iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chris Rodda

GET UPDATES FROM Chris Rodda
 

The Camp Pendleton Cross: The Facts vs. What the "Persecuted" Christians Are Saying

Posted: 12/02/11 12:29 PM ET

A thirteen foot tall cross atop a mountain near Camp Horno on the Camp Pendleton Marine Corps base in California has become the source of much controversy over the past few weeks, sparked by a Los Angeles Times article about a group of Marines erecting the cross on Veterans Day.

The cross put up this Veterans Day is actually the third cross to adorn this hill. The original cross, erected by a group of Marines from the 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment in 2003 was destroyed in 2007 by a brush fire. That cross was then replaced in early 2008 with a second cross. The cross erected earlier this month is a fire-proof replacement of the second cross, which was also made of wood like the original one destroyed by the fire.

In virtually all cases like this -- whether its a Ten Commandments monument in a courthouse or a cross on a military base -- you'll hear the same few talking points coming from those who claim that religious neutrality by the government is somehow tantamount to persecution of Christians. I call these the "Persecuted Christians Myths," and here's how they relate to that thirteen foot tall cross at Camp Pendleton.


Persecuted Christians Myth #1 -- Nobody is being forced to look at it

Well, in the case of the Camp Pendleton cross, this is certainly not true. From postings on message boards from Marines at Pendleton who say that they can see it from their office windows to commanders boasting about its visibility, it is clear that this cross is intended to be seen by everybody, whether they want to look at it or not.

Just read the 2009 article that appeared on the official Marine Corps website, which began:

"Although many Marines may not know where the heart and soul of 1st Marine Regiment is, they have two ways to find it: either look far off behind Camp Horno or run up the hill and see it firsthand.

"'It's the biggest hill around here,' said Sgt. Parker C. Vaculik, a reconnaissance Marine with Company B, 1st Reconnaissance Battalion, 1st Marine Division. 'Really, by coming up here, you are killing two birds with one stone. You're exercising and you're showing your respect to the fallen.'

"'If you look way up to the top of the hill, you will see a cross,' said Col. Daniel J. O'Donohue, the commanding officer of 1st Marine Regiment. 'It is the heart of 1st Marines. It's a monument put up by Marines for Marines.'"


And, it's not just that this cross is visible from various areas of the base. It goes far beyond that. The cross is the destination of many mandatory training hikes, forcing countless Marines of all religions and no religion not only to visit it, but to participate in the rituals that have grown up around it and to listen, often in formation, to Christian prayers and sermons delivered by their superiors.

This completely inappropriate and unconstitutional practice has been going on since the original cross was erected in 2003, and has been well documented in articles on the official Marine Corps website, such as this one from 2005, and this one from 2006.

To fully grasp what occurs during these mandatory hikes, just watch this video from one that took place in 2008.


That's not a chaplain delivering that Christian sermon (beginning at 3:36 in the video); that was the battalion's sergeant major, Jeffrey D. Moses, and the Marine speaking right before him was the battalion commander, Lt. Col. Benjamin T. Watson. Get that? The superiors that a non-Christian or non-religious Marine should be able to go to when they have an issue with being forced to participate in religious exercises are the ones who are leading these forced religious exercises. Is it any wonder that so many service members say that they can't go to their chains of command to resolve these issues and instead come to organizations like the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF)?


Persecuted Christians Myth #2 -- The "lone atheist troublemaker"

Now, whenever one of these issues makes the news, there must be someone for the persecuted Christians to blame. Typically, they go after someone who they can turn into what I call the "lone atheist troublemaker." In the case of the Camp Pendleton cross, the "lone atheist troublemaker" of choice has been Jason Torpy, a West Point graduate, former Army captain, and Iraq veteran, who now serves as president of the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers (MAAF). From FOX News to Jay Sekulow to The Christian Post to outspoken fundamentalist Christian military officers like Air Force Major Jonathan Dowty (a.k.a. JD the Christian Fighter Pilot), all were quick to make Jason Torpy the requisite "lone atheist troublemaker" on this one after he wrote a blog post about it on the MAAF website.


Persecuted Christians Myth #3 -- Only non-Christians object to government promotions of Christianity

Contrary to Persecuted Christians Myth #2, it's not only atheists who are objecting to the Camp Pendleton cross and calling for its removal. While MAAF is an atheist organization, MRFF is not, so MRFF hears from service members of all religions as well as those of no religion. In fact, 96% of the now over 25,000 service members and veterans who have come to MRFF for help are actually Christians -- both Catholics and Protestants who just aren't "Christian enough" for the military.

