After President Obama's speech to a special Joint Session of Congress and the telecast of the GOP candidates' debate at the Reagan Library, the president will be confronted with a major foreign policy issue affecting domestic politics. This is the ongoing Israel-Palestinian peace and land negotiation dispute. Few issues, except for race relations in America, have the capacity to inflame domestic politics and become as divisive.
Historically, a majority of Americans have supported successive Democratic and Republican administrations' support for Israel. Such support will undoubtedly continue. However, there is a risk that such future support may be a mile wide; but only an inch deep. The significant domestic fiscal limitations upon United States economic power and resources have qualitatively rearranged the dynamics of the power and ability of Israel and the United States to play the decisive role they once enjoyed in the region. Sooner or later, the reality of this will impact and influence domestic politics in America.
The spark most likely and immediately to reignite and inflame the Israel-Palestinian "peace negotiations" is the pending plan of the Palestinian Leadership to seek admission of Palestine, as an independent "State" to the United Nations. The PLO leadership intends to appeal to the UN General Assembly meeting in New York later this month. However, the proposal of the PLO, in and of itself, will not be the sole source of exacerbating divisions within Congress and our nation.
It is more likely that the "interrelatedness" of this event to the pending dispute between Turkey and Israel over the recent UN Report upholding the legality of Israel's efforts to stop the Mavi Marmara from breaking Israel's naval blockade of Gaza, and its refusal to apologize for the killing of several Turkish nationals. This, combined with the upheaval in Libya and Syria, the pending trial of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and the accelerating winds from the Arab Spring are fanning the embers of the current Autumn of peaceful non-violent protest in Israel and Palestine against continuation of an unsustainable status quo. This may create, potentially, a perfect domestic political "storm" for President Obama.
In an editorial in the New York Times, last month, the Times commented:
For years, they (the Palestinians) have been promised a negotiated solution -- President Obama called for a peace deal by September -- and they are still empty-handed. But the consequences could be profoundly damaging for all involved.
... All share blame for the stalemate. Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has used any excuse he can find (regional turmoil, the weakness of his coalition government) to avoid negotiations. He has blustered and balked at President Obama's prodding. Republican leaders in Washington -- who seem mainly interested in embarrassing Mr. Obama -- have encouraged his resistance."
We see no sign that Washington or the Israelis are thinking beyond the incremental.
James Zogby: Let the U.N. Act on Palestine
Alon Ben-Meir: The Palestinians' Uncharted March to the UN
The Israel-Palestine U.N. Statehood Vote Igniting the Mideast ...
Plan B on Palestine at the UN? Europeans mull alternative ...
Palestine, the UN, and international law - Opinion - Al Jazeera English
U.N. Vote on Palestinian State Could Force Israel's Hand - NYTimes ...
BBC News - Arab League backs Palestinian membership bid at UN
Viva Palestine.
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=gul-israel-is-ungrateful-even-burden-to-its-allies-2011-09-08
No more Israeli-American puppets like Mubarak who had no regard for the lives of his people
The old rules don't work anymore, and now that Mubarek is gone, the one remaining ally of Israel is the United States...and how much longer can we expect to dominate the world?
What's always been disingenuous is to lay blame for the continuation of the conflict on "settlements".
There were settlements and continued building in the Sinai when Egypt and Israel agreed to peace. All the settlements disappeared.
There were settlements in Gaza, they disappeared even in the absence of peace, and all Israel received was renewed violence.
The core issue has always been the religious intolerance of the muslim population in the middle east. This intolerance expresses itself as a denial of the rights of non muslims to freedom and self determination.
And that has been why the palestinians, as pawns of the arab league, have refused the statehood offered by UN 181 in 1948. They refused because to accept UN 181 and their own state, they would have to accept the existence of Israel. Something they are still unwilling to do.
This has always been a religious war, and until that is addressed, there will be no peace.
There is a feeling abroad of ‘an eye for an eye’ retribution as the Palestinians recall Israel’s blockade of any air traffic in or out of Gaza and the demolition of its international airport.
Turkey said on Thursday it would escort aid ships to Gaza and would not allow a repetition of last year's Israeli raid that killed nine Turks, setting the stage for a potential naval confrontation with its former ally.
I hope they make some progress in the UN despite to opposition from Goliath.
(If only they had some oil under their sand -- then we could be there ''friends.'')