iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Craig and Marc Kielburger

Craig and Marc Kielburger

GET UPDATES FROM Craig and Marc Kielburger

Bringing Tolerance Back in Style

Posted: 07/23/10 04:51 PM ET

As France takes steps towards banning the burqa, Paris designers are staging their own unveilings in the Middle East.

Saks Fifth Avenue of Riyadh is a gleaming department store in the oil-rich Gulf state. It's there that associates pull designer abayas with the labels of Paris fashion houses. These floor-length, robe-like dresses are worn by millions of Muslim women.

It's meant to be modest -- but that doesn't mean it can't be luxurious.

French labels by John Galliano of Dior as well as Nina Ricci and Jean Claude Jitrois appear in abayas adorned by Swarovski crystals and elaborate embroidery. They range in price for $2,000 to $2,500 for ready-to-wear. Although a couture abaya with a coordinating veil could go for as much as $11,500.

It shouldn't be a surprise that French fashion is weighing into the burqa debate. Coco Chanel moved women's clothing away from binding corsets, while Yves Saint Laurent pioneered the feminine suit. Today, as French President Nicholas Sarkozy wages his own war on the burqa and niqab, Givenchy is sending models down runways with their faces covered to protest the government's stance.

The fashion industry is more often labelled as frivolous than political. But, it highlights an important point. In a globalized world where national borders are now less tightly bound than seams on a dress, institutionalized racism counteracts the gains we've made towards a more tolerant world.

While "burqa bans" are being contemplated across Europe, France is probably the most vocal in denouncing the garment. Last week, French Parliamentarians voted 336-1 in favour of a bill that would fine women US$190 if they are caught wearing a face-covering veil on the street, in public parks, on buses or in shops. Men who force their wives or daughters to wear a burqa or hiqab will face a fine of US$38,000 and face up to a year in prison.

This bill is counter-intuitive to women's empowerment by further isolating a supposedly abused subsection of the population. Worse, it perpetuates stereotypes that Muslim women are submissive and validates racism and Islamophobia in our society.

While countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia use forced veilings and morality police to control their populations, these practices are not true to Islam. They should rightly be condemned. But, it must also be acknowledged that millions of Muslims around the world successfully marry their religious values with Western culture.

A browse through one of the hundreds of online stores for Muslim women in Europe and North America shows just how closely they can relate.

"If you're looking for long tops that are very hijab friendly then you have to go to Gap and get your hands on the boyfriend shirt," says a recent posting on Hijab Trendz, a popular fashion, beauty and entertainment blog for Muslim women, which called the shirt hijabilicious. "It's perfect because of the length and looseness of the top."

Rather than seeing the similarities between these cultures, many tend to focus negative values perpetuated by oppressive governments. That focus is now leading to the institutionalizing of the stereotype through a ban -- something that only enforces a misconception rather than working towards tolerance on both ends.

Polls have shown that while the Western world debates the burqa, our image in the Middle East is less than favourable. As feminist media critic Fatemeh Fakhraie has pointed out, while governments work to change the Muslim world's perception on the West, we do little to improve our own perception of the Muslim world.

That unfortunately is left to runways in Paris where designers take the bold step of using Islamic influences in their collections. But, if Chanel could make the corset passé, maybe today's designers can introduce tolerance as the latest trend.

 

Follow Craig and Marc Kielburger on Twitter: www.twitter.com/craigkielburger

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:11 PM on 08/29/2010
Banning the Burqa is a safety issue as well as a human rights issue. The idea that anyone must total hide their presents from the world is dehumanizing. The face tells us all so much. In this day and age where more conversations are done by texting or by e-mail maybe we have forgotten how important it is to actually look into someones face and read their emotions as we talk to them.
When I walk in a public place I want to see who is there. I cannot imaging crossing a busy street or driving a car wearing Burqa. How do I know if it is truly a women wearing it? Why only women? If men were force to wear Burqas it would have been band ages ago.
10:33 PM on 08/03/2010
I think it's a mistake for the French to ban the burqa, just as it's a mistake for the Americans to get agitated about the mosque by Ground Zero. Banning the burqa will only make wearing it cool. People in some of the Islamic countries won't feel so guilty anymore about banning bibles and churches and synagogues when they read the news out of New York.

