iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Craig Kanalley

GET UPDATES FROM Craig Kanalley
 

With Google+ Sign-In, Google+ Can Now Do Things Facebook Can't

Posted: 03/04/2013 2:47 pm

When you look at the explosion of Facebook or Twitter as platforms, it's hard to deny the significance of third party developers who built applications to enhance the social networks.

For months, Google engineers have been hard at work improving Google+, the social network layered across Google products. Now Google+ is turning to outside developers for help super-charging its platform with the launch of Google+ Sign-In.

It all has the makings of a classic win-win. For developers, there's the potential for an app to "take off" when paired with Google+. For users, the more people who are developing for Google+ features and products, the better Google+ will be. It's not difficult to see why all of this is a win for Google too.

For its part, Google has clearly explained how developers can get started and how this works. With Sign-In, Google brings a social identity system to apps with the ability to share data back-and-forth.

But Facebook does that already, right? Facebook Connect? That may be true but Google is offering some things that Facebook doesn't.

(1) Mobile Advantage: Google has its own mobile operating system. It's making use of that by allowing instant-app install to Android devices when one connects with Google+. For example, if an Android user signs in with Google on a partner's website, like The Guardian, he or she will have the chance to instantly install that app to their mobile device, even if visiting from a desktop computer. This is among the ways Google can make experiences seamless on mobile with its own OS.

(2) Call-To Action Buttons: Google launched something called Interactive Posts that can get developers' imaginations running wild. Facebook has nothing quite like it, but within Google+ itself, partners can have a prominent button display alongside content with a simple call to action. Buy. Listen. Watch. Answer. Check-In. Add To Calendar. Record. Invite. Install. Confirm. Bookmark. Review. The possibilities are endless. In fact, Google has launched with 100 possible buttons partners can utilize, and a Google spokesperson tells HuffPost more could be in the works based on feedback from the community. On Facebook, you can Like. Rumors have long said there's more buttons to come, but that still hasn't happened yet.

(3) Other Google Products: A clear advantage Google has over Facebook is the ubiquity of its many products: Search, Gmail, Maps, YouTube, and so on. It has the potential to tap into these and it's doing so with Google+ Sign-In. For instance, when you find a movie you want to see in Flixster, a movie site, and you're signed into Google, you can one-tap add it to your Google Calendar. In other words, signing in with Google brings the entire Google ecosystem to other services, tied around your identity.

(4) Selective Sharing Only: Google says it won't let apps "spray 'frictionlessly' updates all over the stream." It's a swipe at Facebook itself, without naming it of course. Facebook worked with partners like Spotify to share music you're listening to without you taking any action, but it has drawn privacy concerns and complaints. None of that is a concern with Google's new sign-in system.

Facebook does own one thing Google doesn't, and it's big: the Social Graph and all the data we've inputted into Facebook. As Josh Constine wrote for TechCrunch, "Most people do not have richly filled-out Google+ profiles with data to personalize apps they sign in to."

Still, Google+ Sign-In represents a significant step forward for Google and its potential for growth. A quick look at how initial partners are using Sign-In provides a glance at what could come in the future.

Early Implementations Of Sign-In

In addition to Google Calendar integration, Flixster is allowing users who sign-in with Google+ to read reviews written by people in their Google+ Circles. With Interactive Posts, users can also invite their friends to come along. A "Join" button appears on Google+ and when someone accepts the invitation, it'll get posted to their Google Calendar as well.

The new Sign-In can also be used creatively for e-commerce. Fancy has added "Buy" buttons alongside its products shared to Google+. With one click, G+ users are off to Fancy to purchase the product displayed.

In food, OpenTable is an early adopter of Sign-In. The site, which can be used to make restaurant reservations online, allows for sharing restaurant picks and even entire menus to Google+. Friends who click through can make their own reservations if they'd like.

