iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chris Weigant

GET UPDATES FROM Chris Weigant
 

2012 Electoral Math -- Ups and Downs

Posted: 08/08/2012 9:27 pm

It's time once again to check in with the horse race and examine the math in the Electoral College, since it is (after all) the way we actually elect our presidents.

Since the last time we took such a snapshot, roughly three weeks ago, both candidates have shown some firming up of their positions, but the good news for both candidates is mixed with some softening as well.

First, let's take a look at the overall chart, which shows no nuance but rather how the election would go today if every single state poll out there was 100 percent correct (which would indeed be newsworthy, in and of itself). This graph charts percentage of the Electoral College for both candidates (blue for Obama, red for Romney):

Electoral Math By Percent

While an intital glance might lead you to believe Obama has jumped out far in front of Romney, I do caution everyone that this includes Florida in Obama's column, which I fully expect to flip back and forth throughout the campaign (and, at 29 electoral votes, is hugely significant).

Obama, at this point, has opened up the biggest lead yet, winning 61.7 percent of the total Electoral College vote (referred to in these columns as simply "EV"). Mitt Romney has fallen from 43.7 percent of the EV to a paltry 38.3 percent. Below 40 percent is dangerous territory for any candidate, it goes without saying, because it may leave too big a gap to close before Election Day.

But, as I said, Florida is the 800-pound gorilla here. The only difference between Obama's previous 56.3 percent and where he is today is the 29 EV to be found in Florida. While the overall picture has remained fairly stable, there has indeed been movement in the more micro examination of each candidate's strength in the states. As previously mentioned, this movement has been positive (in a way) for both candidates, and slightly negative (in another way) for both, as well.

To see this, we must delve deeper into the stats. Let's begin with the outlook for Mitt Romney:

Romney Electoral Math

[Definition of terms: Strong means 10 percent or better in the polls, Weak means 5 percent or better, and Barely is under 5 percent.]

Just to remind readers who may have missed the previous column in this series, the vertical lines in these charts represent the dates these columns have previously appeared upon. This provides an easy reference point for my analysis of the intervening period from the last Electoral Math column.

Let's take a look at Mitt Romney's position. Romney went overseas during this period, and was ridiculed by the American media for dissing the London Olympics -- as well as a few other gaffes from the rest of his trip to Israel and Poland. Harry Reid tossed one heck of a gauntlet down in front of Romney, daring Mitt to release further tax returns. Romney has so far resisted doing so, in an effort to turn the whole thing around on Harry Reid. It remains to be seen how this will play out with the undecided American voter, it bears pointing out.

As for the actual state-by-state numbers, Mitt Romney has stayed remarkably stable -- much more stable than John McCain in 2008. In fact, Romney's support is reminiscent of nothing more than Barack Obama's job approval numbers, which haven't appreciably changed in the last four or five months. Perhaps the American public has simply made up its mind on the entire election, and any further speculation on the part of pundits is completely and utterly unnecessary?

Well, of course, this column must reject this logic, because if accepted it would argue strongly for just wrapping the whole column series up altogether and going into the back yard to take a nap or something. Ahem.

Back to solid data, Mitt Romney lost Florida early on in this particular cycle (although, as I said, this should be considered as a large number of EV which could flip back at the drop of a hat). This brought his total EV numbers down. Later on, Romney firmed up two states in significant ways. Mitt got good news in a poll out of North Carolina at the beginning of August, which moved the state from Barely Romney to Weak Romney. Then a few days ago, a poll came out of Indiana that moved it from Weak Romney to Strong Romney. Unfortuantely for Mitt, while this did increase his base vote in the states he can probably count on in November, this totally erased the Barely category for him. To put it another way, Romney is firming up his support in certain states, but he has yet to convince any of the swing states to swing in his direction. At the very end, there was further movement which all but cancelled out this bump for Romney, as North Carolina moved back to Barely, and, somewhat surprisingly, Georgia moved from Strong to Weak for Romney.

So, even with this good news for Romney's camp, there is a fairly ugly lining to that silver cloud. Romney started this period with an overall total of 235 EV, but ended up (due to the Florida flip), with only 206 EV. Romney's key "Strong plus Weak" numbers moved upwards from 191 EV to 206 EV, but then fell back again at the end to 191 EV. Romney's Strrong numbers jumped from 144 to 155 EV -- a level John McCain would struggle to achieve throughout his entire campaign -- but then fell back even further to end at 139 EV.

