More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Craig Aaron
GET UPDATES FROM Malkia A. Cyril

OMG Comcast! Pick on Someone Your Own Size

Posted: 05/20/11 03:18 PM ET

Last week the public was dismayed and disgusted by news that FCC Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker was leaving her government job to lobby on behalf of the Comcast-NBC colossus whose merger she had just approved.

Seattle's Reel Grrls -- an award-winning nonprofit group that trains teenage girls in making their own media was no exception. So they posted this tweet:

OMG! @FCC Commissioner Baker voted 2 approve Comcast/NBC merger & is now lving FCC for A JOB AT COMCAST?!? http://su.pr/1trT4z #mediajustice

But instead of being ashamed, Comcast got angry. It turns out Comcast had given the Real Grrls an $18,000 grant to run a summer program teaching filmmaking, editing and screenwriting. So its local VP fired off a livid email yanking the funds. He wrote:

Given the fact that Comcast has been a major supporter of Reel Grrls for several years now, I am frankly shocked that your organization is slamming us on Twitter. I cannot in good conscience continue to provide you with funding -- especially when there are so many other deserving nonprofits in town.

Without those funds, the Reel Grrls summer camp won't happen. But the Reel Grrls didn't back down or delete their tweet. Instead, they called their allies and alerted the media. They even made their own fabulous video telling their side of the story.

And once the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and Associated Press got hold of the story, Comcast suddenly changed its tune. It claimed the threats were "unauthorized" and said that it wouldn't yank the funds.

It's not easy for any nonprofit to turn down $18,000. Yet even when Comcast reversed course trying to avert a PR disaster, the Reel Grrls stuck to their principles. They're telling Comcast to keep its money if it's going to try to censor what they say.

How many other nonprofits would stand up to a behemoth like Comcast? But what Comcast didn't know was that the Reel Grrls weren't alone -- they're a member of the Media Action Grassroots Network (MAG-Net), a national coalition of local organizations working together for media justice. So when Comcast yanked their money, unlike many groups Reel Grrls was well positioned to fight back.

According to their filings with the FCC in the merger proceeding, Comcast and its foundation have donated $1.8 billion to local nonprofits over the past decade. How many times did those groups have to think twice before saying something about their Internet service or cable bills? How many emails have been written like this that didn't get leaked to the press?

The email to Reel Grrls makes clear that Comcast isn't just making donations for charity. They expect the groups they support to toe the company line as well. Looking at the long list of groups otherwise disengaged from media policy that weighed in on the Comcast merger, we can't help wonder how many of them were motivated by the size of the corporate checks they received or the threat -- unspoken or otherwise -- of those funds disappearing if they didn't get on board.

The Real Grrls brave and inspiring response to Comcast's bullying is even more remarkable when you look at how many Washington groups ignored Meredith Baker's scandalous departure from the FCC. They certainly showed more integrity than the members of Congress who didn't even ask about Baker at a hearing on reforming the FCC -- where the revolving door between the agency and the industries it's supposed to be regulating would seem to top the list of concerns.

Reel Grrls are training the next generation of media makers and activists. Their example gives me hope there are some people out there willing to do more than shrug in the face of the corruption and cronyism of public servants who are supposed to be looking out for us instead of opportunities to cash in as corporate lobbyists.

We can't think of a better way to show our support and thanks to the Reel Grrls than making sure that summer camp still happens. Free Press and the Center for Media Justice are asking our members to donate today -- and if just 1,000 of us kick in 20 bucks each, we can easily make up for the money Comcast tried to take away.

We need to stand up to Comcast's censors -- and show these young media makers we've got their backs.

 

Follow Craig Aaron on Twitter: www.twitter.com/notaaroncraig

 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
srheard
Life is full of a number of things.
11:06 AM on 05/25/2011
I love it when the "little people" hold their ground and their heads high. Go Grrls!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElBruce
01:39 PM on 05/24/2011
If Baker knew about the possibility of that job position before the vote - one conversation, or one phone call - then it's criminal bribery. Everybody who thinks that conversation didn't happen, raise your hands...? Yeah, that's what I thought too. She'd better hope no evidence of such ever turns up.
02:52 PM on 05/23/2011
JUut a thought...This is what people were afraid comcast could do if the merger went through..and lo and behold, it's exactly what they did.
09:09 PM on 05/22/2011
First off, it's not a merger. GE is selling NBC-U to comcast. Also, many people would think before criticizing someone who is voluntarily giving you critically needed money.
02:55 PM on 05/23/2011
"many people would think before criticizin­g someone who is voluntaril­y giving you critically needed money".

