NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Astor

GET UPDATES FROM Dave Astor
 

An Appreciation of Margaret Atwood

Posted: 06/02/11 06:02 PM ET

Margaret Atwood is best known for her 1985 novel The Handmaid's Tale. But that classic of speculative fiction is just one of dozens of expert works by the Canadian author -- with another book, In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination, coming this fall.

Why is Atwood, 71, such an impressive author? Let me count the ways:

1. She is amazingly prolific. Among her creations are 13 novels, nine nonfiction books, seven short-story collections, seven children's books, and 17 major-press poetry collections. In fact, Atwood was a published poet for several years before her first novel was released -- a career arc like Sir Walter Scott's.

2. Her novels embrace a variety of genres. She has written contemporary fiction (such as 1993's The Robber Bride), historical fiction (1996's Alias Grace), speculative fiction with a male protagonist (2003's Oryx and Crake), and even a book from the perspective of Odysseus' wife Penelope as her legendary hubby is off adventuring (2005's The Penelopiad).

3. Her books are extraordinarily layered. Atwood shifts scenes from the present to the past to the present in many of her works, while managing not to confuse her readers. The Blind Assassin even includes a novel within that 2000 novel. And several of Atwood's fiction books contain poems, letters, newspaper stories, and other plot-advancing devices.

4. Her characters are complex, three-dimensional people. Even her "heroines" are flawed, as is the case in Cat's Eye. That 1988 book stars Elaine Risley, a middle-aged artist whose quirks include being ill at ease with other women. It certainly didn't help that the younger Elaine was bullied by her childhood "friends," as the novel recounts in flashbacks.

5. Atwood's books can be heartbreaking and intense, but they're often leavened with humor. For instance, the three hyper-intellectual apartment mates in 1969's The Edible Woman are definite chuckle-inducers. She also puts mystery elements in some of her novels, such as 1972's Surfacing.

6. Like Barbara Kingsolver, Atwood is socially conscious without being preachy. This is certainly the case in The Handmaid's Tale, Oryx and Crake, and 2009's The Year of the Flood -- three dystopian novels that say a lot about things like women's rights and the despoiling of the environment but do that via the books' interesting characters and plots.

7. Atwood does a huge amount of research for some of her novels. One particularly well-researched book is Alias Grace, which focuses on the real-life Grace Marks and whether or not she was truly guilty of helping with an 1840s double murder that put her in prison for decades. In this work of historical fiction, Atwood smoothly threads in countless details about Grace's case and the 19th century (including the clothing, the transportation, and the chamber pots).

8. Her books are set in both North America and abroad. While Atwood often places her characters in Canada (particularly Toronto), she has also used locales such as the U.S. and Europe. For instance, the Italy scenes in Lady Oracle are crucial to that 1976 book.

No appreciation of Atwood would be complete without an example of her wonderful prose. In the "Hairball" story that's part of her 1991 collection Wilderness Tips, Atwood describes her character's name this way:

During her childhood, she was a romanticized Katherine, dressed by her misty-eyed, fussy mother in dresses that looked like ruffled pillowcases. By high school she'd shed the frills and emerged as bouncy, round-faced Kathy, with gleaming freshly washed hair and enviable teeth, eager to please and no more interesting than a health-food ad. At university she was Kath, blunt and no-bullshit in her Take-Back-the-Night jeans and checked shirt and her bricklayer-style striped-denim peaked hat. When she ran away to England, she sliced herself down to Kat. It was economical, street feline, and pointed as a nail.

Another Wilderness Tips story is "True Trash." None of Atwood's books will ever be confused with the second word of that title.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 86
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jerry Zezima
10:03 PM on 06/24/2011
Dave, you may not have written the book in Atwood, but you've penned a great essay.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
08:47 PM on 06/26/2011
Thank you, Jerry!
10:47 AM on 06/09/2011
And don't forget, Atwood manages, unlike so many brilliant Canadian writers, to cross the divide; she began her career in Toronto, with a tiny press...Too many Americans and Europeans are unaware of the depth and breadth of Canadian Literary talent, but thanks to writers like Atwood, there's some hope that won't remain the case.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
12:00 PM on 06/09/2011
Very good point, Amy. Thanks for making it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ValdaDeDieu
Author: NOCTURNE, BLOODPACT, DEATH MISSION TRILOGY
05:07 PM on 06/06/2011
I appreciate Margaret Atwood's range, her depth, her perspicacity. It's an art, married to your gift, to write about what moves you without being "preachy". It's something I keep working on, since I think I do get a bit preachy in my DEATH MISSION SERIES, which is dystopian: set in 2088.

Anyone with the slightest bit of imagination understands that environmental denuding (initially) affects women and children worst, (in the long term it is destructive to everyone) because it is the protection of women and children which keeps civilization civilized.

