A McCain Administration Would Set Women's Equality Back For Decades
Women could lead starkly different lives depending on whether they live under a McCain/Palin or Obama/Biden Administration. At risk is their economic well-being, their health, and their very right to control their own bodies. Looking beyond the sound bites and attack ads, the candidate's actions portray strikingly divergent views on their approach to women's issues.
Reproductive Freedom
Senator Barack Obama is a firm supporter of Roe v. Wade and the Freedom of Choice Act, which intends to codify the protections granted by Roe. Senator John McCain has clearly stated that Roe v. Wade should be overturned. McCain believes that the question of a woman's right to choose should be returned to the states and that the fight for life will be one of courage - "the courage of a pregnant mother to bring her child in the world." See here, here and here.
Obama supports funding for Planned Parenthood, McCain does not. Obama supports insurance coverage of prescription birth control, while Senator McCain voted against requiring health care plans to cover basic birth control. Obama supports emergency contraception for rape survivors, Senator McCain does not. Given 119 chances to support a women's right to choose and other reproductive issues, Senator McCain has voted no 115 times, including voting against spending $100 million to prevent unintended and teen pregnancies.
I also asked Katherine Grainger, the Vice President for Public Policy and Political Initiatives at NARAL Pro-Choice New York, what she thought about the candidates. Katherine says:
"A McCain/Palin administration would set women's equality and reproductive health back decades. McCain not only fails to support abortion rights, but also basic methods of prevention, like birth control, emergency contraception, and comprehensive sex-education. It is hard to imagine an America where women are worse off than they are after 8 years of George W. Bush - but a McCain/Palin victory will absolutely take things from bad to worse."
Women's Health
Obama has a record of addressing the impact of HIV/AIDS on women. Obama introduced the Microbicide Development Act, which would accelerate the development of products that empower women in the battle against AIDS. In contrast, McCain voted to earmark 1/3 of all HIV/AIDS prevention funds for abstinence only program.
In 1990 McCain voted against extending the Title X federal family planning program that provides health care services ranging from breast and cervical cancer screening to birth control to low-income and uninsured women.
McCain also voted no on legislation in 2005 that would have overturned the global gag rule. This rule bars foreign nongovernmental organizations from receiving U.S. family planning assistance if the organization provides abortion services or information or advocates for pro-choice laws and policies in its own country. Obama supports this legislation.
Equal Pay
Women earn 77 cents for every dollar earned by men. Last year, the Supreme Court, in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., a now infamous ruling, made it even harder for women to break the glass ceiling. In that case, Lilly Ledbetter, a manager at Goodyear, was paid significantly less than her male counterparts, though she didn't find out until the end of her career. A 5-4 Supreme Court held that she couldn't sue Goodyear for discrimination because she didn't bring the lawsuit within 180 days of the first instance of discrimination, years earlier. Never mind that Lilly had no way of knowing because the pay disparity had been kept secret from her.
Obama supports the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act that would reverse the Supreme Court and allow women, like Lilly, to hold their employers accountable for discrimination. Obama would also extend child care tax breaks to close the pay gap.
McCain is against the Fair Pay Act and offers no plan to close the pay gap.
What the Candidates Don't Say
There are some women's issues McCain is neither for nor against. Rather, he simply "can't recall" where he is on that issue or hasn't decided yet. When asked whether he supports requiring health care plans that cover Viagra to cover female contraception, McCain responded that he doesn't recall his vote. When pressed for how he would vote, he said that he did not have enough information on the issue to respond. McCain also stated that he doesn't know whether he supports or is against the government funding of contraception. Obama supports both.
Choice of Vice-President
Obama has chosen a running mate with a history of supporting women's issues. Senator Biden authored and passed the landmark Violence Against Women Act, the strongest legislation to date criminalizing domestic violence and holding batterers accountable. Biden voted yes on a bill providing $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education and contraceptives and co-sponsored a bill ensuring access to and funding for contraception. Biden has also strongly supported the fight against breast cancer.
McCain's running mate, Governor Palin, has little if anything in her record to indicate where she stands on women's issues. What she has stated is that she is against the Fair Pay Act, and that she is pro-life, even in cases of rape or incest. Palin doesn't support the morning after pill under any circumstances. Although Palin stated in her interview with Katie Couric that she doesn't judge others, as vice-president, and someone who could become president, she would support the overturning of Roe v. Wade. She can say that she wouldn't judge others, but she would cast a vote that reflects her own personal values. It is difficult to understand how she can reconcile the two positions when her position on issues reflects her own personal values.
