More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chris Weigant

GET UPDATES FROM Chris Weigant
 

Republican Field Shaping Up

Posted: 05/24/11 12:16 PM ET

Less than two weeks ago, I first wrote about the Republican field of candidates for the upcoming 2012 presidential primary season. Somehow, it seems a lot longer ago than that, because of all the activity since -- which has included many surprises as to who will and who will not be running.

With all this frantic jumping in and out of the race, I thought it was time to take another look at the Republican field to see how it is shaping up. At this point, there are only a few holdouts left on the sidelines, as most of the bigwigs (and some decidedly "smallwigs") have made their intentions known.

Within each of the rather broad categories below, the names are presented alphabetically, to avoid showing any sort of favoritism. For a full list of who isn't running and who has even been mentioned, see my previous column (as time goes on, we'll be paying less and less attention to people who simply have no chance whatsoever).

 

Not Running

This is where most of the surprising news comes from, as the people who have made a formal announcement in the past few weeks to declare their candidacy were all widely expected to run (no surprise there, in other words). The Republican field opened up considerably with the news that the following three people had decided against a run.

Mitch Daniels -- To the dismay of many Republican pundits and much of the Republican Party establishment, Mitch Daniels announced (in the middle of the night) that his wife and daughters had vetoed his ambitions to run for the highest office in the land. Daniels was seen by much of the Washington Republican chattering class as their best hope for the general election campaign against President Obama. Daniels was seen as the ultimate guy on a white charger who could ride in to save the day, but now it looks like that white horse will have to be ridden by someone else (if anyone -- that horse might just stay in the stable this time around).

Mike Huckabee -- Out of the three announcements from people who have decided not to run, Mike Huckabee's may eventually have the most impact on the primary race. Unlike the other two, Huckabee not only has run a national campaign before, but he started with fairly solid support in the Republican voter base. He could quite easily have won two of the four early primary/caucus states (Iowa and South Carolina), and was regularly polling in the top three among Republican voters nationwide. But Huckabee is happy with his new job at Fox News, and is going to take a pass on the campaign this time around.

Donald Trump -- [Cue: "Money Money Money Money" theme music.] To the dismay of late-night comedians everywhere, Donald Trump decided not to toss his hat in the ring. While I mistakenly expected Huckabee to make a run, I called the Trump situation exactly right. Two weeks ago, I wrote: "The only reason Trump doesn't rate the top tier is that I really don't think he's going to make a serious run. Oh, sure, he may make some sort of wild announcement on the season finale of his reality show, but I think his entire 'candidacy' is nothing more than a bargaining tool to be used with NBC, during next year's Apprentice contract negotiations." Which is about all that needs to be said about The Donald, at this point.

 

White Horses

We're slightly revamping our categories this time around, because of the new dynamics of the race. With Huckabee and Daniels out, the hue and cry among establishment Republicans for someone to ride up on a white horse and save the 2012 nomination race from itself is only going to grow louder and louder, at least for the next few months. Most of these people are swearing up and down that they have absolutely no intention of running, and that wild horses (no matter what color) couldn't drag them into the race. But their names are going to be on a lot of radars, so we'll very briefly list them here:

Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, Rudy Giuliani, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan.

Of these, Bush, Christie, and Ryan are the three whose names are getting mentioned most frequently. All three have repeatedly said they are not running, and will not run under any circumstances. But, in politics, such statements can easily be disavowed later -- and the pressure is on all three from certain Republican circles to mount up that white charger and gallop into the fray, so we'll see if any of them are persuadable.

 

Dark Horses

This category might have been called "no chance whatsoever," but we thought "dark horses" was more polite. Eventually, this category will be dropped altogether, but is included here for completeness' sake. I gave slightly more detail on each of these in my previous column, but I'm just going to provide a list of them today. Some of these people are definitely running, some have just expressed interest in possibly running, but (at this point) none of these people is going to win the Republican nomination. The full list of dark horses, so far:

John Bolton, Gary Johnson, Fred Karger, Andy Martin, Jimmy McMillan, Roy Moore, Rick Perry, Buddy Roemer.

