"Nice guys finish last." ~ Baseball manager Leo Durocher
When did the American left become such sissies? We are shocked, shocked! And throw up our hands in horror cowering behind prissy words like "divisive" and "sexist" and "uncivil" when frothing-mad, homophobic Republican smut-emailers like New York governor candidate Carl Paladino hurls verbal excrement at gays, or serial philanderer Newt Gingrich insults President Obama as a treasonous Kenyan mole with "the ideology of Luo tribesmen", or Democrat Jerry Brown calls Meg Whitman a "whore", or a Colorado billboard accuses Obama of being an Islamist suicide bomber as well as a gay Mexican bandit.
"Sickmaking" and "the worst I've ever seen," my friends call the current wave of corporate-financed attack ads. A little perspective, please.
We Americans have a wonderfully slimy history of "negative campaigns" that goes back to George Washington in 1789, if not even earlier to the Plymouth rock puritans, who probably accused each other of unChristian heresies, if not downright bestiality.
To refresh our memories: in 1800, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, once warm friends, tore each other apart because President Adams found himself running against candidate Jefferson. Adams's hacks called Jefferson "a mean-spirited, low-lived... son of a half-breed Indian squaw sired by a Virginia mulatto father." (Race mattered even then.) Jefferson's PR man, a proto-Karl Rove, slammed Adams as a "repulsive pedant" and "hideous hermaphroditical character". That's before the mudslinging got really ugly -- Tom labeling John as a hypocrite, criminal and tyrant anxious to drag us into war with France and John calling Tom a sex-mad atheist and coward.
Mud stuck, and Tom stole -- er, won -- the election.
A few years later, John Quincy Adams was called a pimp, and Andrew Jackson's wife a slut and his mother a "negro-loving prostitute". Davy Crockett accused Martin van Buren of -- wait for it -- wearing women's corsets. Of course, Abe Lincoln was for slave-loving Democrats the "gorilla tyrant" -- and he had stinky feet, too. In the 1884 elections, Republicans accused nominee Grover Cleveland of fathering and abandoning an illegitimate child with the party slogan "Ma, ma, where's my pa?" (And when Cleveland won the presidency, the Democrats paid back with, "In the White House, ha ha ha!")
Closer to modern times, Teddy Roosevelt running against obese William Howard Taft called him "a rat in a corner", and William McKinley's supporters tagged candidate William Jennings Bryan a crazy degenerate. In my time, President Roosevelt was compared unfavorably to Hitler, had committed "the crime of the century" by giving federal money to the jobless, was a demented paralytic cripple and probably Jewish ("Rosenfelt" was a common slur) and had a lesbian wife. It follows that Jack Kennedy had to be the Pope's captive, Barry Goldwater a dangerously psychotic warmonger, thrice-wounded Lt John Kerry "swiftboated" as a cowardly liar, and in the 2000 presidential primaries, John McCain effectively lost the nomination when South Carolinians were leafleted (the groundless accusation) that he had fathered an illegitimate black baby.
This year, the supreme court's ridiculous Citizens United v Federal Election Commission ruling that corporations can unload any amount of money on conservative candidates (the real meaning of the court's decision) has unleashed a tsunami of ugly personal and racist ads on the hapless Democrats running for cover.
Dirt is not a GOP monopoly, however. Lest it be forgotten, Obama's press secretary, Robert Gibbs, who has led the charge against the Chamber of Commerce's dirty-secret funding of Republican candidates, himself in 2004 ran a miserably low TV ad attack against the then Democratic frontrunner Howard Dean that merged images of Dean with Osama bin Laden.
But maybe Gibbs had the right idea: kick 'em in the groin and fight to win, not to score points for civility or decency.
The fact is, "claims that 2010 is the most negative election to date may be premature", reports the Wesleyan Media Project. Compared to 2008, there's only a "slight" increase in personal attacks, but it just feels worse because of our rising anger and frustration at the wrecked economy.
The point of the Republican ads I've seen is to bully voters: to reach deep down into our guts to re-channel our (often justified) rage away from the rich and powerful and onto the most vulnerable citizens and their champions. There's always a barely disguised code, and the code is pure impotent hatred.
What we know of bullies from schoolyard brawls is that they're never satisfied until you knock them down and step on them, hard. That seems to be beyond the imagination and capabilities of the sweet-tempered, passive, over-educated, please-play-nice Obama staff whose Democratic-controlled congress has just stripped $12bn from a long-term food stamps program precisely at the time when more Americans than ever hunger, literally, for such assistance. By the end of next year, 10 million homes will be lost to (often fraudulent) foreclosure -- 10m! Yet, President Obama refuses to honor his campaign pledge to declare a moratorium because he fears the bankers' fury.
The Democrats fold to appease their unappeasable Republican enemies. Across the country, in tight races in Florida, Oregon, Ohio and Colorado, they're even running away from their own at-risk Democratic candidates who loyally voted for "ObamaCare" health insurance. Moral: you turn tail from bullies and they chase you into a dark alley and kick you to death.
When did we on the left forget how to fight back in dark alleys and call our enemies what they are: degenerate psychopaths who wear women's corsets, have smelly feet and hermaphroditic tendencies?
This post originally appeared at The Guardian.
I could not agree more.
Andrew Jackson would have recognized the current political climate, and so would TR, but they knew how to handle bullies.
The Republicans negotiate like 1950s Russians where any concession to them is seen not as a gesture of reconciliation, but that if they are a bit more intransigent and push just a bit harder, they might win the next point. They will NEVER be satisfied while out of power, and they barely tolerate individual freedoms that mean they might one day be out of power again. They can not be negotiated with. If we do not figure out a way to keep the Rethug Orligarchs from crossing the Rubicon, they will. If Republicans had a choice of the Republic falling and them gaining power for the next 200 years, or them loosing power and Republic thriving, I have no doubt what choice they would make.
The Obama administration seems to have forgotten it is more than just a game, that children are going hungry, that health care is still unaffordable and inaccessible because the funding is not there, that some people will be so broken on the bleak anvil of poverty that they turn to crime, abuse and or suicide.
Elected Democrats need to get the real idea that the stakes are life and death. We are not a debating society, we are a civil society fighting all of us, for honor, for happiness, for work, for life.
clancy
Why not accost them for being oligarchic hyppocrites who try to upend a free society all the while prating about freedom and liberty. Why don't we call them traitors for their les and warmongering. Why not call them twisted deviants who would inflict prudery on the world while they revel behind closed doors at S+M clubs!
Leave us poor corseted hermaphrodites alone, we got enough trouble as it is.
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/anthony-weiner-video-073010
It is obvious the shallow pretend centrist formula does not work.
clancy
http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2010/10/glorious-addictions-war-oil-2.html