More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Clarence B. Jones

Clarence B. Jones

GET UPDATES FROM Clarence B. Jones
 

April 27, 2011: A Day of National Shame

Posted: 04/28/11 10:19 AM ET

The release by the White House of President Obama's "official" birth certificate was a poignant reminder of just how deep and pervasive racism remains in our nation.

Think about this: A sitting president has to "prove" to the nation that he was indeed born in America -- Hawaii -- and therefore eligibly qualified to be elected president of the United States!

A factually non-issue was permitted become a national issue, not because of Donald Trump and the media. No, this was the ultimate result, of the silence and tacit acquiescence of white political, religious, and community leaders, especially leaders of faith-based organizations, who sat, said and did nothing to counter this insidious new form of 21st-century racism. The silence and abnegation of moral leadership, by persons whom we should have otherwise expected to publicly to challenge this growing "birther" issue, is a stain on the conscience of our nation.

In 1963, Rabbi Joachim Prinz, then president of the American Jewish Committee (AJC) was the speaker who immediately preceded Dr. King's famous "I Have A Dream" speech at the March On Washington. The AJC was one of several major organizations participating in the March On Washington on August 28, 1963.

Obama's decision to release his "official" birth certificate in an effort to silence the challenge to the legitimacy of his American citizenship reminded me of the words of Rabbi Prinz on that occasion. He said:

When I was the rabbi of the Jewish community in Berlin under the Hitler regime, I learned many things. The most important thing that I learned under those tragic circumstances was that bigotry and hatred are not the most urgent problem. The most urgent, the most disgraceful, the most shameful and the most tragic problem is silence.


Is the "need" of Barack Hussein Obama, the 44th president of the United States, to "prove" his citizenship, yet again, another example of what some people called the dawn of a "post-racial America" following his election?

White political leaders, especially in the Republican Party, should hang their heads in shame. Wednesday, April 27, 2011, should be remembered as day of moral ignominy in America. It was a day that symbolized the disgraceful and tragic silence of the "good" people among our political and community leaders who did nothing to publicly challenge the irrationality of Donald Trump and others who peddled their racist garbage of President Obama's non-citizenship.

 
 
 
The release by the White House of President Obama's "official" birth certificate was a poignant reminder of just how deep and pervasive racism remains in our nation. Think about this: A sitting presi...
The release by the White House of President Obama's "official" birth certificate was a poignant reminder of just how deep and pervasive racism remains in our nation. Think about this: A sitting presi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,562
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
12:51 PM on 05/02/2011
This is ridiculous. No one ever said the republican party spoke for all white people everywhere. And when I think of white leaders that stand up for Obama, I think of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, who arguably have more influence with the youth than any politician in DC.
10:16 PM on 05/01/2011
Obama should send the IRS and the Justice Department with a flashlight to look up Trumps affairs. I am sure that crook has plenty to hide. I am tired of this President acting "Presidential." He should go after these people with the same vigor that they are pursing him. This nonsense is not about policies but hate. As parents of old used to tell their kids, "quit crying or I will give you something to cry about."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Horatio Nelson
09:21 PM on 05/01/2011
My most profound fear is that, to this day, most Americans are not cognizant of the vicious right-wing fraud the whole thing represents. It is bitterly depressing that the architects and supporters of this will probably never receive their proper consequence.
photo
myhumangetsmeblues
my micro-bio is now 66% empty
07:03 PM on 05/01/2011
As disgusting, outrageous, and, arguably, un-American and racist some of our fellow Americans appear to be judging from recent 'events', our glorious history is chock full of politicians and media, lying and distorting the truth for the short and long term gain of a handful of rich and powerful white men, doing serious damage to our nation and Constitution while amassing great personal wealth and power. Everybody should be disgusted and outraged, but none should be surprised or shocked. I must admit, though, history does seem even crazier and more colorful than ever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:04 AM on 05/19/2011
isn't obama amassing personal wealth ?
still hate the whitey don't ya ....
photo
myhumangetsmeblues
my micro-bio is now 66% empty
03:46 PM on 05/19/2011
Not Whitey, no. Just right-wing, racist, wealthy, Christian, middle-aged, terriffied of everyone else, male, Whiteys. Obama looks like a saint compared to white republicans, but he's no liberal, so no, I'm not that big a fan. But you. You are so obviously the Whitey of which I speak.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smithn
Different strokes for different folks.
06:36 PM on 05/01/2011
Mr. Jones,
You are absolutely, unequivocally, correct, sir.
Thank you for calling us out. We can, and will, do better.
Dayne
People are people
04:02 PM on 05/01/2011
Never was a birther, thought the whole thing was stupid in the first place. However, I have two things to comment on. First, Pres. Obama should have provided the long form right from the get go, end of story. Second, and more importantly, the Constitution is very specific about the requirements for Senator and President. So I would assume that some government agency, first in Illinois, would have vetted the credentials for Obama as a Senator. I would also assume that when he won election to the Congress there would have been some kind of background check by a Federal agency before he could assume the mantle of U.S. Senator. Finally, I would hope to God, that there is a huge background check for anyone who becomes a U.S. President. So, why hasn't a government agency come out with an unequivocal statement and proof that Pres. Obama satisfied all the requirement to become the POTUS? If anyone has additional info on the process, or that information has come out prior to his assuming the position, I would love to hear/read something.