 

The "B" Team

Which brings us to the top two categories -- the candidates with a real chance at winning the nomination race. Deciding who was in the top tier and who remained secondary was hard to do this time around, because there haven't been any national candidate polls reported since the eighth of May -- a lifetime ago in political news. Watching the polls is going to be very interesting now that the field is truly settling down, because it will be fascinating to see where the Huckabee and Daniels voters migrate to in the coming weeks. But without hard data, at this point we can only guess. This has left us with a large "B" team, and a very small group of frontrunners -- which is almost certain to change when the poll numbers come in.

Michele Bachmann -- Bachmann has not yet announced whether she's running or not, so there's a case to be made for including her name among the white horses. But she shows every indication of running, so for the time being we're just going to assume she's in. Bachmann's natural base overlaps almost perfectly with one other person's, who has also not announced her intentions. If Sarah Palin jumps in the race, then Bachmann may have serious second thoughts about running in 2012, but if Palin stays out, then my guess is that Bachmann will formally become a candidate.

Herman Cain -- Cain formally announced he's in the race, which was no surprise as he's already participated in a televised Republican debate. Cain could benefit from Huckabee staying out of the race, and he could easily become the Tea Party favorite if Bachmann and Palin either don't run or damage their candidacies in some unforeseen way. For now, though, he's still a longshot. It'll be interesting to see if Cain soon shows a bump in the polling, though.

Jon Huntsman -- Huntsman has also indicated he's in the race, to absolutely nobody's surprise. The Obama White House, in particular, has been expecting him to run since about 2008 (which is why they made him Ambassador to China). Huntsman is one of two people in the "B" category who may soon move up to the frontrunners, if the pundits are to be believed. Huntsman could easily occupy the space Mitch Daniels was supposed to be in, at least with the Republican establishment -- who is looking for a candidate moderate enough to actually win in a general election, and not just the primaries. But it remains to be seen whether Huntsman -- who is not widely known outside the Beltway -- will catch on with the Republican primary voters. Working for Obama is going to be a pretty big hurdle for him to get over with many of them.

Ron Paul -- Due to public outcry from my last article, I've moved Paul up to the "B" team from the "dark horse" category. I still don't think he's got much of a chance, but with Huckabee and Daniels out of the race, Paul's polling numbers are strong enough (at this point) to justify him a valid shot at the nomination. He's polling better than several others on this "B" list, so it's only fair to include him here this time around.

Tim Pawlenty -- Pawlenty has been described as the "Michael Dukakis of the race," which I'm sure he wasn't happy to hear. The reference is to being the "last man standing" -- the one candidate seen by the voters as not as flawed as the rest of the field. Pawlenty has ratcheted up his rhetoric to Tea Party levels of frenzy, but it still hasn't done him much good in the polls (which are, to be fair, completely out of date at this point). But Pawlenty could benefit enormously from Daniels pulling out of the race, if he's seen as the only candidate acceptable to moderate Republican donors. If Huntsman is seen as unacceptable (because he worked for Obama), then Pawlenty could become the semi-official "establishment" candidate. By doing so, Pawlenty could easily vault into the frontrunner group. But he's still got a long way to go in terms of firing up voters in any significant way.

Rick Santorum -- Santorum is teetering on the edge of being sent down to the "dark horse" category. His name is rarely mentioned when pundits discuss the race, and he has never gained any degree of support in the polls. His chances, at this point, have to be seen as the longest of longshots.

 

Frontrunners

There are three frontrunners, at the moment (we changed this category from "Top Tier," to continue the annoying "horserace" metaphor). One of them isn't yet in the race, and may not even run.

Newt Gingrich -- Newt's foibles over the past two weeks could fill volumes, so we're just going to take a quick overview. Gingrich had what one pundit recently described as "the worst first week in a campaign I've ever seen." But while everyone is writing Newt's entire campaign off as dead, what a lot of people haven't grasped is that Gingrich isn't just good under fire, he absolutely thrives on being the center of adversity. There's another interesting thing about what Newt has been saying the past two Sundays that few have noticed -- Newt is positioning himself as the moderate centrist in the Republican Party. Anyone who remembers Newt's term as Speaker of the House will be stunned to hear this, since Newt prided himself on being the most radical of the radical Republicans back then. But the Republican Party has shifted significantly since then. Lost in all the Republican recriminations over Newt's choice of words is that he's staking out a position in the middle, which may actually appeal to a lot of independent voters. Listening to Newt speak on Meet The Press a week ago and Face The Nation yesterday was like listening to a candidate in a general election, not a primary. If Newt keeps this strategy up, it will be interesting to see what the Republican primary voters think. More of them than many pundits expect may want to hear someone say "we've got to meet in the middle." Positioning himself in the center may be seen later as politically suicidal or politically brilliant. But, true to form for Newt, it certainly is risky.

