Surrender, Integrity

I don't watch much CNN anymore, or TV news in general for that matter. I figure since there's no longer a steady paycheck to provide the requisite level of incentive, there's really no need to subject myself to most of the horseshit the networks try to pass off as legitimate news these days.

The average human digestive tract can handle only so many breathless reports on the latest out-of-control teens or bombastic warnings about the threat posed by plastic water bottles before it goes all Lovecraft and starts trying to force itself out of any orifice it can find. I'd like to believe that joining the ranks of those who play 24/7 watchdog to the news industry -- the ones attempting to Quixotically stand against the tide of daily abuses -- will make some kind of difference, but I'm just not sure that's the case.

As much as I want to feel otherwise, I don't think organizations like Media Matters really, well, matter. They're fighting the good fight and bringing the power of new media to bear against a previously unchecked leviathan, sure -- but there are times when I can't help but believe they're stoically trying to empty Lake Michigan with a spoon. I realize that this kind of thinking stands in sharp contrast to some of the antagonistically insurgent, all-or-nothing statements I've made in the past. But when a discordian convergence of the magnitude that we've witnessed in the past several days occurs, it makes me just want to throw in the towel, take my Paxil and let the chemically-induced somnambulance wash over me like a warm bath.

It started last week, at the annual National Association of Broadcasters convention in Las Vegas. The event's keynote speaker was none other than actor, activist and occasionally pompous ass Tim Robbins; he took the opportunity to verbally scold America's broadcasting community while simultaneously calling upon it to remember its responsibility to the public, reinvest itself in quality product and turn away from celeb-fellating, political ass-kissing, ratings-driven nonsense. Needless to say, Robbins received a warm reception and a staunch chorus of amusingly indignant "hear hears" from the crowd, which then dispersed to head back to the bar, then to the casino, then to the panel discussion entitled "Tits and TV: How To Make a Freezing Cold Air Conditioner Work for You," then to the Cheetah lounge.

Given the amount of lip service paid to Robbins's noble but perfunctory attempt at forcing change from within the industry, you'd figure on at least a minor grace period of self-reflection and soul-searching from America's broadcasters before completely disregarding any drunken vows taken in Vegas to clean up their act. You'd of course be wrong. Sure, executives say they want to see integrity and honor restored to television and radio -- particularly when it comes to news. But here's the thing: Each person sincerely believes it's the other guy who's to blame.

Finding a news or programming manager who'll say that he or she is even partially responsible for inundating the airwaves with crap is like trying to nail down Warren Jeffs on Father's Day. These people are like addicts: They'll never admit they've got a problem. Which is why, just one week after Robbins' verbal beat-down and the obligatory head-hanging and hand-wringing it produced, two of America's most powerful television networks are still doing what they do best -- and that's whatever the hell they have to do to get ratings, regardless of how shameful an abandonment of their responsibility to respectable broadcasting.

Two nights ago, NBC's strangely successful game show Deal or No Deal was visited -- via a satellite image displayed on a huge, somewhat Orwellian monitor -- by George W. Bush. The president was on hand to lend his support to a contestant on the show -- a captain in the U.S. Army who pulled three tours of duty in Iraq and whom dingbat host Howie Mandel referred to as "the ultimate American." (As Mandel is Canadian, who knows whether he was being slightly facetious.) The surreal image of a giant George W. Bush head doing its self-deprecating "aw shucks" routine while wishing the best to a man who's spent the past few years dodging bullets and picking sand out of his ass in the name of a war Bush himself started was almost too much to take. All that was missing was a final Vaudevillian mug to the camera and a hearty "Sock it to me!"

Despite Bush's on-air joke that he's "happy to be anywhere with good ratings," however, the numbers for the most recent Deal or No Deal actually mirrored Bush's own anemic approval rating these days: The show matched its lowest Monday night numbers ever.

Incidentally, the president's support didn't do much good for the contestant either: The Iraq war vet went from banking around $140,000 to just a little over $25,000 before finally recouping some of his losses -- which makes this just the latest instance of a U.S. soldier being fucked by George Bush.

While there's technically nothing wrong with giving the president a forum on a harmless game show, NBC has spent so much time over the past several years pandering to this administration -- going along with it in the name of condescendingly appealing to the GOP's cheerleading base -- that you'd think by now the network would want to draw a very distinct line between itself and the miasma of controversy that is the Bush White House. This would be particularly important given the criticism NBC News -- and to be fair, most other news organizations -- endured from those who claim the network gave Bush and company a pass during the lead up to the Iraq war. But, once again, network executives aren't interested in legitimacy in programming or news -- they're interested in being able to promote appointment television. In their eyes, that's what Bush's appearance on Deal or No Deal was (although the audience apparently thought differently).

