iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chris Stedman

GET UPDATES FROM Chris Stedman
 

Finding Common Ground With 'Sacred Ground'

Posted: 08/15/2012 5:42 pm

On my last day of work at Interfaith Youth Core, I had lunch with its founder, Eboo Patel. As we ate I told him that, inspired by his book "Acts of Faith," I was going to write a book of my own about atheism and interfaith work.

"Yeah?" he replied, grinning and taking a bite of his sandwich. "When?"

"Oh," I offered, realizing I hadn't actually thought about details. "Someday..."

"When?" he said again.

"In five years? Maybe 10?"

He thought for a second, then said, "Why not start now?"

I chewed on my sub, and on his question. Why not now? I came up with several reasons immediately: I'm young; I like to write but have little formal training; I'm really young. But I swallowed those thoughts and said: "Sure. Why not? I'll start writing and see what happens."

As soon as I started writing, I couldn't stop. Before I knew it I had a book contract, and then a finished book. (My book, "Faitheist," will be released Nov. 6 and is available for preorder.)

While I was writing, so was Eboo. I got a copy of his excellent new book, "Sacred Ground" -- a vital, urgent exploration of America's dark history of both prejudice toward religious minorities but also its principled promise of religious liberty -- a few weeks ago. When I read the chapter on interfaith leadership, where he describes some of the journey I share in "Faitheist," I was moved.

A story about an atheist in a book like "Sacred Ground" is good for atheists; it demonstrates that we have a unique contribution to make to America's diverse religious landscape. And it will promote the idea of atheists as largely goodhearted people who want the same things most Americans do to people who might believe otherwise -- people whose perceptions of atheists are based on caricature rather than meaningful relationships.

Storytelling can do that. It can connect and inspire us to new ways of thinking, to greater empathy and to increased familiarity with different experiences, identities and values.

I thought more about the power of narrative as I followed the news cycle last Sunday with a broken heart, when a white gunman stalked into a Sikh temple in Wisconsin and shot and killed six people and wounded several others. I surveyed reactions to the shooting and found they were significantly more muted than the response to the Aurora tragedy several weeks before. Perhaps people are becoming more accustomed to awful, violent outbursts such as this, but I wonder if the reactions don't say something about the way we see "others" in this country.

Upon hearing news of the shooting in a Colorado movie theater, many people likely conjured an image in their mind. They could imagine what it was like there, and they could imagine themselves in it. But how many Americans can envision a Sikh gurdwara and what goes on inside? Many people can imagine themselves in a movie theater, but how many can picture themselves, or people they love, in a gurdwara? How many people know about American Sikhs' sacred ground?

This is just one reason why "Sacred Ground" is such an important book -- and why it is so important for people to share their stories. The day after the horror in Wisconsin, my dear friend Valarie Kaur, a longtime Sikh activist, shared her story on CNN. We tell these stories -- stories of being Muslim, of being Sikh, of being an atheist and of finding common ground -- with the hope that they will accomplish what "Sacred Ground" suggests: that familiarity with diversity changes how we think about it.

My hope is that "Sacred Ground," "Faitheist," Valarie's words and work, and the cumulative efforts of everyone who promotes pluralism will build a world where tragedies like the one in Oak Creek, Wis., never happen again. We all -- Muslims, atheists, Sikhs and everyone else -- have stories to tell, and sharing them with others will help make the world a place where everyone is free to proclaim their beliefs with pride and without fear of violent recourse.

I'm happy to say that we are building that world -- in the last week alone, atheist friends donated to rebuild a mosque destroyed by arson in Joplin, Mo.; Muslim friends petitioned to free Alexander Aan, an atheist jailed in Indonesia; religious friends decried Pat Robertson's statement blaming atheists for the shooting in Wisconsin (following a trend of blaming atheists for tragedies such as this, an issue I explore in "Faitheist"); people of all different beliefs (atheists, Muslims, Sikhs, Zoroastrians, Pagans, Christians and others) joined me at a Sikh gurdwara for a memorial where we shed tears of mourning and of happiness. When a mosque in Illinois was shot at on Friday -- just two days after Rep. Joe Walsh said at a town hall meeting just 15 minutes away that there are Muslims in Illinois towns "trying to kill Americans every week" -- atheist and religious friends reached out to him and asked him to condemn this act as awful and un-American. So when naysayers claim that building bridges between different communities is impossible or a waste of time -- that it is not possible for atheists to be in solidarity with those who believe in sacred ground -- I am encouraged by the reality that we are improving the world through the stories and values we share and the actions we take together.

