More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Marsh

GET UPDATES FROM Dave Marsh
 

Woodstock at 40: What it Means Today

Posted: 08/12/09 03:23 PM ET

August marks the 40th anniversary of Woodstock. Now a cultural reference point, the three-day festival held in upstate New York quickly became a symbol of the times: the backlash against the Vietnam War, the electric rock and roll revolution lead by artists such as Jimi Hendrix, The Who and the Grateful Dead and a general questioning of society's values.

The following post is excerpted from rock historian Dave Marsh's essay reassessing what Woodstock meant in 2009. The full story can be found in the August/September 2009 issue of Relix magazine - currently on newsstands.

Woodstock stands as the defining moment of my musical generation, like it or not, which I mostly don't. But there's no squiggling out from beneath the myth that has been created around the aborted pop festival that became, momentarily, the second-largest city in New York state and a vaunted site of "three days of peace and music," or however that old saw runs.

Within days of the event, though, another perspective blossomed. Woodstock was a political event, this interpretation said, the eruption of a new class--Youth. Ironically, the person who best articulated the idea, Abbie Hoffman, had made the only expressly political comment from the stage: "I think this is a pile of shit while John Sinclair rots in prison." As he said this, Pete Townshend, whose stage Hoffman had commandeered, put his Dr. Marten square into Abbie's ass, swatted him with his solid body Gibson and serenely watched as the acid-addled activist tumbled into the photographer's pit. Hoffman apparently went straight over the hill and back to Manhattan but nevertheless, his next book was entitled Woodstock Nation.

Fittingly, it was Sinclair who best summarized the idea, in his essay "We Are a People," which he wrote from the penitentiary where he'd been sentenced to 10 years for giving away two joints:


"Woodstock was something we produced out of our own national genius and energy, it was a beautiful experience for hundreds of thousands of our people which we produced ourselves, but the mother country record companies and movie companies and vampires of all kinds swooped down on it and grabbed it and took it into their factories and cooked the reality of Woodstock down into records and movies and shit which they now sell back to us..."

The graces of history then gave us Woodstock as the antithesis of itself, in the form of the hideous 30th anniversary concert, held at Griffis Air Force Base. In 1999, the new Woodstock not only provided good music but plenty of food and water-if you were willing to pay extorted prices (12 dollars for a personal pizza, four dollars for a bottle of water). The promoters' approach to sanitation can be seen by the fact that Griffis AFB is a SuperFund site and their idealism was expressed in a horde of corporate sponsors, including broadcasters who opposed any kind of freedom of music choice, and a "shopping mall" filled with everything but necessities. The audience expressed its ideals in arson, rape and looting. Wikipedia nicely sums it up: "Woodstock '99 is remembered best for reports of violence, rape, fires and an abrupt ending of the show." After Rage Against the Machine played, guitarist Tom Morello compared the looters to the promoters, who charged $150 per person for the debacle, which was by far the highest price ever gouged from the hide of the Woodstock Nation illusion. Maybe it should have been held at Altamont.

The real legacy of Woodstock Nation is felt in the battles to create an American health care system, to end the nation's various wars and to save the lives and communities devastated by the finance industry swindles and 40 years of benign governmental neglect. None of those has a guaranteed draw, either. That is what happens, it seems, after an attempt to organize a social transformation based around a group of people who are all for it-as long as it doesn't inconvenience them or keeps them too stoned to notice.

Yet something did come out of Woodstock, and something may yet come out of the generation defined by the most exciting electoral campaign of my lifetime. If not the great lost rock festival, at least a reawakening to the best idea of the Woodstock generation, most recently expressed during that campaign by the candidate himself: "This isn't about me. This is about you," Obama said. When I heard him say it in my presence (I swear this is true) my mind immediately went to Roger Daltrey slamming home the same idea: "Right behind you I see the millions /On you I see the glory/From you I get opinions/From you I get the story." And though I've gone to innumerable Who concerts, the image in my head is Roger with long locks streaming, fringed vest and bare chest and that beautiful night sky framing the scene--an image I saw only in the Woodstock film.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:48 PM on 08/14/2009
The only thing special about Woodstock was that it became a commercial success after the fact. These 'music and arts festivals' were a dime a dozen back in the day.
12:53 PM on 08/14/2009
By far the best Woodstock retrospective I have read:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/211496
04:44 PM on 08/13/2009
How about us exploring a bit more what would happen today during such an event? Would the police allow the crowd to congregate without stepping in to help? And when they helped what kind of violence might ensure, and who would be held responsible for it? That is, since Woodstock we've become a police state, and the freedom the kids had then doesn't exist now.
03:59 PM on 08/13/2009
Every boomer I've known has turned from a Woodstock hippie into a self absorbed, money grubbing conservative, once they partied their way through the 60's and 70's, made their money in the 80's and found g o d in the 90's. They all sold out. Every single one of them. They are my friends' parents. I was born in 1966. And watching them up close for the last 40 years has made me lose all respect for them. The greed of the "me generation" is what has put our economy where it is today.
photo
AlexNYC
Pumps dont work cause the vandals took the handles
06:02 PM on 08/13/2009
You are right for the most part. However, there are still some who until today maintain their ideals and did not sell out. They still are active in their community on a grass roots level, they are not materialistic, and they are not self-absorbed. But I admit they are the exception. To be fair, a lot of the ideas of the Woodstock generation were too naive and idealistic to exist in a capitalist society. They voted in Ronald Reagan for president, and then George W Bush. There are realities such as holding down a good paying job, paying for a mortgage, a car and growing children, but it's sad that most have totally lost touch of the ideals of their youth and become greedy materialistic hypocrites, oblivious of the values they once admired so dearly.
02:22 AM on 08/14/2009
Wow. You are one cynical individual. Many of us from that generation still believe in the dream and are still trying to change the world. You need to get out more.
11:36 AM on 08/13/2009
I've always said I WISH I was of age in 69', born in 67', so that I could have attended Woodstock. The 60's was more than just Woodstock. It was a time when this country was in turmoil because certain groups were looking for identification and representation. Blacks were fighting/marching for civil rights. Women were fighting/marching for equal treatment...and to get rid of that bra and gurdle. Peace activist were fighting the draft and the Vietnam War. Gay's were fighting/marching to be recognized and not discriminated against. I use the term "fighting" because that's what they had to do, while they were marching...literally. It was the perfect storm. It was a liberating movement where people were standing/protesting for their rights and opposing an oppressive government; letting their voices be heard.

