iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Darell Hammond

Darell Hammond

Why All Schools Should Require More P.E.

Posted: 03/25/11 05:36 PM ET

Are multiplication tables more important than our children's health? Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell seems to think so. He vetoed a bill yesterday that would have required all elementary and middle school students in Virginia to participate in 150 minutes of physical activity a week, in addition to recess.

McDonnell says the bill is an "unfunded mandate," according to The Washington Post, citing concerns about the cost of implementation. Other opponents worry about placing the burden of solving our country's childhood obesity crisis on our public schools.

While these concerns are understandable, they don't justify a veto. Government funding is largely a matter of priority, and by passing the bill, McDonnell would have demonstrated to the people of Virginia that the state is serious about children's health. The reality of implementation would have lent urgency to a problem that we as a country have let languish for far too long.

Plus, consider these sobering statistics: According to the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health, on a national level, "the direct costs of childhood obesity include annual prescription drug, emergency room, and outpatient costs of $14.1 billion, plus inpatient costs of $237.6 million" (emphasis mine).

In Virginia, 24 percent of children are on Medicaid and one in three is overweight or obese. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Virginia has the 14th-highest obesity-related health care costs in the 50 states. Clearly, the childhood obesity epidemic is already costing the Virginia government a significant chunk of money--so why refuse to invest money in a long-term solution?

It's important to remember that the bill is not the only solution. Childhood obesity is a multi-pronged problem that requires a multi-pronged plan of attack. As opponents of the bill rightly point out, schools certainly can't be expected to shoulder the entire burden of "fixing" the problem, but they can still play an important role.

According to McDonnell, "Kids need to get off the couch and away from the computer and onto a soccer field or basketball court... Our young people should be taught by parents, teachers and mentors about the benefits of a healthy lifestyle and to pick active, rather than passive, recreational activities."

Isn't this bill explicitly about getting kids onto the soccer field or basketball court? The government cannot control what children choose to do in their free time, but it can inspire a passion for sports and physical activity by ensuring that kids have sufficient time to play soccer, basketball, and other games during school hours. Extracurricular programs to encourage healthy lifestyles may also be beneficial, as McDonnell notes, but they alone will not solve the childhood obesity epidemic.

McDonnell has also cited concerns that the physical education requirement would "exceed the time dedicated to any other subject in our public school system, and potentially cut into crucial time in the classroom needed for instruction in math, science, history and reading."

McDonnell clearly hasn't seen, or is choosing to ignore, the many recent studies proving that physical activity and recess actually boost student performance in the classroom. In April 2010, USA Today reported on a government review of research showing that "increased time in PE classes can help children's attention, concentration and achievement test scores." In addition to promoting physical health, regular outdoor play profoundly impacts our children's emotional, social and cognitive development.

The state of Virginia had a tremendous opportunity to not only improve the health and happiness of its children, but also to set a precedent that other states would be inspired to follow. Shame on Governor McDonnell for passing it up.

Learn more and take action.

 
 
 

Follow Darell Hammond on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kaboom

 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:42 PM on 03/27/2011
Thirty minutes a day for P.E. from K-12 would be great for most children physically and academically. Education should include health and exercise because of the cost benefit to society, if for no other reason.
03:55 PM on 03/27/2011
There is no cost benefit. There is no connection between school based physical education or health education and long term medical costs. How many times have children been through health class but still cannot tell the difference between bacteria and viruses?
06:44 PM on 03/27/2011
The multiple differences between bacteria and viruses are usually taught in biology class, not health class. Physical Education in the US is usually short on time and funds.
11:07 AM on 03/28/2011
Perhaps, Superdestroyer, you and others cannot tell the difference between a virus and bacteria after attending a health education class. I wonder how and whether that influences you and them to be physically active and to eat a helathy diet? Recognition of specific microbes aside, the purposes of school health education and physical education are to ensure that students learn what they need to know and do in order to live a healthy and balanced life now and for a lifeltime. Increasing physically active physical education is paramount in providing opportunities for children to be active, to learn how to be active and to value being active, since preventing obesity costs lots less than remedying it and paying for all of the costs of problems obesity causes. Kudos and huge props to the Virginia legislators who offered Governor McDonnell the chance to have the courage to do the right thing for the children as well as the taxpayers of his state -- this kind of 'right thing' would make a huge impact in health and wellness, and in the medical and insurance cost savings for a long-long time to come. We all wonder if there is such a courageous and sensible governor in any state in additon to Illinois....
02:31 AM on 03/27/2011
Just another example of how schools can't figure out what their mission is. More PE? More math? More science? More foreign languages? More Testing? A longer school day? More differentiation? More "Constitution Days" and "Democracy Days". What exactly is it that is going to be the real fix?

