More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Rubin

GET UPDATES FROM Dave Rubin
 

GOProudly Nowhere

Posted: 12/19/11 12:28 PM ET

Is it just me, or are the Republicans running for the 2012 GOP nomination absolutely obsessed with us? Not a week goes by that Rick Santorum doesn't talk about us, or that Rick Perry puts out a commercial about us, or that Michele Bachmann may be married to one of us. (Zing!) Frankly, it seems to me that we don't ask for this attention, except for the occasional glitterbombing of Newt Gingrich or a long-overdue gay kiss on Glee. But, despite the fact that we live lives that are shockingly similar to every other American, this crew just can't stop thinking about us. We're like Sookie Stackhouse in True Blood: each week someone new pops out of the woodwork determined to get us. (If you need a slightly gayer reference there, go with the song "Piece of Me" by Britney Spears.)

So, seriously, what is the deal with these guys? Why are they so fascinated with the gays? Here's a look at the 2012 GOP field, with a quick thought on each of them:

  • Mitt Romney: instead of "flip-flopper," gays should call him "politically versatile."
  • Newt Gingrich: against us getting married because he wants all the marriages to himself.
  • Rick Perry: from Texas, doing the best he can.
  • Ron Paul: as a gynecologist, maybe he knows something we don't.
  • Michele Bachmann: see above.
  • Rick Santorum: Google him.
  • Jon Hunstman: a closeted Democrat.

Now that we've gotten each of their general gay ethos out of the way, let's talk about the big news of last week and the subsequent fallout. First, there was the absurdly ridiculous Rick Perry ad, which somehow juxtaposed gays serving in the military with Christians being persecuted in America (which, by the way, is now the second most disliked video in the history of YouTube, with even more dislikes than Rebecca Black's "Friday," but not quite as many as Justin Bieber's "Baby.") The ad was utterly ridiculous, though sadly nothing more than standard pandering during primary season. You can see it here, though I think you'll enjoy the "Bad Lip-Reading" parody of it here even more.

It wasn't that ad that really piqued my interest, though. It was everything that happened after all those dislikes. Jimmy LaSalvia of GOProud, the gay Republican group (try not to giggle), outed Rick Perry's chief strategist, Tony Fabrizio, in a tweet (calling him a "faggot," no less). To LaSalvia this was justified, because sadly there is no shortage of Republicans who actively work against gays while being closeted themselves (see Ken Mehlman, Larry Craig, Roy Ashburn... I could go on, but I have a word limit for this column). I actually have no problem with LaSalvia outing Fabrizio at all. The man is working on a campaign that is using hate aimed at gay people for a political means. What I had a problem with is the fallout that followed.

Andrew Breitbart, who sits on the advisory board of GOProud, along with Ann Coulter (with friends like these...), suddenly resigned from the GOProud board because of his apparently incredibly strong feelings about outing. In part he said:

On numerous occasions I have spoken with [GOProud leaders] Jimmy LaSalvia and Chris Barron of the significant impact the practice of 'outing' had in my evolution from the political left to the right. I was under the absolute impression that both agreed. I have a zero-tolerance attitude toward the intentional infliction of vocational and family harm by divulging the details of an individual's sexual orientation as a weapon of political destruction.

Breitbart is the same man who had no problem editing a video to make Shirley Sherrod look racist, and who, as far as I can tell, has never done anything positive for the gay community in his whole life. I know many people suspect that he is gay, though frankly I don't care, and it is irrelevant to all this. What is relevant, though, is why outing someone is still a red line that must never be crossed, even when the people being outed are doing things that are directly attacking the community they only secretly wish they could be a part of. If we've come so far, as we'd all like to believe, then surely outing someone can't be all that bad, right? Well, not if you're in GOProud.

After Breitbart's resignation, GOProud issued a statement firstly condemning outing, and secondly condemning Fabrizo. And theirin lies the problem. Somehow in 2012, we still have a gay organization that thinks outing someone is the single most horrible thing, even more horrible than the direct attacks on the gay community that the person themselves propagate. And this is the real crux of what the gay Republican deals with every day: while the things they believe in outside themselves, such as lower taxes, limited government, states rights, and a strong military, are important, they think they can only achieve those things by being surrounded by people such as Ann Coulter, who are actually disgusted with the very way they express love and fundamentally live their lives. I'm not sure if the Republicans hated the gays first or if the gays hated themselves just enough to become Republicans, but I pity them both for their unholy alliance.

