The Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme is generally regarded as the biggest financial scam of all time. I don't agree.
Hedge funds, and particularly "fund of funds," make Bernie's despicable conduct look like small potatoes.
The underlying premise of hedge funds -- outsized returns with no increase in risk--is fatally flawed. Numerous studies have demonstrated the vast majority of these funds do not beat the returns investors could obtain for themselves, by investing in a simple S&P 500 index fund.
It was only a matter of time before these funds started to implode. According to a web site that tracks hedge fund failures, 108 funds at 66 firms have gone of business since 2006. Many more are sure to follow.
While the pitch of hedge funds is a scam standing alone, the "fund of funds" embellished the con. These funds charged 1% or more for selecting and monitoring the performance of "the best" managers.
This scam relied on the gullibility of investors who believe "best managers" is not an oxymoron. The data clearly indicates that it is. If you own an actively managed fund, the odds of it beating its benchmark over 1 year is 1 in 3, over 5 years it's 1 in 5, over ten years it's 3 in 100 and over 25 years it's essentially zero!
How anyone can claim to be able to beat these odds and convince so many sophisticated investors they should pay them to do so, is the poster child for a combination of greed and cognitive dissonance.
Enter the track record of Bernie Madoff. Fifteen years with steady returns of 11%. This was something fund of funds could really sell -- and they did. Some funds reaped hundreds of millions of dollars of fees for simply forwarding billions of dollars of assets to Madoff. These investors felt privileged to gain access to him and were happy to pay the fund fee, secure in the knowledge that Madoff was being closely monitored.
You know what happened next.
Here's the real scam: How motivated were these "fund of funds" to carefully monitor Madoff's performance? Did they really want to kill the golden goose? Or is it likely they either knew his returns were too good to be true or engaged in "willful blindness" to his fraud?
It would not have been difficult to detect his misconduct. He used an obscure accounting firm. He had no independent custodian. These are major red flags.
Or, they could simply have read a 2001 story about Madoff written by Erin E. Arvedlund in Barron's.
The article was skeptical of Madoff's track record and noted "[T]hree option strategists for major investment banks told Barron's they couldn't understand how Madoff churns out such numbers using this strategy."
Of course, real monitoring would have included replicating Madoff's results. No one has been able to do so....and with good reason.
The real beneficiaries of the scam are these funds. Their rewards dwarfed those received by Madoff.
They are the ones who engaged in the scam that outscams "The Scam."
The views set forth in this blog are the opinions of the author alone and may not represent the views of any firm or entity with whom he is affiliated. The data, information, and content on this blog are for information, education, and non-commercial purposes only. Returns from index funds do not represent the performance of any investment advisory firm. The information on this blog does not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice and is limited to the dissemination of opinions on investing. No reader should construe these opinions as an offer of advisory services. Readers who require investment advice should retain the services of a competent investment professional. The information on this blog is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or class of securities mentioned herein
Follow Dan Solin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DanSolin
Then, of course, there is the whole fiat money scam of the non-federal 'Federal' Reserve .
We youngn's are in for a nasty surprise in another couple decades. Who will bail the government out? lol...
What? They say they're giving me money back? Whatever. I'm not counting on it.
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/90328?ref=patrick.net
1. If Greed > Fear then Greed WINS and AMERICA and the WORLD Loses
2. If Fear > Greed then Greed is STOPPED in its TRACKS and AMERICA and the WORLD wins
3. Fear = Justified Punishment for Crimes
We can rebound when
1. Regulations are back in place
2. When Fear of Punishment for Crime is Restored
3. When FAKE paper is Valued at the Market
4. When Two sets of Books are reduced to ONE Honest SET!
Only when Fear > Greed can we achieve control!
The collective culture of Capitalism created Madoff, celebrated people like him in pop-culture, - created millions *just like him* and/or aspired to BE him and now the MSM is running out of bad-apples to distract us with so that Americans don't see the slimy, rotted trunk of the Free Market tree that's falling in the yard.
Free Market Capitalism failed miserably, *again*, tell the charismatic banker media puppets to acknowledge this and get with the revolution or shut the f**k-up.
1981 Welcome to "SCAMELOT"
2001 Welcome to " DAMNED a LOT"
Welcome to "SCAMELOT"
Thinking about Ponzi schemes, it doesn't seem like the smartest thing to get into, unless you thrive on stress. Once you get it going, there's no getting out; you have to keep making it bigger and bigger.
I d not envy the IRS agents at all!
1) H-1B visas
2) Off-shoring
3) Out-sourcing
4) 401k accounts
5) "Freed trade"
6) Privatized roads
7) Foreign owned factories
8) "Stimulus payments" that are advances on income tax returns
They have the ability to print money "out of thin air" as they have no actual reserves--we have a fiat, or un-backed currency.
President Woodrow Wilson, who signed the Act into law, later deeply regretted the action: "I am a deeply unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now dependent on its system of credit. We are no longer a country by free opinion...but a country by the opinion and duress of a few dominant men."
Henry Ford once said, "It is well enough that people of this nation do not understand our banking and monentary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
This, and "the corporation," are what have lead us to be this:
5% of the population of the earth using up 25% of its resources, and accomplishing this at the price of traditional and economic warfare towards hundreds of third world countries: to basically steal their wealth and resources, either through economic war, or, if that doesn't work, we send in the military.
We can do better than this. We need to seperate Corporations from State, we need to return to sound and constituional money.