Anyway, enough of this junk, move on and do your jobs.

Dayne
photo
thorrsman
Why should I define myself by quoting others?
06:49 PM on 05/01/2011
Actually, there is no government agency at state or federal level tasked with assuring that those who run for political office meet the legal requirements to hold political office.

Shocking, isn't it?
Dayne
People are people
07:52 PM on 05/01/2011
Frightenly, but many of the things our govt. does and does not do, scare the crappola out of me. Maybe I need to go do some research (I was being lazy). We know that have to disclose their financial records, so who does that? Maybe that should wrap it all into one process. But that would sound too much like common sense for some people in DC I guess.

Dayne
Dayne
People are people
07:54 PM on 05/01/2011
Sorry about the errors, I was in a rush.

Dayne
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Suntio
Amat victoria curam.
09:39 PM on 05/01/2011
No, no other president was required to do so, and neither should Obama. Period.
Dayne
People are people
09:58 PM on 05/01/2011
Perhaps the point should be taken that ALL govt. officials, by the dictates of the Constitution, should be vetted by a Federal agency. My question, per my post, and my surprise that all presidents should be verified. Now, for the record, what possible proof do you or any other pro-Obama people here have that EVERY president was not required. Don't waste your time because there is none.

Dayne
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Don Stalvino
2006 & 2011 TIME's Person of the Year
03:16 PM on 05/01/2011
"Think about this: A sitting president has to "prove" to the nation that he was indeed born in America -- Hawaii -- and therefore eligibly qualified to be elected president of the United States!" Yes think about it. Chester A. Arthur was asked to prove he was born in Vermont and not in Canada. Was that a poignant reminder of just how deep and pervasive racism was in our nation.
05:17 PM on 05/02/2011
Actually, you're wrong in part. Chester Arthur's citizenship was challenged to prove his citizenship when running for VICE-President and his citizenship was not a factor by the time he inheritied the presidency after President Garfield's assassination and death. Among other sources that say there was good cause to wonder about whether or not he was a "naturual born" citizen, here is one that suggests that though Arthur WAS born in Vermont, that he was a dual citizen and he KNEW it (British and American) by way of his British father not being naturalized until Arthur was 14 years old:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12/06/urgent-historical-breakthrough-proof-chester-arthur-concealed-he-was-a-british-subject-at-birth/

This is one of the most compelling articles I've read in a long time. The person who wrote it put a lot of time, energy and research into it, so I accept it as viable. What's more interesting is the assertion that Arthur was just flat out, a liar.

And there also seems to be proof of this since Chester Arthur lied about his parents history to cover up his (non-natural) citizenship status (because of his British father).

So you no longer have the "Chester Arthur" argument ot hang on to. What's your position now?
02:46 PM on 05/01/2011
Nonsense!! If Jesse Jackson had this issue , it would be racist; if there is one group that no one would question were americans would be African Americans.
However, the Pres lived abroad, had a family with roots abroad and he played with this issue to his benefit,
so again, nonsense!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
02:02 PM on 05/01/2011
Sorry, I don't see it the same way at all.

