More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Johnson

GET UPDATES FROM Dave Johnson
 

The 99 Percent March on K Street to Take Back the Capitol from the 1 Percent

Posted: 12/08/11 08:30 AM ET

I am in D.C. covering the Take Back the Capitol "99 in DC" events. On Tuesday I wrote about the efforts of unemployed people and others to get in to talk to their senators and representatives. (Watch some of them tell their stories.) On Wednesday they marched to "K Street" -- the symbolic ground zero of the corporate takeover of our democracy. But first...

When I was waiting to get on the plane to come here, the jetway was backed up. Now that the airlines are charging $25 just to check a bag, everyone brings their bags on and tries to cram them into the limited on-plane carry-on space. But of course, the airlines aren't paying the flight attendants more because of the extra work this causes. So this guy came pushing his way down the left side, shouting, "First class, out of the way, first class, let me through," because he missed boarding first, and he was entitled to already be on the airplane and not have to wait in the line like the rest of us.

The rest of us are supposed to walk past the already-seated first-class passengers, eyeing their large, comfortable seats, while they sip their champagne mimosas and look important and... rich. We're supposed to envy them and hope to eventually be among them. But until then, we are supposed to be grateful that they "create jobs" and allow us to serve them. This is America today.

Why Occupy?

Outrages like this been getting worse and worse and have reached a breaking point, with many of us unemployed -- because actually, the rich don't "create" jobs; we do! So the rest of us -- the 99 percent -- have been getting mad about things like this for a long time and are finally starting to show it, now that things have gotten so bad. Across the country people are "occupying" places and ideas that have been taken over by the 1 percent. They are letting themselves get angry about the things that have been happening, the change from democracy to plutocracy, the way the big corporations and Wall Street now make the rules while they don't themselves have to follow the rules.

Not only has our Congress come under the control of the 1 percent, but they have done very little to help the 99 percent through this crisis that was caused by the 1 percent. This Congress -- the first since the Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court -- has done nothing to create jobs while doing a lot to kill jobs, and worse, at the end of this year extended unemployment benefits run out and 2 million people will lose their entire income.

Take Back the Capitol

So this week Take Back the Capitol brought unemployed people and others to Washington to confront their members of Congress and the lobbyists on "K Street" that they work for, to demand a change. Today they marched on K Street, the center of lobbying activity. CAF intern Sean McMartin was observing and writes:

On December 7, 2011, a date 70 years after Pearl Harbor, another piece of history was made. Supporters of the American Dream Movement and several other organizations from all over the country marched from the National Mall up to K Street in Washington. They came to protest their outrage with the rich, corporations, and the special interests, many of which have lobbyists with offices on "K Street." They shouted they were the 99% of the country, who have not fared well over past few years with high unemployment and stagnated wages.

Just before noon the people from the Take Back the Capitol came to the intersection of 16th and K Street, which became the epicenter of the protest. Occupy DC, which happened to be camped only a block away, saw what was happening and came out of their tents to join the protest. Then a group came marching from the west, too, as Occupy DC came from the east. The coordination was something to see in real time and represented several groups coming together from all over the place.

The police had to use their cars to block off a perimeter for the protest that involved 14th Street to 17th Street and I Street to L Street. Even policemen on horses,not seen often in Washington, were used as a show of force. There was no violence from what I could see, but a good old protest where people come together to show their outrage with the status quo.

Pedestrians going to lunch stepped out of their offices to witness history in the making. They took out their cameras and smartphones to record history as it happened and some even shouted their support for the movement.

After 1 pm city workers and police ordered the protestors onto the sidewalks and of the streets. The protestors slowly but surely followed and cleared the streets as were told.

Politico reported:

Wednesday morning, protesters organized by the ADM swarmed the headquarters of major corporations and financial institutions including Verizon, General Electric, Capitol Tax Partners, the American Bankers Association and the financial lobbying firm Clark Lytle Geduldig & Cranford.

A labor organizer said the protesters targeted corporations and lobbying groups representing companies that have paid more in executive compensation and lobbying in recent years than they've paid in taxes, citing a recent study by Public Campaign.

Hundreds of protesters from around the country converged on Verizon's headquarters, chanting slogans like, "whose street -- our street" and "shame on Verizon, pay your fair share." Verizon employees and building staff looked on from the building lobby as protesters swarmed by.

Protesters also marched around the front of the American Bankers Association, where extra security had been put in place to prevent outsiders from getting into the building.

About 20 protesters were in the lobby of the Capitol Tax Partners' building for a brief time, according to a source in the building.

Also on Wednesday, activists aligned with the Occupy D.C. movement based in McPherson Square marched to protest the Podesta Group, one of the city's most powerful lobby shops, which has close ties to the Obama administration.

