Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page:  « First  ‹ Previous  15 16 17 18 19 (19 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jason grenier
11:37 AM on 09/12/2012
Thats karma for ya. This is the same lady that told people to get off their lazy butts and work more if you want to be rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Liner
Searching for truths.
11:37 AM on 09/12/2012
And here I thouight all the discusting rich people lived in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kepowell5
01:06 PM on 09/12/2012
You can't be serious!
11:37 AM on 09/12/2012
her dad gave her 75 million... why does not want to give her kids anything??? yes they are not entitled.... but she got where she was because her DAD gave her 75 million.... she should help her kids..
11:51 AM on 09/12/2012
if her dad gave her 75 million and she turned that into 18 billion that means she did most of the work
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randy Johns
09:55 PM on 09/12/2012
true.. well her underlings did but then why become such a #$%^&*(...
photo
zmfts
Whatever doesn't kill you makes you walk funny.
11:36 AM on 09/12/2012
You wouldn't think that a woman worth eighteen billion dollars would be so stingy with money. I hope she gets her "assets" handed to her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karen Berish Heilner
11:50 AM on 09/12/2012
W/ all that money you'd think she could get a better haircut...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
strangervessell
Cold War Submarine Veteran During Reagan Years DAV
11:35 AM on 09/12/2012
Pathetic woman.....
11:29 AM on 09/12/2012
When you have that much money....more then you could spend in a lifetime, why would you feud with family. What a sad woman she is. From her comments to the general public to her actions towards her children she`s any angry unhappy individual. with all she has life could be joyful and fulfilling and expansive. But instead she chooses to be angry and aggressive and argumentative.I wish her peace.
11:46 AM on 09/12/2012
Many who are that rich, it becomes less about the money, and more about CONTROL/POWER over everything around them. Only she can give herself peace. But I doubt she will ever find it. She never earned, nor made her riches, it was given to her. Spoiled brat all grown up, never knowing respect or humility.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randy Johns
09:56 PM on 09/12/2012
Agreed...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fogjam1
11:51 AM on 09/12/2012
Many in fact most wealthy people are pretty stupid in my experience
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jewseyfroot
11:24 AM on 09/12/2012
Legally this is quite simple.... she has the right to say WHO........ period!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bostonbakedncali
Education ends simple-mindedness
11:49 AM on 09/12/2012
Exactly. I didn't quite understand why she would push the childrens' trust out to 2068. Why not just give it to them and let them either blow it or do something with it. Seriously, if they don't want to listen, give them the money, let the capital gains cripple it and they can have what's leftover. From the kids standpoint, 2068 is a long way off. Who wants the money when they are 80 years old?

But, as you said, legally she's in control. Apparently she is a very shrewd and cutthroat business woman which is why she was left in control.
.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mollyinthemiddle
If you're not outraged you're not paying attention
01:35 PM on 09/12/2012
If the money is earmarked in the trust for the children then her pushing the date back is just an act of meanness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mollyinthemiddle
If you're not outraged you're not paying attention
02:30 PM on 09/12/2012
And "control" does seem to be the operative verb.
11:51 AM on 09/12/2012
Not quite. The children's share of the pot was ready to vest. She alterred the vested date, thus closing them out of their control of their inheritance. If the children can prove careless and negligent actions against their mother, then they will win the control of their money. And I believe she's headed for lose of her money as well as theirs.

The children want control of their inheritance. They do not want to receive their share due to tax liability. They want to ensure that their share is protected. Gina is a loose canon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randy Johns
09:57 PM on 09/12/2012
Your probably right.