So to you, reader, I ask the question Eboo posed to me over a set of sandwiches: You have a story, and sharing it will help build a better world. Why not start now?

 

Follow Chris Stedman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChrisDStedman

FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayBall101
02:08 PM on 09/14/2012
God loves us.So,we must LOVE each other.Less is not more!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methodman
03:29 PM on 08/16/2012
The tiny religious mind is defending. That is the nature of religion. If a person's conversation only defends. I am wasting my time. I' don't get heard. I don't need to be a part of that myopic tent.

Other conversations no longer are in examples from pastors so that is what we do believe and is right to believe. I already am a wrong fit and so let's leave it at that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
03:29 PM on 08/16/2012
The bible is abhorant.Clearly the men have a problem with their sexuality.The way women are treated and the advise given to men on how to treat them is nothing short of criminal.Why any woman would want to have anything to do with christianity is far beyond me.
Case in point; the slide show today talked about things you do but are really a sin.One of them was the advise to cut off a wifes hand if she raises it in defence of her husband.Beyond this we are told not to pity her.I know that not all christians are literalists,but really,this kind of stuff is all through the bible.personally,i'd keep a healthy distance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methodman
03:25 PM on 08/16/2012
This is called focus on education get away from religion. The two are mutually exclusive. You can't have one with the other. I choose Education. I rebuke religion.
photo
Indigo1941
Time traveler.
01:39 PM on 08/16/2012
I am put in mind of the old-fashioned saying, "Polite people do not discuss politics or religion in public." Maybe it's time to bring that saying back into the public forum. We chatter too much about our deities and their presence or absence. Let's just let the metaphysical mist clear, please. Deities are well able to take care of themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
12:31 PM on 08/16/2012
As an athiest,i find it very difficult to even converse with beleivers.I find that they have a perspective that in no way can be reconciled with mine.Agreeing to disagree is the best i've been able to accomplish.At worst i end up hurting someones feelings.I can put my beleifs aside and live in peace and tolerance with beleivers,but i can't say that I've ever been able to have a fair fight with one.
12:25 AM on 08/16/2012
For me, my reticence about answering "yes" to the "why not now?" question is tied to the fact that, for so long, telling stories about (non)belief have been tied to efforts to (de)convert one's listeners. I'm a Christian, but many of my good friends are atheists, and I'm always worried that if I talk about my beliefs or faith practices it will be perceived as some sort of stealth conversion attempt.

However, as my faith has sometimes come up in spite of this ("my, you have a lot of books on Catholicism!" or "what are you doing this Sunday?"), I've found that ultimately my friends and colleagues understand that this is a conversation I want to have in good faith (no pun intended).

I'm also really interested in talking to my friends who are atheists or from faith traditions other than my own about what the lived experience of their (non)beliefs are like. So, if I can get to a point where everyone recognizes that they're having a conversation about seeking understand and common ground, that's great, but it can take some time to get there.
08:39 PM on 08/15/2012
" it demonstrates that we have a unique contribution to make to America's diverse religious landscape"

Atheism should not be looped in with the religious landscape of america. Mostly because it isn't a religion. I don't feel it is necessary to loop us in with people that believe in myths. We are human first and then some people believe in fantasy and a severe minority do not. So in that we are all humans that find ourselves on this planet at this point in time we can agree that some violence is not necessary and should be condemned, I agree this should be attempted. I don't think it is a good idea to try to link us to religion. Mostly because it gives the religious a false knowledge that atheism is merely another religion to ignore that isn't theirs.

We all have stories and we all want to build a better world. However are versions of that world are drastically different despite most wanting it to be peaceful. One wants a world based in science, empiricism, logic and rationality. The other wants to base it on what is left over when we knew little to nothing about the universe that surrounds us and what makes us, us. And is steeped in myth and superstitious, supercilious nonsense.

I do however look forward to reading your book in November.