The music of that decade is the BEST IMO. I love that era of music because the songs were about something, there was a message in the music. Whether it was about drugs or politics it was very powerful. KinkyGirl mentioned a few, but lets not forget Jimi, Jim, and Janis - R.I.P. Oh I could go on with Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Deep Purple...etc

Long live the 60's.

Peace, Love, and Happiness.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:21 AM on 08/13/2009
I'm a Boomer by most definitions, but was still a kid when this went down, so what I'm about to say is not the rant of some Gen X/Y/Z person.

I doubt the mythology surrounding Woodstock. I think the promoter & performers were trying to get paid & most of the attendees were trying to get laid or high. Were many there opposed to the war- probably. Were their motivations primarily of conscience- probably not.

Vietnam was an unjust war on many levels, but was at it's heart, a war fought by poor kids who stood nothing to gain by going other than staying out of jail. With deferments, few kids from the middle or upper classes went. Maybe some who were taught by their WWII generation fathers to 'go when your country calls' but few others.

The older Boomers- the ones of age at the time are the ones who voted in Reagan, voted for Prop 13 in California, chose white flight to the suburbs and later joined the MegaChurches that have been so corrosive to our politics and have abandoned the principles of quality public schools and a more equitable society.

That generation has seen their personal wealth evaporate in the recent market bubble on the cusp of retirement or in the middle of it. Behind, they leave a country deeply saddled in debt, with a trail of disinvestment in out cities, infrastructure, public schools and public institutions. Way to go, guys.
04:01 PM on 08/13/2009
You just described every one of my friends' parents. Couldn't agree more.
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
09:47 AM on 08/13/2009
I'm a baby boomer, but the romancing of Woodstock makes no sense to me. When I look back at the whole scene in the 60's and 70's--I feel not sentimentality but bitterness. Baby boomers talked a really good line about what they were doing then, but they grew up to be far more materialistic, grasping, and greedy than their parents and grandparents ever were. They started out pampered by their Depression-traumatized parents, and they continued to pamper themselves by sinking the country into today's present state. No one was minding the store while they were out grabbing everything they could for themselves and shrugging their shoulders at the devastation that surrounded them--that THEY CREATED. From poisoned fields to vanished fisheries to dead zones in the ocean to global warming to dried-up aquifers to the paved-over West to the blossoming of hideous right-wing cults, both Christian and Muslim. My parents used to tell me that we were their hope for improving things in this country. Only a small minority of us remained true to a vision of peace, non-materialism, and a planetary ethic. The rest just closed their eyes and gobbled greedily so they could buy McMansions. Look how they have left our country. It is hardly time to look back into the past and pat ourselves on the backs for smoking pot at a rock concert. The one factor that has remained a constant for baby-boomers is selfishness.
10:22 AM on 08/13/2009
Don't forget the hideous left wing cults.
09:31 AM on 08/13/2009
I don’t think Woodstock means anything today to most folks, unless they identified themselves with the event. For a growing number of people, it was a silly moment in history that defined a generation as generation Narcissus. Woodstock has become the signature moment that defined that generation, just like D-Day defined the WWII generation. I’ll leave folks to figure out the differences there. But just like throughout the 80s and 90s (until Spielberg gave the world Saving Private Ryan), D-Day was increasingly portrayed by the youth oriented establishments as a relic of a bygone era, a burst of nostalgia for a graying generation that increasingly meant little to the youth of the day, so Woodstock is increasingly seen as a relic of a bygone generation, one that gray-haired hippies continue to insist meant something, despite a growing number of youths and young adults who believe otherwise. It’s sort of ironic that the generation that gave us the importance of youth is becoming increasingly irrelevant to the modern youth, not unlike the way the WWII generation became irrelevant to their posterity. What comes around goes around I guess.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
middleoftheroad
09:06 AM on 08/13/2009
Awsome show. It spoke to those people at the time...I love all the bands there. Would have been fun to go...but ask five 17 year old girls (boys for that matter) to name three bands that played at it, and they probably can't do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Democrab
Pretty far so good
08:44 AM on 08/13/2009
I still fail to understand the branding of the "Woodstock Generation." Just because a bunch of pot smoking hippies (emulating the beatles, by the way) grouped together for a concert, I don't believe for a second that this event defines a generation of people in America. The majority of my friends avoided drugs and that particular concert. The riots outside the democratic convention were more of a political statement of the 60's kids. They hated the war and the rationale behind it, and found their voice in the constant demonstrations on campuses and public forums that eventually defeated the architects of that "police action." Kent State was the defining moment in exposing the idiocy of Vietnam. I'd prefer we'd that we'd call it the "Age of Awakening" generation, even though it took years for those people to stop blaming the kids who fought in that war and realize that the government support of losers like Thieu and Ky was what we were sacrificing for.
06:57 AM on 08/13/2009
Oh, what year 1969 was!. We felt free and thought we could stop wars.
These are some of the tunes we used to listen to back then:

