iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dan Fleshler

Dan Fleshler

Posted: February 25, 2011 12:09 PM

Why the Jewish Right Is Terrified by J Street's Conference


J Street, the political arm of the American Jewish pro-Israel, pro-peace movement, will convene its second national conference on Saturday night. There will be an enormous turnout. An organizer told me that about 2100 people are pre-registered (at their last conference, only 850 people were pre-registered but 1500 people showed up). There will be about 500 students from 100 campuses.

Why are all of these people converging? There are many reasons. They are desperate to find hope in what often seems like a hopeless mess in Israel and the territories. They want answers to troubling questions, like, "Is the 2-state solution dead?" and "What, in God's name, can the U.S. do to help?" They want community. They want inspiration. They crave ideas for mobilizing somnolent American Jews and cowardly U.S. politicians. I'm going, and I want all of those things.

This won't be quite as large as AIPAC's legendary policy conferences, but AIPAC has had more than 50 years to build momentum; J Street is only three years old.

So what is the reaction from the American Jewish and Israeli right? Abject terror.

There is no other way to explain the panicky screeds on the right-wing Judeo blogosphere. Check out these widely-publicized riffs from Noah Pollak of the Emergency Committee for Israel and the permanently truculent folks at Front Page magazine. I won't dignify all their arguments and character assassinations by conveying them here, but one of their objections to the conference is that some of the speakers are, gasp, Arabs who are unhappy with Israel!

American Jews, you see, are not supposed to listen to Arabs who are unhappy with Israel, people with different narratives and perspectives than those of the pro-Israel community, people like James Zogby or Mustafa Barghouti. Spend three minutes reading about Barghouti here, and you will learn about the kind of impassioned, articulate Palestinian nationalist that not all Israelis like very much. But surely all Israelis need to figure out how to live with a neighbor like Mustafa Barghouti.

But Americans Jews, you see, are not allowed to hear him speak. Perish the thought! And, of course, if an organization gives him a podium, that automatically means the organization endorses each and every one of his views. That is an enduring principle of the Jewish thought police. He will be speaking at a panel on Hamas, summarized as follows: "Hamas remains in control of the Gaza Strip, armed and opposed to the existence of the State of Israel. What is the best way to counter the threat posed by Hamas? Is reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah a prerequisite to peace, or would it make peace more difficult to achieve? Can Hamas be neutralized by undermining its popular support among Palestinians or splitting its moderate elements from its militants?" It would make perfect sense to exclude Palestinians from the ground who actually know what they are talking about from such a panel, wouldn't it?

American Jews are not supposed to hear from Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish, the physician and friend to many Israeli moderates whose daughters were tragically killed by Israeli forces during Operation Cast Lead. Perish the thought! He has devoted his life to reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians. But we must not hear about his experiences or his three lovely, lost daughters because, Front Page asserts, he denounced the Israelis but not Hamas. We must run the other way if we see him coming.

Front Page sums up the other principal objection: "Any illusion that J Street has included these speakers merely to give insight into "the other side" is dispelled by the roster of Jewish speakers scheduled to speak at `Giving Voice to Your Values.' All are leftists, and most are even more radically anti-Israel than the Islamists who will appear." There are certainly a lot of leftists, and it is not hard to show that they are, in fact, pro-Israel. But what scares these righties more than anything, I think, is all of the thoroughly mainstream, centrist speakers who are also gracing J Street with their presence: Knesset Members from Kadima; Dennis Ross; Kenneth Pollack of Brookings; Patrick Clawson of the Washington Institute for Near East Peace; Tom Dine, who used to run AIPAC; Ethan Felson of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs; Rabbi David Sapirstein, head of the Religious Action Center of the Reform movement--the largest synagogue movement in the US.

"Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself," wrote Justice Potter Stewart. And that is what is going on here. We are listening to the sputterings of an insecure right wing that has no answers. They have no suggestions about the Israeli-Palestinian situation other than grim, bloody "conflict management," which should really be called "nightmare management." They have no notion of how to preserve the democratic Jewish state. They don't know how to stop the steady drift of young people out of the American Jewish community because what is happening to the Palestinians cannot be reconciled with either Jewish or universal values.

