- BIG NEWS:
- Barack Obama
- |
- Sarah Palin
- |
- Future Fuel
- |
- FISA
- |
News broke Thursday that the RNC was preparing to air its first contrast ad of the general election in four battleground states: Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The $3 million buy was a first jab at the Democratic Party, a signal of the buying power of the wealthy RNC. Sunday, we got our first glimpse of the ad. As expected, it focuses on energy issues:
The ad advances two related themes that will be at the core of the McCain campaign in the coming months:
The ad makes clear that the GOP sees energy as a winning issue for McCain. Hillary Clinton failed to win significant numbers in hitting Obama with the gas tax holiday in April, but the GOP clearly thinks McCain can be portrayed as proactive and flexible on the issue. It is also an issue with which to distance McCain from Bush, presenting the presumptive nominee as a moderate without angering the conservative base. In the wake of the Bush years, simply making clear recognition of global warming as a starting-point position seems forward thinking, the approach of a problem solver.
A second ad was also released Sunday by an independent pro-Iraq war group, Vets for Freedom. It features veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan or family members who insist the surge is working and that it is important to "finish the job."
While the ad never mentions Obama or McCain, the aim is clearly to move public opinion toward the Republican position. The surge is associated with McCain, after all, and the ad makes the case for McCain without him having to push it: stay the course and stop talking of withdrawal.
Of course, the danger for the GOP is speaking of the enormously unpopular war at all, reminding voters that McCain is not looking to end it, that on the contrary he is committed to continuing it indefinitely, until "victory" is achieved, something fewer and fewer Americans believe is possible. Iraq is indeed precisely the subject Democrats have long been preparing to use against the Republican nominee, the party's efforts boosted by McCain's careless soundbites. However many veterans Republicans put on the screen and however much public opinion comes to scale back its approval of withdrawal, McCain will have to defend himself against the perception of hawkishness on Iraq and the Middle East in general.
The ad will run in Ohio, New Mexico and Virginia for $1 million, an interesting slate of states that confirms that Ohio is shaping up once again to be ground zero for the presidential election (despite Obama’s attempts to move the election’s epicenter elsewhere) and that some Republicans are coming around to recognize the key role Virginia may well play this year.
Read more at Daniel Nichanian's blog, Campaign Diaries.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
McCain leaves a hole in his platform logic big enough to drive a Sherman tank through:
By supporting off-shore oil drilling and more tax breaks for Big Oil, he is encouraging even more oil consumption and therefore, planetary damage through climate change.
The Bush administration saw 9/11 as an opportunity to sell the invasion of Iraq.
Bush and McCain see the current oil crisis as an opportunity to sell Offshore drilling.
Who stands to benefit? Follow the money.
Lets see. Nope, their still joined awkwardly.
http://www.light-to-dark.com/McBush.html
My sympathy to the crowbar.
Even though the ad is good, McCain keeps using the same POW thing which at some point do not answer an important question. Does his military files testified that he is a leader or simply a responsible capable leader? And for that, we don't know, because he doesn't want to release the totality of it. Do we know why?
We should find an answer to the "Vets for Freedom" from back in the LBJ days, with reference to getting out of Viet Nam.
The crowd drawn to Washington for the March on the Pentagon and a rally at the Lincoln Memorial numbered more than 100,000. For the first time, there were significant numbers of hippies, with long hair and fanciful garb. Hoffman donned beads and an Uncle Sam hat. Speakers included Mailer, poet Robert Lowell and pediatrician Benjamin Spock. Protest signs now brimmed with counterculture wit:
"LBJ, Pull Out Now, Like Your Father Should Have Done."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/2000/vietnam092799.htm
In today's fast paced world, we could shorten the sign to use a single initial: W.
The global warming is being mightily contributed from the hot air emanating from John McCain's mouth.
McCain would do well to make this ad (and others like them) the centerpiece of his campaign.
Except for the part about going against his own party. That won't resonate with anyone. All that will do is get the conservatives more angry at McCain. He's shooting himself in the foot there.
The guy really is stubborn. He mistakenly believes he got the nomination because the voters wanted him and that he was a 'maverick' who goes against his own party. The real reason is that the conservative vote was split between Thompson, Guiliani, Huckabee, Romney, and Paul. McCain walked in the back door.
He can shoot himself in the foot in Philadelphia all he wants to without harming himself anywhere else. He will have to explain himself to Rush Limbaugh and his dittohead followers sometime however.
This is exactly why Obama did not go for public financing because of the unfairness of the republicans who would use ads financed NOT by the campaign itself against him. He had asked McCain to agree to not using those 501-type ads but McCain refused and look at what's happening.....exactly what Obama said would happen.
McCain loves to play dirty and outside of the box. He will get what he deserves accordingly.
Why doesn't McCain support a Bill forcing Big Oil to drill on the 68 Million acres the US government has already given them?
Big Oil has 68 Million US acres - given to them - McCain/Rove/Schmidt want big oil to drill in USA -- so -- what is stopping them?
Does big oil want more land than the already 68 million US acres they have?
Posted July 7, 2008 | 09:39 AM (EST)