More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Danielle Cavallucci

GET UPDATES FROM Danielle Cavallucci
 

Another Blight on the Abstinence Only Agenda

Posted: 08/12/09 11:53 AM ET

This morning, Faith Lab published a compelling query concerning the fact that abstinence-only requirements may actually push young people into marriage before they're ready, simply because they feel less guilty about divorce than they do sex outside of marriage.

In a society like ours, with over 50% of couples disappearing into the realm of divorce, this seems rather irresponsible. The fact that abstinence only education has been proven to have even more detrimental effects than providing educational and contraceptive tools to cope with sex among consenting adult individuals (and the teens who continue having sex despite all efforts to prevent them from doing so), is only magnified by the fact that such attitudes may force individuals into a financial, spiritual and emotional arrangement that they are simply unprepared for.

Yes, you can argue that if you're not prepared to take on the responsibilities associated with marriage, then you may be unprepared to take on those of having sexual relations. Idealism, however, has proven a poor indicator of what actually takes place. People are having sex, will continue having sex, and the religious institutions standing on principle alone in their campaign for abstinence actually relegate their congregations into the margins where no real discourse can take place.

Trapped by their hormonal and social urges, young people may decide incorrectly to get married rather than to have safe sex. This seems a shameful waste of hearts and resources, both on a familial and personal level. Safe sex between two consenting adults, after all, is premised on a choice between two individuals. Marriage, on the other hand, tends to involve entire families, communities and a larger number of lives on the periphery, which will be adversely affected in the long run by ruined vows.

Given that the reality is far from the ideal, isn't it time to just say no to the notion of abstinence only agendas and embrace, instead, that we are a sinful and sexual lot, we humans; and that we will continue having sexual relations with or without the guilt imposed upon us by our religious leanings? Perhaps we should talk, instead, about how to go about these sexual exchanges in the most self-preserving and mutually respectful manner rather than suggest that the majority of us are capable of abstinence at all.

 
 
 

Follow Danielle Cavallucci on Twitter: www.twitter.com/cavallucci

This morning, Faith Lab published a compelling query concerning the fact that abstinence-only requirements may actually push young people into marriage before they're ready, simply because they feel l...
This morning, Faith Lab published a compelling query concerning the fact that abstinence-only requirements may actually push young people into marriage before they're ready, simply because they feel l...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:10 PM on 08/13/2009
Cavallucci wrote, "Trapped by their hormonal and social urges, young people may decide incorrectly to get married rather than to have safe sex."

__________________________________________________________

I assume the writer is referring to prevention of pregnancy, disease, emotional fallout (particularly among teens), when mentioning "safe sex". Statistics prove there is not a single contraceptive on the market that is 100% safe (many factors involved). So the statement "safe sex" in itself needs to be rephrased "safer sex".
Safer meaning "Reduced risk of disease, pregnancy, etc., etc."

The only 100% reliable contraception for teens is 100 proof abstinence. Surprised?? Teen marriage, due to pregnancy, is a result of not practicing 100% abstinence. So teens who channel their hormones, thoughts, relationship practices, to productive areas other than sex will not have to face making a marriage decision due to pregnancy.
03:41 PM on 08/14/2009
And people who never go outside will never get rained on. But the reality of modern teens includes sex - I and most everyone I knew had sex as teens despite cultural strictures. Rather than wishing for a sexless teen Utopia, we need to work with the real world.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HPdevotee
12:08 AM on 08/15/2009
This is what the philosophy of 'Abstinence Only' gets us.

1) Increase in abortions
http://www.thecontemplation.com/index.php/2009/06/01/interesting-results-religious-girls-more-likely-to-get-abortion/comment-page-1/

2) Increase in sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV-AIDS
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1102735/Why-chastity-pledges-U-S-teenagers-dont-ring-true.html#ixzz0ODdvLPSP

3) Disinformation concerning contraception

This is from new research;
"The authors suggest that the recent decline in teen contraceptive use since 2003 could be the result of faltering HIV prevention efforts among youth, or of more than a decade of abstinence-only-until-marriage sex education that does not mention contraception unless it is to disparage its use and effectiveness."
http://www.guttmacher.org/media/nr/2009/06/18/index.html

A religious self-righteous attitude translates into real world consequences for these teens and I suggest you forsake your own fantasies and truly guide our young people in the ways of realistically protecting themselves and their partners.
08:22 AM on 08/13/2009
On the bright side, at least this misguided, totally non reality-based advice and lifestyle isn't followed by the majority of Americans. Let's hope it stays in the margins.
06:39 PM on 08/12/2009
Most teenagers figure out that sex is pretty fun, that their bodies are theirs to play with, and many believe that no one or any institution should mandate otherwise. But some religious institutions seem to be so stuck to the medieval mindset of SIN, that if it feels good is must be WRONG, they forget that we are all sexual beings. Yes, we can control those urges to a point, but teenagers, with generally low self control, need more than hearing they shouldn‘t have sex, or that sex before marriage is immoral. Abstinence pledges and purity rings - which DON'T WORk - are dangerous because they frame those very real impulses, those strong feelings, into the immoral category, and sets up a freefall of disillusionment when the kids realizes they’re failing to uphold that naïve promise they gave. What we need to educate kids with is the framework of what a healthy relationship IS, and that includes a sexual one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mredder4
02:20 PM on 08/12/2009
Children of faith have always looked for loopholes around the No Sex mantra. Teens that perform oral sex or anal sex still consider themselves "virgins". What's to say that the sanctity of marriage can't fall before the desire to have sex?