And they are panicking. They want us to put our hands over our ears, like the haredim who don't want to hear women's voices singing, or the fanatics who want to burn down the offices of newspapers that print cartoons of the prophet Muhammed. Sorry folks. It won't work. Thousands of American Jews and others will show up in DC this weekend, eager to hear complicated truths and nuanced arguments, instead of the useless pablum of those who cling to a horrific status quo.

Originally posted at Realistic Dove

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 606
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
hfpf
Wake up World.
01:23 AM on 03/19/2011
J Street DOES NOT speak for me, and never will.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cynthia Rays
peace in the valley seeker
11:29 AM on 02/28/2011
Why no reports in NY Times or other main stream media about the conference?
FreeAmerican7
It's hard to soar like an Eagle around Turkeys!
12:43 PM on 02/28/2011
Because the US News Media is run and controlled by
staunch Pro-Israel supporters which -in effect- make them: Agents of the Foreign Country: Israel!
Such Agents are REGULAR FEATURES EVERWHERE as was the case in YESTERDAY's Fareed Zakaria's CNN at 10AM & 1PM (Eastern) and the GUEST of HONOR was NO OTHER than Wolfowitz who was ONE of the MASTERMINDS of the Invasion of Iraq whose costs is running in the TRILLIONS of Dollars.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
01:00 PM on 02/28/2011
"Because the US News Media is run and controlled by
staunch Pro-Israel supporters which -in effect- make them: Agents of the Foreign Country: Israel!"

Translation: Jews.
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
03:15 PM on 02/28/2011
No Matt some Pro-Israel suporters are just defense contractors who know supporting Israel will enhance their bottom line, Some Israeli supporters are looking for predictions to come through that their religions teach will come with certain actions by Israel Both of thes groups have money and influence with the media . Some Pro Israeli supporters have big portfolios of Defense company stocks and Israel is good for the bottom line , directly and indirectly but nice try in trying to make it look that way Matt
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
10:36 AM on 02/28/2011
Jerry Levy made a comment to me and huffington post did not print it (to their credit) but somehow it ended up in my "JerryLevy commented to you"box and i would really like the opportunity to answer him. Here is his post to me copied and pasted Jerry Levy you may not understand this Talab as you probably come from a country that does not engage in it but Americans have a functioning democracy and have their revolutions at the ballot box and without violence...............something I hope one day will exist in the Arab Middle East
Jerry my family came to America 250 years ago from the country of Scotland. My family with the rest of this invasion force participated in all the battles to form this country. I was born in Georgia and grew up in South Carolina , My father was a Navy veteran that served in WW2 I served in the Army during the Vietnam war and my brother served in the Air force . I feel that my service to America gives me the freedom to chose the religion of my choice. . I know that the SCOTUS decision handed our government to the Highest bidder IE Corporations , the wealthy and their lobbys . I am also very aware of our government's actions to support Israel andCorporations at all costs , citizens be damned . People like you are part of the problem and not the solution
10:52 AM on 02/28/2011
Thank you for you service to our country.
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
02:29 PM on 02/28/2011
I even admit the simularitys in our two nations, America and Israel Both formed by a ruthless invasion of europeans driving the indigenous population before them , in our casr including destroying many tribes while the remnants of this proud people try to ekk out a living on the tiny portions remaining for them called reservations . It appears that Israel is headed for the same conclusion with it's indeginous population to the shame of both Israel and America who is enabling this path. The Native americans did not make peace while they could still fight and only relented when faced with extinction. In America this happened before the world had laws for all nations to follow . Israel on the other hand was formed after these laws were enacted . Is Israel intent on now continueing to follow in the footsteps of America. Why insist on following us in what we got wrong
02:13 AM on 03/01/2011
Your argument is riddled with fallacies. First, the Arabs lost the war that THEY started in 1947. Those who remained in their homes and did not flee nascent Israel became Israeli citizens. Their numbers grew from around 100,000 to around 1.5 million today. They have more rights than most in the Middle East. The Arabs of what became the West Bank and Gaza lived under Jordanian and Egyptian rule for 19 years, from 1948 to 1967. Had Nasser's pan-Arab blustering and repeated terror attacks not led to the Six Day War, the West Bank and Gaza would have remained under Arab rule. And let us be clear: over a million Arab refugees are forced to remain in squalid camps, generation after generation, in sovereign Arab nations--Lebanon, Syria, Jordan (itself around 70% Palestinian, BTW).
photo
Kramerica-Industries
And with Darren’s help, we’ll get that chicken
10:02 AM on 02/28/2011
J street?
Seems like no Kosher option on what is supposed to be a Jewish organization.