This obviously wasn't "voluntarily" given money, at least not the true kind with no strings atached.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
apathyman
Let them hate, so long as they fear
10:10 PM on 05/23/2011
Yes how dare they not think of the money before making a comment about something that seems at best unethical. Don't they know that corporations have all the money so that make the rules ?
03:22 PM on 05/22/2011
Good for you Reel Grrls! We need to see more of this kind of courage to stand up against corporate bullies! Your suggestion of there possibly being some unethical behavior must have hit a nerve. LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitybase
09:12 AM on 05/22/2011
Comcast sucks. All monopolies suck.
11:30 AM on 05/25/2011
Except for the federal government, right?
10:40 PM on 05/21/2011
How is this legal? There must be a way to get some justice out of this. This merger doesn't benefit anyone but the people at the top
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ESerafina42
Abandoned by wolves, raised by Republicans.
05:53 AM on 05/22/2011
That's exactly what I was wondering. Members of Congress (and their staffs, as the Ensign brouhaha reminded us) have to wait a year before becoming lobbyists. We need a similar law, or preferably something stiffer, like five years, against regulators going to work for those whom they have been regulating.
09:22 PM on 05/22/2011
No, it sohuld be illegal for them to accept jobs for whom they have been regulating at all.
photo
unfoxworthy
We:ScottOlsens,the misfits,out to change the world
09:19 PM on 05/21/2011
Great to keep these monopolistic megalomanics and their misdeeds in the limelight.
CommieCast has gotten too big to fail (...or so they think).
I am one of the newest fans of the Reel Grrls.
Great post!
04:02 PM on 05/21/2011
By Comcast's standards, criticism of their actions = unworthy of their continuing grants.
12:58 AM on 05/22/2011
Well, yes. Their "conscience" tells them that.
airmikee99
I can has micro-bio?
03:15 PM on 05/21/2011
If Comcast didn't have a monopoly on high speed internet on my side of the street, I would have dropped them completely years ago.
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
02:51 PM on 05/21/2011
What sort of response would you expect from a company that would bribe the regulator? This is way too common these days, but no one does anything about it. They've made what obviously should be illegal, legal. We are an empire in decline, no doubt about it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Dayne
12:38 PM on 05/21/2011
Obviously, Commissioner Baker got her cake and gets to eat it too. Has it gotten so bad in Washington that these government bottom feeders don't even try to disguise the bribery any more?

In Illinois it is fascinating to follow the Blago trial and watch the government try to convict a politician for doing exactly what Baker has done, take money for providing a favor to a private enterprise.
04:47 PM on 05/21/2011
Corruption has become the law of the land. The US is toast.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Dayne
01:43 PM on 05/22/2011
Sadly, I'm afraid you are right about the endemic nature of corruption. I often tell a story about going to a movie in Chicago several years ago. A guy in front of me with his date, opens his wallet and is given two tickets without taking out any money. Upon being queried the cashier told me, "he showed me his badge, he's a Chicago cop." Enough said.
12:07 PM on 05/21/2011
While it's very easy to bash corporations, let's put it into perspective.

Let's say you own a bakery in a small town. The local Girl Scout troop asks you to donate some cupcakes for their bake sale. You gladly help them out. After selling your cupcakes, the Girl Scouts turn around and send out a Tweet saying that your cupcakes were make with white sugar and flour instead of organic products and weren't any good.

Would you be donating your cupcakes to them again?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceminerals
Dog is my Co-pilot.
12:42 PM on 05/21/2011
Hi chloebe. You're comparing apples to oranges here. 1) Comcast is a publicly traded company. 2) The Comcast matter is a response to blatant, in-your-face corruption and cronyism i.e. business ethics not core business. One can make fabulous cupcakes while also being utterly corrupt. These issues are not mutually exclusive. 3) The fact that its media we're talking about adds another layer of difference since media's role is information to the public for the greater good. Obviously, the greater good paradigm is dead at Comcast (and many others), but that business doesn't shield them from criticism. They are free to response to such criticism in this manner, but business ethics tell us not to because, in this case, it represents a manner of oppression and fascism.

Think of it this way: Do you want to live in a world where a media company can deny someone media service (cable, internet, and phone) because one criticized them...because that's the logical conclusion of your analogy put to this situation.

Business Ethics 101.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jon David
Erase the 20th century, vote republican
08:22 PM on 05/24/2011
She still wont get it some people just burry thier heads in the sand when presented with an opinion diferent then thier own, its so much easier than sierious thought.
airmikee99
I can has micro-bio?
03:21 PM on 05/21/2011
Are you saying that Hostess needs to be looked at for antitrust abuses and corruption?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jarhead65
Writer, teacher, Marine Vet, Dog Lover
11:50 AM on 05/21/2011
Hooray!! for honesty fueled by courage and backbone. Comcast owners are just a part of the group of bullies that are trying to control this country and turn us backwards into a form of corporate feudalism. It won't depend so much on your bloodline, but instead, how smart you are, where you went to school, and how willing you are to lie and cheat to get wealth and power.
anothervoice2
Mitt has secret accounts in 7 countries
07:51 AM on 05/21/2011
Kudos to the Reel Grrls!  Comcast is nothing more than another right wing owned media empire like Faux Noize. Who bully and intimidate opposition. Shame on Comcast!