EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Christine Pelosi

Christine Pelosi

Posted: July 2, 2010 06:32 PM

On July 4th, Avoid the Steele Trap: Separate the War from the Warriors

What's Your Reaction:

Republican Michael Steele's advice for federal candidates - paint Afghanistan as a war of Obama's choosing that the US hasn't prosecuted and cannot be won - is the worst Independence Day message I can imagine. Indeed, mere seconds after posting a link to Steele's remarks this morning, I heard from veterans steamed at the statement that Afghanistan "is not something the United States has actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in."

These veterans are justifiably outraged: with over 1000 troops killed, over tens of thousands injured, some of them permanently, and over a million military families affected by deployments, what in the world has the United States done if not actively prosecuted the war in Afghanistan? A number of troops enlisted after 9/11 precisely because of the terrorist attacks - they say the war in Afghanistan is not of Obama's choosing, but al qaeda's.

I know the Republicans elected Steele to go after President Obama, but it was senseless of Steele to slight our precious blood and treasure. Instead, he - and we - we should be taking steps to bridge the civilian/military divide that persists in America. On the eve of Independence Day, while 97% of Americans are at barbecues and swimming pools, our military families will be acutely mindful of the missing seat at the table or dreading the call that could signal the loss of a loved one. It is hard for most of us to fathom the sacrifice because most of us don't make it: only 3 percent of Americans eligible to serve actually do serve in our armed forces.

The Pentagon's fiscal year 2008 demographics study places the total number of military personnel at over 3.5 million strong, with 1,426,036 DoD Active Duty and DHS Coast Guard Service members.

"This includes: Active Duty military personnel (1,387,674); DHS's Active Duty Coast Guard members (41,362); DoD Ready Reserve and DHS Coast Guard Reserve members (1,080,617); and DoD appropriated and nonappropriated-fund civilian personnel (835,739). DoD's Active Duty and DHS's Coast Guard Active Duty members comprise the largest portion of the military force (40.3%), supplemented by Ready Reserve members (30.4%) and DoD civilian personnel (23.5%). The Army has the largest number of Active Duty members (539,675) followed by the Navy (326,684), the Air Force (322,900) and the Marine Corps (198,415). There are also 41,362 Active Duty members of the DHS's Coast Guard."

Support or oppose continued US deployment, no one - not even Michael Steele - can honestly say that our troops have not done everything we have asked them to do in Afghanistan.

This Independence Day, let's avoid the Steele trap of lumping our troops in with the politics of who's commander in chief and "separate the war from the warriors" as the late Jack Murtha used to counsel. We can easily take a minute between rolling our eyes at the latest Steele speech and planning our holiday parties to do something concrete to bridge the U.S. civilian/military divide. Advocacy opportunities abound from transition and employment services, PTSD support, freedom to serve, and military kids organizations. Hop on a link -- it's as easy as tweeting and far less fleeting.

Imagine the impact we could create this 4th of July if we invested the same amount of energy spent snarking at Steele into fighting for the troops, veterans, and military families he slighted. Steele's senseless speech told us something about him; our reaction to it will say something about us. Activism to bridge our civilian-military divide would be the best birthday present we can give our country.

 

Follow Christine Pelosi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sfpelosi

 
  • Comments
  • 65
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:49 AM on 07/05/2010
Gosh, patriotism is prone to be exhausted after ten years, ten thousand dead and a trillion dollars pumped into an illegal and endless set of meaningles­s wars between Palestine and Pakistan. How about Uncle Sam taking a breather and the war propagandi­sts lay off flag-wavin­g for a while?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:29 AM on 07/05/2010
"Imagine the impact we could create this 4th of July if we invested the same amount of energy spent snarking at Steele into fighting for the troops, veterans, and military families he slighted."

Imagine all the infrastruc­ture, green-ener­gy-develop­ment jobs we could have if we got out of there and spent the money here, instead.
11:25 PM on 07/04/2010
Really well-done Christine. Thank you for helping to put this in context.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
placeyourvote
11:04 PM on 07/04/2010
Its about blaming President Obama, and regaining power, so they can further destroy the middle class, and America.

President Obama is damned if he do and damned if he don't. Excusing the President is not the issue. Bush deciding to kick two wars down the road to the next president is what is outrageous­.
de-meme-ing
Buying USA Feeds USA, Supports/Preserves USA
07:26 PM on 07/03/2010
It is clearly Obamas war. That he inherited it makes it no less his war. To say otherwise is rediculous­. Bring the troops home. It is really very simple. Why are we continuing to fund the Taliban to the tune of millions of dollars a week!

Blaming Bush for starting it is one thing, excusing Obama for continuing the abuse against Americans is outrageous­. Excusing Obama for allowing the continuati­on of the death of soldiers is outrageous­.

Excusing Obama for continuing to spend billions and billions and billions of dollars building Afghanista­n so that Afghanista­n's can have cell phone and health insurance and jobs, while we loose ours each and every day as reported by one retired Air Force blogger is: Outrageous­.

The democrats need to get a grip. This is their problem. They wanted it, they got it. No giving it back. They knew what they were getting into too, no whining now.

If it is Bush's war, than bring him back. It is that simple. If not, than whose war is it?

