More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dale Maharidge

GET UPDATES FROM Dale Maharidge
 

Bring It On, James O'Keefe

Posted: 11/01/11 03:15 PM ET

One morning last week, I received an email from David Weigel at Slate: the subject line referred to how I'd been "stung" by James O'Keefe's Project Veritas. Believing it was spam, I sent it to my trash folder. Why would O'Keefe come after me?

Then I got an email from HuffPo's Sam Stein, my former student, who was on the other end of the operation. It turns out a kid who called himself "Lucas Fowler" had posed as a prospective student and surreptitiously filmed me. The appropriately-named Fowler came two times with a hidden camera to my office at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.

The O'Keefe piece falsely claims that I said that Sam "gets his sources drunk." What I actually said in the video is that Sam works 12-hour days and often goes out drinking with sources, and from that information flows. I also said that Sam is a better reporter than I am. It's a paean to Sam. The video is worth viewing as comedy.

I had a double reaction: laughter and anger. It wasn't only that I felt personally violated. Something larger was desecrated -- the special nature of an academic safe space, the professor's office.

I give a generous amount of time to prospective students and young journalists who visit my office. With my students anything can be discussed there and the matter never goes beyond those walls. I view that office with sanctity akin to a confessional.

After watching the video, I thought about it all day and decided to bait O'Keefe. I wanted him to ambush interview me. I had a plan for a counter-sting.

I posted a taunting entry on my Facebook page and then sent Project Veritas an email. My salutation referred to O'Keefe and his minions as having heads filled with excrement and I used a common expletive. The last words: "Bring it on!"

The next day, I wondered if I really wanted to take on this battle. I suddenly wanted to just be left alone to finish writing a new book and to teach my students -- what I'd been doing before the invasion of my private office space.

But I was in for the dollar. There was no turning back.

Instead of having the guts to show up, O'Keefe telephoned and asked for comment about my email. I declined to say anything. He posted my Facebook page and email on his site and chortled in his copy.

I bided my time. I hoped he'd be goaded into ambushing me in person. I'd welcome any publicity from him for my new book, Someplace Like America: Tales from the New Great Depression. (Actually, my Amazon numbers went up after the video was posted -- thank you O'Keefe!) The book appears to be why O'Keefe sent "Lucas Fowler" my way -- the kid kept asking about Bruce Springsteen, who wrote an introduction to this book that I produced with photographer Michael S. Williamson.

O'Keefe has been on an anti-Occupy Wall Street jag. Two weeks ago he showed up at Zuccotti Park posing as a banker. Also last week, a fake prospective student named "Lucas" secretly taped Jay Rosen's class at New York University, going after what O'Keefe called "the New York Times' strategy to support Occupy Wall Street," among other things.

It's clear that "Lucas Fowler" was after something related to OWS with me. O'Keefe told Neda Semnani of Roll Call that "We kind of stumbled into this," regarding how Stein came up. The failed hit on Sam was mere collateral comedy.

All of this is part of the right-wing attack on progressive populism. It was an attempted assault on my work. In my case, however, there is no "there" for O'Keefe to "get" me on. That's why he didn't post any of that secretly-taped video about my work or what I said about Springsteen. I've spent 30 years documenting American workers -- the 99 percent -- which is the story I tell in Someplace. Springsteen, in many of his songs including two inspired by our work, sings about these same people.

What did O'Keefe expect to get on me or Bruce?

O'Keefe can send another 100 spies with video cameras my way and he'll wind up with the same thing in the end -- nothing.

That's because my work is based on solid reporting and real people who have been affected by the bad economy. The only scandal is that for the past 30 years, we've listened to the acolytes of Ayn Rand, and catered to the bankers that James O'Keefe seems to be doing his kind of "journalism" for when he poses as one. His assuming the role of banker reveals more about him than anything else he has done. I welcome O'Keefe's hatred.

In the past week, I've had a baiting phone call from an unidentified number (the caller screaming that I was a "tenured faggot," and worse), suspicious emails. Were these from O'Keefe? Who knows? But it fits his style of deception. I didn't respond to them. Sorry O'Keefe -- no sale.

I've asked our lawyers at the university to look into the legality of secretly videotaping someone in a private space. In the infamous 1992 Food Lion case, in which the grocery store sued ABC television over an undercover investigation, the issue was not over the secret taping, but the fact that the news crew lied on a job application form. ABC eventually won.