Let's take a look at the similarly-mixed picture for Barack Obama:

Obama 2012 Electoral Math

Like Mitt Romney's chart, the overall "if the election were held today" picture for President Obama has only changed with the Florida flop. But within these numbers, Obama showed much more movement than his opponent, some of which was good news for Obama fans and some of which was not.

Obama got bad news in five states this time around, as New Mexico, Minnesota and Connecticut all moved from the Strong Obama column to Weak Obama. Wisconsin and Virginia weakened even further, moving from Weak to Barely Obama. Three states showed weakness, but then recovered, as Washington and New Jersey both moved from Strong to Weak, but then moved back to Strong. Pennsylvania moved from Weak to Barely, but then right back to Weak.

This was partially offset by two states that firmed up, as both Michigan and Ohio moved from Barely Obama to Weak Obama. But the biggest piece of good news for Obama's chart was the movement of Florida from Barely Romney to Weak Obama, although it fell back into Barely Obama to finish up.

On the chart, this all translated into a falling off of Obama's Strong numbers, with a limited recovery after the dip. At the same time, however, his Weak numbers improved and his Barely numbers filled in to leave the top line steady, after the addition of Florida. Obama's overall total went up from 303 to 332 EV, as a result of the Florida move. Obama's Strong numbers fell from 194 down to 146 EV, but then made gains to finish at 172 EV. The crucial "Strong Plus Weak" number moved upward for Obama from 256 until -- for the second time this cycle -- they topped the magic 270 EV needed to win, hitting a high of 288 EV before falling back to finish up at 267 EV. Which is still pretty close to 270 EV.

If every poll is accurate and the election were held today, Obama would gain 267 EV in states where he's running five points or better ahead of Romney. This would mean he would only need to win a single state from his Barely column -- even New Hampshire would do -- to gain a second term in the White House. So while the drop off in Strong states is a little concerning, Obama's overall Electoral Math picture is still quite rosy.

Since this column uses data only from Electoral-Vote.com, we always like to provide a check on the numbers from another poll-watching site run by Samuel Minter. Also, because his charts are cooler than mine. Here is his current chart, which combines all three of my above charts into one:

Abulsme.com chart

The purple line shows where the total stands, if it is above the green midpoint then the advantage is Obama's and if below, then the advantage is with Romney. Clicking on the chart above will take you to a page with a bigger image, or you can read Minter's most recent comments for a much more in-depth analysis than I manage to do. As I mentioned, Minter gathers data from multiple sources, and takes a much closer look at the numbers, state-by-state.

 

My Picks

To finish up, here is how I divide the states up at the moment. These picks take into account other factors than just raw poll numbers, which is a fancy way of saying sometimes my gut just overrules the numbers. Full lists of the states in each category and their EV totals are at the bottom, and we've added to the data section this time around a list of states which have not been polled at all this election cycle, as well as the states which have not been polled since the first of June. Most of these are extremely safe states for one side or the other, but the older the polling data the less it can be relied upon.

The three categories here are "Likely" for each candidate (broken down into "Safe" and "Probable") as well as a "Tossup" category (with "Leaning" for each candidate and a "Too Close To Call"). Got all that? Then let's get on with it, shall we?

 

Likely States -- Obama

Safe Obama (13 states, 172 EV)
Obama loses three states downwards here, as Minnesota, New Mexico, and Connecticut all drop back a notch. This reduces Obama's total Safe number by 22, leaving him with 172 EV here for now (see below for full list).

Probable Obama (7 states, 71 EV)
This category gains the three states which moved down from Safe, for a total of seven states. All of these seem to be holding firm for Obama, though, meaning none have moved any further down the list.

 

Likely States -- Romney

Safe Romney (18 states, 148 EV)
Arizona is now looking so strong for Romney that it has to be considered one of his Safe states. Offsetting this good news for Romney fans, however, we've got to move both South Dakota and Georgia down a notch, for now. These three moves mean Romney winds up losing one state and 8 EV in this category.

Probable Romney (5 states, 43 EV)
Like Obama, however, all this movement merely reshuffles the deck between these two categories. Romney now has five probable states, for a total of 43 EV.

