NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Astor

GET UPDATES FROM Dave Astor
 

Mary Shelley and 9/11

Posted: 09/09/11 04:15 PM ET

If the 10th anniversary of 9/11 has put you in an apocalyptic mood, you might try reading Mary Shelley's The Last Man.

That very underrated 1826 book by the author of Frankenstein was out of print from 1833 to 1965, but I think it's one of the great 19th-century British novels. Even if The Last Man doesn't quite reach the level of a Jane Eyre or a Wuthering Heights or a David Copperfield, it remains a tour de force.

Shelley -- just 29 the year The Last Man was published -- packs in romance, battle scenes, literary excerpts, philosophical musings, political commentary, feminist meditations on the limited sphere of women, and gruesome depictions of a plague sweeping the world in the late 21st century (our century). Maybe it was all too much for 1826 sensibilities, because the novel unfairly bombed with reviewers and the public.

Besides being a great read, The Last Man also gives us veiled biographical looks at several notables of the day. The book's Adrian character is partly based on Percy Bysshe Shelley, Mary's poet husband who drowned in 1822. (Indeed, the novel's pessimism was influenced by the premature deaths of Percy and three of his and Mary's children.) Lord Raymond is modeled on poet Lord Byron, whom the Shelleys knew well and who also died young, in 1824. The Last Man's narrator, Lionel Verney, is partly based on Mary herself, who -- like Willa Cather nearly 100 years later, with Jim Burden of My Antonia -- was a female author channeling a book's central character of the other gender.

The Last Man does have its flaws. Though the novel is set more than a quarter millennium beyond 1826, little has changed technologically. For instance, characters still use horses (and the occasional balloon) to get around in the 2090s! Also, Shelley's writing can be wordy (not atypical of 19th-century prose), though also quite beautiful. One excerpt from soon after the plague hits:

The experience of immemorial time had taught us formerly to count our enjoyments by years, and extend our prospect of life through a lengthened period of progression and decay; the long road threaded a vast labyrinth, and the Valley of the Shadow of Death, in which it terminated, was hid by intervening objects. But an earthquake had changed the scene -- under our very feet the earth yawned -- deep and precipitous the gulph below opened to receive us, while the hours charioted us towards the chasm.

Then there's a flaw in believability, but a flaw that's very appealing in a wishful-thinking way. When the plague sends people from other countries streaming into England (before the contagion reaches that nation, too), Shelley has the wealthy make sure the non-wealthy have food by giving up most of their estate lands for anyone to cultivate. Contrast that with how most of America's rich currently refuse to make any sacrifices -- such as paying higher taxes -- to help the many millions of non-rich slammed by the economic meltdown caused by the rich.

It's obvious what Shelley would have thought of that selfishness if she were alive today.

And, in an eerie harbinger of the Bush administration's invasion of a country (Iraq) that had nothing to do with 9/11, The Last Man has a scene in which Americans "attacked" by the plague in their nation invade an England that had nothing to do with bringing that plague to the U.S. But this action wasn't "mission accomplished," as readers will find in a book published 175 years before 9/11.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
threnodymarch
Art is long, life is short.
10:01 AM on 09/12/2011
I never would have put Mary Shelley together with the tenth anniversary of 9/11, but so you did. I hadn't heard of this book but now it's definitely on my list to read in the future. From what you wrote about The Last Man, it sounds like Shelley was pre-occupied with the overarching themes that plague brings rather than the minute concerns of what life would be like in the future. It shows the flaw in her writing, as you point out, but doesn't seem to lack depth. I picked up on that similar way of writing when I read Frankenstein. But this is just me postulating, as I haven't read the novel. Great article - thank you!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
10:15 AM on 09/12/2011
Thanks, threnodymarch! Although you haven't read the book yet, I think you nailed it when you said "it sounds like Shelley was pre-occupi­ed with the overarchin­g themes that plague brings rather than the minute concerns of what life would be like in the future." Her book is so multilayered, and probably took so much effort to write, that maybe she consciously or subconsciously decided to forgo the ordeal of imagining late-21st century technology.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
threnodymarch
Art is long, life is short.
10:39 AM on 09/12/2011
I can definitely understand your conjecture about Shelley forgoing imagining future technology. Not all writers are gifted with uncanny foresight and she more than makes up for that in her writing. I agree with you - it can be wordy and a little dense, but it makes it that much more rewarding when you uncover those magical passages that are written so well.
canuckjen
A life that is lived is a life of evolution.
11:18 PM on 09/11/2011
I'm definitely going to try and track down a copy of this book. Thanks for the heads'up.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
06:55 AM on 09/12/2011
You're welcome, canuckjen!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
07:04 AM on 09/12/2011
Luckily, my local library had a copy of "The Last Man." The edition includes a very interesting 25-page "scholarly" introduction to the book along with a timeline of Mary Shelley's life. She lived from 1797 to 1851, and also wrote several other novels and lots of magazine/journal articles.
12:26 PM on 09/11/2011
Neat and unusual method to commemorate the 10-year anniversary. Well done!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
01:28 PM on 09/11/2011
Thank you, Dave!
02:24 PM on 09/10/2011
Howdy, Mr. Astor!

-- The Last Man does have its flaws. Though the novel is set more than a quarter millennium beyond 1826, little has changed technologically. For instance, characters still use horses (and the occasional balloon) to get around in the 2090s! --

Personally, I posit Mary Shelley's depictions in the sphere of transportation may be proven to be peerless prognostications, given the Peak Oil, Peak Natural-Gas, and Peak Coal theories.

What goes around comes around.

Whoa, Trigger! Whoa!

MugTheFifthHorsemanOfTheApocalypseRuith1
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
02:43 PM on 09/10/2011
Actually, that's a good point. Shelley may have been predicting a more realistic, eco-friendly way of getting around than what we have in 2011! Of course, the plague came anyway in the book, but it spared the horses and other animals. Thanks for your smart (and funny) comment, MugRuith1!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Suzette Standring
07:51 AM on 09/10/2011
Dave, I think it's wonderful how you are breathing life back into these long forgotten books. Nobody else is doing what you're doing. More, more!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
08:09 AM on 09/10/2011
I appreciate your very kind remark, Suzette! A HuffPost commenter had mentioned "The Last Man" under a June piece I had written, and I vowed to read it. The "Books" section of HuffPost is a great way to learn about books a person (including myself!) has never heard of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colonelsun68
Ready! Fire! Aim!
07:32 AM on 09/10/2011
I have never seen or heard of this book! I am intrigued!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
08:30 AM on 09/10/2011
Thanks, colonelsun68! If you decide to read "The Last Man," I hope you like it!