MRFF has been contacted by well over one hundred Marines at Camp Pendleton, as well as many Marine Corps and Navy veterans, some of whom served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and all of whom want the cross removed.

Are all of these Marines and veterans atheists? Of course not. The following email is from a highly decorated senior non-commissioned officer (NCO) in the Marine Corps, who identifies himself as a devout Lutheran, writing on behalf of himself and fourteen of his fellow NCOs at Camp Pendleton, all of whom have served multiple combat tours.

Subject: Marines Fight and Die for America and Fellow Marines, PERIOD!!

My name is (name withheld) and I am a (senior USMC Non-Commissioned Officer rank withheld) stationed at Camp Pendleton in San Diego, California. I am a "lifer" in the USMC. I am here until they kick me out of the Corps. Thank you to MRFF for being there so that I can express my feelings on behalf of myself and my fellow Marines. If I said these same things to my superiors in the Corps I probably would get kicked out.

I am a veteran of many, in fact (exact number withheld), combat tours to both Iraq and Afghanistan. I have been awarded many combat decorations including (combat awards and decoration names withheld) for my combat tours which have always included much hand-to-hand combat. Now, about that cross being lugged up that hill on the federal land controlled by Camp Pendleton. Fuck those Marines who did that! FUCK THEM TO HELL! What, they think that that cross stands for and represents all the dead Marines that have fallen in the combat zones where we have fought and bled? I happen to be a devout Lutheran myself but I lead now and have led, as a senior Marine NCO, USMC combat units which have Marines in it from DOZENS of different religions and atheists and agnostics too. I have fought and bled with my fellow Marines all over the desert down range in Iraq and Afghanistan. Many might have been Christians like me and many were not Christians but that didn't matter worth a shit when my hands were on their open wounds trying to plug bullet and shrapnel holes to keep them from bleeding out. No, in the Marines we do not honor those who have fallen by the religious symbol of ONE religion. Doing that on Camp Pendleton land itself is in fact a DISGRACE TO THE MARINE CORPS AND ALL OF AMERICA! We Marines fight and die for America and our fellow Marines, PERIOD! Last time I checked, the cross of Jesus and Jesus himself, who is my personal Lord and Savior, does NOT represent my country of America! Nor was Jesus ever a member of the United States Marine Corps! Those Marines who put up that cross disgrace all we fight for in the Corps. Why did they do it then? They did it to let everyone know that, at Camp Pendleton, the USMC-approved, supreme religious faith is their version of fundamental Christianity. Ironic and outrageous, as the Marines they claim to honor with their cross died fighting fundamental Islam. What if Muslim Marines had dragged a giant symbol of Islam and erected it up on that same Camp Pendleton hill? We would be waist deep in blood and guts if that had happened. I and my fellow Marines did not fight and get wounded and almost killed numerous times for that cross to be put up there by those fucking pathetic Marines. They should be severely disciplined and made an example of immediately.

(USMC Sr. NCO's name, rank, position and title and combat unit withheld)


Persecuted Christians Myth #4 -- Blatant displays of Christianity by the government are OK because most Americans are Christians

Well, this is about the stupidest argument used in these cases, given that we have that pesky Constitution to prevent the majority from trampling on the minority, but it's always pulled out by somebody, so I should include it.

Listen to Jordan Sekulow (from the American Center for Law and Justice just like his father Jay Sekulow) in this clip from FOX News as he explains that the great big cross on an Army chapel in Afghanistan should not have been removed because the majority (inflated by Sekulow to be 90%) of the military is Christian. This chapel cross, currently being lumped into stories with the Camp Pendleton cross, as it is in this clip, was removed by the chaplain, who was correctly following an Army regulation that clearly states that symbols of any specific religion can only be displayed at times when worship services of that religion are in progress. This is not persecution of Christians, but merely a common sense regulation to keep Army chapels that are shared by a variety of religions neutral and welcoming to people of all faiths, as Kathleen Johnson, former military director and now vice president of American Atheists, explains.


The bottom line is that religious neutrality by the government DOES NOT equal persecution of Christians, no matter how many times FOX News and "Team Sekulow" keep claiming it does.