Governor Palin leads a state with the nation's highest rate of sexual assault. As Mayor of Wasilla, Palin allowed the city to bill sexual assault victims and their insurance companies for the cost of rape kits and forensic examinations. Hers was the only town in Alaska to allow this. There is nothing in her record that indicates a pro-active effort to reduce the number of sexual assaults in her home state to address this crisis.
The upcoming vice-presidential debate, and remaining two presidential debates, will focus on national issues, including these "social issues". When discussing their positions on these social issues, both Governor Palin and Senator McCain have tended to state in interviews that although these are their personal beliefs, and they do not judge others. But their record, or in Governor Palin's case, lack thereof, indicate that their policies do reflect their personal beliefs. The choices all of the candidates have made in the course of their public service have been a reflection of their beliefs. There is no reason to believe that they would act any differently than they have in the past when they become president and vice-president.
OffTheBus is publishing a variety of stories that cover the policy differences between Senators John McCain and Barack Obama. If you have a policy expertise and would like to participate, please see Calling All Policy Gurus.
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Palin doesn't even believe in hiring women in key positions. She has one female commissioner out of I believe, 14. That is less than 10%. And minority women? She actually was quoted saying she does not have to take race into consideration in making appointments. So, in addition to the important policy questions like violence against women, choice, and health she brings nothing to the McCain campaign on these issues.
Wonderfully written. Kudos.
McCain is no champion of womens rights and his choice of a running mate from the bottom of the barrel shows what he thinks of women and how stupid they are.
Vote Sarah because she also has you mother nature monthly visitor?? How OUTRAGEOUS. What a SMACK in the face for all LIBERATED women!
Phooooeey!!
Pic is worth a 1000 words:
http://bag
Proposal would exempt a specific kind of arrow from excise tax
Rum from Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands would get tax break
Filmmakers would get a $478 million in incentives to produce movies in U.S.
U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 224-3121
http://www
Republicans hate government intrusion in their lives. They rail against the "Nanny state" whenever they get the chance. Tell me how denying women access to birth control devices and education, including "morning after" contraception, akin to a Nanny state. Arent they in fact, intruding into our personal lives?
I'm guess that Republicans, or those possessing small brains, demand to see "proof" of illicit sex - in the form of illegitimate births or abortions - that's why sex amongst gays and lesbians drives them nuts - no "proof".
One other question to the general audience here - on the subject of abortions.
*right now* dont you have confidentiality between you and your doctor?
If, behind closed doors, your doctor is performing ANY medical procedure.
Are clinic employees blabbing about the business between dr and patient?
I really thought office staff was included in the confidentiality, and that ANY information was gotten only by court order, such as a search warrant for medical records. Not just by a random fishing expedition.
So - how is the information of abortions being communicated to those outside the doctor's office?
When we see picketing, how is that info getting out?
What a comprehensive piece. I shudder at the thought of a McCain-Palin administration especially because of Palin. I think McCain would just amble along like Bush and not really pass any anit-abortion legislation and kick the can down the road. His scary supreme court nominees will threaten things but like Bush I think politically he doesn't want this fight. But Palin will make this a religious quest, true to the zealot she is. America needs to fight for itself right now!
I would like to ask big government Sarah Palin if she has costed out the additional judicial enforcement, court costs and incarceration that would result from banning abortions to all woman. If one wants to use Sarah simplistic math, that means that in addtion to the 2M in jail already, there would be another 40M Americans (to cover abortive mothers, practitioners etc) who would have gone through this cost process including jail. What kind of massive big government is that! Pay up or shut up Sarah!
She will set back women's issue and our country! Thinking women could never support the likes of Palin!
No kidding. Hasn't anyone noticed that yet?
The only women that support McCain and Palin are the ones who get slapped around and then say "Oh, but I deserved it."
Bite me.
Obama/Biden are for us women and all of us need to vote them into office on November 4.
Link the Pink and Rock the vote, ladies....
"Link the Pink and Rock the Vote"
PeaceOnEarth62 - you're awesome! Thanks
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
