"Majority rules." That is a concept that every child grows up with. When you were trying to solve a schoolyard dispute or pick a TV show with your siblings, you knew that "majority rules." So how is it we now live in a society where 1% rules?
Yes, I am the 99%. The odds would predict that. Yes, I feel that Occupy Wall Street speaks for me (read their minimal "mission statement") -- to the extent that OWS is going out of its way to not have positions and not speak for anyone except to say that everyone needs to have a voice that is heard and a vote that counts -- not just lobbyists representing the interests of the rich and global corporations (who are NOT people, too).
Critics complain that there is no list of demands. I like that. If there were a long list, maybe I'd agree with some and disagree with others. But if there is just one overarching demand -- that our government needs to fairly, justly and equally represent its citizens and, by doing that, its citizens can fairly, justly and equally have a voice in putting forth new ideas and the ability to fairly, justly and equally vote for or against them. I am 100 percent for that
Americans are not naive. We know that it is better to be rich than poor -- for so so many reasons. And the rich, like the poor, will be with us always. We know that there are advantages built into the system for the rich and powerful (that is the definition of "powerful"). That is reality and Americans accept that. But the discrepancy between the rich (and powerful) and the rest of us has grown to an unhealthy, unproductive and harmful size.
A strong, healthy and large middle class is a very good thing -- not just for those who are in that middle class. A strong, healthy and large middle class means a strong, healthy and large group of consumers, taxpayers, volunteers, workers, teachers, police, small business owners, renters, home buyers, etc. It is good for America. And good for the idea of America.
It is great to be rich and it is great that Americans should all feel that this is something they can attain. But it is even more important that all Americans feel that they can attain middle class status. And not a new, "downsized" view of middle class but the traditional view -- people who, through hard work and fiscal responsibility, can own their own home, have one or two cars, send their children to college and are able to endure a medical crisis without bankrupting themselves.
The unfairness of our current system is depressing and staggering. Whichever area you pick -- health care, criminal justice, financial/taxes -- the rich have it so much better than not just the poor (which is not shocking) but the middle class (which should be shocking). And not for the obvious reasons -- because they have more money - but because of how the system is stacked in their favor (and against the rest of us). This clear and prevalent unfairness is finally getting a lot of attention. Great recent examples: Arianna Huffington's "Lessons from Spain," Rachel Maddow's show on Wall Street's culpability without accountability , Politifact's "fact-checker" article on income inequality, Thomas Friedman's NYT column on Citigroup's "non-admission" of guilt, Matt Taibbi on Rolling Stone about winning vs. cheating.
What I hear Occupy Wall Street saying is "We will follow the rules. But let's make the rules fair." The system is rigged. It wasn't designed to be rigged but has bit-by-bit, step-by-step, become rigged. Sadly, when there seemed to be a booming economy, we didn't pay that much attention. But now that so many more people are struggling and disenfranchised, we have suddenly woken up, seen how unjust the system is and said "What???? This is wrong!" The argument can (and should) be made that the poor and minorities, in America and across the world, have experienced this inequality for a long time, that the "99%" is a little late to this party and that, only once the American middle class has been affected, have they decided to act. But better late than never.
Occupy Wall Street : Pictures, Videos, Breaking News
Think Occupy Wall St. is a phase? You don't get it - CNN.com
Telling people to "stop whining and get a job" in this economy begs the question because it's like telling 100 people sitting around 53 slices of pizza to each take a slice. There simply aren't enough slices. And if all 100 people did manage to each get a slice from that pizza, it means they had to cut those 53 slices into 100 pieces. I bet the 53 people who would have otherwise gotten a whole slice would be extremely unhappy that their slices got reduced by nearly half, but that is what they are asking. On the other hand, the Occupiers are fighting to be allowed to make a pizza with 100 slices, rather than having to divvy up those few existing slices between everyone.
The 53% really don't want the other 46% to be taking parts of their slices, they want those 46% to get their own slices. That's what the 46% want, too. Except the Occupiers want all 99% to be able to make bigger slices all around.
So why are the 53% telling the others, essentially, to take their slices from the 53%'s share? No one really wants that, do they?
Hopefully Americans will start a new movement and call it "KISS" (Keep It Simple Stupid). I believe that politicians and corporations alike will oppose it vehemently because it will force issues into the light or to be hidden. But with the simplicity concept anything hidden will effect any thing in the open. Think about it!
Hopefully Americans will start a new movement and call it "KISS" (Keep It Simple Stupid). I believe that politicians and corporations alike will oppose it vehemently because it will force issues into the light or to be hidden. But with the simplicity concept anything hidden will effect any thing in the open. Think about it!
The only way the citizens of this country are going to be able to truely run our country is to require that we vote in our representaÂtives district on each and every issue and require our representaÂtives to then vote the will of their constituenÂts. In earlier times there were less than a million people that were representeÂd and the constituenÂts actually talked to their representaÂtives. And to those that say it would slow things down too much in WashingtonÂ, please remeber that it took 13 years to agree on the original ConstitutiÂon.
By forcing our representatives to do what their constituents want through the power of the vote, lobbiest would basically have to go to the people to get their way and that would not be cost effective. This would reduce the corruption that is now evident in our politics. To further reduce corruption term limits should be put in place for all political offices (this should also include all appointed offices and party member workers) and there should be no retirement. Beware though, political parties and "professional" politicians will fight this as hard as they can. With these measures The politicians power would be reduced to the will of their constituents.
Bumper sticker for 2012: GOP = Greedy One Percent
Since the GOP predominantly favors the 1%, voters should stop voting for the GOP so that the GOP will fade out like the once powerful Whig party did in the 1850s.
Though their less articulate voices don't always express it well, the core issue is less about rich and poor than it is about right and wrong.
It's better for only one person to get ripped off while the others 'rule'?
Is that what you're saying?
I would also add Matt Taibbi's book--"Griftopia". It is comprehensive on this subject.
I'm not 99% of anything. I'm just one person, not a state, not a branch of government, not a politician, or any other label people want to attach to me.
My issue is, someone who needs to rip me off to get by is the problem. I don't need to steal from, or disadvantage anyone to live, why is my ambition the issue?
Aren't thieves the ones who need to be shrunk?