Likewise, NBC saw nothing untoward about handing off an entire hour of Today to first lady Laura Bush and her twin daughters yesterday morning. It may seem innocuous at first glance, but really, think about it: The wife and kids of a low-rated and staggeringly divisive president, taking the reins of a network news show -- even one as toothless as Today. It's a jaw-dropping violation of the fragile but sacrosanct Rubicon dividing the government from those whose job it is to police and maintain an adversarial relationship with it. Murrow would've quit before allowing something like that to happen on his watch.

But if you think that's bad, it's a journalistic parking ticket compared to what CNN just did: It hired former White House Press Secretary and Fox News shill Tony Snow. I've had plenty to say recently about CNN's comically inept attempts at proving to the Fox Fans that it can be trusted with their viewership; the network has basically bent over backward and twisted itself into one ethical pretzel after another trying to gain momentum against FNC's ratings juggernaut -- abandoning every principle it swore to uphold at its inception and napalming the very last vestiges of its journalistic credibility in the precious name of ad revenue.

CNN is as guilty as anyone of not holding the government accountable for its offenses over the past several years; although not the blatant mouthpiece for the White House that Fox has been, CNN in some ways abandoned its post in an even more egregious manner. No one with a brain ever expected Fox to tell the truth, not with Republican interests at stake; CNN had a responsibility to be the necessary beacon in the night -- to balance out the bullshit -- and instead, it drank the Kool-aid, hopped on the bus and did exactly what it was told to do by people like, irony of ironies, Tony Snow. In some ways, it only makes sense that the circle is now complete and the chicken hawk has come home to roost -- but it damn sure doesn't make it right.

CNN, in its relentless pursuit of Fox's audience, has just closed the White House's deal to buy the media outlet that should've been standing against it all along. It really is enough to make even the staunchest defender of journalistic independence give up once and for all. Malcolm X once famously told a crowd, "You've been hoodwinked; you've been had; you've been took; you've been led astray; you've been bamboozled." Turns out, he was only half-right -- because when it comes to today's broadcast media, you're still being hoodwinked, took, led astray and bamboozled. And I'm not sure there's a damn thing that can be done about it anymore.

Follow Chez Pazienza on Twitter: www.twitter.com/chezpazienza

Comments

[MariaHopeful]

Prominent among the people and organizations that Hillary Clinton should thank for her "victory" last night is CNN. We have been crying foul for the past months about how CNN has been covering the campaigns especially with their so-called Ballot Bowl. We have stated over and over again that CNN cherry picks how it presents the candidates and what they have said. Check out Chris Matthews show today and see what the participants have to say about the candidates presentations and this they get primarily from CNN. The "experts" on the show all agree that Clinton is very specific as she talks about and college aid, working class jobs etc while Obama is somewhere in the stratosphere. Joan (?) says that she was surfing the net and she was surprised by the lack of depth in Obama's speeches in Pennsylvania. Well that is because CNN edits the speeches like that. They are not showing the whole speech! They are showing snippets. We need to let our voices be heard with these news outlets. I cannot lead but I am ready to follow. Let's go! Our man is being attacked from all angles.

[TomR]

----
CNN, in its relentless pursuit of Fox's audience, has just closed the White House's deal to buy the media outlet that should've been standing against it all along...And I'm not sure there's a damn thing that can be done about it anymore.
----

How about boycotting corporations who advertise on CNN/FOX etc.?

- Tom

[Lisette]

IN VAIN I WAIT FOR SOMEONE TO SAY
THAT HILLARY LOST

[zahavi]

Hillary lost.

[gramofsam1]

Hillary lost.
But despite the fact that Hillary lost, Joe Scarborough spent the morning insisting that not only has Hillary not lost, she has actually won. Who knew that there's such "ambiguity" about who is really the frontrunner?
There really is no hope that the media will abandon its complete disregard for reality. If enough of us just stop watching, they might or might not get the message, but at least we take away their ability to drive us completely insane.

[millions]

I refuse to watch CNN because they air Nancy Grace's show. Now I have another reason. Nuts to CNN if they're willing to alienate their given audience to suck up to another network's.

[Cuzn]

And CNN just extended Larry King's contract till 2011! Ugh! Will the madness never stop?

[frappe]

I understand your frustration with the msm and am in complete agreement with your views. I've given up watching the msm. It simply became too unbearable -- too consistently painful to watch anymore, and why punish oneself in such a manner?

Hopefully, in order to preserve our democracy, steps will be eventually be taken to restore independence and integrity within the msm. An important first step would be to break up these media empires that have consolidated far, far too much power. And don't allow any of them to own multiple media entities within a given market segment. It's simply too Orwellian.

