iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Christian Piatt

GET UPDATES FROM Christian Piatt
 

'Christian Parenting' Ideas to Let Go Of

Posted: 07/23/2012 9:08 am

I've been thinking about Christian parenting lately, and more specifically, how that looks different today than maybe in the past. When I started thinking back to scripture, my mind first wandered to several "what not to do" stories, which abound in the Bible. For example:

  • Don't pass out drunk before securing your loincloth first (See: Noah)
  • Don't hand over your virgin daughters to an angry mob to be gang-raped (See: Lot)
  • Don't lay your son out on top of a big rock and attempt to sacrifice him to God (See: Abraham)

I could go on, but you get the idea. There's plenty of fodder for sub-par parenting in the Good Book if we want to find it. But based on the examples of Christian parenting I see in more contemporary culture, the things we'd be best to move beyond are a little subtler (sometimes anyway) than the examples above.

Consider James Dobson's (former head of Focus on the Family) writing on raising children. He advocates corporal punishment, placing the male as the "head of the household," and other advice that makes a guy like me cringe. And interestingly, a lot of the differences I have with traditional (some might say "evangelical") Christian parenting parallel my differences in how to approach Christian community all together.

In that light, here are five habits, often attributed to "Christian parenting" values, that I'd just as soon replace with something new:

Beatings will continue until morale improves. Though physical violence is a shortcut to compliance, it sends the wrong message to our kids. We say as Christians that our core values center on mercy, love, grace and compassion, so where exactly does corporal punishment fit in this? Some will contend that sparing the rod spoils the child, but the Hebrew word (shebet) often translated as "rod" can also be translated as "authority." In this sense, we can interpret that the author of Proverbs (from which this 12th century phrase seems to come from) may have meant that if we don't use our wisdom, authority and influence to guide our children's lives, they will likely be lost.

Because I said so. This style of parenting is a bit like being in the middle of a theological debate and throwing down the "The Bible says it; I believe it; that settles it" trump card. True respect doesn't come from browbeating or intimidating someone into compliance or silence. It comes from living the example you preach, and in doing so, illuminating a path your children -- and perhaps even others -- desire to follow.

Father is King. This certainly isn't limited to Christian households (my dad was an atheist and ascribed to this ethos), but it's certainly prevalent within lots Christian families. From Promise Keepers to the Family Research Council and Focus on the Family, there are many faith-based groups that base their family values on the establishment and maintenance of a clear, hierarchic order. Everyone knows their role, their place, and that the dad is ultimately in charge. Yet in Galatians, Paul says that as Christians such labels and hierarchies should fall away. If, instead, the principles of the Greatest Commandment (Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind; Love your neighbor as yourself) are placed at the head of any family, the rest falls into its proper place.

Sex is dirty; save it for marriage. We Christians have such a screwed up relationship with sex and sexuality, it's a wonder we keep finding a way to reproduce at all! From Eve to Bathsheba and Delilah, we delight in paining the woman as the sexual temptress who leads men astray, as if we have no control over ourselves. And from this, any number efforts to oppress the rights and identities of women emerge. But guess what? We're still clueless when it comes to sex. We tell our kids about how scary, dirty, dangerous and evil even thinking about sex is, but then we tell them it's precious gift to save for the one person you love and plan to live with forever. This is a setup for sexual confusion, guilt and even sexual addiction or abuse later in life.

Think like me when you grow up. Many Christians say that their faith is all about a personal relationship with Christ, trumpet the primacy of free will and love to quote scriptures about "seek and you shall find." But not when it comes to our kids. We feel the need to force-feed our notion of the faith on them far too often, rather than trusting that, given the chance, they will find God on their own terms as they come to understand it. More often than not, it seems at least within my generation, the didactic forcible approach to raising kids in the Christian faith causes them to run the other direction as soon as they're able. How many millions more will it take walking away from Christianity forever before we finally wake up and realize that maybe we're part of the problem?

 
 
 

Follow Christian Piatt on Twitter: www.twitter.com/christianpiatt

FOLLOW RELIGION
I've been thinking about Christian parenting lately, and more specifically, how that looks different today than maybe in the past. When I started thinking back to scripture, my mind first wandered to ...
I've been thinking about Christian parenting lately, and more specifically, how that looks different today than maybe in the past. When I started thinking back to scripture, my mind first wandered to ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 714
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
08:06 PM on 07/31/2012
Some of the best parents (great parenting skills) teach love as in the new testament. They don't go to church because the "formal" church promotes hatred: Don't think like me = you'll go to hell, Don't worship like me = you'll go to hell.