 
 
 

Follow Chris Rodda on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChrisRodda1

 
 
  • Comments
  • 140
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:30 AM on 01/21/2012
How about one more from George Washington:

"While we are zealously performing the duties of good Citizens and soldiers we certainly ought not to be inattentive to the higher duties of Religion. To the distinguished Character of Patriot, it should be our highest Glory to add the more distinguished Character of Christian."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:22 AM on 01/21/2012
George Washigton:

"The General hopes and trusts, that every officer and man, will endeavour so to live, and act, as becomes a Christian Soldier defending the dearest Rights and Liberties of his country."

"The Continental Congress having ordered, Friday the 17th. Instant to be observed as a day of "fasting, humiliation and prayer, humbly to supplicate the mercy of Almighty God, that it would please him to pardon all our manifold sins and transgressions, and to prosper the Arms of the United Colonies, and finally, establish the peace and freedom of America, upon a solid and lasting foundation" - The General commands all officers, and soldiers, to pay strict obedience to the Orders of the Continental Congress, and by their unfeigned, and pious observance of their religious duties, incline the Lord, and Giver of Victory, to prosper our arms."

"The General most earnestly requires, and expects, a due observance of those articles of war, established for the Government of the army, which forbid profane cursing, swearing and drunkenness; And in like manner requires and expects, of all Officers, and Soldiers, not engaged on actual duty, a punctual attendance on divine Service, to implore the blessings of heaven upon the means used for our safety and defence."

If it's good enough for George Washington, then it's good enough for me and my fellow military family!!!
04:11 PM on 12/19/2011
So there I was sitting in the 53 Area of Camp Pendleton "Camp Horno". Looking up at “the Cross” but I could not see it, and yes I have hiked to the cross a couple of times but could still not really see it, even though I knew where it was. That is because it is a thirteen foot tall pole at the top of a 1648 foot mountain. I know it’s not a real mountain but you climb that sucker and then call it a hill. I have never been had to hike to “the cross” for the purpose of going to “the cross”. I have had to hike pass it and we take a rest because it is at the top of our hike trail before we hike back down.
But if you look at the area that “the Cross” is at you will see lots of really tall Crosses, they are called power line poles and they are 50 Ft tall going across the fire break. Oops I guess we better take those down before we offend someone, we don’t need that communications tower anyway.
I don’t care what shape it is in, the cross was put up there for Marines By Marines period, as soon as we start holding church up their you can complain, but you have to hike up there and complain in person.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PRONESE
Somewhat Opinionated Curmudgeon
05:48 AM on 12/08/2011
In other Military News:
Link: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/12/07/ft_hood_shooting_classified_as_work_place_violence
More Coffee...
R/ PRONESE
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Rodda
10:32 PM on 12/06/2011
A follow-up to this post, addressing the ACLJ's misrepresentations of both the Camp Pendleton cross issue and of MRFF, can be found here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-rodda/the-psychological-project_b_1132579.html
01:09 PM on 12/06/2011
I think your Marine NCO put it more 'pithily'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
04:03 AM on 12/06/2011
All this rabid hatred expressed for Christianity by "libs" over the years has probably been a big driver of the religious right. Many, many people cherish their religion and why should non-Christians take it upon themselves to destroy these symbols of peace and love which appeal to so many. And the same people would never rail against symbols of non-Christian religions (such as Muslims). And forget that cr*p that Christians don't follow their own beliefs. Hardly anyone follows the precepts of their religion other than fanatics. That doesn't mean those beliefs don't matter a lot to them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Robertson
06:20 AM on 12/06/2011
"All this rabid hatred expressed for Christiani­ty by "libs" over the years has probably been a big driver of the religious right. "
Rabid hatred such as saying, "Hey, it's not ok for you to try to force me to join you in your religious observances."?

"Many, many people cherish their religion and why should non-Christ­ians take it upon themselves to destroy these symbols of peace and love which appeal to so many."
It's not about destruction. It's about saying that symbols of private faith belong in a private place. No one religious group should be allowed to brand a public space with a symbol of their faith.

