iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chris Lehmann

Chris Lehmann

GET UPDATES FROM Chris Lehmann

This Isn't An Education Debate

Posted: 10/ 4/10 01:05 AM ET

As you may have noticed, education has become a hot topic of late. President Obama spoke to the nation's school children again this year. In Arne Duncan, we have the most activist Secretary of Education in memory. "Waiting for 'Superman' " and MSNBC's Education Nation have created discussions and debates that are, in theory, about education in this country. That should be a good thing. But it's not.

We should have a great debate in this country about education. Educational ideas are -- and should be -- controversial. The space between people like Alfie Kohn and Robert Marzano, between Deborah Meier and Ed Hirsch, could fill volumes. How we teach, what we teach, how we assess students... these ideas should be debated and discussed at dinner tables and PTA meetings across this country.

That's not the discussion we're having.

What is going on right now has little to do with education. We are having a labor debate masquerading as an education debate. And that's an important debate to have, but it's not really about education, and we should recognize that.

The conversation we should have is actually about education. Most high schools in this country are still structured off of the Taylor Scientific Method decades after business moved on. We still, in so many classrooms, put the desks in rows and put textbooks on the desks and expect learning to happen. In too many schools the innovations that have touched every other aspect of our society are absent. And in too many schools, the only thing that matters is how well students perform on someone else's test.

I say as both an educator and a parent -- we need a great debate about education in this country.

We should be asking ourselves -- what do we need our schools to be? What do we hope for our children? How are we going to modernize our schools so that they can change with the changing times? What do our children need from schools and how are we going to teach to meet those needs?

We're not going to get there if we expect the politicians and the media to start these conversations. These conversations have to happen in cities and towns all over this country. Parents and children and educators need to take the time to come together and have these conversations. We need to understand that without a vision of what we want our schools to be, reform is destined to fail.

So where do we go from here? What can we do?

  • Write to MSNBC and demand that the next Education Nation segments focus on how we teach and learn and not on the charter vs. non-charter debate. MSNBC's address is: NBC News, 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10112
  • Go to your local school board meetings and ask them how they are going to modernize the schools in your district. Ask them how they see the new tools that kids have at their disposal can -- and should -- change the way we teach and learn. Ask to sit on the committee that is drawing up the technology plan.
  • Organize conversations in the schools in your neighborhood -- ask the principal to hold an education summit on a Saturday that brings together community members and educators and parents and students and asks the hard questions about what our schools can be and the steps necessary to get there.

We deserve a great conversation about education in this country -- better than the one we're seeing now.

 
 
 

Follow Chris Lehmann on Twitter: www.twitter.com/chrislehmann

 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:20 AM on 10/11/2010
Good article but if a district is still "drawing up the technology plan," they've already lost. Time to quit planning and seize the momentum.
04:48 PM on 10/06/2010
AMEN. In order to have that serious, substantive, nuanced and productive conversation, we'll need our public officials to talk to classroom teachers a lot more often, and with a lot more substance. The VIVA Project (Vision Idea Voice Action) www.vivausa.vivateachers.org launched 3 weeks ago for exactly that reason--to give classroom teachers a chance to collaborate on line and craft detailed, substantive solutions to policy issues that vex our classrooms. They will deliver their first report directly to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan. Teachers across the United States are invited to join in this unprecedented effort to do precisely what Mr. Lehmann suggests: stop beating around the bush and focus on what American students and their teachers need.
11:03 AM on 10/05/2010
Absolutely correct- The problem DOES NOT lie with teachers-it lies with communities or lack of. What surprises me is how absolutely Republican this sharade is. Dissolve the union and you also dissolve the quality of education. I am a teacher of 24 years and I am not in it for the pay. Yet, I do belong to the union. My son-in-law (26 yrs old) works 3/4 time as at a computer guy and makes 10,000 $ more than me per year. This idea that American teachers are inept is utterly ridiculous. There are more universities in the US than anywhere in the world and the people flock here to attend them.Most students in the universities are American. I have been around long enough to see clearly what is going on. Use educators as a scapegoat- distract the public from the main issue- There are no jobs for the parents of the under priveledged kids.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnthompson
08:31 AM on 10/05/2010
Excellent post. Too many "reformers" don't understand how and why data-driven accountability has worsened the Taylorism in poor schools. Its either that or they have done a complete bait and switch and showcased outliers or great teachers who have managed to respect their students depsite overwhelming pressure to turn kids into widgets, knowing that the poison of the overall anti-teacher campaign will flow downhill to the kids.

