More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Connie Saltonstall

Connie Saltonstall

Posted: March 31, 2010 07:26 PM

Why I Decided to Challenge Bart Stupak in the Democratic Primary

What's Your Reaction:

I believe passionately that Americans deserve the opportunity to have affordable, accessible healthcare, and until recently, I believed that Congressman Bart Stupak represented my beliefs in Washington. But when Mr. Stupak threatened to block reform unless the amendment bearing 'his name' was included in the bill, I was furious. He crossed the line. He broke his word to his constituents that he would not block healthcare reform over this issue. He lost his district's trust, and he lost my trust.

His argument that the Stupak Amendment was necessary to prohibit federal funding for abortion is misleading. The Senate bill already included that provision. Mr. Stupak risked derailing the core vision of the Democratic Party, he let down his constituents in the 1st Congressional District, and he no longer deserves to be our Representative. Like so many others, I waited for someone to challenge him. But when no one did, I decided it was time to stand up, and I announced my candidacy.

I have been overwhelmed and humbled by the enthusiasm, support and outreach for my campaign, both nationally and locally. People from all over this district are calling daily, offering to contribute their valuable time and to do anything that they can to help. Political pundits like to say that someone from the lower peninsula cannot win in Michigan's first district. I don't believe that. I have heard from citizens all the way from Keweenaw County in the northwest of our district to Bay County in the southeast. We are all Michiganders and our commonalties are far more important than our differences.

My campaign is about getting past the kind of political obstruction and grandstanding that marred the healthcare debate. I look forward to working in Congress to represent the traditional Democratic values of the First District - affordable, accessible healthcare for all Americans, healthcare that allows women the opportunity to make responsible life decisions for themselves and their families, protecting our Great Lakes and other precious natural resources, and fighting to put people in our district, so hard hit by this recession, back to work.

I am here to give the people of the Michigan's First District a choice in the August 3rd primary. I ask for your support as we show Mr. Stupak that he cannot take Democratic voters for granted. Thank you.

http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/24052

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:47 PM on 04/01/2010
BART HAS BECOME THE THOMAS CLARENCE OF HEALTHCARE.

WOMEN AND MEN ALL OVER AMERICA ARE WAKING UP.

RUN CONNIE RUN!
04:43 PM on 04/01/2010
We're in California and will be sending you a check. Give him hell!
Thank you for standing up and running.
WIN! WIN! WIN!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:02 PM on 04/01/2010
"He broke his word to his constituents that he would not block healthcare reform over this issue. He lost his district's trust, and he lost my trust."

Oh, you must live under a rock. Health care passed. Stupak didnt block it, he voted for it. Stupak folded like a cheap tent. He caved in for a meaningless executive order that isnt worth the paper it is written on.
03:58 PM on 04/01/2010
Ms. Saltaonstall should come clean on what her primary challenge is really about. It is not about healthcare and it is certainly not to challenge Bart’s solid Democratic voting record as a previous poster noted. Her campaign is about abortion funding which became even clearer when Planned Parenthood gave her $5000 and their endorsement.

In reality, Bart saved health care reform by leading an effort to ensure that a majority of his constituents’ views were represented and that the President’s promise that there would be no change in the status quo with respect to abortion was upheld. An overwhelming majority of Bart’s constituents’, and a majority of people in this nation, did not want the bill to include public funding of abortion.

In a year where many Democratic seats are endangered, this effort to unseat a solid Democrat because he is pro-life is misguided and a mistake. This same strategy in the late 80’s led to the Republicans regaining the control of the House for the first time in over 40 years. If we are not careful, we could face a terrifying re-birth of the Contract on America.