I wonder if anything has changed in the law. If not, all professors are going to have to think about being subjected to what I went through. One colleague asked if this will place a chill on my talking with prospective students or young journalists.

There was fear in her eyes. She was emotional. What happened to me is a violation to all who cherish open and free thought.

I told her this: "No way."

I'm going to continue talking with kids who come to my office. It's what I do. I'm not going to let the O'Keefes of the world win. Heck, I gave that kid "Lucas Fowler" a lot of time and good advice. Maybe someday he'll listen to it and actually practice some real journalism.

I will take one precaution: I'll kindly ask a visitor to place his or her backpack on the floor, not on a chair facing me like that kid did.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gypsy508
02:43 PM on 11/11/2011
Reporters find stories in bars? I'm shocked.
10:55 AM on 11/07/2011
You got to love this really, if he was a lefty all this would be OK. How about separating the two issues, how he got the news from, was the news interesting or reveling.

Sixty minutes has done this for decades. For all you who are so interested in this subject, the long time producer of sixty minutes once said that had he not edited the Bill and Hillary interview, Bill would never have become president. All news organizations manage the news. O'keefe's revelations have done a lot of good. The cops catch a lot of crooks doing the same thing.
notreallyabadguy
Help ever, Hurt never.
10:21 AM on 11/04/2011
O'Keefe has decided to make a career of deception. He creates a situation, records it and than edits the video out of context so that he can make false claims. He creates partisan propogands. Someday he will have a show on Fox News. Or maybe he'll take Roger Ailes job.
10:58 AM on 11/07/2011
Or maybe he'll host 60 minutes because he's using the same kind of reporting process they frequently use. How did we get here where what actually happened or was said is less important than the process used to gather the information?

Go James, Go!!!!
12:53 AM on 11/03/2011
Does O'Keefe's middle name happen to be McCarthy?
photo
phoebequeen
I blame the dog
08:23 PM on 11/02/2011
No surprise O'keefe was behind this. He is a bug. A very low form of life.
03:58 PM on 11/02/2011
Filming or tape recording anything you say violates your copyright to your own words. Numerous college professors have successfully sued people who have recorded classes (often for the purpose of selling transcribed notes to students) for copyright violations. O'Keefe can be put out of business very rapidly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlueFloyd
The Antidote to Ayn Rand...
11:06 AM on 11/02/2011
What's this young fella's name again? McQueen is it?
08:11 AM on 11/02/2011
So should the law allow intimidating and harassing people just because their views are different from bankers or corporations? Since when is it acceptable to do this on innocent citizens? More worse things could come indicating the power of the bankers.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LeftLeanWing
RightKickFoot
08:53 AM on 11/02/2011
The law unfortunately doesn't allow for someone to kick his @ss.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlueFloyd
The Antidote to Ayn Rand...
11:11 AM on 11/02/2011
It's the Pinocchio theory. Don't fake the funk or your nose got to grow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
07:33 AM on 11/02/2011
O'Keefe and for that matter his mentor Andrew Breitbast yearn for the good ol' days when O'Keefe's doctored tape ACORN tape got every conservative loud mouth in the nation claiming the organization promoted and accepted prostitution. But O'Keefe remains what he was: A spoiled and out of control rich kid with apparent moeny to burn and nothing better to do. He's yet another joke that no one laughs with and rather at.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
02:21 AM on 11/02/2011
It's amazing how desperate the far right has become. Once upon a time, they at least pretended to care about facts and reality. No more- they moved over to Southern Wingnuttia a long time ago, and now permanenty occupy a fantasyland where if you can shower wealth on the already wealthy for long enough to get them to stop pouting, maybe they'll create a job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Counter Sniper
Though I Wander I Am Not Lost...
03:19 AM on 11/02/2011
Southern Wingnuttia? Is that anywhere near Baggerville?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jeany
Woman w/ Pitchfork
03:28 AM on 11/02/2011
One is the sewer for the other.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zogimperator
is this microbiology?
11:45 PM on 11/01/2011
There is a filthy skein in American journalism, and there always has been. It's the people who hunt for a story they have already told themselves -- they're poison.
photo
mollysmomma
God Bless Obama
12:13 AM on 11/02/2011
and when you alter tape and cut out dialogue to make the story what you want it to be....then you should be punished.
06:18 AM on 11/02/2011
"and when you alter tape and cut out dialogue to make the story what you want it to be...then you should be punished."