"And the same people would never rail against symbols of non-Christ­ian religions (such as Muslims)."
I'm calling you on this one. Show me a 13 foot tall islamic symbol on public land that hasn't been challenged.
02:44 PM on 12/06/2011
No, Rabid hatred such as saying, "We can't even look at a cross because it makes us physically ill." (this was an argument used regarding the Ground Zero Cross). That either means the person is mentally unstable or they are so filled with hate for a symbol it causes physical pain.
As for "forcing" people to join, that shouldn't be happening. The article doesn't actually address whether or not the Marines can opt out, though. The Marine who wrote the letter didn't say that, but he was angry at its very presence, even though a cross is a symbol of ultimate sacrifice. Maybe he just can't separate the religion from the symbolism. I don't know the guy, I can't say.
"It's not about destructio­n. It's about saying that symbols of private faith belong in a private place. No one religious group should be allowed to brand a public space with a symbol of their faith."
It IS about destruction and removal. Religious groups have a right to donate whatever they want to public spaces, and if the public space wishes to display it, it is their prerogative (they often do with a little plaque that says, "donated by the dudes from that one organization"). But most of these FFRF.MRFF, MAAF, AAA, etc. organizations seem to only want to remove references to Christianity (however vague) and other general references to God.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:11 PM on 12/06/2011
But what about the Constitution?
03:00 PM on 12/06/2011
124 Fans Become a fan
3 hours ago(12:11 PM)

But what about the Constituti­on?

Good point.

These organizations who are trying to get rid of every public reference to G-d are using their incorrect understanding of the establishment clause to attempt to violate the free exercise clause.

The constitution doesn't prohibit religious symbolism or reference it prohibits the State from forcing everyone to follow a single religion (see: Church of England). It doesn't even ban public prayer.
If you want an example of questionable, probably unconstitutional behavior it is this:
The Military has strict guidelines regarding the handling of the Koran (one who is not of the Islamic faith [infidel] must wear gloves while handling the Koran, must handle primarily with his right hand, a minimum of contact must be given with the left hand...a small example of the most important regs). But the Army, on a base in Afghanistan, has reportedly burned Bibles that were brought in country by soldiers. Why burn them? Because that's what they do with trash, says the Army. So, in this case they are giving preferential treatment to Islam over Christianity. The only reason the Army does this is because they fear Muslim backlash will interfere with the "hearts and minds" campaign.
photo
liberalsrheros
GOP's voter suppression, an insult to veterans.
07:50 PM on 12/05/2011
poor education is the root of this problem.
03:11 PM on 12/06/2011
You're right. If people educated themselves on the constitution, they'd realize there is no constitutional crisis here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:45 PM on 12/05/2011
"given that we have that pesky Constitution to prevent the majority from trampling on the minority"

yeah, tell that to the folks who got their right to marry voted away in California (mostly by "persecuted Christians")
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eliasasm
itsgoingtobeabumpyride
11:00 AM on 12/05/2011
From my own experience, getting some of faith to except that there are more ways than theirs is an impossibility. It is more than obvious that this once Secular nation is becoming/has become a Theocracy. How is it that America for two hundred or so years never had so much religion encroaching on our everyday lives and our government and now seems to be the norm? I call it ChristoFacism.
03:16 PM on 12/06/2011
History books...check some out.

You seem to be pretending that our president hears directly from the Almighty and orders the House and Senate to Legislate accordingly.

Please, can you make more outlandish claims? This is entertaining.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Robertson
05:07 PM on 12/06/2011
"You seem to be pretending that our president hears directly from the Almighty and orders the House and Senate to Legislate accordingl­y."
No. Obama is the anti-Christ. Duh. Don't you watch Fox? It's the Republican candidates who have been quoted as saying that god commanded them to run for office.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Robertson
09:29 PM on 12/06/2011
Exhausted the thread. Replying here...
"Fantastic! You have been promoted to the next level! You have proved yourself a worthy Progressiv­e by applying the required party rhetoric!"

Thanks. That was my intent.
Out of interest, which bits do you believe are incorrect? :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RK Johnston
Good Blood Never Lies...True Love Never Dies!
03:47 AM on 12/05/2011
To claim to be a victim of "religious persecution" while seeking to persecute others for their beliefs is as hypocritical and two-faced as it gets.
One does not wield the sword and face it's point on their knees at the same time, unless they are trying to take their lives in a very pain-filled way.
Our warriors are supposed to be training for war.
Could it be that what they are truly training for is Holy War...an American version of the12th-14th century Crusades, if you will?
God help us all if that is what is happening--any fool knows that Holy Wars have very little to do with what is truly holy.

--RKJ
07:29 PM on 12/06/2011
"Could it be that what they are truly training for is Holy War...an American version of the12th-14­th century Crusades, if you will?"

No, I won't.