I would urge Ms. Saltonstall to withdraw and supporters should put their money and time into saving Democratic seats.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:29 PM on 04/01/2010
by the way, a prolife democrat is a farce. stupak folded. the health care vote exposed that. but i do like the contract on america reference democrats make. seriously, i find it funny. but i do love mob movies. and i agree with most of your post. dems are in real danger right now.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Busbydav
03:30 PM on 04/01/2010
I am from Michigan and live in a politically similar state now, PA. It was quite embarrassing to have HCR held hostage while he tried to take reproductive rights away from women. I wish you luck!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Binea
Only a fool denies she is a fool, I am no fool
09:35 AM on 04/01/2010
Mrs. Saltonstall,
I was mulling over what you wrote,and my own observations and that of those who commented,and an idea came to me.I don't think the idea has been done before,but ,I for one, would enjoy reading and then maybe participating after it's done ( though I live in NY) in a text debate,between you and Stupak. Perhaps here on Huffington Post,you and Stupak can have a real time discussion/debate where all can follow,and they the voters,then can be allowed to challenge and question eigther of your comments,after it's over.,and you in real time can answer. It's far differnt than watching debates on TV,voters can participate more and issues can be thouroughly hashed out.You as candidates and they as the voters will have a far better understanding of where your heads are really at.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
09:10 AM on 04/01/2010
Time to get involved and congradulation for having the fortitude to do it, most people just like to flap there gums and complain i wish you well and remember should you win why the people put you there.
photo
Rastageneral
Babylon can't fool I - Rastafari rule I
01:26 AM on 04/01/2010
Good for you, I wish you all the best. See if you can find out during your candidacy howcome Stupak and the other C-Streeters were paying such low rent to live at a "church" - was their rent subsidized? Did they report it?
photo
ancientgame
GOP - the Irony deficient party
01:02 AM on 04/01/2010
Ms. Saltonstall,
I wish you all the best. Michigan needs a strong pricipled voice and Stupak was not it.
Best,
09:57 PM on 03/31/2010
He held out for the payoff. Just another corrupt politician. Good Luck.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hypyrwyf
there'll be pie in the sky when you die
09:53 PM on 03/31/2010
My impression was that Stupak lost his conservative friends because he gave in, and lost his Dem friends because he held it up. I don't know anybody who's still on his side.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Binea
Only a fool denies she is a fool, I am no fool
08:10 AM on 04/01/2010
I'm on his side,but,that won't help him since I'm in NY. I think he did the right thing. He did not give in,He got a prochoice president to sign an executive order to ensure the Hyde ammendment wasn't being gone around in anyway,even though you and the president felt it was secure,it eased the fear and suspicion,of many people.So how can anyone think that he gave in,when he didn't ? As for the other side of it,He eventually voted for the bill,so why is the other side upset,really ? Was their sneaky language in there after all ,proving stupak justified in his stand ? What was eigther side really expecting of him ?
I'm all for gutting congress and senate and getting all new people in,but there are a few,like stupak,who should stay.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:39 PM on 04/01/2010
he gave in because that executive order isnt worth the paper it's written on. the law says something different than the executive order. presidents (thankfully) cant overturn law by executive order, if they could the president would be a dictator.

so congrats his 'stance' earned him a sheet of paper. wow. obama or any other president could just write a new executive order overturning this one. but i doubt that will be needed, as again, president dont have the authority to overturn the law by executive order.
09:44 PM on 03/31/2010
In a district described as "pro-life, pro-gun and pro-working families" Connie right off the bat concedes the pro-life vote, no one knows where Mz. Saltonstall stands on gun issues (Stupak was endorsed by the NRA in 2008) and Stupak has the support of the unions having a lifetime grade from the AFL-CIO of 98%.
Connie's record against hte Republicans isn't good as she got a drubbing in her 2008 race for the 105th state house seat getting less then 37% of the vote.

For an excellent summary of Stupak's voting record in Congress, click on the below link:

http://www.eclectablog.com/2010/03/before-you-pillory-bart-stupak.html

For anyone who wishes to support Stupak, below his a link to his Act Blue page:

http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/12765
09:52 PM on 03/31/2010
Good to see someone else understands the issue with her.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Busbydav
04:33 PM on 04/01/2010
That list kind of cherry picks the votes. On civil rights he voted in favor of DOMA as well as ENDA. He has also voted against efforts that would curb unwanted pregnancies and thus decrease the number of abortions such as voting to fund Abstinence only education and parental notification of contraceptives. He's a decent democrat on many issues but we are striving for BETTER more progressive voices.
08:58 PM on 03/31/2010
Best of Luck to you!
Could you explain your platform in greater detail?
08:39 PM on 03/31/2010
Good luck Connie! Competition is good.
08:11 PM on 03/31/2010
There is no way I would vote out a Democrat who agrees with the Democrats on every issue but one, who is rather popular in a Democrat in a rather Red district, because of an issue of what could have but didn't happen. I know very little about you, I can find out little about you, and your entire platform seems to be Bart Stupak doesn't like abortion. So explain to us Ms. Unknown, how are you going to take on Republicans?

If you think an unknown Democrat has a any chance in a Republican district in 2010..... then I have some stuff I would like to sell you.

And yes, I live in Michigan's 1st district, most of my life.
08:42 PM on 03/31/2010
So she shouldn't run because you wouldn't vote for her if she did? Why are you even concerned if you think she has no chance?
09:02 PM on 03/31/2010
You really don't understand? If she stops Stupak from running she puts this district at a very high risk of having a Republican take it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:42 PM on 04/01/2010
im from florida, so i dont know much about the district youre describing. it seems to me though, stupak will lose the pro-life vote this time around as well. smells like a GOP gain in november.