It's true that the short form is all that is legally needed to prove anyone's citizenship in Hawaii, but it's also true that the President ignoring further action for three years succeeded in making the Republican finge seem looney...(Orly Taitz, Joseph Corsi, Alan Keyes. anyone?)

I think the timing of the release of the longer form also was a brilliant masterstroke, achieving maximum exposure for a Trump putdown before the Correspondent's Dinner and torpedoing any success the Joseph Corsi book coming out next week might have had.

I don't see it as a negative from his standpoint at all, and if you analyze his response at the dinner last night, you will find that he's just laughing at the nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
normalintexas
TaDa!
08:43 PM on 05/01/2011
Seem looney?????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Suntio
Amat victoria curam.
09:41 PM on 05/01/2011
Why should be show it, since no other president has had to do it? And do you really think that this will put the issue to rest?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
10:41 PM on 05/01/2011
I do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:13 AM on 05/19/2011
WHAT FACTS DO YOU HAVE TO STATE " NO OTHER PRESIDENT HAS HAD TO DO IT" ?
01:13 PM on 05/01/2011
Mr. Jones on Apr 29, 2011 at 08:49:32 I posted following:
“Perhaps the most important result of a Black man becoming the U.S. President is that event now allows the WORLD to see the color fade from the artificial roses of…truth, justice, fairness, and liberty…Am¬erican has long maintained as being authentic plants grown in her garden…”

While addressing the ugliness motivating those pushing the non-issue of the President's place of birth, I neglected to lay any blame at the feet of those who remained silent on the issue, and thus as you stated provided “tacit acquiesces”. Thank you for drawing attention to that fact. Silence in the face of bigotry and other evils make their existents possible. As both, you and the Rabbi alluded to silence is an evil unto itself. Today we can find the evil of silence pervasive in our everyday existences. As you point out silence, and by default acquiesce, can be found in our churches, in our workplaces, our government agencies, and throughout our communities. Thank you for pointing out the importance of silence as it applies to this case. I hope some will acknowledge, extrapolate and apply that understanding of silence you shared in your article.
01:32 PM on 05/01/2011
So, Mr. Abouttogiveup, our election of a black president allows "the WORLD" to see our racism by fading "the color from the artificial roses of truth, fairness and liberty." Gosh, if we elect him twice, will that prove that we are doubly racist?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
04:50 PM on 05/01/2011
It shows that a great number of our citizens are still racist, though not a majority.

The racism is concentrated in the South, parts of the West, the Rustbelt, Appalachia, and Alaska.

Big surprise, huh?
05:15 PM on 05/01/2011
Mr. Beaton, If during the campaign leading up to the 2012 election, President Obama continues to be portrayed in as an ape and witchdoctor; if the White-house is depicted as having a watermelon patch on the lawn, or similar depictions that can be viewed in historical terms as demeaning and dehumanizing to a segment of the population, then yes, I will continue to believe that there is a racist element in the group that opposes his re-election. If Mr. Obama is re-elected the “WE” that would be the cause of that re-election will not include members of that group that has been responsible for the aforementioned depictions. Would you agree? Would you also agree that such depictions are counter to that imagery of all American citizens being respected equally, when those depictions are viewed in the context of America’s history of racism? My intent was simply to point out the differences between what is stated to be and what is. Your angry should be directed at those actions and behaviors that make American culture and norms appear to be bigoted and racist. (My 1st reply had links providing examples of the bigoted depictions I spoke. Apparently, they were viewed as inflammatory and did not make the cut).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCPrincess
I'm probably gaming.
11:16 AM on 05/01/2011
The problem is a combination of racism and what I think is another moral dilemna facing our nation: systemic greed. No one spoke up because they were making money by either talking about it (the media), or by using the topic to garner votes for their campaigns. We need people to speak up about both the racism and greed that plague us. Silence really is an issue.
11:05 AM on 05/01/2011
Oh come on. At the outset, due to the frequent travels of his parents there was a legitimate issue as to whether the guy was born in America. As it turns out he was, but only by few months. Obama himself could have put the issue to rest years ago by releasing the birth certificate that he finally released last week. For whatever strategic political reasons, he chose not to. Please put your race card back in the deck, and save your hysterical comparisons to Nazi Germany.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Msquad99
Space is a vacuum because earth sucks.
12:46 PM on 05/01/2011
It should never have been a question. Why? Because the man had already served four years in the Senate. If there had been the slightest discrepancy BO would never had made it through that process. Due to frequent travels, pure bull sh*t.
01:22 PM on 05/01/2011
Wrong. Unlike a president, a United States senator is not required to be a natural born citizen. He need only be a citizen for the last 9 years. Look it up.