When I arrived at the conference this morning, before 8 a.m., I asked a staff person if the breakfast would include kosher options. She told me it would. But when the food arrived, there was nothing kosher to be found–not even fruit. I sufficed with coffee and decided to wait for lunch, when–with an hour of free time–I could rush on the metro to a kosher restaurant.

When that time came, I got ready to hurry out of the conference room only to be told by multiple J Street staffers that there were sandwiches for purchase across the building and yes, some of them were kosher.

You can guess what happened next. I arrived at the sandwich cart and requested the kosher option. I got a blank stare in return, and when I asked the manager she told me she had no idea what I was talking about. She hadn’t heard anything about kosher sandwiches. The best they could do, they said, was a regular turkey sandwich with the cheese taken off. No good. I bought a Clif bar, a Nature Valley, a Kit Kat, an apple and a banana. I filled the feast out with some mini Twix I found at a conference table."

http://myrightword.blogspot.com/2011/02/j-street-is-treif.html
11:53 AM on 02/28/2011
That sucks. What a ridiculous oversight by JStreet. Hope it's not interfering with your enjoyment (hopefully) of the conference. Please share with us what you hear and see. wish I could be there with you.
photo
Kramerica-Industries
And with Darren’s help, we’ll get that chicken
12:47 PM on 02/28/2011
My mistake forgot, the quote mark in the beginning it is a quote from the link I added , wasn't there myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
01:17 PM on 02/28/2011
If you check out the blog it is from, you will see quite a few extreme zionist assertions. One post asserts the legitimacy of a Jewish claim to Israel and territories, and no legitimacy to Palestinian identity or claim to any land.
THey comments on many posts are stupefyingly bigoted.THe writer lives in Israel--looks like he made a special trip to criticise J-Street, which he portrays as a threat to Judaism.
Nice.
hfpf
Wake up World.
01:16 AM on 03/19/2011
J Street cares bout Kashrut, like they care about Israel. They don't.
09:21 AM on 02/28/2011
Again I state the obvious - 90+ % of American Jews are independant thinkers.
AIPAC and J Street are unimportant to our thought process.
These organizations are just like these 1000s of lobbying groups that work the captital.

If you have a message you want us to hear, appeal to the 90%, and worry less about the J Streets and AIPACs of the US. If your message makes sense we will listen.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
10:01 AM on 02/28/2011
pg, anti-Zionists like to blame AIPAC for America's support of Israel so they don't have to face the ugly reality that the vast majority of the American people don't agree with them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
01:44 PM on 02/28/2011
Both Israel and the US are divided societies. But because most people are fairly comfortable, they don't necessarily act on their opinions. They are divided on the issue of extreme zionism--which is not homeland zionism, which most of them endorse, and rightly so.
The people who are against occupation, blockade and siege--and that includes many Israeli and American Jews-- are not anti-zionism but FOR human rights and self -determination. More and more people agree with them, once they understand. See, explaining what you are FOR takes longer than saying what you are against.
So, the goal is for ordinary Palestinians and Israelis to live in peace, without fear of attack, to have full human rights and self-determination in their communities, to remain in their homes and communities (this goes for all settlements), to have freedom of movement and the ability to live a normal life.
hfpf
Wake up World.
01:17 AM on 03/19/2011
Correct!!
photo
Farmers Market
Public Relations Propaganda not Journalism
09:18 AM on 02/28/2011
A group that practices censorship (including media censorship) of others who present a different narrative is a group whose ideas do not rest on the truth, the full truth and nothing but the truth.