If kids weren't all compelled to come to school you better believe many of them would have stayed home and learned to cook real food alongside mom and grandma. Real cooking is a lost art in this country. A large part of the obesity problem is diet. Hmmm... We make them come to school - they never learn to cook. Because school is a babysitter, mom can work and doesn't have time to stay home and cook. Uh-oh. Unintended consequence.

And, kids have to be up so early to be at school at a certain time so few eat anything but pop-tarts and sodas. Few children ever get to eat healthy breakfast.

Nope, our compulsory public schools have created a plethora of unintended consequences. Can I give you guys a little secret about public school PE? Most of the kids can hardly be compelled to get up to participate. You guys want to make PE longer? Okay. Whatever makes you think you're solving the problem from 50,000 feet.

Actually, it's beginning to sound like public schools are destroying the natural order of things in family and community. I don't think our solution is more PE, but that's just me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gem Mayers
10:15 PM on 03/26/2011
More PE can be good or bad. See, PE for socialization (related to my post of social efficiency at http://3rseduc.blogspot.com) is wrong, I think. But we do need PE as exercise is good for you...you only get one body so treat it right! :) However, I HATED PE as a kid but....I was VERY active and you could not get me to go inside; I barely watched tv, never played a video game... but I hated PE. I have horrible vision (20.400 and 20....uncharteable) so depth perception and thus ball games scared me for good reason! So I was the laughing stock of my PE class. But I went on hikes every weekend, loved to swim and climb trees and go for long walks. In college I enrolled in many semesters of yoga. But I failed all my PE tests and passed PE with a C- every time.

My point? (sorry, I'm rambling...tired...) is that PE needs to be more then just ball sports and running the mile as exercise has lots of other things!
03:18 PM on 03/28/2011
Exactly. We need to focus on helping kids find ways to move (to play!) that they enjoy.
04:55 PM on 03/26/2011
Increasing the time and funds used for physical education will do nothing about obesity, nothing about health problems, and nothing for children. Natural athletes find P.E. classes a joke and non-athletes hate every minute in those classes.

Schools in the U.S would be better off eliminating physical education and putting the resources into improving academic education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gem Mayers
10:17 PM on 03/26/2011
I agree and yet not, lol. I think students...children...need exercise, it is healthy and many live in ghettos where you can't go out and play safely. But..then again, is it the school's job to keep kids healthy? Schools seem to be the fix-all for all of societies ails and that is too much for schools to adequately handle. And I HATED P.E. as a kid....still makes me kind of angry because I was healthy but un-coordinated and got teased and hated every minute of PE
07:47 PM on 03/25/2011
P.E. classes are not the answer, in fact they are part of the problem. The dirty secret is that most kids hate organized sports. The hyper-competition, the bullying by the coaches and star athletes, and frankly, the boredom of chasing a ball around turns off most girls and many boys.

If P.E. classes were effective at teaching kids to make exercise a life-long priority, we wouldn't have generations of couch potatoes who prefer to sit on the couch and watch other people play sports.

We don't need more P.E., we need more opportunities for kids to play unstructured activities outside, to walk and hike in nature, to try yoga or dance, or to work out at the gym without the destructive effects of forced competition.
07:16 PM on 03/25/2011
McDonnell only pulls out the pro-fitness good health line when he's in front of a camera.

And what's this about an unfunded mandate. Don't we already pay PE teachers? Can't they come up with a thirty minute exercise plan? Sure they can. Alternatively, we get the teachers to get their kids out of their seats, yell "MOVE" and at the end of thirty minutes they yell "Stop"! Believe me, just the act of getting off their behinds would be a vast improvement over their current physical activity and it wouldn't cost a dime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:42 PM on 03/27/2011
so, what are you going to eliminate from the teaching day to accomodate this "MOVE" idiocy every thirty minutes ( five minutes to get the youth out of their seats and back in 14 times a day=70 minutes...even if it only takes 3 minutes, we still lose 42 minutes of instructional time ...every time something is added to the very long list of that which must be accomplished each day, something else must be taken off the list...so what is it going to be? teachers cannot create time.
06:52 PM on 03/25/2011
For the real cause of the obesity epidemic and why we even have obese babies !
view the Dr Robert Lutig Video on U Tube

Here is the unvarnished truth. View it and weep. Excercise is important yes, but the real root cause of the problem is the sharp order of magnitude increase in fructose consumption.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
02:42 AM on 03/27/2011
Which is due to the fact that our generation cannot cook from scratch. We buy everything ready made. But hey, who is home to cook? Government pays for kids to go to school, parents have no choice but to contribute taxes, high taxes and no kids to take care of means both parents work (back when most families had 2 parents). No mother at home and mom working means that, at the end of the day, mom doesn't have the energy to pull off a "real" meal (can't blame her).

It's the harsh truth, the unintended consequence of compulsory education is that it has completely destroyed any possibility that anyone in the family will have time to quick a truly healthy meal. At least they are at school being made to read "Catcher in the Rye" and going to football and cheerleading. That will help them in the real world.