And cut the profanity. It subtracts from whatever argument you are making (even the patently wrong ones).
03:37 PM on 05/01/2011
I assume you know you don't need to be a naturally born American to serve in the senate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saje3d
01:05 PM on 05/01/2011
Since one of his parents was an American citizen, it doesn't matter WHERE he was born, and the fact that it became an issue is suggestive of nothing more and nothing less than rampant racism. Pretending otherwise is akin to pretending that gravity is a state of mind.
03:38 PM on 05/01/2011
If one of your parents is an American and the other isn't and you are born outside the US you are not automatically a US citizen.
nancynancy
Atheist.
09:21 PM on 05/01/2011
You need to do a Google search and read the regulations because some children born outside the country do not automatically qualifiy as "natural born citizens" even though one of their parents is a US citizen. This law is not straightforward and there are many exceptions especially for those children born prior to the 1980s.
10:52 AM on 05/01/2011
Very well said! On April 27th, I watched the President, and I hurt for him, his family, all people of color, and for this country. I am white, but I ask as well--why are the churches so silent today? Why are so many politicians so silent today? Why are my neighbors so silent today? I think many of us have been hurt when we have spoken--I, for one, have been shouted at, left sitting in a restaurant while a "friend" departed angry that my husband and I had spoken up, and have lost other "friends." But, we have to continue our quest for justice and truth, especially when the propaganda machines are so loud.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
10:41 AM on 05/01/2011
Why is the birth certificate issue racism ? Do you really believe that if we had a white republican president that refused to release his birth certificate it wouldn't be an issue ? It would have been a front page story every day and the folks that would support non-disclosure would have been the ridiculed "birthers" in that case..

If this was a racially divisive issue Obama was responsible for perpetuating the divide by not releasing it sooner.. I thought he was supposed to be the great "uniter".. He was using this issue until he couldn't use it any more..
11:36 AM on 05/01/2011
A white Republican president would never have been asked or expected to produce his birth certificate. Please name one sitting American president who has ever been asked to produce such a document. You make the unbelievable statement that it was Obama who was using this issue until he couldn't use it any more. You put poor, befuddled Orly Taitz to shame.

Steven Colbert uttered the definitive statement regarding this ridiculous issue:

"I have no proof he's even a black man. He could be white and if that's the case I don't understand why we're questioning his legitimacy."
photo
thorrsman
Why should I define myself by quoting others?
11:58 AM on 05/01/2011
John McCain, running in the same race as Obama DID in fact have to produce his birth records.

How quickly they forget uncomfortable facts...
12:09 PM on 05/01/2011
BS - John McCain in the same presidential race... Obama is the first american president (since before 1830) that had one parent that was not an american citizen.. He's president - not king.. He is OUR employee.. He knew the media circus he was getting into.. good or bad there are no secrets for a president..
01:00 PM on 05/01/2011
I agree, I don't think it stems from racism, it is just the usual swift boat tactics that have come to define the R party. We should recognize this and focus on it, because it insidious and surprisingly effective. I agree with the writer that it was a sad reflection on the mentality of our populous, in terms of gullibility mostly.
nancynancy
Atheist.
09:31 PM on 05/01/2011
Agreed. It's dirty politics pure and simple. The same type of people who hounded and impeached Clinton are now harassing Obama. Whether the birthers are racists or not is beside the point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
09:30 AM on 05/01/2011
***[quoted] The most urgent, the most disgraceful, the most shameful and the most tragic problem is silence.***

Describes the "position" of our nice, liberal churches and their deafening silence perfectly.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StillIRise
The past, present and future are one
11:44 AM on 05/01/2011
Our nice conservative churches are pretty quiet as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toofarleft4thisworld
the Lord giveth; the Landlord taketh away
12:22 PM on 05/01/2011
it describes a lot of well meaning people, on both sides of the political spectrum and all denominations.