iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Baldridge

GET UPDATES FROM Dave Baldridge
 

Who's an Indian? The Feds Aren't So Sure

Posted: 08/20/2012 3:52 pm

America's notion of who's an Indian is, as usual, in flux. Johnny Depp -- presumably on the basis of his upcoming portrayal of Tonto in the new Lone Ranger movie -- has recently been adopted (a ceremonial recognition) by the Comanche Tribe. At the same time, Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren's (D-Mass.) claim to Cherokee Indian-ness was roundly denounced by a small but angrily vociferous group of Cherokee women. Clearly, the notion of celebrity Indian-ness has captured the nation's imagination.

But how the government defines who is an American Indian determines who gets health care and other benefits.

In truth, anyone can claim to be an American Indian or Alaska Native and the Census Bureau will not challenge them. For most people, the claim is made in good faith. Millions of Americans have been told by their parents or other relatives that they have some Indian heritage.

Many Americans go through life expressing their identity in terms like, "I'm part French, English and Native American." In the 2010 Census, nearly 16 percent of multi-race white Americans reported one of their other races as American Indian despite the fact that Indians comprise only about 1 percent of the nation's population.

However, American Indian is not just a race. It means citizenship in a tribe, and all of the responsibilities that go with being a member of not only a tribe, but often also a clan within the tribe. When American Indians talk about their right to vote in tribal elections, they used terms like "enrolled member" of a tribe. Tribal rolls are like voting lists. As sovereign nations, tribes get to decide the terms of citizenship. Many tribes set a minimum "blood quantum," sometimes as high as 50 percent.

The federal government gets to decide which people are qualified to receive benefits entitled for American Indians and Alaska natives. Definitions of American Indian in federal laws and regulations can determine eligibility for health services, housing assistance and college scholarships.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in implementing provisions of the Affordable Care Act, has added another level of complexity in the "who's an Indian" debate. In its recently published regulations, the agency defines Indians in the narrowest possible manner -- members of federally-recognized tribes.

The definition runs counter to long-standing landmark legislation established by the the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (1976), the Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act (1978), and even the existing Federal Tax Code. These Acts define Indians as members or descendants of recognized tribal members -- a definition used by the Indian Health Service to determine eligibility for health services.

If the narrow definition prevails, thousands of Alaska Native village members, California Indians and other legitimate Native descendants will become ineligible for special protections under the Affordable Care Act. The federal government and states that are planning to operate Health Insurance Exchanges may face a difficult challenge in trying to develop a single streamlined application for health insurance plans offered through Exchanges, Medicaid and Child Health Insurance Programs. Each program has different definitions of Indian that apply to the special provisions in the federal law.

The Affordable Care Act is a major new federal program with tax credits to help make health insurance more affordable and thereby reduce the enormous health disparities in our country. While Native Americans have some of the worst health status, and Congress has tried to create an opportunity for them to access more health care resources, this intent may be thwarted by a simple misunderstanding of the definition of American Indian. As federal agencies can't even agree about the definition of American Indian, once again, the U.S. government will have failed its trust responsibility to American Indians and Alaska Natives.

One of my best friends, a Cherokee elder, spoke the language fluently, was deeply couched in traditional spirituality, yet could not find public records to prove that he was an American Indian. His ancestors had settled in Missouri, outside of tribal lands, and so had missed being listed on the Dawes Roll created around 1900 and used as a criteria for determining who is a descendent eligible for Cherokee citizenship. His quest for identity became obsessive before he died of cardiac arrest, still unrecognized as an American Indian -- still ineligible for care from the Indian Health Service.