 

Tossup States

Lean Obama (5 states, 47 EV)
Relying mostly on gut feeling for the final groups, there now seem to be five states leaning towards Obama, but not comfortably in his column quite yet. Colorado, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Wisconsin all didn't move this time around. Virginia seems weaker than before, so it has moved into the Too Close to Call group. At the same time, Iowa seems to be consistently leaning Obama, so it moves up to take Virginia's place. Because Virginia is bigger, this results in a net loss for Obama here of 7 EV.

Lean Romney (1 state, 15 EV)
No change here. North Carolina firmed up for Romney, but then right at the end fell back. Rather than moving it up to Probable, it has to still be seen as just a "leaner" for Romney.

Too Close To Call (2 states, 42 EV)
Which brings us to the true dart-at-the-wall category. Iowa, as mentioned, seems to be holding in the Obama column, so it moves up to Lean Obama for now (this could change with further polling, of course). Virginia, however, seems like it could be very close indeed, so it has moved into the "anybody's guess" group. Florida remains here as well, and will likely do so right up to Election Day.

 

Final Tally

In general, as state-level polling gets more frequent, we're going to see more movement between all the categories. Much of the movement we see this time around is likely due to polls being taken in states which have been mostly ignored up until this point, in fact. Call it setting a true baseline, before the national conventions kick off and election season really kicks off.

Mitt Romney is doing a remarkable job -- when compared to John McCain in 2008, at least -- of firming up his early support. Almost every state in his column is virtually a lock for him in November, now (shown by the disappearance of the light pink section of his chart). In 2008, McCain didn't even have 100 EV in his Strong column at this point, whereas Mitt Romney has already (briefly) broken through the 150 EV barrier.

The problem for Romney, however, is that other than swapping Florida's 29 EV back and forth with President Obama, he has yet to make any appreciable inroads among any of the other battleground states. He's doing well in North Carolina, but he's going to need more than that to have any chance of winning.

Barack Obama, conversely, is looking stronger and stronger in some very crucial states for Romney -- states like Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. If Obama easily picks up these three, it could deny Romney any plausible chance of putting together the winning 270. Especially if Obama takes Virginia, as well.

Counting up my personal picks right now, with no leaning or tossup states, both Romney and Obama have exactly the same number of easy wins as they previously did -- 243 EV for Obama, 191 EV for Romney. Obama maintains his 52 EV edge for the period. From all of the leaning and tossup states, Obama only needs 27 more electoral votes to cross the finish line, whereas Mitt Romney needs a whopping 79 electoral votes to deny Obama a second term.

 

[Electoral Vote Data:]
(State electoral votes are in parenthesis following each state's name. Washington D.C. is counted as a state)

Barack Obama Likely Easy Wins -- 20 States -- 243 Electoral Votes:

Safe States -- 13 States -- 172 Electoral Votes
California (55), Delaware (3), Hawaii (4), Illinois (20), Maine (4), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (11), New Jersey (14), New York (29), Rhode Island (4), Vermont (3), Washington D.C. (3), Washington (12)

Probable States -- 7 States -- 71 Electoral Votes
Connecticut (7), Michigan (16), Minnesota (10), Nevada (6), New Mexico (5), Oregon (7), Pennsylvania (20)

 

Mitt Romney Likely Easy Wins -- 23 States -- 191 Electoral Votes:

Safe States -- 18 States -- 148 Electoral Votes
Alabama (9), Alaska (3), Arizona (11), Arkansas (6), Idaho (4), Kansas (6), Kentucky (8), Louisiana (8), Mississippi (6), Nebraska (5), North Dakota (3), Oklahoma (7), South Carolina (9), Tennessee (11), Texas (38), Utah (6), West Virginia (5), Wyoming (3)

Probable States -- 5 States -- 43 Electoral Votes
Georgia (16), Indiana (11), Missouri (10), Montana (3), South Dakota (3)

 

Tossup States -- 8 States -- 104 Electoral Votes:

Tossup States Leaning Obama -- 5 States -- 47 Electoral Votes
Colorado (9), Iowa (6), New Hampshire (4), Ohio (18), Wisconsin (10)

Tossup States Leaning Romney -- 1 State -- 15 Electoral Votes
North Carolina (15)

Too Close To Call -- 2 States -- 42 Electoral Votes
Florida (29), Virginia (13)

 

Polled, but no polling data since the primaries:
(States which have not been polled since the beginning of June, with the dates of their last poll)

Georgia (5/22), Maryland (5/21), Nebraska (5/13), Oklahoma (5/10), Rhode Island (2/22), South Carolina (1/13), Tennessee (5/9), Texas (5/13), Vermont (2/22), and West Virginia (4/28).

