More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel Robelo

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel Robelo
 

Mexico's Presidents Are Considering Legalizing Drugs. Will the U.S. Join the Debate?

Posted: 08/11/10 03:35 PM ET

The question of whether legalizing drugs would help reduce the killings in Mexico has made front page news this week and is causing unprecedented debate around the world.

Last week, former Mexican President Vicente Fox called on his country "to legalize the production, distribution and sale of drugs" as the best way to weaken the drug cartels.

Acknowledging that "radical prohibition strategies have never worked," Fox's recommendation echoes another former president of Mexico, Ernesto Zedillo, as well as past presidents of Colombia and Brazil, who last year issued a ringing condemnation of the failed war on drugs, in favor of alternatives that include the removal of legal penalties for marijuana possession.

This latest endorsement of legalization also comes on the heels of current Mexican President Felipe Calderon's own announcement that, while he opposes legalization, he nevertheless supports an open debate about ending prohibition -- the root cause of the violence in Mexico that has now claimed over 28,000 lives.

Sadly, however, legalization is not even part of the policy dialogue in D.C. In fact, the U.S. drug czar has repeatedly said it's not even part of his or President Obama's "vocabulary."

Yet despite Washington's reticence to engage the topic, the debate about legalization is taking place in many communities throughout the U.S. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, like Calderon, has called for a debate about marijuana legalization, a proposal that Californians will vote on in November. In 2009, the City Council of El Paso, Texas -- directly across the border from Ciudad Juarez, the world's deadliest city and ground zero in Mexico's drug war -- passed a resolution "supporting an honest, open national debate on ending the prohibition on narcotics."

President Calderon's openness to debating legalization comes amid new recognition that the cartels are not just killing each other, or members of the government, or innocent civilians - they are openly challenging the Mexican state and eroding its democratic institutions.

Signs of this bleak reality abound in news reports from Mexico: whole portions of the country where the cartels' influence exceeds the government's; the silencing (through intimidation, kidnapping and murder) of national and international journalists; the assassination or bribery of local, state and national politicians or law enforcement officers; a broken criminal justice system that allows the cartels to operate with impunity; and the widespread violation of civil and human rights by the army, sent into the streets to fight the cartels since 2006. These are not the conditions of a stable democracy -- or a successful counternarcotics strategy.

It is heartening that Calderon, the Mexican congress and members of civil society have begun a serious discussion about changing course and pursuing legalization -- and not just of marijuana, but of all drugs.

Unfortunately, as the AP writes, "Just about everyone agrees Mexico probably can't or won't legalize on its own." In other words, they need our help. But in stark contrast to the open discussion going on to the south, the topic remains taboo in the U.S.

It's time for the Obama Administration to follow the lead of Mexico -- and its own citizens -- and consider real alternatives to its failed drug war policies. It is our moral imperative to join Mexico in this important debate.

 
The question of whether legalizing drugs would help reduce the killings in Mexico has made front page news this week and is causing unprecedented debate around the world. Last week, former Mexican P...
The question of whether legalizing drugs would help reduce the killings in Mexico has made front page news this week and is causing unprecedented debate around the world. Last week, former Mexican P...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 244
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R Davis
“The truth is rarely pure and never simple.”
07:53 PM on 09/04/2010
I have a couple of family members wrestling with drug addiction. It seems obvious that our current philosophy of prohibition is impotent. Other countries treat addiction as an illness that needs treatment. Just putting them behind bars only makes them worse when they come out. Now they are hardened criminals where as before they were just experimenting. It isn't the empathy and compassion I want from my government.
11:09 AM on 08/14/2010
Before the "War on Drugs" it was estimated that about 600 people a year died of drug overdose. Considering the deaths from this endless war, in both the United States and Mexico -- which run into many thousands, it doesn't seem to take much brains to think over which is worse, the "War" or simple freedom to do what one will to oneself.
photo
relians
the interconnectedness of all things
02:31 PM on 08/13/2010
just think, the united states has more incarcerated individuals than any country in the world. either we have some serious social issues with our population, or we have some serious issues with the laws that target victimless crimes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ehjay
Reform, social, political, economic
01:30 PM on 08/13/2010
Sure legalize and get the same result as with alcohol. The Government opens distribution centres for drugs and every hotel, restaurant and bar can add an assortment of drugs to their Menu.
11:24 AM on 08/13/2010
legalize and tax marijuana!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeaderofMen
Bilingual former US Marine.
07:40 AM on 08/13/2010
77 years ago, the 18th and 21st Amendments to the US Constitution addressed this issue. There is NO POSSIBLE WAY that prohibiting drugs will do any good. In fact, the 18th Amendment led to a stretch of time when the US had Tommy Gun wielding thugs who shot up Chicago and other cities, until that little experiment in stupidity was lifted with the 21st Amendment. The time between was a miniature version of what's been happening ALL OVER AGAIN due to the prohibition of a weed. History proves - PROVED - that the prohibition of commonly used HARMLESS drugs doesn't work.