OpenTable's Jocelyn Mangan, vice president of consumer product management, told HuffPost it was a no-brainer to partner with Google. "In the business we're in, helping people go out to eat, it's really relevant to our space," she said.

TuneIn takes advantage of the new "Listen" button. A user listening to one of the streaming network's thousands of stations of music, sports and news can share the station they're enjoying, and users on Google+ can begin listening with one click.

Beautylish uses Google+ Sign-In to make it simple to create a new account on the site, pre-populated with information from Google+ profiles. It also automatically customizes a user's activity feed based on their Google+ Circles.

The most exciting part of Google+ Sign-In and Interactive Posts? As often is the case with new products centered around developers, the best innovation and use cases are likely still to come.

So, developers, have fun. And if you want to learn more, Google will discuss partner stories and technical implementations of Sign-In on Google Developers Live on Tuesday at 2:30 p.m. Pacific Time.

 

Follow Craig Kanalley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ckanal

FOLLOW TECH
When you look at the explosion of Facebook or Twitter as platforms, it's hard to deny the significance of third party developers who built applications to enhance the social networks. For months, G...
When you look at the explosion of Facebook or Twitter as platforms, it's hard to deny the significance of third party developers who built applications to enhance the social networks. For months, G...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:50 AM on 03/07/2013
Mobile Advertising:- What I need to do for that ..pls more explain.
09:26 PM on 03/05/2013
Twitter is for Communicating with People You Don't Know.
Facebook is for Communicating with People You Used to Know.
Google+ is for Communicating with People You Should Know.
09:00 AM on 03/06/2013
I like that.
4101alberta
Go with your dreams.
11:01 AM on 03/06/2013
Which platform is for Ignoring People You Don't Want to Know?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aldo Rodriguez
No Trumps need reply.
12:36 PM on 03/07/2013
Neighbors.
photo
KeepNIt2Real
Thibodeau, Stern's got nothing on your honesty
10:21 AM on 03/05/2013
What difference does ot make if you use Google+ vs Facebook? In the end, they both aggregate data about the user. Facebook is advantageous for those using it, of course, or they wouldn't boast as many users as they do. Google+ is good for tech-minded individuals...me loving it personally.

With that said, Bing actually outdoes Google Search now and I thought I'd never say that. I find myself going there a lot more these days with good results. All companies shine in some area. Stick with what works for you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Black Adder II
You're a sad, laughable figure, aren't you.
08:35 AM on 03/05/2013
My Google+ account has absolutely nothing on it. I have also set it to private, and not visible in search. I find that it's an annoyance. There are none of my friends listed on it and not a thing in my circle. In fact I never access it in the first place. Even on Facebook I won't spam my friends timelines with liking anything as I hide any story from my time line that they might get posted that is an advertisement.

I understand that that is one way that they make money, but I have clicked on a link that was posted to my Facebook for any sort of ad.

Plus I have a few accounts on it which I use under a Psuedname and registered with the name of my character's name. I still use my actual date of birth, I just don't show it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UmaUma
12:54 PM on 03/05/2013
I wish your grammer was better, I think you might actually have some thing interesting to share. Maybe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Black Adder II
You're a sad, laughable figure, aren't you.
03:27 PM on 03/05/2013
Good sir I do beg your
forgiveness for your vast intellect over my puny serf brain which does not
have the capacity to comprehend such words you speak of. For you see, I am no
more intelligent than a potato. Henceforth, because of your intellect over me I shall
remove myself and refrain from further interaction with you.
05:48 AM on 03/07/2013
*grammar
08:19 AM on 03/05/2013
I'm pretty sure Goggle has always been more about information and discussion than facebook which connects you to those you already know.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
metalsmithgirl71
Just say NO to GMO's!
08:13 AM on 03/05/2013
i would rather my fb be a separate thing and not attached to places i go online. it's nobody's business and i find it invasive.
xgomazx
I am We
06:36 AM on 03/05/2013
If google wants to impress me.