Sarah Palin -- Palin's been pretty quiet through all the hoopla over the past few weeks. But at this point, she's got to be looking at the Republican field shaping up and thinking to herself: "I could beat those guys!" With Huckabee and Trump out of the race, Palin is one of only three or four people left who have shown they can even consistently break ten percent in the polling. That's a pretty low bar, to be sure, but it has been a fairly crowded field. Now that the field is thinning out, Palin's chances look better and better. But nobody knows the answer to the "Will she or won't she?" question, at this point. She's being pretty coy, although she did recently admit she's got plenty of "fire in the belly" should she decide to go for it. Palin is unique among those who haven't declared their candidacy yet, though, because she could enter the race quite late and still have a huge impact. So Sarah may be content to sit back and watch the game play out, at least for the next few weeks. The White House would dearly like Palin to run, I should mention. An unidentified Obama campaign staffer was recently quoted saying "Unless it's Palin or Gingrich, we expect a very close race no matter who emerges." Which covers two out of three of our frontrunners, at this point.

Mitt Romney -- The one true heavyweight in the race is Mitt Romney. Mitt's been seriously running for president since the morning after the 2008 election. Romney is the "next in line" for the Republican nomination, which is how the party usually chooses its nominee. Everyone is saying "this year will be different," but the Republican rule of thumb may prove to be correct once again. Romney did two things of note in the past few weeks. He gave a speech desperately trying to create some daylight between "Obamacare" and "Romneycare," without much noticeable success. Republicans did give him some credit for not flip-flopping on the issue, but they still don't like his stance. In fact, the entire rest of the primary race at this point seems to be a frantic search for "Anyone But Romney." But Romney also flexed his political muscle a week ago, when he held a one-day fundraiser that pulled in over ten million dollars. That's an impressive haul for so early in the race, and for a single day's fundraising. There are two races being run right now -- one in public with the voters, and one in private with the financiers. Mitt showed how strong his money-raising abilities are, which may cause some party regulars to give him a second look.

 

Chris Weigant blogs at:
ChrisWeigant.com

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant
Become a fan of Chris on The Huffington Post

 

 
 
 

Follow Chris Weigant on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChrisWeigant

Less than two weeks ago, I first wrote about the Republican field of candidates for the upcoming 2012 presidential primary season. Somehow, it seems a lot longer ago than that, because of all the act...
Less than two weeks ago, I first wrote about the Republican field of candidates for the upcoming 2012 presidential primary season. Somehow, it seems a lot longer ago than that, because of all the act...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 118
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:33 PM on 05/25/2011
The Winning Obama campaign strategy: I let my opponents speak.

It's that simple... just ask them about any real issue, and let them open their mouths. It's enough to guarantee his re-election.
09:23 AM on 05/25/2011
The difference between Ron Paul and the rest of the candidates?

Ron Paul has read the Constitution.

Ron Paul 2012
photo
iconoclast6
This is my BOOM stick!
05:36 PM on 05/24/2011
The RNC is pushing Romney and the Base wants a shiny bauble. Too funny!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NebDem78
Protector of Herland
05:22 PM on 05/24/2011
I agree that Mitt is the "true heavyweight" in this field. The question now is how will that 'big tent' accommodate him? There will be a big debate in that tent when they are forced to realize that he is the best chance at looking presentable in the 2012 election. Will they prefer to save face, or, will his religion be too much of an issue?
05:46 PM on 05/24/2011
Klingons are so skeptical. But so am I. I don't think it is just his religion. Much of that big tent, the Ferengi for example, is opposed to "socialized medicine".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NebDem78
Protector of Herland
06:30 PM on 05/24/2011
That is a good point. By warming to Romney will they place themselves at odds with their more ardent constituents? Since, the Health Care issue is the only firm ideological objection to Obama's plan that the Conservatives have. Would it be wise of them to close that gap in Health Care by going with Romney to have a broader appeal to the electorate?
Or, will they distance themselves from Romney and use his stance on Health Care to mask their differences with his religion? I'm guessing that they will prefer the latter.

