iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chris Rodda

Chris Rodda

Posted: April 28, 2010 04:32 AM

While all the reports about Franklin Graham being cut from the Pentagon's National Day of Prayer event focused exclusively on Graham's anti-Muslim statements as the reason his appearance was cancelled, there is actually a second and equally important reason that he should never have been invited in the first place. Even if Graham had never uttered a single disparaging word against the religion of Islam, his invitation would still have been in violation of several Department of Defense regulations. As explained in the Military Religious Freedom Foundation's (MRFF) letter to the Secretary of Defense demanding that Graham be disinvited, the affiliation of the Pentagon's NDP event with Shirley Dobson's National Day of Prayer Task Force was in violation of the regulations that strictly prohibit the U.S. military from endorsing or offering preferential treatment to a private organization (or "non-federal entity") -- regulations that apply across the board to both religious and non-religious organizations, as well as to commercial entities.

As stated in MRFF's letter:

MRFF also strongly objects in the most fervent magnitude to the Constitutionally noxious affiliation of the Pentagon's National Day of Prayer event with the National Day of Prayer Task Force (NDPTF). This illegal affiliation violates the Joint Ethics Regulation (DoD 5500.7-R) regarding the strictly prohibited endorsement of a non-federal entity (Section 3-209), and DoD Instruction 5410.19, which, likewise, prohibits the providing of a selective benefit or preferential treatment to any organization (Sections 6.7.1 and 6.7.2).

By making it a regular practice to have the NDPTF's honorary chairman, who this year is Franklin Graham, as the designated keynote speaker for the Pentagon's event, and by using the promotional materials supplied by the NDPTF, the Pentagon Chaplains Office has clearly turned the Pentagon's event into an official NDPTF event. No other interpretation is reasonable, rational, or possible.

MRFF was already working on addressing another National Day of Prayer issue when we were contacted by the members of the Muslim worship community at the Pentagon requesting our help regarding Franklin Graham. This other issue is the scheduled participation of military personnel (i.e., military color guards and military bands) in other official NDPTF events across the country. This participation is not only in violation of the same military regulations cited above regarding non-federal entities, but DoD and individual service branch regulations on uniform wear.

And, of course, there's also that pesky constitutional issue of the military's endorsement of a particular religion by participating in NDPTF events. The NDPTF's message is very clear -- no non-Christians need apply.

To begin with, all NDPTF volunteers must subscribe to the following "Statement of Belief," a statement that excludes all non-Christians and non-religious, and even many Christians.

"I believe that the Holy Bible is the inerrant Word of The Living God. I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the only One by which I can obtain salvation and have an ongoing relationship with God. I believe in the deity of our Lord Jesus Christ, his virgin birth, his sinless life, his miracles, the atoning work of his shed blood, his resurrection and ascension, his intercession and his coming return to power and glory. I believe that those who follow Jesus are family and there should be unity among all who claim his name."

NDPTF event coordinators must also agree, by subscribing to the following statement, to restrict any participation beyond simply attending an event to Christians only: "I commit that NDP activities I serve with will be conducted solely by Christians while those with differing beliefs are welcome to attend."

The NDPTF actually has an "Official Policy Statement on Participation of 'Non-Judeo-Christian' groups in the National Day of Prayer," which states:

"The National Day of Prayer Task Force was a creation of the National Prayer Committee for the expressed purpose of organizing and promoting prayer observances conforming to a Judeo-Christian system of values. People with other theological and philosophical views are, of course, free to organize and participate in activities that are consistent with their own beliefs."

While the NDPTF, of course, has every right, as a private organization, to organize exclusively Christian events and prohibit the participation of non-Christians, the U.S. military cannot endorse these events by its participation in them. Therefore, MRFF will be sending a letter to the Secretary of Defense officially demanding that military participation in any NDPTF event be prohibited.

 
 
 
While all the reports about Franklin Graham being cut from the Pentagon's National Day of Prayer event focused exclusively on Graham's anti-Muslim statements as the reason his appearance was cancelled...
While all the reports about Franklin Graham being cut from the Pentagon's National Day of Prayer event focused exclusively on Graham's anti-Muslim statements as the reason his appearance was cancelled...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
MyFatCat
I'm paid in catnip
02:30 AM on 05/07/2010
Problematic as the entire issue is, the writer really got something wrong here. Offensive and questionable as the NDPTF task force's other beliefs may be, its "Statement of Belief" reads like the Nicene Creed of 413 CE or so--to which all Christians do, actually, subscribe. The main problem with the statement is its tone, which has an aggressive edge the Nicene Creed doesn't have. Never ascribe to malice what might simply be bad writing...

The other elements of their platform remain objectionable.

