Gore's Sacrifice Squandered

Enough about Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party at large. The real loser in this historic battle for the Democratic nomination is Al Gore. Following his defeat by Katherine and the Supremes in 2000, the candidate-turned-caveman-turned-activist quickly became something of a rallying cry for Democrats. Gore was the primary victim of Republican treachery and his fate was invoked by John Kerry in 2004 and Clinton and Obama this time around.

The message: Republicans are thugs, they will cheat again.

Of all the electoral gifts the Bush Republicans have handed Democrats in the last seven years (some more enthusiastically received than others), the Florida debacle was undoubtedly the best/worst. Remember all the sound bites of Kerry & Co. regarding Bush's inability to carry the popular vote the first time around? And, remember how the big news on November 3rd wasn't really the president's reelection itself but rather the fact that he now had a "mandate" -- something not even 2000 version of justice could afford him?

Alas, the future campaigning Godsend that was Gore's crucifixion has been irrevocably squandered by Hillary Clinton in her increasingly demon-possessed candidacy for the Democratic nomination.

The Democratic Rules and Bylaws Committee's decision on Saturday guarantees Barack Obama's nomination. Yet Clinton and her supporters' ludicrous proposal -- that of absolute reinstatement and seating of all Michigan and Florida delegates -- is the ultimate indignation of an already ugly campaign season. Al Gore was essentially awarded Democratic martyrdom in 2000 for the grandest of betrayals by a broken system. If anything positive were to come from Republican contempt for the Democrats, it would be the scar that would forever mar the complicit GOP machine.

In other words, Gore took a bullet for the party in 2000 even if the exit wound was only partially punched.

Suddenly, still recovering from the investigations and impeachment proceedings of the Clinton administration, Democrats had the upper hand in the ongoing pray-off over righteousness -- an issue with deep implications in the branding of both parties, but particularly the Republicans.

All that came crashing to a halt several weeks ago when Hillary Clinton decided that, despite the state parties' clearly violating the rules set forth by the DNC, she would push for the delegates she supposedly won from Michigan and Florida to be seated at the convention, making of it a phony case of disenfranchisement. All of this despite the fact that her opponent had acted in accordance with the rules, even going so far as to withhold his name from the Michigan ballot.

As OTB's own Dawn Teo recently wrote, "Just because Clinton understands that the rules were broken does not mean that she thinks the rule breakers should be punished."

So much for Gore's sacrifice. No wonder he has so retreated from the political stage.

I don't know how a dictionary would define faith, exactly, but I was once told that faith is believing in the truth of something despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. In this respect, Hillary Clinton's continued persistence is an act of deep faith, and one that is perhaps most easily understood in its most personal context. This was, after all, supposed to be her year and the culmination of an undeniably extraordinary life and career that has brought her -- nearly -- to the very pinnacle of political success.

But faith alone isn't good enough in politics and, in the case of Hillary Clinton, it's just damn misguided.

It's time for hope.

Comments

[JennyJay]

Not endorsing anybody . . . made me think he is so far out in space as to be on a whole other planet.
I don't know him as a person, but as a public figure . . . I lost all respect for him. Nothing he does
will interest me again.

[chriss0114]

Yes, Gore should endorse Obama as should any respected Democratic delegate to get his GWE campaign moving with tons of momentum.

[SouthAmerica]

At this point Al Gore should not endorse Barack Obama. He should stay away from any controversy and he should position himself for a presidential run in 2012 against John McCain's reelection bid.
.

[grumpygranny66]

"The topic has nothing to do with whether Al Gore endorse Barack. It iis about the sacrifice he made in the 2000 Election, that Hillary is now squandering. But, there is a saying WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND....And it has now come back to HILLARY.

[egal]

Controversy? You mean, Clinton deciding that the rules don't apply to her even when her opponent has already won?

And Obama's leading McCain nationally by quite some margin, now, even before McCain has been attacked at all by the MSM. The only way McCain could win would be if Hillary continues her evil ways and joins his ticket out of selfish spite.

Oh, wait, a larger percentage of voting Americans would never vote for her under any circumstances than would consider it. Never mind.

Maybe THAT's why she feels she is owed being allowed to break the rules and receive special treatment in order to win--not because of the effect of sexism that she severely overcredits (while going against every study ever done and the experience of millions to claim race has no negative impact), but because she knows she's so weak a candidated that changing the rules and making up new ones is her only chance.

[MizLiz]

I wonder if Gore will endorse Obama.

[burnt]

good post