Mitt is the best candidate for a broader appeal, but the way it seems to be going is that they do not at this point want to acknowledge that writing on the wall.

It seems that the RNC has been forming the narrative for the up-coming election. They have been making hay with their stance on food-stamps, they already have issue with Health Care, but what will they say about immigration? I'm certain they will rely on the nativist sentiment going down the stretch.
04:35 PM on 05/24/2011
Newt Gingrich? He has just polled at the bottom. I don't think he'll get any votes in the primaries at all. His ideas are from 20 years ago, and it shows.
03:59 PM on 05/24/2011
Full disclosure: I consider myself an independent with no loyalty whatsoever to either party.

Sarah Palin is missing her calling. She should be the RNC Chair. She's fantastic at raising money. She knows how to get the Republican base excited and motivated. Lots of Republicans like her on a personal level and consider her "good people." She's obviously driven and a tireless worker. She "resonates" with many Republicans.

On the other hand, the idea that she'd be the one to answer the 3am phone call makes democrats and independents quite nervous, and any President needs to win some of both of those groups. Foreign policy is not one of her strong points.

Given where her strengths and weaknesses lie, she'd help her party best by organizing, fund-raising, agitating, motivating, etc...

-Card-Carrying American
http://cardcarryingamerican.blogspot.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Card-Carrying-American/149565408390518
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
04:54 PM on 05/24/2011
Card-Carrying American -

I'm no Palin fan, but I have to say this is an intelligent and interesting idea. Palin as RNC chair might actually be a good fit, for the reasons you name. And, if she were contemplating, say, running in 2016 rather than this time around, it would increase her heft within the party.

Excellent comment, even if (like I said) I'm no Palin fan.

-CW
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
09:25 PM on 05/24/2011
I don't see her wanting to belong to the Old Guard machine.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rosalee Harris
03:38 PM on 05/24/2011
Its shaping up into a disaster of epic propoprtions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antipodal2u
Just say NO to hypocrisy
03:32 PM on 05/24/2011
Shaping up? Letting themselves go is more like it. 2 exceptions, Ron Paul and Rubio
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
02:56 PM on 05/24/2011
I'm seeing libs beginning to make the same mistake they always do. Instead of evaluating the numbers that prospective Republican candidates are pulling against Obama, focus on Obama's numbers. Among "likely voters" (who actually show up on election day), he's averaging in the forties against the Republican names that are being bandied about.  And they haven't even begun to speak to the country. Obama, on the other hand, is front and center, 24/7. And he still doesn't pass the 50% mark against any of them. Not even against Michelle Bachman, whom he only gets to 49% with. Think about that.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
04:51 PM on 05/24/2011
Chris1962 -

OK, let's take a look.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html

RealClearPolitics numbers from polls taken this month:

Obama v. Romney -- Obama by 5-13 points
Obama v. Pawlenty -- Obama +14-18
Obama v. Gingrich -- Obama +14-18
Obama v. Bachmann -- Obama +21-22
Obama v. Palin -- Obama +17-21
Obama v. Paul -- Obama +7 (only one poll, pre-OBL death)
Obama v. Huntsman -- Obama +21 (only one poll)

But, having typed all that out, two things. One, the polls have yet to catch up with the new parameters of the Republican field. In particular, Trump and Huckabee pulling out is going to redistribute a lot of voters (T and H were in the top three in most polls, previously). So the situation is quite volatile right now among Republicans. Two, to be fair, Obama's having his best polling month ever (in terms of improving his standing) because of the OBL bump. So this month's polls will likely be a spike. In 2-3 months, we'll see how things stand.

I'll get into the "Obama v. GOP candidate" thing later in the race, I promise, but for now I'm just concentrating on the race within the Republican Party.

