More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Johnson

Dave Johnson

Posted: June 23, 2010 04:35 PM

Drill Baby Drill Judge Pits Mega-Corporations Against The Rest Of Us

What's Your Reaction:

This post originally appeared at Campaign for America's Future (CAF) at their Blog for OurFuture. I am a Fellow with CAF.

American deregulated corporatism: Short-term profits for a very few at the expense of the rest of us. The Gulf oil spill is driving home the "expense of the rest of us" part of this equation. And the corporatist/conservative reaction to government's efforts to reign in an industry that provides so much of their funding highlights for us the battle lines of the equation.

Conservatives say that getting a company to set up a fund to compensate its victims is "Chicago-style thuggery" and a "shakedown" and apologize to the company! Instead we demand they apologize to democracy for this.

But this is not really about "corporatism" it is about raw bigness translating into raw power. This is big industries and companies and a few extremely wealthy people that "have" vs not-as-big industries, companies and the rest of us that "have not." Big, centralized oil is a "have." Fishing, tourism, alternative "green" energy - these are industries and corporations too -- and democratic decision-making are "have nots." This is not corporations vs democracy, this is big corporations (really, the wealthy few people who control their resources) against smaller corporations and the rest of us.

Yesterday a Reagan-appointed, oil-stock-owning judge set aside the Obama administration's moratorium on exploratory offshore oil drilling, citing "potential economic harm to businesses and workers" in the oil industry while ignoring the not-potential threat of harm to the fishing, tourism and other industries now being destroyed by that industry. Big oil's wishes, a judge appointed by the guy who took Carter's solar panels down from the White House roof and dismantled mass-transit and alternative energy programs, and an anti-government conservative movement out to dismantle democracy combine to push back against the "thuggery" of a public daring to attempt to assert that safety is assured. The battle is over who is in charge.

The administration placed the moratorium while they develop new safety standards and procedures. This followed the revelations of near-complete regulatory capture of the Minerals Management Service by the oil industry, resulting in the chain of safety-ignoring, cost-saving diversions from standard procedure. They filed a xeroxed spill plan citing dead phone numbers and dead consultants, and the dead regulatory agency never bothered to read it before approving it. The blowout preventer wasn't working and they knew it but didn't want to take the time or expense to fix it. Etc, and etc.

Since so much was wrong on this rig the government wants to take a look at the other rigs drilling offshore and make sure they are operating safely, and get procedures that work in place. The industry is infuriated that government is "interfering' in their profit-making enterprise. Their oil is under our water and they want it now.

The industry threatens to just move oil rigs out of the Gulf to other areas, taking the jobs with them. Democratic oversight of corporate behavior is again held hostage to the threat of moving jobs across a border. The judge lets them get away with it.

This is the fight. The big and wealthy industries, corporations and people against the smaller industries, corporations and the rest of us. This is the same fight as that unleashed by the recent Citizens United case. It is not corporations vs democracy, it is the the wealthy few people who control the resources of the biggest corporations against everyone else.

And it is in no way clear who will come out on top.

Sign up here for the CAF daily summary.

 

Follow Dave Johnson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dcjohnson

 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:14 PM on 06/24/2010
For years, anyone who took a stand in favor of the middle class of this country against the elites was accused of waging "class warfare". And amazingly, they even managed to change the definition of the word "elite" so that it no longer means the privileged upper class but any one with an education who believes in fairness for all.

There is a class war going on this country, but it was the wealthy elites who run the mega-corporations who declared it. And anyone who shouts "free markets" needs to wake up. The markest in this country are anything but free. It's a rigged game and the people who loaded the dice always win. What we need more than anything else is a leveling of the playing field so that average Americans have a chance to have their voices heard once again. It's the only way to save our democracy from the oligarchy it is rapidly turning into.
03:41 PM on 06/24/2010
Agreed. But how to make our voices heard?? No one listens in Washington....
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
01:43 PM on 06/24/2010
Why do we need a President if the court is going to rule against his moratoriums and decision making? I was shocked when I heard that his moratorium had been ruled against in favor of Big Oil. I say we let them take their jobs away and pay the victims on the coast for the lost way of life. Cut our losses and start over, without big oil. I really don't care about lost jobs at this point. All I care about is survival and it's obvious that BP does not care about our survival. The only way the GOP is able to get by with their dirty policies is by threatening the public with fear. It doesn't work with me any more. I can't believe we Americans ever fell for their crap. Bring it on Republican'ts!
02:22 PM on 06/24/2010
It was overturned because it was based on lies and exceeded the powers of the President.

(I realize this is a tangent, but for some reason I cannot post a comment, only reply)
And the Citizens United decision actually leveled the playing field for small corporations who don't have enough resources to form PACs. Corporations still cannot directly donate to campaigns.
03:17 PM on 06/24/2010
Really? Because Congress gave the Executive Branch the power to review and decide on whether or not to issue a drilling permit. Seems like saying, "we're not going to issue any for six months" is perfectly in line with that inten.