The dominant narrative of the Palestinian issue presented by groups like AIPAC and other friends of Israel seems to rest on a pinch of lies, a dash of half-truths and a cup of deceit. The American people must activley seek out the truth of events in the Middle East as corporate media will not present the truth.

Here is a video of Israeli Gilad Atzmon speaking about Zionism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fKYAkKIKFk
12:19 AM on 02/28/2011
PSSST,DAN...they're NOT!
10:04 PM on 02/27/2011
I am proud of J-Street...
06:52 AM on 02/28/2011
ditto
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
Farmers Market
Public Relations Propaganda not Journalism
09:23 AM on 02/28/2011
J Street is at least "trying" to save Israel from its own insanity. For that I prefer J-Street to AIPAC any day.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sharmine Narwani
04:27 PM on 02/27/2011
Update on J-Street conference: Mona Eltahawy's standing ovation - http://mondoweiss.net/2011/02/at-j-street-eltahawy-gets-standing-ovation-when-she-calls-on-peaceful-revolution-to-come-to-israel-and-palestine.html

J-Street wants Netanyahu gone. Now that is ONE difference between them and AIPAC.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
04:58 PM on 02/27/2011
+1
09:29 PM on 02/27/2011
Does J Street want Hamas gone? Do they want the PA gone? Do they want Hezbollah gone? Just wondered
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
10:17 PM on 02/27/2011
Do Hamas, the PA, or Hezbollah set Israeli policy? Just wandering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gibranII
seeking peace through equality
08:48 AM on 02/28/2011
we all do...well maybe a reformed PA... Jstreet is scary to the old gaurd..they actually acknowledge Palestinians are human.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GZLives
03:07 PM on 02/27/2011
J Street is irrelevant. Israel is not the pressing issue it's been presented as by the left and Europe. Its barely visible in the countless street demonstrations. What is very visible is the rank hypocrisy of the west and its institutions as they stumble all over themselves to catch up with events. I suppose the UN was way too busy condemning Israel for daring to approve building a bathroom or an extra bedroom and couldn't get around to a Security Council vote on Ghadafi murdering his people in Tripoli in cold blood but then again Libya was only just recently the Chair of the United Nations Human Rights Council so its no surprise. And after all the Arab League only a few days got around to suspending Libya from their esteemed membership.
04:19 PM on 02/27/2011
I thought we were talking about israel not Libya. Hasbara tactic #4 CHANGE THE SUBJECT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GZLives
04:45 PM on 02/27/2011
"Hasbara tactic #4 CHANGE THE SUBJECT. "

J Street is as irrelevant to most as Israel is to the majority of the Arab world .. or haven't you noticed?
12:21 AM on 02/28/2011
You must be taking Hasbara classes...as you do it all the time!
10:05 PM on 02/27/2011
lame
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GZLives
12:25 AM on 02/28/2011
Lame because it puts the lie to what you have so much invested in ....
Sorry if I rained on your parade
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:39 PM on 02/27/2011
American Jews have always been torn between liberal politics at home and hard right politics in Israel. The hard right Jewish neocons who were used by Cheney and Rumsfield in a bid to break apart OPEC and the use of Islam as a boogeyman are meeting their Waterloo in the democratic grass roots uprisings in the middle east.