Here is a collection of photos and videos from the action at K Street (click through for videos):


Click here to tell House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell: stop sabotaging the economy. Quit obstructing extensions of the payroll tax cut and long-term unemployment insurance.

This post originally appeared at Campaign for America's Future (CAF) at their Blog for OurFuture. I am a Fellow with CAF.

Sign up here for the CAF daily summary.

 

Follow Dave Johnson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dcjohnson

I am in D.C. covering the Take Back the Capitol "99 in DC" events. On Tuesday I wrote about the efforts of unemployed people and others to get in to talk to their senators and representatives. (Watch...
I am in D.C. covering the Take Back the Capitol "99 in DC" events. On Tuesday I wrote about the efforts of unemployed people and others to get in to talk to their senators and representatives. (Watch...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:04 AM on 12/09/2011
Adam Corolla really summed up the OWS movement real well.
12:30 PM on 12/09/2011
F Co 75th Attached to the 25th Div, Cu Chi 69 to 71 apo 96225 any more stupid questions ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xenubarb
Nebulon V
01:44 PM on 12/09/2011
Chao ong!
08:57 AM on 12/09/2011
To all those 'in the streets' who are so ready to blame professional lobbyists. They ARE part of the problem, but only a part of it. Even more important, is the problem of US, the back-home-in-the-district voters, who put our man (woman) into congress, and then they start sending the pork back to US in the districts, and we start to like it, and so that continues, until we finally get to throw "our man in congress" a big retirement party about 13 or 14 elections later. We measure his success --- and thus OUR success back at home - - by how much he can send back to us for our benefit and 'entitlement.' PORK IS A WAY BIGGER PROBLEM THAN CORPORATE LOBBYING, and that is OUR problem. But - - it doesn't make good press to picket in the streets about that; better to bitch about the ephemeral '1%.' Grow up, America! Pogo got it right: "We have met the enemy, and he is US."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eggsackley
Organic gardener & growers marketer.
05:56 PM on 12/11/2011
Pogo was right. But, that does not mean that we can't get things fixed. It won't even take a revolutionary war, just a real agreement that change must be made and that we must organize and vote effectively for change. As I see it, the Republicans are clearly the enemy of the people and our democracy. I would hope none of the 99% would vote for them. Then the problem becomes the Democrats, I don't think it would be possible to effectively start a new party before next years elections. If people can organize locally and elect independents, that would be great. But if the Democrats get a clear majority and don't produce real change within the first year, its time to give up on them and get behind a new party. The one thing we don't need is to let the powers that be continue to divide and conquer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:24 AM on 12/09/2011
My feeling on this, Dave, is that we ARE NOT in protest against "the rich," nor "the poor," nor the vast gulf that is fixed between the two.

In all of human society, throughout all of human time, that gulf has been fixed and it shall not be moved. "At this time of the rolling year," we watch the familiar parable of a lonely rich man who, thanks to the efforts of four Ghosts, became human.

And so on.

No, "Occupy" is not about that. Not at all.

I believe that "Occupy" is all about Article 2 Section 4. "All civil officers shall be removed from office for Bribery (or anything else)." It's about Article 4 which gives the Supreme Court no such powers and prerogatives as it now claims to exercise. It's about Article 5 which says that to change the Constitution's meaning you must laboriously change its text.

It's about civil officers -- nearly a thousand of them -- who are knowingly committing felonies against us all as they collude with those who are conspiring against us all to deprive us of what the Preamble promised to us all.

"High Crime Is REAL Crime." That should be your slogan on every sign.

"Book 'em, Dano." Book 'em all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:44 AM on 12/09/2011
May I please clarify my own post:

If we take the approach that "high crime is real crime," and that "in particular, the High Crime of Bribery (which is what we ARE dealing with here) has been expressly prohibited in our Constitution since the day it was first penned," then our core-issue is reduced to a simple law-enforcement issue.

Albeit one of staggering proportions: "what do you MEAN, the Entire(!) Federal Government is guilty?"

We write Laws for one reason: that they may be Enforced. We already have the world's biggest prison population, but we could certainly contract to build a Supermax facility for six hundred more people who, having been tried by a jury of their peers and found to be guilty as charged, would spend the rest of their days ... not in a Congressional office of power, but in an orange jump suit (with pink underwear).

We all watched the film noir movies where someone muttered to someone else, "Don't worry ... The Fix Is In." But we never expected to find Washington, DC saturated with it.

Once we confront the fact that we ARE truly Plaintiffs here, and that the very people in whom we sought to place a most sacred public trust HAVE betrayed us, well, we can all deal with that. We have "the due process of Law" expressly to deal with that.