-CW
05:29 PM on 05/24/2011
Right on, Where in the heck does "chris 1962" get his info. Oh wait, I know FAUX NOISE
06:56 PM on 05/24/2011
Thanks for supplying the rest of the story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
02:34 PM on 05/24/2011
Boy, what a sad field. If Romney is their best hope, they've got no hope. Flip-flopping Mormon isn't going to get him past the primary. He won't make it to the nomination if the far right has their way. Huntsman may seem reasonable but he's got working with Obama and being Mormon in his way. And, they're too mild mannered for the far right, too. How much did Romney spend last time? I think it was about 100 million and he got 1 (?) electoral vote? It was bad. Evangelicals vote in greater percentages in primaries and they won't vote for anyone who isn't a member of their cult.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
02:54 PM on 05/24/2011
Romney was the second place candidate for the Republican primary. 1 electoral vote? You only get electoral votes in a general election. He got convention delegates and a lot of them.

Of course by the time it got to the later states the primary election had already been decided for McCain so it really didn't matter.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
04:41 PM on 05/24/2011
tinsldr2 -

This time around, GOP primaries will award their delegates proportionally before March, unlike the winner-take-all plan they went with last time. This means second and third place candidates will likely stay in the race a bit longer this time around. I don't think the GOP primary calendar is set yet, it's going to be interesting to see which states go first...

-CW
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ann Oid
02:32 PM on 05/24/2011
The Detroit News reports today that Thad McCotter is contemplating a run. He would be interesting...he did a great speech in support of the auto bailout (hey, it's Michigan--even the Repubs have to deal with that) so has a shot with traditional Democratic union types. But otherwise seems to toe the conservative line, and is the complete opposite of "telegenic"
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
04:39 PM on 05/24/2011
Ann Old -

I had him down in the "Sheer Speculation" column two weeks ago. Do you think he's serious?

-CW
05:32 PM on 05/24/2011
Thad McCotter, who in the heck is that ???? If the GOP is digging that deep in the ditch they might as well all go home.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwinps
01:48 PM on 05/24/2011
The "Republican Field Shaping Up" is actually quite humorous. The last time I checked, "shaping up" meant that one was getting into good physical form. I guess this means that the Republican fields shape-up will look more like a "before-before" picture than a "before-after" picture.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
04:37 PM on 05/24/2011
jwinps -

Heh. OK, that made me laugh. Didn't really mean it that way, but that's the danger of writing your own headlines....

How about: "Republican Field Becomes Less Nebulous"?

:-)

-CW
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwinps
07:54 PM on 05/24/2011
Hi Chris! Sorry, my comment wasn't meant to be critical of your headline! I actually think it's appropriate. Their "shaping up" is actually quite comical. They just can't ssem to get it together.
01:42 PM on 05/24/2011
Jon Huntsman seems like the only viable candidate to me, but then I'm not a rightwinger. I wouldn't vote for him, but it wouldn't kill me to see him as President. He's the only R I can say that about. For that reason alone, I'd say he has no chance to win the nom. The right only eats nutcake.
05:34 PM on 05/24/2011
He just endorsed the Ryan "couponcare " plan, is that something you could really live with. I'm 76 and I could tell you a thing or rwo about medical bills and how vital medicare is to you..
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
09:28 PM on 05/24/2011
I get the funny feeling that a guy from Obama's administration is not gonna fly with conservatives.
10:45 PM on 05/24/2011
Thanks, Chris. I'm glad to hear that. Considering Huntsman is probably the only R who had a chance in the general, and the only one who has the proper demeanor to ever be president, I'm comforted to know your wingnuts will make sure he gets nowhere near the nomination.
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
01:32 PM on 05/24/2011
wRong Paul belongs in the Dark Horse category. If spam counted on election day, his chances would improve.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
01:30 PM on 05/24/2011
9/11 Rudy is going to ride up on a white horse and save the GOP? LOL!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
04:34 PM on 05/24/2011
JohnFromCensornati -

Hey, it's politics. Stranger things have happened...

Heh.

-CW
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
04:44 PM on 05/24/2011
I think that OBL's death put the nail in Rudy's coffin. All he's got left is his very unappealing personality.