I've worked in the church for over 30 years.... most of the parishioners are NOT CHRISTIAN.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KSU Dem
12:01 AM on 08/02/2012
As a former Protestant, now Catholic convert, I'd have to say there is no fire and brimstone in the Catholic Church, I'm not sure if I've ever heard hell mentioned in church. I try not to judge who's a Christians (though I do spot hypocrites.... they tend to look a lot like me). Believing in Jesus is easy, understanding him is harder, but actually following him in all things.... I wish. Jesus is like the North Star. You can follow it but you'll never get there.
08:21 AM on 08/02/2012
Understood. I find that the ROMAN catholic church is very evil. A society of an inner circle that do not allow other christians to participate.

Catholic = all people who believe in Jesus

So the ROMAN catholic church is very un-christian. Hide the priest who break the laws (pedofiles). Women as 2nd class citizens. Stance on contracption is stone-aged thinking.
Carroll27
Nature's own nice conservative
04:23 PM on 07/31/2012
Question: Why do atheists who want to point out the flaws of Christianity also refer to the Old Testament to do so? Don't they know that we view everything in the OT with fresh eyes as taught by Christ?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Grada3784
Dogmatic Dictators, believers or not, not welcome
10:50 AM on 08/01/2012
Hardly all christians, especially with regard to gays.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Anonymous
Mumpsimus, I am not entertained!
03:02 PM on 08/01/2012
Maybe, because half of the new testament is considered by many, even in the faith, to be added later by the Romans. There is also the concept of the old testament being the original God (before he changed and got better?), which i've never been able to figure out since he's perfect anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KSU Dem
12:06 AM on 08/02/2012
Many of the original Christians thought there might be two Gods, the evil Old Testament God and the God, Jesus father. If you're a fundamentalist and you think God dictated the Old Testament, then God sounds pretty bad. But if you believe the Old Testament was written by people.... many people... then you can figure they got a lot of things about him wrong.
Carroll27
Nature's own nice conservative
04:20 PM on 07/31/2012
Wow, what strawmen arguments. My wife would wipe you up.
02:47 PM on 07/31/2012
Real men are leaders. Real men are the head of the household, and as the head, men are the ones appointed self-sacrifice, not tyrannical rule. If you live your life according to Ephesians 5, the true husband sacrifices pieces of himself in order to preserve his glorious wife; his wife not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that she should be holy and without blemish. She is the treasure, and he is the guardian willing to lay down his life, so that she may be spared harm. A true man of Christ would never harm a hair on the head of his wife. Now, my wife and I gladly submit to that.

Ephesians 5 also states to husbands and wives in verse 21:

“Submit yourselves one to another”

It goes on to explain how women should submit to their husbands and how husbands should submit to their wives. The true husband is given the role of the king that lays his life down for his subjects.

Christ teaches that men and women are not the same, but that they ARE EQUAL and have complementary roles.

Too many self-proclaimed “Christians” pervert Christ and His Word to their own agenda. I am sorry someone lied to you about Christ’s true nature and His infallible character. Satan is a liar and the father of it.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
09:43 PM on 07/31/2012
Any so-called "authority" that attempts to propose that "separate but equal" is to be accepted in any regard whatsoever in modern society, is a false authority that is actually seeking to legitimize and legislate the exercise of oppression and discrimination against those they deem as "separate".

Equal means EQUAL. It does NOT, and can NOT, mean "separate but equal". United States civil law of the latter half of the 20th century has finally eradicated this scourge that was formerly legally visited upon any citizens who were NOT white males.

How wonderful it would be if every "religion" that operates tax-free in the US, were proscribed from preaching any and all doctrine and/or dogma that would violate US civil rights law. Especially since each and every attack upon women's rights in the GOTP War On Women is fueled by "religious" doctrine and dogma. These theocrats want free rein to supersede settled US civil rights law with their "separate but equal" cult nonsense, to trample citizens' rights while enjoying non-taxable status! Not only that, but when US civil rights laws require them to STOP oppressing and discriminating against the "separate", they have the utter gall to whine that their "religious freedom" and their "free speech rights" to oppress and discriminate are being "violated".