Someone once said the mark of an advanced civilization is when the weak and the strong--are equally valued. (paraphrased)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
05:30 PM on 06/06/2011
Thanks for your eloquent comments, ValdaDeDieu.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
04:39 PM on 06/06/2011
I love Margaret Atwood and find her incredibly thought-provoking. My favorites of hers are The Blind Assassin and Oryx and Crake, though I really enjoyed The Handmaid's Tale, too. There are three contemporary women writers in my mind who exemplify consistent brilliance: Atwood is one, Kingsolver is another, and Joyce Carol Oates is the third. And they've managed not to sink into throw away "chick lit" superfluousness, finding some serious issues to comment on while still crafting very readable stories.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
04:53 PM on 06/06/2011
Nicely said, inmyhumbleopinion. When a book is serious, thought-provoking, readable, and entertaining at the same time, it doesn't get much better than that! Thanks for writing.
10:03 AM on 06/06/2011
I trust Atwood is a good novelist, due to her reputation, but the only novel I've read of hers was The Handmaid's Tale and I recall it lacking subtlety and I don't recall an interesting character. The plot seemed extreme and far fetched, and her main points, to me, were way too obvious and heavy handed. I liken it to Vonnegut's Galapagos, which I have the same complaints about - obvious, blunt, and therefore rendering it almost pointless and uninteresting. Huxley's Brave New World, on the other hand, was believable, and actually frightening in its plausibility.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
10:32 AM on 06/06/2011
Even though I like The Handmaid's Tale, I like several of Margaret Atwood's novels better (including Cat's Eye, The Robber Bride, Alias Grace, and The Blind Assassin). All four of the just-mentioned books are probably more subtle than The Handmaid's Tale, and all have very interesting characters. I should add that all four of the books are also a bit on the complex side, but well worth the effort. If you're looking for a (somewhat) more straightforward Atwood read, titles such as The Edible Woman and Oryx and Crake would fit the bill. I loved Brave New World, too. Thanks for writing, TimeToWaste!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
04:47 PM on 06/06/2011
Perhaps being subtle wasn't the point?

My takeaway from that book was that subtlety is what led to the ultimate gross invasion of women's privacy to begin with--you start taking away women's rights bit by bit with little resistance, and this could be the appallingly blatant violations you might end up with.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
05:01 PM on 06/06/2011
Actually, that's a very good point, inmyhumbleopinion. Some books are more effective by not being that subtle. And anti-women attitudes can be so nastily strong that a powerful book like The Handmaid's Tale is very welcome.
02:06 PM on 06/04/2011
Agree with everything here except the comment about Kingsolver. I find her earnest and totally lacking in the wit that Atwood infuses in all her novels. Not humor or comedy--wit. You either have it, or you don't. I can't stand a novel about social issues that lacks this critical distancing ingredient.

But, I'm the only one in America, apparently, that can't bear Marilynne Robinson's last two books, and for this very same reason.

BTW, I refer to Atwood and Drabble both as St. Margaret. They are among the few novelists for whom I'd spring for a hardcover!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
02:20 PM on 06/04/2011
Thanks, IowaGirl, for your eloquent comment! You're right -- Ms. Atwood is wittier than Ms. Kingsolver. But I still don't think the social issues stuff in Kingsolver's fiction is preachy. She creates characters and plots (in novels such as The Poisonwood Bible, Prodigal Summer, and The Lacuna) that are so interesting that the social issues stuff goes down easy. I think even (open-minded) conservative readers would enjoy Kingsolver -- and Atwood!
10:14 PM on 06/06/2011
I was desperate to like The Lacuna but just couldn't buy into it. Love those people in history (Frida Kahlo, Trotsky), the setting, the events of that time period. Didn't believe the narrator's voice one iota.

