By now you're almost certainly aware that on Friday, MSNBC announced that it was suspending Keith Olbermann indefinitely and without pay because he made three donations to Democratic candidates during the lead-up to the mid-terms. The reaction to the move has been swift and, shall we say, pointed; it seems that the only thing both the left and right can agree on right now is that Olbermann should be able to give money to whomever he wants and not have to worry about losing his job over it.
I don't really have much to add to this that hasn't been said far more articulately by just about everyone besides, maybe, Howie Kurtz (who predictably took the bullshit professorial, "Well, he violated the first rule of being an objective journalist" route). The fact is that I'm willing to actually consider all kinds of conspiratorial notions on this one because I just can't make heads-or-tails of it as a rational decision. Maybe Bernie Sanders is right and NBC's corporate overlords pressured management to crack down on Olbermann because they don't like his message, as ludicrous as that seems because while Olbermann may be liberal and spend much of his time on-air railing against corporate interests, he ironically makes a shit-ton of money for the ones who run NBC; maybe MSNBC president Phil Griffin just got fed up with his talent running roughshod over him and decided to sit on that zoo fraternity of his and show it who's boss. Honestly, who knows?
The bottom line here, though, is that this highlights the disadvantage that MSNBC has always been at when it comes to allowing its hosts to express a political viewpoint, whether on-air or behind the scenes: MS is the only cable entity that has to answer to the traditional -- and laughably antiquated -- standards and practices of a network news mothership. Fox News was created as a right-wing mouthpiece; CNN basically made its own rules; only MSNBC had a set of intractable standards plastered into the walls of the place from the very beginning. NBC's dilemma has always been how to draw the line between the outspoken free-for-all on MS and the supposedly dignified proceedings at NBC News proper. Maybe this will be the event that finally forces the NBC suits to fess up and admit what everybody already knows: MSNBC's prime time isn't a news block; it's opinion. And there's nothing really wrong with that. Olbermann doesn't just wear his political leanings on his sleeve -- he occasionally shouts them in your face. The demands at NBC for notions like objectivity and fairness simply don't apply to Keith Olbermann, and it's ridiculous to pretend that they do.
At some point, these traditional media outlets will finally wise the hell up and realize that we're well past the point where it was unforgivable to express an opinion; where every journalist was supposed to robotically, dispassionately relay information; where it had to be "just the facts, ma'am." Fox News obviously realized this a long time ago; the place is almost literally a 24/7 factory for generating money for the Republican party and its candidates. MSNBC, if it has any brains at all and doesn't simply feel like trying to stare down its main marquee player just to prove that its penis is bigger, will put Olbermann back on the air as soon as it can -- and admit that it made a mistake by taking him off in the first place.
Because if you know anything at all about Keith, his penchant for standing his ground could easily lead to MS not having a star to put back on.
Follow Chez Pazienza on Twitter: www.twitter.com/chezpazienza
LOL!!! This is exactly what I thought too. Kudos!
I take issue with Olbermann's Lefty creds being defined as "taking on corporate interests." Oh. Right. MSNBC isn't corporate?
BOTH PARTIES support corporate interests. At least Fox isn't in denial about it. You can see them coming. MSNBC and npr are insidious.
Welcome to the Jon Stewart false equivalence club. You lost me at that statement.
Lots of you guys need to learn the difference between objectivity/fairness and neutrality. As Bill Maher so eloquently put it, this isn't Team Edward vs. Team Jacob. Olberman's rants are fact-based and fair. Too bad the truth of our government and media carries a liberal bias.
In the interest of removing the conflict of interest, Phil Griffin should reveal all on air personalities that gave with his permission. That should include the amount and the recipient.
NBC has network news and MSNBC has opinion journalism. The two are wholly different animals. Isn't that kind of the point of having two different networks? And at least the parent company makes a distinction between the two, neither CNN or Fox do that.
MSNBC has never marketed themselves as 'fair and balanced news', they're marketing tag-line was 'the place for politics' for many years until just recently. I hardly think there was any viewer out there who deluded themselves as to the difference between NBC and MSNBC.
But you also have to give MSNBC more credit than Fox in that they actually present both political viewpoints. That's also what makes Griffin's actions so ridiculous.....Dude, you have talent that expresses both viewpoints! Why not play that aspect of your network up instead of punishing them for it!
Fox-jockeys lie. They lie routinely. Here's a good example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF9We8dCvZ8
Murdoch doesn't seem to care that they lie, routinely. He shows his utter contempt for his audience by allowing it. But his audience, at least the ones who comment here, don't seem to care that the Fox-jockeys lie as long as it's what they want to hear (evidence, for me at least, that conservatism is a mental illness).
Lies should be abolished, not opinions.
For example, over 300k citizens railed against MSNBC to reinstate Keith over the weekend. Do you realize that most, if not ALL of the recent elections, were won or lost by far less than that amount of votes? AND more people got involved to bring Keith back than attended the Sanity Rally !
We must coalesce to progress..
(1) RE: " I don't really have much to add to this that hasn't been said far more articulately by just about everyone "
And you wrote it anyway. People just don't know when to shut up any more. If you have nothing to add - don't add.
(2) RE: "At some point, these traditional media outlets will finally wise the hell up and realize that we're well past the point where it was unforgivable to express an opinion; where every journalist was supposed to robotically, dispassionately relay information; where it had to be "just the facts, ma'am."
It's perfectly fine so long as you believe that information/news should be entertainment, whose sole purpose is to make money. That's the problem - facts should still be facts. Opinions, well you know what they say about those.
Not everything should be driven by the profit motive - there are certain services which are essential to the functioning of a 'democracy'. Entertainment is not one of them.
RE:" Fox News obviously realized this a long time ago; the place is almost literally a 24/7 factory for generating money for the Republican party and its candidates."
Exactly - because their chosen role is to entertain, not educate. That's fine - just don't expect the same privileges as or confuse it with the Fourth Estate.