In other words, if they can't persecute the "separate", then it's THEY who start screeching about how THEY are "persecuted". Unbelievable.
03:01 AM on 08/01/2012
You just crapped a pile so high a show dog couldn’t jump over it.

Christ’s true authority proposes that marriage is the ultimate UNION OF EQUALITY between man and woman. It has nothing to do with the segregation of “separate but equal” that you’re crying wolf about. Men and women are physically different for many varied and valuable reasons. That’s no cause for you to start screeching about how you are being persecuted by the love of Christ.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
01:50 PM on 07/31/2012
If one's name is Jephthah, do not promise to give as a burnt offering "whatsoever" comes out of your house to greet you after a battle. The "whatsoever" turned out in Judges to be Jephthah's only child, a daughter who was sacrificed a couple of months later. Could Jephthah have not looked far enough ahead to even imagine that a human being might greet him? Was he hoping that some sheep would head out to give him a high-five after winning the battle?
photo
chicagokt
Not tonight Helen I have a headache
01:26 PM on 07/31/2012
Brhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDfoJ29CR4Eitish sketch show "That Mitchell And Webb Look" did a very funy take on Abraham. Check it out.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
09:45 PM on 07/31/2012
"A Prayer And A Pint" is also quite good:

http://youtu.be/dbnaSjhn-18
photo
chicagokt
Not tonight Helen I have a headache
09:30 AM on 08/01/2012
Best sketch show ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blizzard man robot voice
10:06 AM on 07/31/2012
This guy seems very closed off by the rest of the world. In any country, in any religion, you'll see this same type of parenting. Nice try though.
08:42 AM on 07/31/2012
The folks in the bible couldn't even follow the rule about sex only in marriage. Don't think we're gonna start now!
But I agree that we as Americans, in particular, have a strange relationship with sex.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
08:41 AM on 07/31/2012
The anti Christian version of parenting..no thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sistagirl Young
11:33 PM on 07/30/2012
I suppose one can follow Christian Piatt or follow The LORD. While I have nothing against Brother Piatt; since I do not know him. I know he did not hang upon a cross for me. So folk may do as they choose; but I must go with The LORD. I'll take my chances with HIM any day of the week. But this is only for me. As the saying goes: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." The LORD is not broke. Life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:13 PM on 07/29/2012
I agree with all of what this author says. My personal experience growing up in a family that mirrored most if not all of these family structors gives me ample proof that they don't work. As children we were punished by spankings of all sorts. I joke that on average I got spanked once a day and its probably not far off the mark. These punishments never achieved the desired result. But they did teach me to hide my activities better. I was not a bad kid. Never been in trouble of any sort.This was because I made a decision not to be. I thought it out weighed the consequences and decided I didn't want that.My parents beating me didn't sway me if anything it made me more stubborn. Although my parents were near equals when it came to the house hold and parenting and that is something I agreed with. I have looked long and hard at the way my parents raised me and I will not be raising my son as I was raise I hope I can do better then that.
03:59 PM on 08/10/2012
Perhaps you turned out to be what sounds like a pretty good person because of rather than in spite of the way your parents raised you. Today we are spoiling our kids and they have no sense of consequences so I can't wait till they all hit the work force and meet reality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:47 PM on 08/10/2012
If it was because of my parents skill at raising children my brothers and sisters would have turned out better then they did. I don't hold any ill feelings toward my parents, but I don't feel they did a good job. Probably the best they knew how to from there parents though.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:20 PM on 07/29/2012
The method of "christian" parenting --indeed, ALL religious parenting-- is indoctrination.

The objective may well be to use the carrot/stick of heaven/hell to teach right from wrong. This can be done without religion IF parents are not lazy and IF parents are not, themselves, too mean, corrupt, etc., to be able to lead/teach by example.

