us are aware of to support your false claim the car of the year award in your words were "......bought and paid for by the Obama energy dept.."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fmal DeHyde
Insert witty comment
10:14 AM on 04/03/2012
This car not only helps reduce reliance on foreign oil, it's American made yet conservatives link it with Obama and automatically hate it. This resistance has already affected American employees at the car plant in Michigan but they apparently can't see the forest for the trees. Or... cutting of their nose to spite their face.

I really don't understand this way of thinking, it's destructive to our economy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who wants to Know
How did I get any fans with the posts I put up???
08:28 AM on 04/04/2012
no .. the resistance is to bad engineering, lies and government propaganda... BTW.. the lithium is not mined or processed here so whining that it is affecting American workers is specious at best.If someone buys a Ford Focus instead of a Volt how is that hurting American workers. If any particular car manufacturer could make a real next generation breakthrough in fuel economy of any sort (Gas, electric, Hybrid or other) they would own the market but there is no magic that is being hidden from us.

What is destructive to our economy is the artificially inflated fuel prices that collapsed our economy and are preventing any real recovery (every major recession since the late 50's has been proceeded by a sharp increase in fuel prices and the recession's only abate once the price of energy comes down.. in the 70's the price remained the same but the value of the dollar fell until the price of energy was on par with the price before the recession in adjusted dollars)
01:00 PM on 04/04/2012
"Bad engineering"?? Volt won "Best Engineered Car" of 2011 from the SAE (professional auto engineers.)

The American workers affected aren't lithium miners, they are auto plant workers right here in my home state of Michigan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hillbilly49
Don't tell me you are a Christian; let me guess.
10:07 AM on 04/03/2012
The Volt is a great automobile; some right wing extremists in America feel they need to bash it for some sort of political sport.  As usual right wing thinking is short sighted as well as stupid.
photo
abhorson
in favor of legalized bar fighting
01:12 AM on 04/03/2012
Why would ANYONE buy this piece of junk ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fmal DeHyde
Insert witty comment
10:17 AM on 04/03/2012
What's your deal? I've seen you make the same comment at least five times here. We get it, you don't like this car. We got it the first time you said it.
12:34 PM on 04/03/2012
If I may generalize... people who call the Volt "junk" have never been near one, and in fact would run away rather than take a test drive if one were offered.

You know next to nothing about what the car really is, how it works, or why actual drivers of the car overwhelmingly love it - and you have no interest in actually finding out.

You just enjoy acting puzzled at why anyone would buy your imaginary straw-man version of the car.
photo
abhorson
in favor of legalized bar fighting
01:02 PM on 04/03/2012
a.) it's ugly
b.) it's slow

c.) Popular Mechanics - a fair and technical publication - found that it gets 32mpg city and 36mpg highway...

if that's TRUE... again, my BMW gets better mileage... not to mention all the other advantages.