To compare the desire for Christians in the military to erect a cross to being a participant in the crusades is disingenuous at best.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bobWal
08:10 PM on 12/04/2011
Doing your job in the Military has never required any religion. Most all chapels are used by all faiths. This is why the draft should come back. Almost 40 years later the military is morphing into some type of religious campaign.
01:13 PM on 12/06/2011
Yes. We need a draft again to cleanse the system, for sure.
03:23 PM on 12/06/2011
Gee...that's logical. Does that mean number 1 in the draft will be Atheists, then Agnostics, then Pagans, then Druids, then Wicca, then on to Scientologists, then Kabala, then Islam and Judaism. We might let some Christian people get drafted, too, as long as they don't have any conviction about their religion. All other Christians shall be banned from the military.
07:49 PM on 12/04/2011
A bleif in GOD is a precept for Marines. Their motto is Semper Fidelis; meaning in Latin "Always FAITHFUL." The Marine should not be required to have no faith as that goes against their motto in being always faithful to GOD. Ihave never met an aitheist in a Fox Hole. Fox news set you people up. They sanbagged the reproter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracy R Gibson
01:24 AM on 12/05/2011
The Marine Corps IS a religion. They are faithful to the Corps.
01:03 PM on 12/05/2011
Nonsense. "Faith" does not refer solely to christianity. A dog is faithful. Is he a christian? Since you're not a marine (evidenced by your referring to Marines as "them" and "they" and "their" and not "we" "our" or "us"), the only Fox Hole you've been in is the rabbit hole Fox News led you down. So it's not surprising you've not seen any atheists. They exist, and they are just as good Marines as any Christian ever born.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
04:52 PM on 12/04/2011
The cross should have never been taken down.There was no reason for it to happen and the vast majority of the soldiers that are serving on that base are very unhappy about it and they ant it back.Considering they are the ones putting their lives on the line etc.I say if they want it,then they should have it.They deserve it.There was no real reason for it to have been taken down to begin with.One thing yuo do not want is unhappy soldiers
photo
leftparadise
Go ahead with your own life, leave me alone.
08:38 PM on 12/04/2011
you've polled them ? all of them ? or are you taking Fox's word for it ? because they never lie. did you read the article above ? have you ever read the constitution ? you should try it some time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
08:54 PM on 12/04/2011
Actually,polls really don't mean much of anything because there are so very many of them and one will say the oposite of the other and so on,I don't go by polls for anything.I read it when it first happened and it did say that the majority of the troops were very very upset over it being taken down,so I guess that pretty much say's it all.I'v been in war 2 tours of duty in nam,5th special forces group to be exact.If the majority wants it back then they need to give it bacl to them,anything that helps them and or makes them feel better is a good thing and should be given to the troops.The original story did say the mahority of them and the majority rules,especially during wars and there is nothing unconstitutional about it at all,if there's people of other faiths they can have what they want also,there was no viable reason for it to happen and all it did was to bring down their morale which is usuall already down and does not need to be brought down any more than it already is.It's not hurting anyone,it's not insulting anyone and like I said,those with other faiths can have their symbol of religous belief
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
10:29 PM on 12/09/2011
Polls are B.S. every one of them says something diferent so I never go by them.Nor did I go by anything fox said.I did read many articles from many diferent fees however and they all mentioned that majic word "majority" Now while some may be wrong I know their not all wrong,and about the constitution?Well when you in a war time cenarion guess what,yep that constitution loses a whole lot of meaning suddenly.I know,I'v been there before 2 tours in nam 5th special forces.If that would have happened then,we would have fragged the officer who gave the oredr to reove it and it would have been put right back up thereFrom everything I'v read and seen oit seem's the problem is coming from righ here in the U.S. and not over there.The people here need to mind their own affairs,if they have a problem with something over there,perhaps they should go there and stay a spell
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
09:10 PM on 12/05/2011
It goes against the 1st admendment is all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
10:25 PM on 12/09/2011
All they have to do is give the catholics and the jewish troops their symbols and allow them to be seen.Thats not hurting anyone at all,if it is then whoever it is hurting has some major problems upstairs.None of it really matters anyways in a war time scenario,if you diminish the mral of the troops in any way shpe or fprm than you'r going to have big poblems on you;r hands.In nam and this would have happened we would have fragged the officer who said to bring it down and that would have been the end of it completely
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nofriendofrepublicans
Mother friendly.
04:39 PM on 12/04/2011
It's amazing what belief in fairy tales can do to countries.