Now, I prefer to get my news from the internet. It's also nice to be able to "vent" when the occasion arises and the internet does often allow that outlet. It helps to preserve one's sanity.

[zahavi]

In general, I agree with frappe, who is in agreement with the author that the news business is a mess. However, the internet has its irritations too. One is a lack of polish. Some say that editors are harmless, like dead yeast left in beer. In fact, in their absence they can be missed.

An example is the recurring phrase used out of any reasonable context. 'Drink the Kool-aid' used the way Pazienza has done is especially irritating, since it trivializes the death of several hundred people simply to refer to an uncritical choice. An editor might have requested that the writer avoid lazy cliches.

[vschicago]

Chez, I agree with your assessment of tv MSM...I've decided to turn it off myself. Looks like the same takeover in talk radio is occurring in tv news. When people have been hanging on to these tv news jobs so long, just like any person who has been a good paying job for years, they find it difficult to stand with integrity when it really counts.

But we, whom feel the pain of this downspiral of our news sources, should look at this as an opportunity to fill that niche of truth-seeking and truth-telling, no matter how much we may have to struggle to form it. Here's an idea: they have the "no spin zone". We should have the "no propaganda zone". We present the actual facts, you decide. No commentary by overpaid white men (or overpaid anyone for that matter). No hiring of people from old news networks unless they have been fully "vetted". :-) Sound good?

[KimFromPittsburghPA]

I too share your disgust and outrage, and don't watch much cable news anymore either because I can't stand listening to the constant barrage of crap they spew forth. The goal, along with ratings and profits, is to continue to "dumb down America" as much as possible in order to make the electorate easier to manipulate. That way, they can spin whatever narrative their own interests dictate and the cable news sheep who believe them think they are staying "informed" and know what's going on in the world -- when in fact, they haven't a clue. So many citiizens are being duped by the media, pundits, and right wingnuts into going against their own interests and serving the interests of the few (who also control the flow of information to the public and the political spins, to a large degree). It's a vicious circle.

[fladdaman]

CNN gave up its right to be called a news organization when it started to promote Lou Dobbs's daily anti-immigrant rants Watch BBC America News. It's brilliant ...and it's objective

[Charmed]

I turned from CNN a while ago.....I got tired of Lou, Wolf and Campbell Brown........I don't even like anyone else in the house watching that. If you have to keep saying "the best political team" then there must be a problem.....

[OrionGal]

No news channel is reporting on this -

article and video:
http://www.peterfpaul.com/
Trial to come up Thursday, April 24 in California

[RButler]

What amazes me is that with all our technology and ability to document, record and store events and information, we currently have so much misinformation out there. There is hardly any fact that can be agreed upon by everyone. On some days the pledged delegate count is different on each channel. It makes me wonder about the accuracy of the 'facts' of history that we seem to accept without question. Yet, there are people who are certain about events that happened around 2000 years ago in a part of the world where we recently couldn't be sure if there were WMDs. Did the WMDs suddenly 'resurrect' after 3 days or what?
After watching a news report I'm left with more unanswered questions than before. Those guys don't even know how to ask the right questions either before they go ahead and misstate the answers. Plus, lately, the so-called anchors are getting more emotional and animated than ever. Anderson Cooper's 'sincerity' irritates me. Shepard Smith is a hothead over certain subjects. I quit watching network news back in the '80s.

[Durango]

Like Napoleon said "History is lies mutually agreed upon."

You should wonder about history. Read it with skepticism. Check and recheck the sources. Don't believe it just because it is written down. Or because it is mutually agreed upon. Historians can and often are, wrong.

But the more history you learn the more you can discern the BS. The more BS you detect the better. But you have to keep studying. Or you simply become a tool of others.

And you are right. What passes for news is a disgrace. The more technology we have the dumber we become.

It is hard to be optimistic in these times, isn't it?

[SouthernBlueBelle]

Ugh, pass the Paxil.

[Jjc2006]

And MSNBC??? Also owned by GE. Outrageously sexist and obnoxious, this is the media outlet that keeps an overt sexist pig like Matthews employed. And before he showed his sexist colors, Matthews was trashing Al Gore while drooling over George W.
I wonder why they are not more taken to task by the liberal bloggers.

[startrekchess]

But what we really want to know, Chez, is how you feel about Richard Quest's recent arrest.

That Tim Robbins lecture couldn't have worked. If the executives had listened to him, they'd have been following the words of a celebrity... Catch 22.

[YuppoHemian]

MARCH ON, Chaz!! BRILLIANCE!!