They will start doing something to stop the up to 12 phone calls I get each week by someone claiming to be affiliated with google to register my google business listings.

And

Return google to the way it returned search results 2 years ago. Google search sucks now
04:14 AM on 03/05/2013
“Facebook does own one thing Google doesn't, and it's big: the Social Graph and all the data we've inputted into Facebook.” That’s the huge advantage Facebook has over Google+ at the moment. I think the innovations are made with Google+ right now, but if all your friends are on Facebook you might just stay with it. Of course, that can change in the near future. At one time, “everybody” was on MySpace
02:30 AM on 03/05/2013
Google already knows too much about me.
I don't link any of my accounts. FB, Youtube, here, there - no where.
The best FB can figure out about usually comes too late.
For instance, it's a little late to place an advert for transmission repairs after I've talked about replacing mine, and now I'm just inundated with ads for shoes. I guess because I mention walking a lot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
metalsmithgirl71
Just say NO to GMO's!
08:14 AM on 03/05/2013
i love mozilla's browser with the ad blocker. no more ads on fb.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BannedFromCommenting
♼ ♼ PLEASE RECYCLE TROLLS ♼ ♼
05:27 PM on 03/04/2013
Yeah but you get GOOGLE saturation. Humans get bored easily and do not want everything GOOGLE. They like variety. Also, Sega was a much better quality product than Nintendo. But what did Nintendo have? Variety of games. Not better ones , but MORE selection.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Craig Kanalley
An editor at HuffPost
05:42 PM on 03/04/2013
Good point actually... this is why Apple is still so huge in the tablet/smartphone space... app store.. more selection.
12:26 PM on 03/05/2013
That may have been true but no one owns the (my)space outright and attitudes, technology and other developments impacts on behaviour. Apple is still huge but not as huge as it was if this recent research is anything to go by: http://dashburst.com/infographic/could-samsung-take-down-apple/
12:50 PM on 03/05/2013
No one ever owns the (my)space and it can change as attitudes, technology, opportunity offers options more suited to new ways of working, seeing the world, engaging.

You're right that Apple is huge but not as huge as it once was if this recent research is anything to go by: http://dashburst.com/infographic/could-samsung-take-down-apple/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skewedtrue
Don' START nut'n, won' BE nut'n
04:44 AM on 03/05/2013
Nope, I'd rather have one good engineering source I can trust than potholes in a bunch of poor patched-together solutions.

Let the easily bored go flitting from new thing to new thing: easily-bored people are far, FAR off my radar, and quite welcome to stay there.
xgomazx
I am We
06:39 AM on 03/05/2013
I dont see google to be any great peice of engineering either.
Google search now for example totally blows. It worked much better and much more to my liking two years ago
04:50 PM on 03/04/2013
Bing is better than Google.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skewedtrue
Don' START nut'n, won' BE nut'n
04:45 AM on 03/05/2013
Now we've heard from Opposite World...
11:13 AM on 03/05/2013
OK
12:37 PM on 03/05/2013
Good provocative comment; elicits a response! Better at what? Search, revenue, profit, global domination, user experience? Maybe you're right, just better, but I dunno!
10:21 PM on 03/05/2013
It just goes to show you. provocative comments cause people to think, research and decide.
03:20 PM on 03/04/2013
Are these really compelling reasons? For content providers maybe
(1) Mobile Advantage
(2) Call-To Action Buttons
(3) Other Google Products
(4) Selective Sharing Only
(5) Early Implementations Of Sign-In

For starters it would be helpful if they fix posting on Google+. Sometimes when I click on the post text area on Google+, it says "Opening ..." and takes ages to come up.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Craig Kanalley
An editor at HuffPost
05:41 PM on 03/04/2013
Sure. It's less exciting to talk about and more exciting for users in action... Being able to hit "Add to calendar" etc. is useful in G+ itself.

That sounds like a bug you're talking about. Not cool at all, agree.