But first, We the People must confront that horrible realization. It's gotta sink in.
02:19 AM on 12/09/2011
Good idea, K Street is the epicenter of the whole mess. The lobbyists make it possible to buy congresspeople which make it possible for the corporations to write the legislation. There has to be some way to take all this gigantic $ out of politics so politicians can care about and work for the American people.
12:19 AM on 12/09/2011
Better watch out! The rich are going to go on strike (ala Ayn Rand) and start killing the 99%. Oh that's right they already are.
12:10 AM on 12/09/2011
Meanwhile….who cares…the American public has no interest in what these uninformed, unwashed, unemployed slackers are doing. For them, it is easier to blame others for their success than to admit their own failure, easier to expect to take from others than earn it themselves, easier to demand that others give up their rights to their wealth and property than to exercise their own rights to go work for their own. Typical takers.

This divisiveness is getting old and most Americans see this for what it is, misdirected anger for self-failure. And if you are going to pick an arbitrary percentage of the population to lay all the bale on why stop at the 1%, why not go big and pick on the nasty 8%, of the virulent 14.2%, or even the sneaky and wonk-eyed 22%...

Time to move on.

Kai
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eggsackley
Organic gardener & growers marketer.
02:00 AM on 12/09/2011
We will move on, with or without you. And you will benefit from our efforts as much as we will.
03:07 AM on 12/09/2011
Are you sure…I am not part of the righteous 64.8%, I am a member of the evil 35.2%. We have been subjugating you 64.8%-ers with our malicious actions, namely by just working and minding our own business. Or am I member of the ‘capitalist-roader’ 19.7%, I keep forgetting since these labels are so overused and went out of style in the 1940’s…

Perhaps I could be branded or forced to where a badge on my clothes and then be re-educated through forced taxation.

You just keep up the good work…remember to wave that little red book and shout ‘service for the people’ as you justify your taking from others without having to work for it.

We have already seen how this nonsense plays out and it ain’t pretty for the poor…they are worse off…but the difference is they become equal in their misery and poverty and are left with no opportunity to change that as the rich take their game elsewhere and create jobs elsewhere.

But you keep vilifying those class-traitor employers…nothing says ‘do not take me seriously’ like vacuous sloganeering about the greedy 1%...or is the wonk-eyed 14.8%...or the bovine 33%....

Kai
photo
Grichde
Little Hope, Wrong Change
08:37 PM on 12/08/2011
This is getting pretty darn old. Who cares!
12:10 AM on 12/09/2011
True that!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 AM on 12/08/2011
Lobbyists are "important" people. They write our laws.

http://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/ALEC_Exposed
ALEC Exposed - Alec Exposed

"Through the corporate-funded American Legislative Exchange Council, global corporations and state politicians vote behind closed doors to try to rewrite state laws that govern your rights. These so-called "model bills" reach into almost every area of American life and often directly benefit huge corporations. Through ALEC, corporations have "a VOICE and a VOTE" on specific changes to the law that are then proposed in your state. DO YOU? "

http://www.news.ku.edu/2009/april/9/taxlobbying.shtml
KU News - Tax lobbying provides 22,000 percent return to firms, KU researchers find

"LAWRENCE — Three professors at the University of Kansas have found that a one-time tax break allowed several multinational corporations to receive a 22,000 percent return on lobbying expenditures.

The study was conducted by Raquel Meyer Alexander, assistant professor of accounting; Stephen Mazza, associate dean of the School of Law; and Susan Scholz, associate professor of accounting and Harper Faculty Fellow. Mazza recently presented their findings at the Critical Tax Theory Conference, sponsored by the Indiana University Maurer School of Law in Bloomington.

A recent law change provided a tax break to the corporations by lowering their tax rate 85 percent on certain worldwide income. The professors examined the extensive lobbying around the law change and found that for each dollar spent on lobbying, a corporation received $220 in U.S. income tax savings..."
12:12 AM on 12/09/2011
The unions have them all outspend and out organized...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eggsackley
Organic gardener & growers marketer.
02:19 AM on 12/09/2011
There are some good model laws out there as well, some of them written by environmental groups with lobbies that I support. The crux of the problem is campaign contributions controlled to a large extent by tax lobbies. We have to overturn Citizens United with a Constitutional Amendment as a first step. Then I would want to see another Constitutional Amendment
requiring substantial federal funding of all federal elections after nominations are complete and limiting all contributions to any campaign by any person or organization to $100.00.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:10 AM on 12/09/2011
I'm not optimistic about getting a constituti­onal amendment passed, or any other reforms, passed as long as big money is happy with the status quo.