The American neocons tried to tell us that democracy would come to Islamic nations in the middle east and Asia only at the end of the barrel of a gun. Wrong. That folly found fruition on September 11, 2001. Then the last gasp of the neocons was 2 failed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now because of that failed policy the US is at the edge of the economic abyss.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
02:54 PM on 02/27/2011
Well stated.
Have a cigar.
12:21 AM on 02/28/2011
Another exploding one for you!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:25 PM on 02/27/2011
Applying American standards of Left/Right to another country is always foolish. You can't compare the situation and surroundings as if they are exactly the same. What is considered " Right" in Israel would actually be considered in American terms a leftist domestic agenda. Their is also the security issue that the U.S does not face thanks to 2 oceans seperating itself from any potential threat. While for Israel, threats exist maybe 30 miles away from the border. The grassroots uprisings in the middle east are not some " boogeyman" to anyone, unless you think the concern over political Islam is not worthy enough to consider? I mean that is what Afghanistan was prior to 9/11..a sharia run country. I think your chronology is a bit off..9/11 happened not because of anything the United States did, but for what Bin Laden and his ilk believed in.
12:47 PM on 02/27/2011
At this time I could care less about JStreet. There are much more important matters going on. The Arab world might also be much less interested in JStreet than in what is going on in their own neighborhood. or backyard. There are some interesting influences in JStreet, such as George Soros. Surely, a financially influential man, and is he a lobbyist? JStreet is a lobbying group. Their interest is NOT serving the interests of Arabs in the ME, nor is it serving the interests of Muslim.It is also not serving the interests of Israel, Israeli, or jews. Mr. Soros appears to be interested in democracies, in doing business, and he comes, as a Hungarian Jew of his age, from a very left wing orientation. The issues of Arabs, and that includes those of Palestinians, will be solved by them. To continue to try and forge outsider interference, in this case an American lobbying group one, serves no purpose at all. Basics are a better life, employment and upward mobility into the current age. Politics, of any stripe or nature, especially foreign politics, are no consideration of Arabs at this time, as we have seen in the Demonstrations. Israel is not mentioned by them. Palestinians and Israelis will figure out their own and their combined futures.They live in the ME. It will be so very difficult for all those opinionmakers in the U.S. who make a living off them to give that up, but they have no choice.
de-meme-ing
Buying USA Feeds USA, Supports/Preserves USA
01:54 PM on 02/27/2011
Well said!
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
02:10 PM on 02/27/2011
You are right about one thing , more important things Are going on , why Americans are marching on the capitol of wisconsin to keep corupt politicans from stripping them of their rights to negotiate for a better life . Who knows America could be next , then what would Israel do
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GZLives
03:31 PM on 02/27/2011
"Who knows America could be next, and then what would Israel do"

Nothing because Israel shares America's values. We are both democracies. Our populations participate. Religion isn't the only voice and certainly not the last say as it is in so many of the Muslim and Arab societies like Iran/

There is never an extreme change. We go from just right of center to a just left and back again but not much more then that.

We are now frequently hearing Arabs expressing their joy at finally being free enough to express their anger at what they've repressed for decades.
This is so far from what we in America experience and far from what Israeli citizens experiences.

And surprise surprise, none of that anger by the way ever has anything to do with Israel.
04:00 PM on 02/27/2011
Labor unrest and negotiations in the U.S. are unrelated to Israel. The U.S. is a large entity which can absorb all sorts of events. It has regular elections. Israel has regular elections. Just as Arab action in other countries is not JStreet's or my concern, Israel's choices and elections of governments are not JStreet's concern. Political action related to Unions and wages in the U.S. is not JStreet's concern. No one is interested in their opinion on any of such matters. Unions and wages in the U.S. are not a Palestinian concern. They have not come anywhere close to that concern. Palestinians Are Perpetual Refugees without rights or citizenship, without voice and without votes. A dictate of other Arabs, singling them out. It has nothing to do with Israel, nor does it affect Israelis rights, voices and votes. It only affects Palestinians.Think about it if you wish to improve the situation of Palestinians. Be practical and factual. You do not need JStreet. No one needs JStreet, least of all Palestinians.
12:42 PM on 02/27/2011
There is no "panic", and there is no objection to another organization claiming to be "for peace". The definitions of "peace" and what is needed to achieve it vary widely.

The objection is for an organization like J-Street to claim that they are "Pro-Israel". To have the chutzpah to tell the people of Israel what is best for them, and then to try to encourage foreign governments to use their powers to force that organization's views on the Israeli government, making an end-run around Israeli democracy, is shameless.