I don't think many reformers are that Machiavellian. Hopefully they see our kids as more than collateral damage in their labor war. They are the victims of "the Big Sort." They have no direct experience with poor schools, so they believe the type of PR campaign that acccompanies Oprah, Waiting for Superman, Education Nation, etc.

Sadly, if we continue to make failing schools the problem, we will continue to fight this blame game that worsens the Taylorism. If generational poverty is the problem, then could advance on all fronts with nonunion and union charters, community schools, diagnostic assessments as well as the testing that others want etc. If you have committed reformers who trust standardized test driven methods IN THEIR OWN SCHOOL, fine. Don't impose non-stop test prep on the rest of the nation which..

I hate hearing John Legend, who I admire so much, mouthing those soundbites. Can you get him to read thisweekineducation.com where he'll have access to an inner city teacher's hard-earned experience in educational politics? after he's read your posts,
10:53 PM on 10/04/2010
Well written as always, Chris. Thanks. I have been watching this debate from the relative safety of Manitoba, but of course anything that happens south of the border is likely to spill over here - and thoughtful messages like yours are something we all need to think about, wherever we are, parents and teachers.
06:44 PM on 10/04/2010
I think the media always makes the issues binary. Charter vs. public, teachers vs. parents, unions vs. non unions. That is the media MO. Milton Freedman wrote an essay in the 50s about education. Even if you don't buy into Freedmanism, which I don't, he made a few good points. First he pointed out that in the 50s, the nuclear family was the smallest functioning unit in society for many students. It is difficult to make that claim today. Now, everyone is acting like the schools need to function in that capacity, but teachers never signed up to raise other people's children. The "education debate" ignores the fact that schools have become the defacto social structure for many students, but no one bothers to acknowledge that fact, nor mention to the teachers that the scope of their job has just grown by about 500%. Terms like educate, the "whole child" are code for "Raise these kids!!!" before nobody does, or they raise each other. No amount of "accountability" will change the basic fact that the family as a primary social unit is dysfunctional for many students. While it does no good to blame parents, we can't assume teachers want that job if we don't ask them. We can't assume that parents who are able to provide a functioning family are rich or elite. They just value the family as a primary social unit, unlike some other parents.
11:54 AM on 10/05/2010
Amen. Our education system was never designed to fully educate an individual let alone raise them. The system relies on parents to build the foundation that allows students to flourish in school. We can't expect our teachers to educate when a majority of their time is spent dealing with the emotional and disciplinary issues of their students. This is why I find what Geoffrey Canada is doing so compelling.

An example. About a year ago, my wife and I were at the grocery store. Our two year old son was calling out letters he recognized. In the checkout line a lady mentioned she was impressed with his skill. She asked if he knew the full alphabet. We responded yes. She then said half of the kids in her Kindergarten class showed up to school not knowing the alphabet. She teaches at a typical suburban elementary.

I don't share this story to aggrandize my wife and me. We are doing nothing different than what many other parents are doing. But when half of the kids show up to school without knowing their ABC's it indicates that a majority of the problems in education are not the fault of the system or teachers or unions. It is with parenting. What we need is a national conversation on parenting. We can talk about teaching techniques till we are blue in the face, but if kids show up without basic skills, it will be for naught.
06:40 PM on 10/04/2010
The more trust we can cultivate in our educational institutions, the more we will be able to have critical debate about learning and teaching. I am hopeful that collaboration can make positive changes to ensure that all students have access to a digitally enriching curriculum where they are free to create. I think that our schools need to be places where students feel safe to fashion and share original content. The structure of schools is not as important as the culture. Let's start a new conversation....
01:18 PM on 10/04/2010
"We are having a labor debate masquerading as an education debate." On this I agree 100%. It's frustrating to read comments on articles about teacher effectiveness and have both sides blaming each other (yes, I believe that the teachers who are trying to divert blame to the parents just as much as some parents are trying to blame the teachers).

And I do believe that this conversation is overtaking the need for real evaluation and perhaps change in the American education system. HOWEVER, I do not agree with you, Chris, that the debate over such things as charter vs. traditional public schools does not need to happen. The idea behind charters is to evaluate the best way to teach children (your identified goal). Without trying new things, you cannot have proof. And repeating the same thing while expecting different results is insanity. Whether or not they truly work remains to be seen, but it was an effort to reach the same goal that we all want - to provide children with a better education.