No polling data at all, yet:
(States which have not been polled so far this year):

Alaska, Arkansas, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Washington D.C., Wyoming

 

Electoral Math Column Series Archive:

[Jun 25] [Jul 18]

 

Chris Weigant blogs at:
ChrisWeigant.com

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant
Become a fan of Chris on The Huffington Post

 

 
 
 

Follow Chris Weigant on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChrisWeigant

FOLLOW POLITICS
It's time once again to check in with the horse race and examine the math in the Electoral College, since it is (after all) the way we actually elect our presidents. Since the last time we took such a...
It's time once again to check in with the horse race and examine the math in the Electoral College, since it is (after all) the way we actually elect our presidents. Since the last time we took such a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
02:20 PM on 08/10/2012
Iowa may have slipped into the too close to call column. ;-(
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
12:20 PM on 08/09/2012
If CO, FL, WI, VA and NH go for Romney, which can happen with a swing of only a couple of points, then Romney wins.

We Obama supporters may be a little bit too electorally cocky.
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
07:09 PM on 08/09/2012
You can add Iowa to that list too
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
11:42 AM on 08/09/2012
For starters, I really look forward to each new installment of Electoral Math. Three weeks since the last? - time flies WYHF!

Graph 2 & 3. Romney's opportunities never cross the 270 threshold, Obama's consistently do. This is a very big hole for Romney to get out of.

CW Safe Obama states: Yes indeedy, I rate them all 95% or better for Obama. CW Safe Romney states: Flip slide of Obama safe states, 5% or less for Obama.

CW Obama Probables: I rate CT, MI, MN, NM, OR as very, very probable, 90% Obama. PA 75% or better. NV 60% CW Romney Probables: I rate these about as grim for Obama as the Romney "safes." Verrry safe.

I'm pretty much in agreement with the rest of the CW assessments of leaners and too close to calls.

Overall, I see the meta trends over the past three weeks breaking out of pure noise and going up for Obama, down for Romney.

Intangibles: Sun Tzu advised looking at the enemy's banners. I see the Red flags drooping, there is a lot of public recrimination in the Republican camp. I rarely (actually never) agree with Ann Coulter, but I think she got it right on nominating Romney. Nobody outside the Romney family genuinely likes Romney....he manufactures loathing.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Grada3784
Dogmatic Dictators, believers or not, not welcome
10:17 AM on 08/09/2012
Wake me up Nov. 1. I'd rather miss all the Republican Obama-Hitler comparisons, Obama is a Kenyan Muslim, Obama married a man, Obama declares war on religion etc. As well as the plasticity of the Mitt Romney Ken doll who won't release his tax forms.. As well as christian churches that want to set up concentration camps for gays or christian groups that want to kidnap children of gays for the Lord.

All we'll get between now and Nov. 1 is filth, so why bother?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allene Stucki
08:32 AM on 08/09/2012
When the last gaffe has been proclaimed, and the dust finally settles, the white folks will split down the middle, maybe plus 2 points for Romney, the Black folks will split 99 - 1 for Obama, and the brown folks will split 75 - 25 for Obama - Obama wins.

(Chris, take a lesson in the virtues of brevity.)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
01:27 PM on 08/09/2012
Allene Stucki -

I would reply in full, but unlike the column area, there is a word limit in these comments.

Heh.

-CW
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
06:22 AM on 08/09/2012
Chris, are you feeling ok? This is two columns in a row I have been in complete agreement with you. I guess it is hard to disagree with numbers.

What is interesting though is the large amount of "barely" and "weak" Obama Support when compared to the Romney side. If Romney gets a good Convention Bump and Debates well he should be able to swing some of that.

He has not been running ads as much as Obama yet, but is gathering his money chests until the Convention. I think after the Convention the ad wars and rhetoric heats up and those leaning states start swinging.

He has a great line up for the convention.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gurukalehuru
cwtc7
09:29 AM on 08/09/2012
A great lineup for the convention? Santorum? Walker? Priebus? It will play well within the hall but I don't think it's going to inspire the audience viewing it at home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
11:12 AM on 08/09/2012
Martinez (NM), Halley, (SC) Condi Rice, Scott (FL) , Huckabee

Be prepared for some outstanding speakers!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
FlamingLibrul
10:30 AM on 08/09/2012
I find it interesting a proud military officer is supporting a draft-dodging hypocritical coward- but what's really telling is you have no concrete policy platform on which to base your support for Mr. Moneybags. Besides your hypothetical wish-list that has already been debunked. Not Being Obama is not going to (legitimately) win an election.

