EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Darryle Pollack

GET UPDATES FROM Darryle Pollack
 

In the Dark About Being in the Sun

Posted: 5/28/10

In 2010, millions of people are still in the dark. I don't get it.

In 2010 it's both ironic and absurd to think a tan is a sign of health, when actually it's the opposite.

In an effort to increase sun awareness at the official beginning of summer, the Friday before Memorial Day has been designated "No Fry Day."

Though small amounts of sun help to absorb vitamin D, worship of the sun is proven to be carcinogenic, especially dangerous to young people, like a time bomb in our bodies that can cause a disease that has grown to epidemic proportions.

Sounds familiar, to anyone old enough to remember back before there were warnings on cigarettes -- back in the Dark Ages.

I was in the dark, too. I grew up in Miami Beach spending every spare minute in the sun, roasting my skin to a golden tan, helping it along with reflectors and baby oil to deepen the color. Who knew?

I didn't see the light until my early 20's. That's when I learned that my mom's death at 41 had been due to malignant melanoma -- the most serious form of skin cancer and one of the most vicious forms of any cancer. It dawned on me that my life-style was threatening my life.

Even though I changed my ways, I was diagnosed with skin cancer before I was 30. Luckily I had the most common and most curable form, basal cell. It couldn't even kill me if it wanted to. But trust me, after rounds two and three -- requiring three surgeries on my nose -- even the most benign of skin cancers isn't pretty.

This is a lesson learned every day by people all over the world, such as Julie Pippert, a young mom in Houston and one of my fellow bloggers for the American Cancer Society's program, Choose You.

As part of her commitment to focus on her own health, Julie visited a doctor last week and was shocked to learn she already has skin cancer. Fortunately, Julie took the right steps -- and took them right away. What I wonder is how many other Julies aren't choosing their health first and choosing tanning beds instead, despite the evidence that using tanning beds can triple the risk of developing melanoma.

And don't try to convince me that a tan is worth it to look pretty, or part of our standard of beauty. Something is wrong with that picture, if you look at pictures of women who prove the reverse, such as celebrities Nicole Kidman, Anne Hathaway and Kate Winslet.

By speaking of beauty, I don't mean that this is a woman's issue: it's obviously not. This particular cancer doesn't discriminate on the basis of sex. It's a risk for everyone, everywhere, every age.

In my opinion, every day should be No Fry Day. Because every day the sun comes up, the danger is there -- and it's not fading. Confounding the issue is a recent study that implies many sunblocks are not effective, and that a chemical found in sunblocks can cause skin cancer to spread. The study raises valid questions, some of them answered in this post. Clearly there's a pressing need for more study. We're a long way from knowing all we need to know about skin cancer.

But whether or not we have answers to questions about sunblock, weather or not some people don't believe global warming is real, there is no mystery about this: Skin cancer is serious; and it's skyrocketing. And to me, the only mystery is why so many people choose to remain in the dark.

 

Follow Darryle Pollack on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DarryleP

In 2010, millions of people are still in the dark. I don't get it. In 2010 it's both ironic and absurd to think a tan is a sign of health, when actually it's the opposite. In an effort to increase s...
In 2010, millions of people are still in the dark. I don't get it. In 2010 it's both ironic and absurd to think a tan is a sign of health, when actually it's the opposite. In an effort to increase s...
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:13 PM on 06/01/2010
I was 27 and had a mole removed from my back. Didn't think for much of it. I get a call 2 weeks later at 8pm. I knew it was bad news for the doctor to call so late. I was told I had advance Malignant Melanoma. I had surgery one week later and 14 years later, I am still alive. However, I think about it everyday. No one should ever get that call.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RMankovitz
Researcher, inventor, entrepreneur, author
02:41 PM on 05/29/2010
Many folks using sunscreen are beginning to take vitamin D3 supplement­s, which is certainly a wise move - with a caveat.

In those foods which naturally contain Vitamin D, the most popular of which is cod liver oil, vitamin A is also naturally present- could this be a clue from nature? There has been a raging controvers­y among researcher­s as to the interactio­n of vitamins A and D, with little consensus.

In my research, which is based on using nature as a template for wellness, I support the conclusion that Vitamin A is critical to those taking vitamin D in supplement form, to avoid toxicity. The latest thinking is that the A to D ratio should be between 4 and 8 (in IU).

Thus, if you were taking 2000 IU of vitamin D, you might wish to consider taking at least 8000 IU of vitamin A (not beta carotene) to avoid long term toxicity. For additional insurance, one should consider also taking a vitamin K supplement which includes K1 and K2.

For a peek at the controvers­y, see:

http://www­.westonapr­ice.org/bl­ogs/drs-li­nday-and-h­ollick-and­-colleague­s-defend-c­od-liver-o­il-citing-­the-weston­-a-price-f­oundation.­html

A peek at nature's clues to stay healthy can be found in "The Wellness Project."

Roy Mankovitz, Director
http://www­.Montecito­Wellness.c­om
04:18 PM on 05/30/2010
In the same way you should not take active vitamin D you should not take active vitamin A. They are both systems carefully controlled by the body. Give it the precursors and let it work it out.
04:35 PM on 05/30/2010
ps I am not a fish and I don't live at the Arctic, also the rest of the fish does not contain high levels of vitamin A, so no I don't think it is a clue from nature. Polar bear liver has enough vitamin A to kill a person, is this a clue from nature?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RMankovitz
Researcher, inventor, entrepreneur, author
12:29 AM on 05/31/2010
Depending on carotenoid conversion for one's vitamin A requiremen­ts is somewhat problemati­c. For details, see:

http://www­.westonapr­ice.org/ab­cs-of-nutr­ition/473-­vitamin-a-­vagary.htm­l

Our ancestors obtained vitamin A primarily from ruminant animal livers.

Regarding polar bear liver, the clue from nature is quite clear: do not eat the entire liver at one sitting. Just ask any Inuit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RMankovitz
Researcher, inventor, entrepreneur, author
04:36 PM on 05/28/2010
Research into existing sunscreen formulatio­ns continues to show that they are not only toxic to the user, but also to the environmen­t. They may cause DNA damage to skin cells, cause hormone disruption­, and also cause damage to coral reefs from swimmers covered in the stuff. Use Google Scholar to search: sunscreen toxic. See for example:

http://www­.ewg.org/a­nalysis/to­xicsunscre­en

http://www­.foe.org/n­ano-sunscr­eens-not-w­orth-risk

http://www­.cosmetics­database.c­om/ingredi­ent.php?in­gred06=700­596

Then there are the Vitamin D studies showing that sunscreens may produce a deficiency that could lead to a host of illnesses including cancer!

Then there are the studies that show rates of deadly melanoma have increased dramatical­ly since the introducti­on of sunscreens­.

The good news is the latest developmen­t in sunscreen technology­. Known as Berrynol, it is totally plant-base­d, and non-toxic to the user and the environmen­t. It is so safe it is edible. This patented breakthrou­gh is based on how nature protects plants from UV damage. It relies on cyanins, which make blueberrie­s blue and raspberrie­s red.

The remarkable advantage of the Berrynol technology is that it not only filters UV, it also stops the reproducti­on of cancerous skin cells, while not harming healthy cells. So, it continues to work its magic even after sun exposure. Hopefully, ingredient­s like this will be designed into future sunscreen products. For research details, see:

www.berryn­ol.com

Roy Mankovitz, Director
http://www­.Montecito­Wellness.c­om
03:44 PM on 05/28/2010
Thanks for the post, Darryle. I hope more people start to wake up on this.