iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel Luzer

Daniel Luzer

Posted: March 24, 2011 05:45 PM

The Danger of the "Practical" University


In terms of higher education, American policymakers must focus not just on educating people, but on educating people for specific jobs, so says the National Governors Association. Wow, that's shortsighted.

According to an article in Education Week:

Colleges and universities must shape their work with a keen eye toward the demands of the marketplace, a new study from the National Governors Association tells us.
It urges governors to "align higher education with state economic goals" by letting colleges and universities know that they're expected to contribute to their state's economic well-being by helping prepare a 21st-century workforce. Governors should create incentives for their state colleges and universities to draw on labor-market research and employers' input to help them set their priorities and to track their impact on student employment and employer satisfaction.

No, don't. Just give up on this little idea. It sounds practical but it's actually misguided and impossible. Train college students to think, train them to dream, and make them to work hard. The jobs will follow. They always do.

Now it's worth pointing out there's something very wrong with vocational education in America as it currently exists. One surely doesn't need to go to college in order to be a successful person, but vocational, technical education in American high school is so bad that it's actually quite difficult to get into a track for a high-wage, high-skill vocational career.

But the solution to this is to improve vocational schools so that they appropriately train people for existing jobs. The solution is not to turn American universities into vocational schools. Colleges and universities, frankly, should ignore jobs.

This is especially true of the jobs of "the future." The danger of the lure of vocational universities is not necessarily that such a focus will draw resources and attention away from the liberal arts and the hard sciences (disturbing as that is); the trouble is that focusing on the jobs of the future won't work. The report says that America's governors should "encourage -- even incentivize -- institutions of higher education to seek state and regional employers' input about how best to ensure that students have the 21st century skills employers need." The real problem is that governors will screw this up if they try to do this seriously.

That's because we really have no idea what jobs will exist in the next 20 or 30 years. Just imagine what would have happened if governors in 1980 "worked to ensure that students have the skills employers of 2010 would need." How would they know? Goals like this are impossible to achieve.

Remember those computer programmers who were so glamorous in the early 1980s? They didn't major in computer science when they were in college. They were mostly philosophy majors who were particularly good at formal logic. That's how this stuff works. Educated people create jobs; they hire other smart people to perform them.

Read the NGA report here but trying to make an academic education directly about specific job skills is pretty much impossible. Train students to think critically. It turns out that's the talent companies that hire for professional jobs want most anyway.

Trying to do anything else with American colleges is a waste of time.

 

Follow Daniel Luzer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/daniel_luzer

In terms of higher education, American policymakers must focus not just on educating people, but on educating people for specific jobs, so says the National Governors Association. Wow, that's shortsig...
In terms of higher education, American policymakers must focus not just on educating people, but on educating people for specific jobs, so says the National Governors Association. Wow, that's shortsig...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bcbailey64
10:50 PM on 03/27/2011
Even when I did my undergrad degree in the mid 80's, so many of my classmates were going to university to "get a job." I didn't. I went to university to learn as that is the purpose of universities. If you just want to get a job, then go get a job, don't go to university. If you want to improve your self-knowledge and your knowledge of the world around you then go to university. When you graduate, armed with that knowledge, you'll be able to "make" your job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
signgrrl
design & production
11:07 AM on 03/27/2011
the trouble with that is, teaching critical thinking is not even close to being a priority. what did you think no child left behind was for ? ppl who can't think critically can be counted upon to vote for the "wrong" candidate with the "wrong" policy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sarahinez
01:57 AM on 03/27/2011
Whether students want to learn to think or not, they need to. Learning to do a job will not take you very far today because jobs end. They are replaced by other jobs or the duties shift dramatically.

The big safe job category when I went to college was key punch operator--today no one can make a living doing that. Accounting used to be all about the math, but calculators and computers have changed that--now it's about following the law and advising businesses on record-keeping. Psychiatrists used to need good interpersonal skills and patience; now they dispense medications and need more education on biochemistry and neurology.

A person who can not think has a difficult, if not impossible, time when his/her job changes. The ability to think allows for the self-awareness to decide whether it would be better to change to fit the new job requirements or to get training for another job.
02:42 PM on 03/25/2011
A lot of kids are in the wrong kind of College -: most kids just want a JOB. They don't necessarily wanna learn to THINK. Yes, High Schools have failed to provide quality job skills. This article is bang on ! A lot of American Colleges and universities already do JOB training. The problem is: a lot of those jobs don't exist anymore (CHANGE came to America). MIT, Harvard and many Liberal Arts Colleges don't do job training. They do job creation. The irony is: those Governors are correct. Kids gotta CHOOSE: either they learn to THINK (Harvard) or get TRAINED (Public/State College),
since, the Governor's and the legislature are the ones steering state taxes towards State Schools.

Sad but true. The biggest challenge is learning about YOU. Not everyone has that luxury or even cares to find out about what really matters to them. They just want a JOB. That's cool, so Choose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
08:24 AM on 03/25/2011
I don't care about "practical." I care about what interests me. I would never go to a university just to learn the skills for a job. The only acceptable reason is because the area of study is something of interest to me.