Oh, and one more thing. I liked Rebecca Black's "Friday." Take that, Rick Perry!

 

Follow Dave Rubin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RubinReport

Is it just me, or are the Republicans running for the 2012 GOP nomination absolutely obsessed with us? Not a week goes by that Rick Santorum doesn't talk about us, or that Rick Perry puts out a comme...
Is it just me, or are the Republicans running for the 2012 GOP nomination absolutely obsessed with us? Not a week goes by that Rick Santorum doesn't talk about us, or that Rick Perry puts out a comme...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tickerage
Listen to the song of life.
10:45 PM on 12/22/2011
GOProud belies their very name, if they are proud to be gay, then how can outing be bad?
08:06 AM on 12/20/2011
The only reason GOproud exists is because Republicans use the organization as justification that there political part is gay friendly, when in fact its one of the most homophobic in the western world. Sure the Democates are not the most gay friendly, but at least gay reform is a small possibility with them in power.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MartiniVirtuoso
Outspoken on equality
07:52 AM on 12/20/2011
On the issue of outing, if someone is actively working to limit the rights of the gay community, actively working to demonize gay people, actively talking negatively about gay-related issues, spreading misinformation about gay people, etc. and they are secretly gay...then, I have no issue with outing them. When they take action against the gay community, the people they are persuading have the right to know where their opinions and misinformation are coming from.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quislet
It is a good day. I woke up breathing.
07:19 AM on 12/20/2011
Of course Breitbart and company think that saying someone is gay is harmful. Because they see being gay as something wrong and sinful.

And it is telling that GOProud used the F word.
photo
Valksy
civis mundi sum
04:35 AM on 12/20/2011
Breitbart talks about the intentional inflicting of "harm" without seeming to comprehend that it is the actions of bigots like Perry helping to keep it "harmful." If we lived in a world that was evolved enough to have no issue with people who are LGBT then people would simply shrug in disinterest if someone was outed. Fabrizio has been part of the effort to stop that world from existing, and he deserves everything he gets. I have no issue at all with outing LGBT people who actively work against the community.
photo
Ed Baker
Militant Moderate
04:54 PM on 12/19/2011
All politicians are a waste of time for us. Barack Obama was elected with more political power than any president in my lifetime. He came into office with a huge wind at his back, PLUS a DNC House, a DNC Senate........ What happened? First - Rick Warren was invited to the inauguration. Next - count the gay appointees to the cabinet - quick count - exactly zero. Then count the gay legislation passed by this DNC powerhouse, trifecta, hat-trick... again a quick count - ZERO.

Barack Obama was given more money by gay people than any politician in history.

Yet, he's to the right of Ron Paul, Dick Cheney and Gary Johnson on gay marriage - he just can't seem to evolve, even though his own birth was the product of a marriage once banned in many states.

His "signature piece of legislation - the repeal of DADT - is actually his biggest humiliation. The Log Cabin Republicans had defeated the statute in federal court, and the DoD was facing an injunction.

So, has the DNC brought DOMA repeal to the floor? Of course not.

The DNC is interested in keeping gay issues unsolved - that's how they continue to collect our money.

Put your money and your energy behind legal advocacy groups and black crow organizations - they deliver RESULTS.
02:51 AM on 12/20/2011
you need to take a history lesson.

I'll start with Johnson passing the CivilRightsAct, alienating a still racist country, affecting only cosmetic change, & leading in part to the election of the father of the modern GOP, Nixon, who then started a war on drugs aimed disproportionally at blacks, & today there are more blacks in prison than there were enslaved. Carter operated on a strictly liberal agenda & despite his foreign policy success was painted as an idiot for talking about universal health care, global warming, & metric conversion, which led to the mother of the TeaParty, Reagan, who then ignored AIDS, proselytized hate, banned international funding for pro-choice/pro-contraceptive hospitals, started the current trend of massive deficits, gave WallStreet free reign to widen the poverty gap exponentially, etc.