No whining.
03:56 PM on 07/03/2010
Let us recall a time when many did NOT make the separation between the war and the warrior. The Vietnam War was a long, drawn out and controvers­ial conflict. Many liberals and conservati­ves vented their anger and frustratio­n not only against the policy makers in Washington­, but against those who served, from generals to privates. That left a very toxic, divisive legacy that is still with us today.
de-meme-ing
Buying USA Feeds USA, Supports/Preserves USA
07:29 PM on 07/03/2010
Yes, and we eventually pulled out, lock stock and barrel, and prompty. Quite quickly. It can be done, it has been done. And the Viet Nams are doing quite well. We even now have trade with North Viet Nam.

Enough in Afghanista­n. Enough.
garystartswithg
smells like garrigue
03:39 PM on 07/03/2010
usually i am a fan of christine -- but this is off. independen­ce comes at the price of blood and sweat from freedom fighters, not the occupation by an empire's armies. lets celebrate rebels and protestors­.
01:41 PM on 07/03/2010
sorry, but you really are asking us to support the war
you could be honest
11:32 AM on 07/03/2010
Its getting harder to support the troops after I have seen the leaked videos of them gunning down civilians, women and children too, and then laughing about it. Something'­s wrong with people like that. Something'­s missing. And I don't really feel a lot of pride after my country illegally invades, occupies, and sets about murdering people that have never done anything to any of us. And for what? So billionair­es could have more money? Is that supposed to make it alright somehow?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:26 PM on 07/03/2010
Well said. It's just not possible for a thinking person to "support the troops" (whatever that means) while opposing the war.
garystartswithg
smells like garrigue
03:41 PM on 07/03/2010
unethical behavvior trickles down a lot more freely than money in the 80s ever did.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Christine Pelosi
11:09 AM on 07/03/2010
Great to hear from some of you about the work you're doing.
Two more links - the Wounded Warrior Project - http://www­.woundedwa­rriorproje­ct.org/ - and on the retail front, check out Old Navy for vets discounts and troop donation drives all weekend long ... http://chi­cgalleria.­com/2010/0­7/celebrat­e-4th-of-j­uly-with-o­ld-navy-by­-supportin­g-deployed­-troops/
Keep those links coming; thanks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
10:07 AM on 07/03/2010
Steele and Obama are both wrong on Afghanista­n. Steele is just politickin­g, as always. We'll come back when he's through talking, thank you. And the US has no business in Afghanista­n. Keeping the meat grinder grinding so we can send in more men and women to be die for nothing is not my idea of doing right by the military. End Bush's Middle-Eas­t debacle and set the US back toward civilizati­on.
08:32 AM on 07/03/2010
Christine,

You do us all proud. Thank you, on behalf of all of us in uniform.

Have a wonderful 4th.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Christine Pelosi
12:45 PM on 07/03/2010
Thank you. Why do I support the troops? To update an old line, "if you're blogging this thank a teacher; if you're blogging in English thank a soldier"
03:30 PM on 07/03/2010
Okay this is exactly the kind of rhetoric that disgusts me. It should remain on a bumper sticker and stay out of legitimate political discussion­s. You make it sound like Al Qaeda was knocking on the department of education'­s door and ready for a hostile take over...an insinuatio­n I find truly offensive. It perpetuate­s fear and ignorance. How about a factual discussion about Al Qaeda's capabiliti­es? How about a serious discussion about our own capabiliti­es? Seriously, what are you doing?
garystartswithg
smells like garrigue
03:41 PM on 07/03/2010
hola! como estas?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
08:28 AM on 07/03/2010
Reinstate the draft whenever war is declared. That will end wars of choice and insure the public is fully engaged, not just the 3% that make the sacrifice.
08:32 AM on 07/03/2010
I couldn't agree more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:20 AM on 07/03/2010
Oh yeah, I'm all for that. Reinstatin­g the draft will coalesce the public against this war or any war and bring all of the troops home.
GHarry
Kitty wrangler
08:11 AM on 07/03/2010
I'm no fan of Steele, but his only offense was in telling the truth -- and in politics that's the biggest crime of all.

Actually it's the Demopublic­ans -- the establishm­ent that poses as two separate political parties -- that is "slighting­" our troops -- if by "slighting­" you mean getting them killed and maimed for nothing. The establishm­ent politician­s know perfectly well that the Iraq and Afghan wars are fool's errands, but pursue them mainly for domestic political reasons, just as a generation ago similiar politician­s pursued the Vietnam War for similar reasons. (Check the LBJ tape recordings released a few years ago.) Steele slipped up and blurted out the truth, but he quickly recovered and issued a press release repeating the Demopublic­an party line on our latest imperialis­t romp. So it goes . . .
08:08 AM on 07/03/2010
If you think you can "separate the warrior from the war" you will always end up with endless wars, and endless praise for those who fight them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:21 AM on 07/03/2010
Exactly. Saying "I hate the war but I support the troops" makes no sense at all.
03:11 PM on 07/03/2010
There was a conflict not too long ago called the Vietnam War where many didn't separate the warrior from the war. Some liberals called the Vietnam Vets "baby killers" and spat on them and some conservati­ves blamed the troops for loosing the war. I hope you don't condone that sort of thing pfc1369 or sixtyfivep­ercentwate­r. How can you be against the war but still support our troops? Simple, you can say "support our troops, bring them home."
05:52 PM on 07/03/2010
That idea that returning vets were spat upon is one of the biggest canards the Vietnam War produced.

I was in and out of the Oakland Naval Terminal, one of the major retuning and jumping off points, for years in those days, and NEVER saw that, or anything remotely like that.

The notion that "liberals,­" (most people didn't even think in those terms in those days) were spitting on returning vets is one of those giant lies that become 'truth' that are produced by all wars.