Youngbloods - Let's Get Together
Zager & Evans - In The Year 2525
Blood Sweat & Tears - Spinning Wheel
Guess Who - These Eyes
Kenny Rogers - Ruby Don't Take Your Love To Town
Elvis Presley - Suspicious Minds
Beatles - Come Together
5Th Dimension - Aquarius Let The Sunshine In
Tommy Roe - Dizzy
Foundations - Build Me Up Buttercup
Tommy James & The Shondells - Crimson And Clover
Creedence Clearwater Revival - Proud Mary
Oliver - Good Morning Starshine
11:08 PM on 08/12/2009
I'm a Generation X-er, but I was at Woodstock in the sense I was with my aunt and her husband, driving home from New York City and we got caught in all the traffic on Route 17. He was in a bad mood because he'd been trying to get on "Jeopardy" and failed because he wasn't "telegenic" enough. All I remember is bumper-to-bumper traffic and everyone's mood deteriorating as we crawled along.

The US was still at its apex at that time, both economically and as a global superpower, although the signs of later decline were already present. Vietnam had a lot to do with that, although there were many other factors.

I also remember it as being a far more prosperous society with a larger middle class that it became over the next 30-40 years. I call that era the Second Gilded Age, but it has ended in a crash now, as Gilded Ages always do. That wasn't just an era of benign neglect, however, but malign neglect.
10:19 PM on 08/12/2009
What did Woodstock give us? Well, for me it allows me to stick my tongue out at those who say that certain things can never happen.....that I'm an idealist.......and that peace is so swift that it's impossible to really catch and hold onto.

Well, it was shown that you can take over a quarter of a million people, of every known color and religion and not have a violent moment. I don't remember anything mentioned about guns, knives, gangs, rapes, etc. Those who were in trouble did it to themselves.

In the past 40 years I've often thought about Woodstock. I think about it when people are beaten up or killed at sporting events, when town hall meetings become hate-filled environments & not places of discourse, and every time I walk through a metal detector or take my shoes off to get on a plane or walk into a school.

Sure, it was only 3 days.....but we can at least say that the 2nd largest city in the state of New York was at peace for 3 days. Peace can happen, because it did happen.......yes, idealistic......but if you don't try....it will never happen. I guess we all have to play to win.............or, jeez.....maybe pot should be legal! hahahahah I end this thinking about a stoned Town Hall meeting! Now, that would be worth watching....................no yelling, just people getting along.......and hopefully accomplishing something when they leave & eat something.
09:29 PM on 08/12/2009
I liked this reflection. Woodstock was highly relevant at the time and continues to have meaning. In these high tech times, it's good to review what happened and what could happen. True, corporate America took over youth culture, but the 60s had blossomed into something so much greater than a 'scene' or underground. It is highly worthwhile to read Abbie Hoffman's Woodstock Nation for a different feel for the times, other than which bands played. It is also worthwhile to read Woodstock Consensus by Rex Weiner for truly following the many paths that folks had taken afterwards. Rev. Bookburn - Radio Volta
07:36 PM on 08/12/2009
Well if you want to develop both sides of your brain - Read the first two posts below... Yin and Yang, Pete ane Repeat, Right and Left. They are typical of what has happened to America in the last 40 years. The polarization that started during the Vietnam war has never really gone away. Problem is that it has been exploited by the professional preachers; and those who capitalize on controversy; and good ole American horse trading. All have all swooped down to claim their prey. Woodstock, like today, was not the best of times and it was not the worst of times. It was just proof that people could come together, even if stoned, for a weekend of music. What we might try to rekindle in America is a coming togther - if only for a weekend to actually talk - face to face and find some common ground. Even detente would be an improvement. Somewhere between then and now a chasm has grown that will be our undoing if we don't learn - and learn quickly - how to reach across it.