I also believe that the media and politicians absolutely have a place in this debate. Whether or not you like them, they have a powerful voice and can spread ideas quicker than dinner table discussions (not to say that these aren't important). The trick is getting the voice from the people to the media. This blog itself is part of the media and look at the discussion it has already spurred!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Lehmann
Founding Principal - Science Leadership Academy
02:27 PM on 10/04/2010
Point is... I don't think it is an either / or. It is an and / both. I agree that the initial point of charters was to create incubators for educational innovation, but that hasn't happened in too many places. There are some (SEED, for example, ACEL out in Fresno, to name just two) that are trying different structures and methods, but too often, all "charter" has meant is a different management structure. Meanwhile, what is getting lost is all the innovation in "traditional" school structures. SLA - our school - has had incredible opportunity to innovate within the traditional structure. The Boston Pilot program has been an amazing laboratory for Boston. School Without Walls in Rochester, NY has been an innovator for many, many years. And in NYC, you have entire networks of innovative schools that exist within the DoE. Again, let's talk less about governance and more about teaching. And yes, I think media and politicians have a role, thus the "community members" that I reference. I just don't believe top down reform is the way we change schools. Education shouldn't be done to kids, but with kids. The same holds true for ed-reform and students, teachers and parents.
07:13 PM on 10/04/2010
Hey Chris,
Don't forget FLVS, the Florida Virtual School, down here. Nice article there old friend.
10:24 AM on 10/04/2010
"We are having a labor debate masquerading as an education debate. And that's an important debate to have, but it's not really about education, and we should recognize that." I think this is a very important aspect to realize. It is a poor debate on that topic, to boot, with research on charters, teacher unions, international comparisons, and merit pay/incentives that is not being fairly and honestly represented/reported and discussion dominated by media experts, politicians, philanthropists, and wealthy business folks. Where are the important and influential educators in this "education" debate? Top that off with the implications of poverty on education in this country and this current debate sorely misses the mark. Thanks for speaking out, Chris.
09:23 AM on 10/04/2010
How true, Chris. The most frustrating thing for me in watching Education Nation and Waiting for Superman this past week was seeing almost nothing about how people learn or a conversation about the skills and qualities we most want young people to gain. Those larger questions, and how education can play a role in building a more just, democratic, and sustainable society, are the ones we need to focus on.

Thanks for the call to action.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Lehmann
Founding Principal - Science Leadership Academy
10:02 AM on 10/04/2010
My pleasure! What I hope is that we can take this to schools and community centers and school boards all over the country. There are parents and teachers and administrators all over the country who know that the current debate isn't what needs to happen. Let's not wait for others to empower us, let's empower ourselves and bring a productive conversation to the forefront.
06:20 AM on 10/04/2010
This is a call to action. I, for one, will act. Thanks Chris.
05:25 AM on 10/04/2010
An excellent column with a new way to see how the discussion has been framed by the media, the BilliionaireBoysClub, and the policy makers. Instead of a debate about education, we have a labor debate. Instead of the focus being on education, it's about the side issues that are not directly pertinent to school reform. I have just retired as a high school principal and have worked in the trenches under NCLB. I am sure there are many principals out there like me who admire teachers and support them. Let's hear from more principals. Teachers are at the heart of this matter, and we must find a way to give them a voice. I agree with Chris Lehmann that we should be having a great discussion right now about education. But first we must halt the reauthorization of NCLB.Once we do we'll have time for a splendid discussion. But if NCLB is reauthorized, we will lose all control over the discussion and its mandates. The unintended consequences of NCLB are wreaking havoc on the goals of education. On Facebook, go to Teachers' Letters to Obama and to Uniting 4 Kids. Go to edweek.org and read blogs by Anthony Cody, Nancy Flanagan, and Diane Ravitch/Deborah Meier. Ken Bernstein will be writing a blog for Huff Post and you can find him on Daily Kos as teacherken.Go to YouTube and listen to Diane Ravitch. Get involved. We're organizing. Get on board -- we're running out of time.
theschoolprincipal@inthetrencheswithschoolreform.com
photo
rackerly
author geniusinchildren
01:58 AM on 10/04/2010
yes, yes, yes and read the last four posts on www.rickackerly.com. How about setting a new vision: that all kids come out of school still loving learning. That would just about do it, actually.
01:36 AM on 10/04/2010
Thanks Chris, you have highlighted such an important point on this current discussion. The discussion has been framed in a narrow (yet complicated) window. I worry that the people just starting to pay attention have been led to rather simplistic answers to questions that miss the larger point. This isn't a WWF style debate filled with clear cut villains a heroes. Just because there are those in this country with vast resources of money, visibility, and power it doesn't mean they have the expertise to set the entire frame of the discussion. I respect your opinion on the topic, so please keep on putting your voice out there.
01:16 AM on 10/04/2010
Chris,

This is such an important message. Thank you.

Learning should be at the core of every school discussion. Good teachers know this. Now we need to spear the message to others.

Again, thank you.