BTW, did George HW Bush exceed his authority when he issued a ten-year ban on new drilling projects for almost the entire coastline? Or does it only exceed a democratic president's authority?
01:39 PM on 06/24/2010
I say ban it until they fix this one, otherwise we know they can;t and never will be able to and we just have to eat it like big boys and girls when they defecate all over our homes. This alone proves the need for a ultra deepwater submarine with robotic arms. At least 200 feet long with huge ballast tanks and structural strength at the front to withstand 1,000,000 lbs. Such a vehicle but be made for 500 million dollars easily. I could design the damn thing.
01:28 PM on 06/24/2010
Glad you made the point about big corporations versus small. There's a night and day difference in the amount of political power held by each. People owning or employed by smaller businesses should not expect any favors from "business friendly" politicians. They'll take care of the big guys at the expense of everyone else. This includes judges who were appointed by "business friendly" administrations.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Johnson
02:18 PM on 06/24/2010
"Business friendly" is a joke. This corporate/conservative line leaves out that these huge mega-corporations are killing innovation, startups, entrepreneurs, small companies, job-creating ideas, etc.

Wal-Mart, for example, has been wiping out local and regional retailers for decades.
12:59 PM on 06/24/2010
When are the "small people" going to realize that they are forever going to be the small people unless they hit the Power Ball Lottery. We have no voice and we have no vote thanks to the U. S. Supreme Court. It is more important for the mega rich to profit even in the face of the ruination of the Gulf of Mexico by way of the oil spill. Where is that God that everyone is talking about?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
adept2u
12:43 PM on 06/24/2010
Can anyone answer this.

Now that the judge has removed the moratorium, if there is another spill has the United States assumed any liability for it? We've already had ample testimony that the oil companies are not prepared to respond to a spill if one should happen after we know this fact will the Judge who did it get a bill?
03:18 PM on 06/24/2010
I say send the bill to the RNC. But pushing this lawsuit and having their judge rule in its favor, the republican party has taken owenership of the next spill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
12:08 PM on 06/24/2010
There clearly needs to be limit to how big any corporation can be. There also needs to be a severe limit on lobbying and campaign contributions. Their power has grown exponentially with their size and must be curtailed if we don't want to be a third world country.
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Show respect to all people and grovel to none.
11:37 AM on 06/24/2010
Obama put a moratorium in place before considering - well, anything. He LIED about the findings of a panel of his own choosing, saying that the panel members favored a moratorium, when in fact, to a person, every member not only opposed it, but were on the record in advance opposing the idea, and wrote a letter they all signed to make it clear that their stance was NOT for a moratorium.

The judge threw out the moratorium because of the lies (would you have hated to be the attorneys for Obama going into that court, or what?), and stated so, clearly. The problem with this president hanging back and golfing for over 2 months, hoping that BP would do everything and not - absolutely not - in charge of an effort to protect the Gulf, is that when he does respond (finally), it is short and shrill and silly.

When HIS OWN PANEL is compelled to call out his lie, and to state that (besides the economic devastation to thousands of familes) a moratorium is a bad idea, not their idea, not their recommendation and in fact, could do far more harm than good in terms of safety, one has to wonder why.

We know that Obama gave the Brazilian, State controlled, oil company $2B of our money to invest in - get this - DEEP WATER DRILLING. So, Obama IS in favor of deep water drilling and gives billions of our money to it, in Brazil. Hmmmm...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Johnson
12:16 PM on 06/24/2010
Can you provide citations to this "his own panel" or is this just something Rush Limbaugh said?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mcsandberg
Free people are not equal.
01:02 PM on 06/24/2010
http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/06/experts_seek_to_clarify_their.html

The key quote:
Members of a panel of experts brought in to advise the Obama administration on how to address offshore drilling safety after the Deepwater Horizon disaster now say Interior Secretary Ken Salazar falsely implied they supported a six-month drilling moratorium they actually oppose.

We Coloradans apologize for dumping the idiot Salazar on the country.
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
01:49 PM on 06/24/2010
Are you an expert on telling lies?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
02:44 AM on 06/24/2010
Until "the guy who took Carter's solar panels down from the White House roof and dismantled mass-transit and alternative energy programs" is recognized for the selfish, dishonest clown that he was, and his policies (top-tier tax cuts and energy policies in particular) reversed, this country will continue to struggle to move forward in the right direction.

The Wall Street crash, increasing income inequality, our enrichment of our "enemies" in exchange for oil and the disaster in the gulf should give even conservatives reason to question the "heroism" of their fabled leader ...
08:10 PM on 06/23/2010
A childish rant at best. Grow up and write something with at least a bit of maturity supporting it. The Pres continues his job killing ways (only government created jobs are good jobs, I guess) and this is just another example of it. Just ask the United Steel Workers what they think about it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
10:33 AM on 06/24/2010
if by job killing ways you mean holding business accountable and making them play by some semblence of rules? Then I'd say tough luck, the days of Enron are over and no business is too big to fail.The TARP bailout was a last ditch effort by the previous adminstration to put a nail in the coffin of the middle class of America, We now have a President willing to call the bluff and up the ante and I see it as the way forward to the future.Anyone wailing about the deficit must not have been raised in this country because for every living American there has always been a deficit.Look at the facts of History and try learning from them for a change
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Show respect to all people and grovel to none.
11:19 AM on 06/24/2010
You are the height of ironic hypocrisy.

Obama hosed down Wall Street with a billion dollars - and no strings attached. He cut secret deals with big insurance and big pharma to drag a health bill, so unpopular that it was toxic to all who signed it, over the line - now forcing us to buy insurance and drugs from American companies. Obama took over GM, inexplicably and unlawfully fired the CEO, took over the stock and gave majority shares to a union.

This has been a bald and shameful money and power grab.
12:16 PM on 06/24/2010
hey...look...you've posted yet another fact free post, void of reasoning...

- 3 points