Telling children that there is some invisible, non-human thing stalking every person from birth with a plan to torture forever those people that displease it is mental and emotional child abuse; then telling them that this thing is all-powerful instills a depth of fear in need of relief so strong that telling the child that loving this monsterous thing will prevent that ultimate torture is all part of the indoctrination process. It is not unlike how a military drill sargent must strip away layers of individuality w/abuse and fear before getting obedience from the troops and then working to instill a sense of belonging to a team in order to assurea degree of loyalty that assures that, if need be, the recruit will obey an order that he/she is reasonably certain will get him/her killed.
04:04 PM on 08/10/2012
Most parent raise their child to follow the social mores of their society which is really just another form of indoctrination. This is normal and parents have done this for centuries, there is always a reward/punishment structure setup. Even if you don't have any religious beliefs if you break the social rules in our society you can be punished (arrested, etc).
10:31 AM on 07/28/2012
Just like religious opposition to gay rights, religious doctrine about sex is objectively indefensible: every "argument" really boils down to circular reasoning around "the bible/qu'ran/torah and I agree with that because I'm personally uncomfortable with the subject", there's nothing more to it. To accept these religious dogmas you already have to believe in those religious dogmas to begin with, that's just the inevitable result of trying to defend an indefensible position by invoking imaginary beings with imaginary authority.
03:59 PM on 07/26/2012
"Sex is dirty; save it for marriage."

I never taught my children that. I did teach them that in is wonderful and should be protected in marriage. The Bible teaches that. If the Bible were followed what would happen?

1) The spread of AIDS would end.
2) There would be no STD's.
3) There would be no single parent families.

Is that so bad?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:50 PM on 07/26/2012
As an unlikely "what-if" 1 and 2 might fly, but for 3 you don't even have correlation, much less evidence of causality.
photo
AZLibDem
If you're speeding, you're an "illegal"
08:27 PM on 07/27/2012
"3) There would be no single parent families."

How would it have kept my wife from dying of cancer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
guamote
04:29 PM on 07/28/2012
You know Bannorhill means illegitimate children and unwed mothers, right?

The NY Times published an article this year stating 73% of black children are born outside marriage, 53% of Latinos and 29% of whites. 53% of out of wedlock children are born to mothers under 30 yrs. old. The problem; researchers have consistently found that children born outside marriage face elevated risks of falling into poverty, failing in school or suffering emotional and behavioral problems.

Back in 1965 when a top Labor Dept Official in NYC reported "a quarter of black children were born outside marriage" and he warned of a “tangle of pathology”, he set off an intense debate.

"Every year about one million more children are born into fatherless families."

Studies done over the past 25+ years, consistently show that children living in single-parent homes increases odds of living in poverty. Study implications show that increases in out-of-wedlock births are staggering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
guamote
04:42 PM on 07/28/2012
To AZLIbDem, I didn't mean to be disrespectful of your loss and your situation. A spouse dying is unfortunate and often times unavoidable. However, in Bannorhill's answer, I believe the answer was intended to be directed toward avoidable situations such as sex outside of marriage creating a child and "creating" single parent families. In some cases divorce is also unavoidable, not all marriages are healthy enough to save, thus resulting in single parent families. (Although all aren't single parent, many co-parent jointly.) Bannorhill was addressing the avoidable single parent families whereby children are born out-of-wedlock. With percentages as staggeringly high as they are, particularly in minority communities and women under 30, the casualness of premarital sex is a serious and avoidable issue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:55 AM on 07/26/2012
Don't lay your son out on top of a big rock and attempt to sacrifice him to God (See: Abraham)

If you read the text and put it into context, The purpose for Abraham taking Issac up the mountain to sacrifice was to show Issac his devotion to God. He trusted God and obeyed him, and didn't sacrifice him because God is good and prevented it and provided another sacrifice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:45 PM on 07/26/2012
In or out of "context", the experience amounted to traumatizing a child and teaching him that his father was willing to kill him on the orders of a voice that only he could hear, and teaching both of them that a just and loving God would play head-games with both of them just to show his power over gullible fools. Any deity who requires sacrificing innocents - children or animals - is not worth the name.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:19 AM on 07/27/2012
God never required the sacrifice of the child.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:50 AM on 07/27/2012
Traumatized? Issac goes on to worship the same God, real traumatizing.
09:27 PM on 07/26/2012
Only the religious are capable of transforming filicide into a holy act, well-pleasing to God.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:19 AM on 07/27/2012
No one is saying child sacrifice is holy.