If we followed this line of thought then there would be no 60 Minutes, no network nightly news programs, no network news specials, no cable news programs, and no film documentaries. There is no such thing as unbiased news reporting and there never has been. As a mater of fact before "news" was presented on radio and television "news' from print publications was promoted as being biased. That was their advertising hook to get readers to buy their product.

What O'Keefe is doing is nothing new. It has been going on for decades. The only difference is that O'Keefe has turned the tables and is doing to liberals what liberals have been doing to everybody else since televison was invented.

The only non-biased news of any kind is on C-Span. They turn on the camaras and what happens happens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
daveny
11:33 PM on 11/01/2011
You know, I hate to be "that" guy... but why the hell isn't anyone on the left doing this with right-wing causes and personalities? Okay, maybe not privacy violations (like, say, setting a phone tap or doing this crap) -- but certainly stuff like O'Keefe's famous ACORN "sting" is fair game (the deceptive editing, not so much).

Seriously, I kind of admire the spirit of him and the kids who follow him. They may be dead wrong, but at least they're trying to expose what they think "really" goes on with things they oppose.

I mean, come on... no one has even plugged into the sound board at a Ron Paul rally to replace his entrance music with Dead Kennedys "Kill the Poor"? Whatever happened to our sense of cheeky subterfuge on the left? Surely we can do this stuff far better... or are young liberals just trying to get internships on "The Daily Show" instead?
photo
mollysmomma
God Bless Obama
12:19 AM on 11/02/2011
okeefe, breitbart and some low lifes like them...change the tape, alter the tape, take out dialogue....they manipulate the film to make the story be what they want. many times they do this.....why are they not in big trouble for such actions?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chriss0114
the meanderings of a madman
03:23 AM on 11/02/2011
O'Keefe didn't "try to expose" anything at ACORN

he made up total BS on purpose to destroy it period

under threat of jail time, he released the full unedited tapes which show it was all BS

they just wanted to minimize potential Dem voters because ACORN helped poor people register and they typically vote Dem

no voter/registration fraud or minor prostitution rings---just bringing down an organization that may gain them an election

how nasty

and I do believe it was a violation of O'Keefe's probation to be in NYC under those circumstances
photo
GrumpyOldGeek
My micro-bio is empty
07:25 AM on 11/02/2011
It's possible that he got permission from his probation officer, but the odds are pretty good that he lied to get permission. It's now in the public record, video pictures and witnesses, that he was in NYC attempting to repeat the same deceptions that put him on probation the last time. Something tells me that this isn't what he told his probation officer.

I would LOVE to have this punk try to "get" me. Bring it on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
daveny
08:26 AM on 11/02/2011
You totally miss the point of my comment -- I don't think he's honest, right, or actually doing anything more than a kind of slimy propagandizing. But what he THINKS he's doing, what he PURPORTS to be doing -- that "spirit" as I put it -- THAT is what I think we need more of. THAT is what I'm asking for. Where's someone from the left showing, say, how GOP candidates will jump at any command from the Koch brothers?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrooveGrl4
11:10 PM on 11/01/2011
The thought of professors having to worry about being secretly videotaped when giving a lecture or holding office hours is appalling to me. The free exchange of ideas and atmosphere of open discussion is what I loved most about college. With the cost of tuition these days at even the most modest state-supported universities, students shouldn't have to worry about their academic experience being limited by people like the sleazy O'Keefe, who has a fondness for distorting the context of secretly taped video footage for his own political purposes via selective editing.
08:46 PM on 11/01/2011
Not sure what your upset about. He just filmed you being yourself.
11:24 PM on 11/01/2011
See Shirley Sherrod and rethink that comment.
01:10 AM on 11/02/2011
Do you want to be filmed without permission? It's called invasion of privacy.
07:24 AM on 11/02/2011
Not in public. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public according to the law. What will need to be determined is whether the office will be considered public or private for reasons of privacy. Is there a reasonable expectation of privacy while simultaneously operating as an official to the public?
08:43 PM on 11/01/2011
It seems they've come after you here too, Professor. Keep up the good fight, and it's really time someone started to follow O'Keefe around with cameras the way the opposition team followed George Allen around to get the "macaca" moment. I bet he wouldn't like it either, nor would you, tygerlily and caveman06.