Folks, as you may know, I've been doing a lot of work with good orgs who are doing fact-checking work, and voter protection. As the nation gears up for the general election in November, and news outlets increasingly cover campaign stops and primary results, my craigconnects team asked the polling firm Lincoln Park Strategies to survey likely voters to find out the real deal about what they look for in a news outlet, the trustworthiness of news outlets, and their opinion about the effect of social media on news quality. Check out the infographic to see the survey results.
The survey interviewed 1,001 likely voters nationwide. Interviews were given by land-line and cell phone from January 10 - 12, 2012.
We discovered that likely voters are looking for news they can trust, but are torn about where they can find it. I'm not in the news business and I won't tell anybody how to do their job, but I am a news consumer and I'd like to know I can trust the news I'm getting.
We asked people about, and explored six media types in the survey:
• Cable news stations
• Network news
• Talk radio
• Internet new sites
• Blogs and social media
We broke the results down by sex, race, age, and party:
• The data set only focused on people who identified as White, Black, or Hispanic. The data we had for other demographics such as Asian and Native American were such a small sample size that all answers for these subgroups are not considered statistically significant.
• Age was broken up by 18-35, 36-44, 45-64, and 65+.
• Party was broken down by Democrat and Republican.
Some of our findings confirmed our earlier expectations:
• "Traditional" news outlets scored highest in terms of perceived credibility compared to newer and less traditional mediums.
• Democrats are more likely to give cable news and network news a higher rating.
• Republicans have more faith in Talk Radio then Democrats.
As for social media:
• Younger people give more credibility to social media vs. older adults, which confirms people's initial thinking, BUT neither really giving high scores for social media usage to get their news.
• Non-traditional media such as Internet news sites, blogs and social media sites scored far down the list as being credible.
• College grads are slightly more cynical about social media then non-college grads.
• Democrats were a little more positive about social media, but not significantly.
• There were some differences in Hispanics vs. Whites and Blacks - Hispanic people tend to be less enamored with news sources, and are going to social media for it.
Most people aren't getting hard election news from social media. I think tech folks and early adopters are, but not most people, not yet.
And we discovered some cool new stuff:
• Cable news stations were the top source of news for 33 percent of respondents.
• Newspapers scored the highest in credibility with 22 percent.
• Less than one quarter of the population would describe any source of election news as very credible.
• Talk radio, often cited as influential on political news, scored only 13 percent as very credible.
• 13% of Republican women and 11% of Republican men think that newspapers are very credible, with twice that: 28% of both Democratic women and men think that newspapers are a very credible source for information about voting.
• Blacks give more trust to news sources and Whites fall in the middle.
Interest-based efforts hold great promise for helping ensure trustworthiness and boosting public confidence in news reporting. It's called factchecking, and there are a lot of good people working on it. They're looking at ways to help the news media hold candidates and other public figures accountable for what they tell the public. It's hard, and it's expensive, but it's really important.
Follow Craig Newmark on Twitter: www.twitter.com/craignewmark