It's time, after more than two centuries of dealing with American Indians, for the feds to get their act together and accept the broader definition of who's an American Indian in the Affordable Care Act. Millions of American Indians -- the real ones -- would approve.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
America's notion of who's an Indian is, as usual, in flux. Johnny Depp -- presumably on the basis of his upcoming portrayal of Tonto in the new Lone Ranger movie -- has recently been adopted (a ceremo...
America's notion of who's an Indian is, as usual, in flux. Johnny Depp -- presumably on the basis of his upcoming portrayal of Tonto in the new Lone Ranger movie -- has recently been adopted (a ceremo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThinkinPerson
01:19 AM on 08/25/2012
So important what you shared in this article. Thank you. California is replete with this problem and its about time that the government recognize this problem as an outcome of past policy that has to be corrected today. To do otherwise is simply to heap on more to people who have had enough heaped on over history. Thank you again for bringing up this important topics.
11:51 PM on 08/21/2012
First they forge my birth certificate and steal my heritage. Now that I have the original they want to mess with that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:13 PM on 08/20/2012
The problem with the so-called Federal Enrollment lists is that they were compiled in the late 1800s. They are corrupt, missing parts, and parts were lost. It is also laughable to believe that in the late 1800s it was even possible to count every American Indian, as there were vast rural isolated areas impossible to reach. While these lists are useful, it is impossible to believe they are definitive. Also there is the casino problem. Corruption over who gets casino money has lead to conflicts and abuse where names are taken off internal tribal lists to create bigger cash payouts for some and denying them to others. Overall the accountability system on these issues is a massive study in incompetence, corruption and human error, so much so that it is impossible to fix. Government mismanagement, indifference and other issues of character and competence clouds the issue.
11:54 PM on 08/21/2012
Corruption during the 60's scoop and the Indian Adoption Project, let alone boarding schools.
07:27 PM on 08/20/2012
Who cares what the Fed definition of an American Indian is. The truth is in the blood. The yDNA and mtDNA. Either you are a direct paternal descendant or direct maternal descendant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
05:23 PM on 08/20/2012
Can we just end this 2-tiered, separate but equal system for citizens already? Eliminate aboriginal title, buyout Dawes lands facing inheritance problems and the remaining reservations, eliminate Indian Health Services and let Indians become eligible for Medicaid and other social services. Give them a few years to adjust before they get taxed and stop treating them different. Separate but equal didn't work in the Jim Crow Days and its not working now. A lot of the Bill of Rights doesn't even apply to Indians and yet they are called citizens.
12:00 AM on 08/21/2012
Where would you start to dismantle Indian stuff? At home, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is ever present on the reservation. We like to refer to them as "Bossing Indians Around (BIA). If you look into the matter, Indian Affairs is one of the oldest federal dedpartments. It used to housed in the Department of War. Today, it's housed in the Interior. Indian stuff employs thousands of people. Where would these folks go to work if their jobs were eliminated? Do we just break the remaining treaties outright? Would the Indians have any legal recourse? I know the idea of treating us differently goes against everything that America is supposed to represent, but we didn't invent this mess. The notion of rounding people up and putting them on land islands (reservations) with a White man in charge was not our idea. This mess started about 500 years ago and I suspect it will take at least that long to fix it, if at all.
11:06 AM on 08/21/2012
@blackraisin-Your solution of total forced assimilation, the theft of what is left of Indian Lands and resources, and the "final solution" of termination of Peoples is the one that has, for the last several hundreds of years been attempted by the US Gov't, it's churches, it's citizens (usually in pursuit of what didn't belong to them), and as part of what is called "Manifest Destiny", and is grounded in racism as a validation for doing these. Oh, by the way, you will also need to throw out the US Constitution, as the Treaties, (which obviously have been more honored in breach, than in fact...) so, it appears to me, that you may wish to rethink your position. African-Americans and Jim Crow were a separate situation. We were forced to become US citizens in 1924, it wasn't a choice. It was done in order to tax and draft NDNs "legally". The "Equality" you want to define for, and enforce upon us was a step down, and in fact many steps down, from what was agreed upon between your and my People, and involved your people murdering, thieving and cheating mine. So figure it out on how my folk look at what you have written here, and the death you are proposing. Will you again take our children? "Kill the Indian, save the man" Beat us when we speak our language? Force us to be Christians (again)?
04:58 PM on 08/20/2012
As historian Patricia Limerick noted, "Set the blood quantum at one-quarter, hold to it as a rigid definition of Indians, let intermarriage proceed as it had for centuries, and eventually Indians will be defined out of existence. When that happens, the federal government will be freed of its persistent “Indian problem.”"

Blood quantum as a measurement of tribal citizenship and federal recognition is a project of paper-genocide.
12:10 AM on 08/21/2012
I've always found the notion of "blood quantum" very strange in that it speaks directly to pedigree. And pedigree is something we usually associate with valuable animals, not human beings. Intermarriage is occurring all over Indian Country. Some of our people marry outside and do in fact diminish their degree of Indian blood as you indicate. Others do not. I've also noticed at my home, that they changed the entire definition of the one-quarter degree of Indian blood so that kids nowadays do meet the one quarter requirement. We know that the primary objective of the federal govt. has always been to get rid of its "Indian problem". We are doing what we can to continue to be here on our terms, of course under duress.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bertiemcn
Sheba1
04:55 PM on 08/20/2012
I heard they could tell from your dna if you are indian or what race we are..If it is true why don'tthey test people?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nishnabe
teacher, armchair philosopher and mechanic
09:02 PM on 08/22/2012
Because blood is a factor IMPOSED on us by the federal govt for purposes of measuring "civilization." The whiter you were, the more civilized you were. Tribal citizenship, speaking the language, participation in and knowledge of the culture are way more important. Think they had DNA tests back when the rolls were done?