- BIG NEWS:
- Dubai
- |
- Holiday Sales
- |
- The Fed
- |
- Banks
- |
As the world's leaders descended on the burg of Pitts, that rascal Sarkozy handed out a French-made pair of 3-D glasses. Upon the one-year anniversary of the financial meltdown, the French president suggested that we've been evaluating the financial world with one eye closed and have been distracted by the "cult of statistics" that traditional economists feed us. Now that his Nobel-winning duet of economists (Joseph Stiglitz and Amartya Sen) have delivered their report that suggests France adopt a "Joie de Vivre" index, this conservative president has started sounding like a leftist or at least someone who spends a little too much time reading Sartre in Left Bank cafes. And, of course, the conventionally wise around the world chortled about how naïve this diminutive president could be since happiness and joie de vivre aren't really measurable. In fact, for most economists, if you can't measure something accurately, it ain't real. Maybe that's why economists are such a glum bunch.
What is the recipe for success for a country? We've been worshiping at the altar of Gross Domestic Product for nearly a half-century, yet one observer recently suggested, "If we all put bars on our windows and buy face masks to deal with pollution, guess what? GDP goes up. That doesn't mean we are better off." In 1968, Robert Kennedy suggested that GDP "counts napalm and nuclear warheads" and, yet, here we are forty years later, just starting to ask the blasphemous question of "what is real?" Economist Joseph Stiglitz suggests, "What we measure affects what we do. If we have the wrong measures, we will strive for the wrong things." There was a time when having a chicken in every pot and two cars in every garage was our real measurement of success in this country, but maybe it's become our measure of excess in the past few decades.
First, Bhutan...now, France. Are we on the verge of a great revolution in which political leaders redefine what's real and what's measurable? Forty national governments are studying or adapting Bhutan's Gross National Happiness Index to imagine how they could create the conditions for their people to have greater well-being. As Sarkozy says, "If leisure has no accounting value because it's essentially full of non-market activities like sport or culture, we put productivity above human fulfillment." Take it from a Frenchman, they know their leisure!
Well, I know something about Joie de Vivre, myself, as it's the impractical name I chose for my company twenty-three years ago. Our mission statement ("creating opportunities to celebrate the joy of life") sounds straight out of the French socialist playbook, yet this mantra has allowed us to grow into the country's second largest boutique hotel company. Miraculously, making employees and customers happy creates beaucoup bucks for our hotel investors (although less so in times like these). And, we measure all kinds of things that our traditional hotelier counterparts don't typically fathom: our employees' sense of meaning and connection in the workplace, the number of employees who take sabbaticals (all our salaried employees get a one-month paid sabbatical every three years), our customers' sense of feeling they are in their perfect habitat in our hotels, and the amount of money we raise for grassroots community organizations.
If you were president, what key metrics would you try to evaluate to determine whether you were leading a successful country? Here's some of my suggestions, but I look forward to reading yours:
• % of High School Grads who go to College
• % of the Population that volunteer their time or donate financially to non-profits
• Commute time (obviously, with higher rankings for shorter commutes)
• Legal immigration demand (this has historically been an important measure of America's greatness)
• Capacity for innovation (either through measuring patents or the like)
• Of Hours Worked/GDP (our productivity is at the expense of our leisure)
Chip Conley is the Founder and CEO of Joie de Vivre Hospitality and the author of PEAK: How Great Companies Get Their Mojo From Maslow.
Follow Chip Conley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChipConley
Prune Perromat: Vive l'Amerique! Carla and Sarkozy in NYC
As his wife continued her gradual takeover of the New York papers' style sections, Nicolas Sarkozy did his best to convince the U.S. that his love for the "most powerful country in the world" was deeper than ever.
Marshall Goldsmith: Are You Addicted to Winning?
Winning is, of course, not bad thing -- quite the opposite. But the desire to win can become a problem, especially when the topic is meaningless or trivial.
Barbara Ficarra: 3 Ways for a Better, Happier and Healthier You
Sometimes, it's the simple things that we can do to help improve our outlook and health.
Mireille Guiliano: Hate the Gym? How Very French
French women see exertion as an integral part of the day. I encourage you to look at everyday movement as essential to your overall wellness, and not to see exertion as something assigned to the gym.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
To me happiness is having worthwhile work that provides adequate compensation and enough time off to enjoy it.
BTW, the reason I think we should exclude the financial sector from GDP is that they don't produce anything. When was the last time you said "I need to stop at the bank for a cup of financial services?"
Instead, they account for 20% of our GDP for moving money around. My bank teller and bank manager provide a service, moving my paycheck into my account and paying my bills with it, but derivitives and financial services are just ways that the rich move money.
Plus, they get paid for the 20% of our GDP they control, and spend that on goods and services. So in exchange for telling other people who should get the actual goods and services produced in this country, they siphon off 20% of those goods and services for themselves, while not producing anything.
This is the equivalent of a 25% tax of goods and services even before the crowding effect of their money (inflation). and is a net 40-45% reduction in productive capacity.
Dollar value of Goods and services produced (as an alternative to the GDP).
>This would exclude the Financial sector from the GDP.
Average years of healthy life
>This makes sure that we value being healthy, not just being alive, also discourages the culture
>of treatment, we should seek cures for ailments, not ways to keep someone on a drug for life.
>This measure would ignore any time that a person is taking any pill, including ADD meds or
>whatever the stuff is for restless legs.
We also should look at how happy people are in their leasure hours. Keep in mind that some folks might be happier working, so forcing them to take time off makes them less happy... If you love your job you never work a day in your life. Heck, how about:
Job Satisfaction
>This could encourage leaders to seek plans to allow workers to retrain for the jobs they dream about.
>Heck, give every worker one month of paid training time per year of work. This can be enforced on
>companies or paid for by the government.
(I wish comments allowed tabs)
Nah, Sarkozy is for this because his own joie de vivre is up.
Hey, he's married to Carla Bruni!
He probably thinks he's living in a Beatles song...
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with