AIPAC stands very clearly in support of the policies of WHATEVER government the electorate of Israel votes in, in the belief that the people whose lives are on the line, and who put their children's lives on the line, are best suited to determine what policies are required to preserve Israel's security. And AIPAC also believes that our government should support those security-related policies, and works to convince our government of the benefits accrued to both sides in doing so.

That is what it means to truly be "Pro-Israel".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
02:46 PM on 02/27/2011
AIPACs goal has never been peace. Thats the problem. There are more people in the world with a stake in seeing the Palestine/Israeli issues settled than right-wing settler supporters. Their time is coming to an end.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
03:00 PM on 02/27/2011
Astounding reasoning skills.

So, dissent of policies that harm Israel is not pro-Israel?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
04:04 PM on 02/27/2011
It's all opinion. I think you're pro-Israel because you support policy X. You think I'm anti-Israel because I support policy Y. You think disapproving of policy Z is "pro-Israel" because policy Z is "harmful towards Israel", I think disapproving of policy Z is anit-Israel because I think policy Z isn't harmful for Israel.
04:07 PM on 02/27/2011
Israeli policies are an internal matter. Israelis regularly vote. If the citizens decide that policies do not serve them, they will make other choices. Dissent is not a matter for outside agitators, not even if they are jews, or U.S. citizens. Where that idea comes from that everyone, but Israelis, get to decide on policies, or whether or not they should accept being attacked and turn the other cheek in perpetuam, may come from the Christian Bible. It has, however, nothing to do with Israel. As soon as it is decided that it is open season, and anyone can attack any nation at will, without repercussions, or individuals of any nation, and kidnap them and hold them for ransom without Red Cross visitation, we might have a discussion on whether or not Israeli policies harm Israel, but only as a matter of theory. When there i another entity which has in its charter thedemolition of the U.S. let us call in JStreet to ask what they think. Even then, it would not matter.
12:53 AM on 02/27/2011
Thanks Mr. Fleshler, for this excellent, insightful piece, which is also well-written.
Bravo and I wish for the conference to be a great success.

- JPL, Montreal, Canada
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
03:55 AM on 02/27/2011
I am with you in this. Now let's watch the CPCCA and Mr. Harper's Israel-right-or-wrong stance.
There is a Canadian Boat to Gaza. It will sail with the flotilla 2, to break the siege-- Gazans don;t want aid, but to live a normal life. We do what we can. Jews for a Just Peace and Independent Jewis Voices would be, I suppose, our J-street.
photo
RubalKhali
Philosophy is the stray camel of the faithful
05:21 AM on 02/27/2011
Harper could barely bring himself to complain about Israel killing a Canadian U.N. observer, and when Israel wouldn't participat­e in the investigat­ion threw up his hands, and said the observers shouldn't have been there.
photo
SamSeven
You're either with Humanity or you're not.
10:04 AM on 02/27/2011
The next flotilla is going to be an armada I believe with ships from Canada, Germany, France, Finland. The fleet is growing.
11:06 PM on 02/26/2011
What is more important than J Street or AIPAC is 90 + percent of Jews in a America don't belong to either group. This important group's "members" choose to think for ourselves. Whether APAIC is scared or J Street is truly supportive of Israel is meaningless to most American Jews.
I like most of my friends who support the state of Isreal are not blind to its imperfections. Just as an American who supports the USA, I understand its imperfections.
They way many of you talk of these two groups' powers is silly - they are only as powerful you make them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
12:50 AM on 02/27/2011
"They way many of you talk of these two groups' powers is silly - they are only as powerful you make them."

True of J Street, not of AIPAC. AIPAC wields influence by directing who receives campaign contributions and as former AIPAC employee Steve Rosen said, "a lobby is like a nightflower, it thrives in the dark and wilts in sunlight".
02:03 AM on 02/27/2011
Sort of like "OPEC LITE"!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
03:57 AM on 02/27/2011
Don't forget the influence of the ADL. If you think it is not influential, see "Defamation". It is fascinating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
03:58 AM on 02/27/2011
Small groups can exert inordinate pressure. See "Defamation", a documentary on the ADL. Plenty of interestin information there.