The point is, you cannot just come in & alienate this country, half of which still hate our very existence. Obama merely gave Americans health care & you saw the backlash there. Instead Obama, in three years, has managed to end DADT, slowly strip support and funding for DOMA, abolish the HIV travel ban, expand partner rights to health care, ban LGBT discrimination on FHA loans, add LGBT to the next census, grant partners hospital visitation rights, allow federal childcare subsidies for children of LGBT couples, etc.

is it everything? not even close. is it a thousand times better than any president in history? yes.

you need to look at the bigger picture. things are radically different than even 10 years
photo
pdsimdars
Steel spine and golden aura.
04:28 PM on 12/19/2011
I like the fact that everyone in Austin knew Perry was having an 'affair' with someone of 'unidentified sex'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mindy Czech
Cindy's wife for life.
04:08 PM on 12/19/2011
Like I've said, GOPround is the largest group of self-hating gays I've ever seen. It's awful, pandering to people who want to marginalize your rights and existence in every way. Unless you're a straight white Christian male who makes at least $100k a year, you are voting against your own interests. If you want to vote fiscally conservative and are gay, don't go to the party who hates you, go to the libertarian party.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:21 PM on 12/19/2011
Who are you to assert when people are voting against their own interests? Maybe just a bit arrogant huh? The democrats pay lip service but have not really done anything that different than the republicans, the only difference is democrats play identity politics and pretend like they want to do something in order to lock in a voting block they see as monolithic and easily manipulated (the same way they view the rest of the people who they so easily divide into groups and pander to).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
Honey Badger Don't Care
12:30 AM on 12/20/2011
Who are you to assert when people are voting against their own interests?
****************************************************************************
She's smart enough to figure that out. How come you haven't?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
Honey Badger Don't Care
12:35 AM on 12/20/2011
The democrats pay lip service but have not really done anything that different than the republican­s
*********************************************
Clearly you haven't been paying attention. The President and his administration has repealed DADT, isn't defending DOMA in court, got rid of the HIV travel ban just to name a few. Now what have the Republicans done? Demonize us, insist that we pay taxes and be treated like second class citizens, spend 1.5 million of taxpayer money to discriminate against tax payers by defending DOMA.

Don't sit there and feed me this utter BS of 'the Dems and the GOTP are the same' when it comes to the GLBT community.

And when a group such as GOProud, that doesn't even believe in marriage equality, but votes for the GOTP,then yeah, they are voting against their best interests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
03:57 PM on 12/19/2011
There may well be a way to be an out, proud Republican. However, GOProud is not it. At Least the LCRs have challenged something like DADT. GOProud has, thus far done nothing to advance understanding or the rightd of GLBTs within the Republican Party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill J4321
03:30 PM on 12/19/2011
I do not think I could live comfortably in the perpetual state of fear and panic that pumps the heart of the GOP.

GOProud???

GOPutz is more like it, guys.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
01:09 PM on 12/19/2011
Hi Dave,

(Loved "Hot Gay Comics". Would love to see another season.)

I can understand there being gays and lesbians who favor a libertarian approach to economics and therefore are attempting the Herculean task of finding allies in the Republican Party.

GOP Proud just disgusts me. It seems there is no gay or lesbian they won't throw under the bus.
05:58 PM on 12/19/2011
But liberarian economincs (by it's fundamental principle) depends on every member of society to have equal opportunity--which is not the case in the U.S. We first need to combat the oppression of every single social category that is disenfranchised. Simply put, libertarian economics will not work in the current social climate...maybe in like 200 years....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
06:53 PM on 12/19/2011
Oh, I agree. There is no accident that the countries with the greatest equality for gays and lesbians are also the countries with the greatest social and economic justice (i.e. Scandinavia, Canada, etc.)
Justin Werner
Finding a little happiness every day... somehow.
08:24 PM on 12/19/2011
It not only depends on equal opportunity, it depends on equal ability, it depends on being able to be adequately informed about everything to the degree not possible in our complex world, and it depends on the moral and ethical buy-in of everybody in society.... clearly not possible. On the surface, it sounds almost plausible, but like every other utopian ideal I've ever encountered, it falls apart rapidly when real human beings are added to the mix.