Thank you for your service in any case. I hope you returned safe and sound from any time you may have spent in the desert.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
01:07 PM on 08/09/2012
I find it interesting that you would bring up Romney not serving when Obama did not serve? Further are you claiming that Military service makes a Better president?

Reagan, Bush the elder, Bush the Younger and Carter all served while Obama And Clinton did not. Are you claiming that Bush's and Reagan are better then Clinton and Obama because they served?

Romney has very clear and specific policies he wants to implement on multiple issues compared to the Failure that was Obama for the last 4 years.

I agree with Romney policies on just about everything and disagree with Obama on almost everything.

I disagree with both of them on allowing same sex couples to marry, since both say they will do nothing about it, but do not think that issue is as important as the economy and energy policy positions of the two men.

AS for you calling Romney a Coward I wonder if YOU served and where or are you being hypocritical? We know Obama did not serve in the Military. And while I agree with his attacks on Al-Q in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Yemen, his cutting the Military budget so severely I do not agree with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
05:41 AM on 08/09/2012
It really amazes me that noone in the MSM is talking about the relatively HUGE lead Obama has in projected Electoral College votes. On the other hand, I suppose it's a good thing as the appearance of a close race should ensure a good overall voter turnout, which will certainly help the overall effort of Democrats in Nov. After all, he White House is just one of the prizes up for grabs...
RaymondAlt
Tamperin with mailboxes is a felony offense
08:29 AM on 08/09/2012
Let me dispel your amazement - the MSM needs to make it sound like it will be close. Otherwise their ratings would drop due to lack of interest. This would effect the ad revenue they can generate which is their PRIMARY purpose. Thats why the MSM is awful - it has to cater to the mass market which is why we are bombarded with idiotic content. Listen to them discuss issues that are extremely complex like the Middle East - they sum up and solve the all the problems of all the countries in the region in a soundbite because their target audience needs to be spoon fed facile arguements
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
02:34 PM on 08/09/2012
Yes, I get that. But it's not like they're not talking about it much, they're pretty much not talking about it at ALL. Other than this article, I can really only think of one other substantial piece I've seen on it in the last couple of months. I would certainly expect to hear it from a Rachel Maddow or Laurence whathisname on MSNBC. Every once in a while Steve Ratner comes on MSNBC and gives some relevant numbers but it's always very low key. I just find it strange...perhaps I am just not cynical enough about the entirety of the MSM. Things like this could change that....
Thanks for taking the time to reply....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
01:18 PM on 08/09/2012
Josh Crawford -

There was one article in... um, Time? Newsweek?... (can't remember) in the past week which did point out the EC advantage Obama's got. Google "landslide" which was prominently in the title, I believe.

But mostly, horserace following is more fun for the national media, I guess. At least they're paying a bit more attention to the state-by-state breakdown this time around -- you see less weight being given to "national polling" which is a good thing. National polls aren't how we elect presidents, and I've always been astonished that so few people really "get" this in the media.

-CW
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
02:29 PM on 08/09/2012
Was that Michael Tomasky's piece from the Daily Beast ("The Coming Obama Landslide"?

"In other words, Obama can lose the big Eastern four—Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida: all of ’em!—and still be reelected....The bottom line is that of the dozen or so key swing states, Romney leads only in one: North Carolina. And that lead developed only over the summer."
Tomasky uses a lot of info from Nate Silver which I find to be very informative and interesting....I especially like his charts on projected EVs (303 for Obama, 235 for Romney) and EV distribution (including a good chance of Obama getting as many as 330 EVs).
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/author/nate-silver/

As Mr. Tomasky pointed out, "Sure, something big could happen to alter the dynamic completely", but as he also acknowledged, time is running out on Mr. Romney. Fingers crossed.

Thanks for once again putting good info out there Chis.
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
01:06 AM on 08/09/2012
Maybe Colorado should be in the too close to call column,
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
01:15 PM on 08/09/2012
Mildmannered -

Yeah, most of this was written Tuesday night, and adjusted Wed. morning. The new CO polls weren't out at that point. Now, I'd place CO as "Too Close To Call"...

-CW