Moi je suis l'americain qui parle francais!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scobes
I have too many opinions.
09:20 PM on 07/25/2010
Thank you for such a well-written, enlightened, and interesting article about tricky subject matter. Fashion may have a ridiculous side, but it has a social and political bent as well.
07:13 PM on 07/25/2010
Thank you very, very much, Messrs. Kielburger. This is an extremely fine essay. If only there were more like it, and if only more would hear its message.
07:04 PM on 07/25/2010
The fashion industry is more often labelled as frivolous than political. But, it highlights an important point. In a globalized world where national borders are now less tightly bound than seams on a dress, institutionalized racism counteracts the gains we've made towards a more tolerant world.

Nothing is more political than the frivolous -

http://www.amazon.com/Serious-Pleasures-Life-Stephen-Tennant/dp/0140165320/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1280099028&sr=8-1

P. S. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/ShahC2.JPG
photo
QueenNewsBee
@ThrftyVntgChc or Facebook.com/thriftyvintagechic
02:43 AM on 07/25/2010
powerful: "while governments work to change the Muslim world's perception on the West, we do little to improve our own perception of the Muslim world." loved the article ...
05:10 PM on 07/24/2010
Above, I read: "This bill is counter-intuitive to women's empowerment by further isolating a supposedly abused subsection of the population. Worse, it perpetuates stereotypes that Muslim women are submissive and validates racism and Islamophobia in our society."
There's no racism in disagreeing with such garments. Muslims don't constitute a race in any case. There's no Islamaphobia in the US, just a majority who don't believe in Islam and who keep patiently waiting for 'Muslim moderates' to moderate the dangerous fanatics.
But more to the point, Muslim women are most certainly more 'submissive' than US women, although that's the wrong word. In short, they have no choice but to submit to second-class citizenship, if not personhood in some cases. They must ask for everything from men, permission to do most anything. They're kept on a very short leash. They don't enjoy the civil rights US women do. Is there even a possibility of a woman's rights movt under Islam? Depending on the country, their options as adults are very limited - driving a car, voting, serving in govt, working.
As far as garments are concerned: I'm ALL FOR modesty. I think we should have much more of it in US. But let's not pretend that a woman must wear a hijab , never mind niqab or burqa to have modesty. Doesn't that imply that US women who don't 'cover' (hide) are being immodest, being sluttish? Do you not see that as crazy? 'Covering' doesn't empower women. Come on!
02:55 AM on 07/24/2010
Wasn't it just a couple years ago we wanted nothing to do with the French (now, we had 'freedom fries'). Every other year we change our friends and enemies.
.
Yes, Taliban..No Taliban
Yes, France, No France
Yes, No,Yes No
.
Let the American people see the issue 'in whole' to make their own decisions. We might be surprised what the truth can do.
01:09 AM on 07/24/2010
I loved Bruno's savage lampooning of the whole schmata business.
11:50 PM on 07/23/2010
"Polls have shown that while the Western world debates the burqa, our image in the Middle East is less than favourable. As feminist media critic Fatemeh Fakhraie has pointed out, while governments work to change the Muslim world's perception on the West, we do little to improve our own perception of the Muslim world."

To Craig and Marc Kielburger"

Thank you for writing such an enlightened, interesting & professional view of the debate over Islamic attire.

The fashion industry is thinking & acting globally, sharing appreciation without the usual Islamophobic focus that we have come to expect from our governments (who should know much better).

I have more respect for the fashion industry than many of our politicians who seem intent on sowing more discord & mayhem rather than looking for commonalities among the peoples of the world.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
08:38 PM on 07/23/2010
If we simply let people choose whether or not to follow these religions, the religions will probably die out eventually.
01:08 AM on 07/24/2010
there is absolutely no evidence, historical or logical to support your this claim.
It is a typically liberal chimera.
France is a secular country and U.S. and Saudi Arabia are not, because French people struggled mightily against The Church oppression and ignored the bourgeois liberal let-split-it-down-the-middle. nonsense
06:42 PM on 07/23/2010
But, should we tolerate the intolerant?
12:29 PM on 07/24/2010
Why should anyone tolerance your intolerance? The moralizing that justifies invasions and occupations for oil and world power is pathetic.