The number of people in jails, the amount of money spent and the destruction of lives that's occurred up until now over a WEED is proof that when you let stupid people make laws, you get stupid results.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
01:12 PM on 08/13/2010
Not stupid people, greedy people. Where do you think the money flows from drugs? If they were legal the flow would decrease exponentially. Too many of the right people are making money here and are very unwilling to let it go.
photo
Kelly L White
An American Ex-Pat- Pagan.
05:00 AM on 08/13/2010
I also agree, stop the drug war, we really need to stop telling people how to live their lives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
12:15 AM on 08/13/2010
I strongly agree with President Fox. Stop the prohibition, stop the violence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverwolf13
I know that I do not know.
10:28 PM on 08/12/2010
We learned in the 1920's that prohibition just does not work. On this I agree with the (true) conservative and libertarian position: that government on any level should not tell us what we may drink or smoke or otherwise ingest, or with whom we may have sex or marry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:41 PM on 08/12/2010
The Flower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMM_T_PJ0Rs&fmt=22

please SHARE this video, spread the love around
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
05:56 PM on 08/12/2010
The "Drug Czar" - there's one federal employee who is sponging up tax-payer's dollars and doing no useful service.
photo
Kelly L White
An American Ex-Pat- Pagan.
05:00 AM on 08/13/2010
I never did understand why we need a czar at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmAxO
04:34 PM on 08/12/2010
I am all for legalization. So let's do it step by step. One of the sates of the union should make a try for a certain period of time, allowing the use only to their residents and not to others in order to prevent "drug tourism". 40 years of war has lead to failure. Time to give legalization a try.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:28 AM on 08/13/2010
The effort to stop "drug tourism" would only create mass migration, no?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
03:46 PM on 08/12/2010
I once saw a documentry on PBS about heroin use in Switzerland. They basicly ignore it. They have parks set aside where junkies can go and buy, sell and use heroin. A lot of Swiss parents take there teenage kids to the parks and show them the zombies and tell them "This is where it leads". A lot less violence and users can get treatment if they wish. I think the only reason we don't do it in this country is we think profit is the answer to all questions. The police, prisons, and banks are all makeing money off of the misery of others, so the status quo is just fine.
04:13 PM on 08/12/2010
I've been to Switzerland. I've been all over Europe. I don't understand why we draw comparisons between the U.S. and various European countries. I find huge differences culturally. What works there just wouldn't work in the U.S. Switzerland is a small country...someone lower down mentions Portugal, a nation of 10 million. We're a nation of 310 million people folks, we have a massive drug problem, we have people creating and distributing cheap addictive drugs like crack and meth on a large scale and destroying whole communities. The problem here is immense. Do you think that will get better with legalization? And this writer wants to legalize "all drugs"...that's complete insanity.
04:34 PM on 08/12/2010
No, insanity is continuing to do the same thing and expecting a different result. As with our last spell of prohibition, prohibition creates problems greater than the ones it was meant to cure. As like last time, ending prohibition won't create heaven on earth, it will only make things, on balance, far better than they now are. For example, it would serve to defund, totally or in part, Al Qaeda/Taliban, U.S. street gangs, Mafia style organized crime all over the planet, the C.I.A., etc.

Drugs don't destroy anything. They're not capable of that. The destruction comes from the high cost associated with drug illegalization. Period!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blomeup2day
10:47 PM on 08/12/2010
so keeping it illegal is keeping it out of addicts hands? I'm pretty positive that you can go to any neighborhood in America and find illegal drugs. So how could legalization lead to more drug use? I could go down 5 houses and possibly buy drugs...it being illegal is not a deterrent. Making people criminals who are going to do it anyways isn't going to make us better citizens. Your premise is that once crack and smack are legal, people who wouldn't do the drugs now would all the sudden change their mind, and that is too far a leap. I'm pretty sure you won't, but you lack the faith in the rest of humanity to make as wise as decisions as you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tibetanterrier
reirretnatebit
10:22 PM on 08/12/2010
they peddle toxic and we provide tax cuts.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
RickO
Musician, Atheist
03:24 PM on 08/12/2010
The toothpaste is out of the tube at this point. A number of states have approved medical marijuana, California may be the first to basically legalize it, Obama has already signaled that the Feds wont make it a priority to go after people in states where it is legal (if that's not a message, I don't know what is) and many other states are talking about it. Combine this with the terrible violence on the border, the potential economic benefits and the fact compared to a lot of other things that are legal, it's practically harmless, I give it 10 years and it'll be a done deal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
02:39 PM on 08/12/2010
Mexico can't "...legalize the production, distribution and sale of drugs" because that would still leave the trafficking to the US as an illegal activity in the US while making the Mexican government a party to this crime.

Mexico has reached a point in which the drug lords are "openly challenging the Mexican state" but the US hasn't. In the US the business likes the "war on drugs" because there is money to be made on it. This creates a considerable difference of interests between the US and Mexico which Mexico cannot ignore.

We will just have more of the same here. The amount of money and human capacity we have wasted on this useless war is staggering but that means nothing to us as long as some corporation is profiting from it. ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
12:17 AM on 08/13/2010
They would not be a "party to the crime" because their government would not be exporting it to the USA. There are a lot of legal drugs in Mexico already that are not legal in the USA. Ever been to TJ and seen the "pharmacies" for tourist selling pain pills? Its time to stop prohibition.
12:23 AM on 08/13/2010
i think he means more like if lets say cocaine is legal and available everywhere in mexico tourists, like they do in TJ would go down and try to bring it back to the US, so as long as the US still finds this drugs illegal people would traffic it to the US where there is a demand for a higher priced product since it is illegal and therefore accidentally Mexico would help to the traffic. So for the legalization to truly work in one country it has to be done in both of them