However, I am also desperate to like The Poisonwood Bible, and want to give it a fair and honest shake. I like Kingsolver's politics and writing qua writing, but just think her reputation is overblown.
canuckjen
A life that is lived is a life of evolution.
01:46 PM on 06/04/2011
I am a huge fan of Margaret Atwood's work and The Handmaid's Tale is my favourite novel of any writer. The more I see the rise of Christian religious fundamentalism in the US and the influence of religion on political discourse, the more I think of The Handmaid's Tale and start to wonder how far off it might end up being.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
02:25 PM on 06/04/2011
Thanks, canuckjen. Well said. And The Handmaid's Tale was written more than 25 years ago, before some aspects of religious fundamentalism became even more fundamentalist.
02:14 AM on 06/04/2011
One of today's best writers, and one that could easily knock V. S. Naipaul off his perch.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
07:53 AM on 06/04/2011
I agree! And if there's any justice, Ms. Atwood will be considered one of the best writers of the 1960-2020 period when people look back on our era in 100 years. Thanks for your comment, Mum.
10:53 PM on 06/03/2011
I recently decided to try a Margaret Atwood novel and just got my copy of Oryx and Crake in the mail today, then read your article! How's that for synchronicity? I'm looking forward to acquainting myself with her work.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WYHKTai-Tai
Wyoming, Hong Kong, Tai-Tai
02:47 AM on 06/04/2011
That is one of my favorite Atwood novels. and of course, you'll have to follow it up with 'After The Flood', the continuation of the story. Enjoy!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
07:58 AM on 06/04/2011
I just made a similar reply to "edwilk" before seeing your comment. Thanks for writing again, WYHKTai-Tai!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
07:55 AM on 06/04/2011
That's definitely a coincidence! You'll love Oryx and Crake (and The Year of the Flood, which is kind of a companion book to O and C). Thanks for writing, edwilk.
06:33 PM on 06/03/2011
to finish my thought: women bought and sold (in more ways than one), perpetual war profiteering in more ways than one. As a result, the novel is not so terrifying. It's just a little bleaker than bleak; not worth writing a novel about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WYHKTai-Tai
Wyoming, Hong Kong, Tai-Tai
02:53 AM on 06/04/2011
Personally, I thought it would be pretty terrible to be in the Handmaid's position. I actually kind of felt like you did on the first read, and I didn't think it could ever happen, then after about a year, I had forgotten some of it, and had to read it again for a book club. On the second reading, I realized I was in denial; it could easily happen and as you say, part of it and to some people, it IS happening. Although, real for some, it is still a horror, IMHO. But if you want a real dystopian nightmare, try Cormac McCarthy's 'The Road'. It doesn't get much darker than that.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
08:03 AM on 06/04/2011
Yes, The Road is definitely a dystopian downer. But Cormac McCarthy writes so well that all his dark books are worth reading. No Country for Old Men, All the Pretty Horses and its two "sequels," Outer Dark, etc. -- McCarthy is amazing. But while Margaret Atwood can create three-dimensional male characters at times, McCarthy doesn't seem to bother a heckuva lot with creating in-depth women characters.
canuckjen
A life that is lived is a life of evolution.
03:46 PM on 06/04/2011
Why is it not worth writing a novel about the commodification of women or perpetual war profiteering? What subjects are worthy of a novelist's time and efforts?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
05:45 PM on 06/04/2011
canuckjen, those two topics (the commodific­ation of women or perpetual war profiteeri­ng) are VERY worthy of a novelist's attention. Thanks for making that point!
06:19 PM on 06/03/2011
I just finished the Handmaid's Tale as part of my course and it just didn't do it for me. First, the intensity of the first person narrative is so strong that it verges on narcissism (which is, I guess, pretty typical for a lot of literature these days since people feel so desperately lonely). Second, to try read the novel as a dystopia makes it a disappiontment. As a satire, less so. Dysotpian novels are Cassandric warnings of a terrifying world that awaits if we continue our nasty ways. Yet, the US (upon which the novel is based) was already screwed. Mass culture (such as mass consumerism), women bought
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
07:20 PM on 06/03/2011
Thanks for your interesting comment about The Handmaid's Tale, benbella. I actually like several of Ms. Atwood's books more than that one -- even though it's her most famous work. My favorites include Cat's Eye, The Robber Bride, Alias Grace, and The Blind Assassin, among others.
02:02 AM on 06/04/2011
I don't understand why the novel would be disappointing if read as a dystopia, which it surely is; and it was told in the first person much as the various tales of "The Canterbury Tales" were told in the first person, which leads me to ask the question:
canuckjen
A life that is lived is a life of evolution.
03:44 PM on 06/04/2011
Agreed. Many works of literature throughout the ages have been written in first person so I am also unclear about how first person has become a sign of narcissism or modern times.
photo
jf12
Occupying myself
05:22 PM on 06/03/2011
You forgot
9. Her stories are cool. Interesting things happen to interesting characters.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
07:16 PM on 06/03/2011
Very good point, jf12. Thanks for making it. "Interestin­g things happen to interestin­g characters­" -- great line!
04:58 PM on 06/03/2011
I love the literary term "speculative fiction" - basically "respectable s.f. for people who don´t want to admit that´s what they´re writing or reading." And the greatest thing about it, it was a term originally used by a science fiction writer (Heinlein) to describe what they were doing.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
07:15 PM on 06/03/2011
Loved your interesting and wry comment! Thanks, moflard.
photo
JoeyDee2
I know what just passed here
04:22 PM on 06/03/2011
I teach literature and often find my tastes and preferences confined to "dead or alive white men". In contemporary literature I don't often read women authors (not a conscious prejudice) with one exception--Margaret Atwood. I've read most of her novels. Her work is awesome.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
04:49 PM on 06/03/2011
That's a strong endorsement of her work! I appreciate you taking the time to comment, JoeyDee2.
photo
JoeyDee2
I know what just passed here
06:31 PM on 06/03/2011
Thank you.
02:04 PM on 06/03/2011
She also wants to Censor free speech remember what she said about Sun News before they even broadcasted ONE WORD a Lieberal Elite if I ever saw ONE.............
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
02:23 PM on 06/03/2011
I'm not familiar with that. My piece was basically about how much I love her books, and not about what she has done or not done in her life. Thanks for writing, joeFrmEdm.
02:07 AM on 06/04/2011
Does she really need to listen to a broadcast of a Murdoch-affiliated station or network before she knows they will be telling lies?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WYHKTai-Tai
Wyoming, Hong Kong, Tai-Tai
02:39 AM on 06/04/2011
Oh HO HO, my darling, Mum! Have you seen this article! VERY interesting:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-roger-ailes-built-the-fox-news-fear-factory-20110525?page=1