JoePenn's right too: our founding fathers did not bring forth a Christian nation. They fled religious persecution and did not imagine establishing it, as the authors of The Radicalism of the American Revolution, The Democracy Reader, and Original Meanings all make clear.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:59 PM on 05/10/2010
Not all Christians believe the Bible to be the "inerrant" word of God but a human document that contains lots of story, myth, history, and fable along with statements and deeds attributed to God and to Jesus. As John Bradshaw used to say, in the Bible, Tobias' dog wags his tail, but that doesn't make it revealed truth.
photo
JoePenn
Shuhada?
10:11 AM on 05/03/2010
So what's all this 'judeo-Christian" bu ll $h it that the founding fathers were under? Seriously, what the HELL did Judaism have to do w/ the founding and raising of America? I scream at the TV every time I hear this stupid statement.
12:59 PM on 06/23/2010
Christians call it the Old Testament. Have you not read it?
09:37 PM on 04/29/2010
Thank Goodness (not God) for your voice and the work of MRFF. I was a Chaplain for many years (interfaith, seminary trained) and continue to be appalled by the predominant and dominating influence of Evangelical and Fundamentalist Christians in most institutions such as jails, hospitals, prisons and the military. We must hold the line (or the wall) and keep these folks from further damage and further "progess" toward seizing this republic for their own Christian Nation.
06:07 PM on 04/29/2010
"Leadership of "National Day of Prayer Task Force" events is limited only to those who will sign a form stating that they adhere to the Lausanne Covenant, the belief statement of an international umbrella mission organization started by Billy Graham in 1974. The Lausanne Movement refers to the ongoing structure of the Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization (LCWE) which works to streamline and organize worldwide proselytizing of Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and "Nominal Christians" which they state are the "approximately one billion people classified as Christians who "still need to be evangelized" and are described as "found extensively among Protestants, Orthodox, and Roman Catholics." In other words, the National Day of Prayer Task Force is limited to leadership that support the goal of ultimately ending all other faiths and belief systems that fall outside of the Lausanne Covenant."
03:11 PM on 04/28/2010
Before everyone judges Franklin Graham I would encourage them to go
to the Samaritan's Purse website and see all that he and his helpers
have done for suffering and dying people all over the world. You may not
agree with the stands he has taken or his personal beliefs and that is
understandable but do look at how he has chosen to dedicate his life
and to all the countries he helps daily.
09:10 PM on 04/28/2010
"...see all that he...ha(s) done..." Christians are specifically told in the bible to prayer in private and to keep their charitable works to themselves. So your comment is actually proving the point about Franklin Graham - he is not a true follower of Jesus Christ. Judge not lest ye be judged, Mr. Franklin.
06:33 PM on 04/30/2010
While I agree that Christians are told to pray in private so that their prayers
show a sincere heart and are not the prayers of fools who only pray to
impress others there are many times in the bible that our Lord prayed in
public as did many in the bible. As for Franklin Graham when I encouraged
people to go to his website to see what Samaritans Purse is doing for many
in need in the world it was not to exalt him but to show how he puts his faith
into actions. How would people who also seek to serve others join with other
groups if those groups did not share their needs or encourage people to join
with them. To say he is not a true follower of Christ is the epitome of what
the scriptures warn of when they tell us "judge not lest you be judged".
I apologize if I was misleading about Mr. Graham and insinuated that everyone
should look at him to see what a great person he is. I only meant to look
at his heart and how he cares for others and how he puts those feelings into
action before judging him as a man who as one poster insinuated was taking
a large salary at the expense of the poor. Words are cheap and ripe for mis-
understanding but actions usually are an indicator of the truth a man lives by.
01:01 PM on 06/23/2010
He makes people sign a pledge to follow his word and belief before he hands out anything. That is done on the over $300 million of OUR tax money that is designed for RELIEF work, NOT proselytizing! Maybe YOU like it, but most Christians do not believe what he does (that the world will end soon) and other non-Christians pay these taxes, too. He is despicable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberty1967
02:16 PM on 04/28/2010
Thank you, Chris Rodda, for another fact-based, excellent article.

So, the NDP wants to reserve the National Day of Prayer to Christians who meet their criteria? Seems to me if it's "National", we should really all participate, no? Using that name. Let's have "National Day of Prayer" public pagan circles, Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, Jewish and every other religious public celebration. Let's show them how it's done. The atheists can have a National Day of Freedom from Prayer. It will be fun!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinkster
I Think, therefore I POST!
11:35 AM on 04/30/2010
This I can agree with - as long we all Americans are included in these National Days of Whatever, it's OK - it's when groups like Graham's try to co-opt that special day to themselves and use it to forward their religious agenda at the expense of all others, then it's not a national day anymore, and it's unconstitutional for our government to be involved.

No government support for religions. Period. They don't need it, they have too much already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnunnster
Peace Geek
08:55 AM on 04/28/2010
Hey Chris-
Thanks for being out there bringing awareness to this kind of BS and working to make it right!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reviewingthesituation
Southern liberal feminist
06:20 AM on 04/28/2010
Isn't Graham the one who took a half-mil salary while asking much poorer folks to donate money to even poorer folks?