iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Arkush

GET UPDATES FROM David Arkush
 

Republicans Do Not Have the Power to Block an Elizabeth Warren Recess Appointment

Posted: 06/21/11 12:39 PM ET

If you're following the story of whether President Obama will nominate Elizabeth Warren to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), you've probably heard that the Republicans found a way to block even a recess appointment. It turns out that's mistaken.

Media outlets have reported that the Republicans, despite being the minority party in the Senate, can block not only Senate confirmation by the Democratic majority (using the standard filibuster), but also a recess appointment -- by stopping the Senate from adjourning. How can the minority party stop the Senate from taking a break? Press accounts haven't explained or elaborated on the point, except to report that apparently it's the House -- meaning Speaker Boehner -- that can hold the Senate open. That doesn't explain much.

Here's the rule:

Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

That's Article I, section 5, clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution. You have to hand it to the House Republicans. They read the Constitution.

But they may not have read the whole thing. A little bit later -- in the very same Constitution -- is this passage on presidential powers:

[The President] shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

That's Article II, section 3, clause 3 (the emphasis is mine, not the founders'). Yes, you read it correctly. If the Senate wants to adjourn and the House won't permit it, the President can adjourn both houses of Congress. That would be a fitting end to the House meddling in nominations -- a power the Constitution expressly assigns to the President and the Senate, not the House.

Below is the letter I sent to President Obama today, urging him to exercise his "adjournment power" if necessary to appoint Prof. Warren. Please sign our petition asking him to appoint her.

President Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20500

June 21, 2011

Dear President Obama:

On behalf of more than 225,000 Public Citizen members and supporters, I urge you to install Professor Elizabeth Warren as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) -- including by recess appointment if necessary.

Few would dispute that Professor Warren is the best candidate to lead the CFPB. She is among the nation's leading experts on consumer financial protection. At the same time, she is no ivory-tower academic. Her expertise is complemented by an understanding of the financial problems of ordinary Americans and a passion for making markets work for them. She is also a superlative spokesperson and, in standing up the CFPB, she has shown that she is a highly competent manager and administrator.

There is no legal obstacle to making Professor Warren the CFPB's first director. Contrary to press reports, the House of Representatives cannot hold the Senate open to block a recess appointment. When the House and Senate cannot agree on the timing of adjournment, the Constitution explicitly provides the President the power to adjourn the Congress:

[H]e may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper . . . .

U.S. Const. Art. II, § 3 (emphasis added). The use of this "adjournment power" would be particularly appropriate if the House prevents Senate adjournment in a bid to interfere with the appointment of certain public officials, a matter that the Constitution explicitly assigns to the President and the Senate.

Senate rules permit just 41 senators to block the Senate from voting on a nominee, and 44 Senate Republicans have stated that they will oppose any nominee for the CFPB unless the agency is weakened. Negotiating to weaken the CFPB is unacceptable. Unless at least four senators change their minds, thereby providing the 60 votes necessary to hold a simple majority vote on a nomination, you will need to make a recess appointment to secure a director of the CFPB.

I urge you to nominate Prof. Warren to head the CFPB and, if House obstructionism makes it necessary, to use your adjournment power so that you can appoint her during a Senate recess.

Sincerely,

David Arkush
Director
Public Citizen's Congress Watch division


cc: The Honorable Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader

This post was edited to add the request to sign a petition urging President Obama to appoint Prof. Warren.

 

Follow David Arkush on Twitter: www.twitter.com/David_Arkush

 
 
  • Comments
  • 125
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeLoup
Res ipsa loquitur, ergo tace!
01:12 PM on 07/21/2011
All nice and far out, but the bottom line is this: Obama does NOT want Liz Warren there.

End of story!
12:03 AM on 07/15/2011
Are these the same people (Repubs) that want more discipline in schools, higher standards, AND are
supposed to be "tough on crime"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Calhoun
What are you DOING to improve things?
04:20 AM on 06/23/2011
Signed, with the following additional comment for President Obama:

"Mr. President,
I implore you to exercise your Executive Powers to appoint the appropriate public servant and circumvent what is otherwise obvious partisan obstructionism. Thank you for your continued support of the citizens of this great nation."
01:04 AM on 06/23/2011
You are right but Dems know that a Republican will later hold the WH and may use that authority to recess appoint the most radical WingNut imaginable as "pay back." Why? Because that is just how Republicans think.

Consider the "fake candidate" phenomena in Wisconsin played by Republicans. Is that not a new low for the country? I would like to flush that entire mentality down the toilet. It only leads to more laws, regulations, and gridlock to prevent the unscrupulous from exploiting the law and breaking the spirit of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Thinkster Paulson
A concerned American moderate
12:55 PM on 06/22/2011
Democrats should hold this appointment as one of a handful of litmus tests for President Obama. In servitude to their Wall St. masters, the Republicans don't even want the CFPB to be formed. They prefer agencies, like the Federal Reserve, that are controlled by bankers. They're scared stiff of an agency with real power that's truly focused on the public good and the wellbeing of American citizens. Add Elizabeth Warren to the equation, and there's nothing they wouldn't do to obstruct progress.

The President has surrounded himself with Wall St. disciples since day one, which is no surprise, since they were his number one campaign contributors. Between Geithner and Summers, Obama has been consistently advised on how to benefit Wall St. He has JP Morgan’s Daley on staff now, and even Orzag left the administration for Citigroup.

It’s time for Obama to show the American people that he will stand with them against the continued pillaging of the Wall St. robber bankers. If he fails to appoint Warren, then it’s game over — there will be no doubt where his loyalty lies.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
11:16 AM on 06/22/2011
If the Republican Party fears her that much i say the President should fire Geithner and give her his job!
01:06 AM on 06/23/2011
That also requires the same confirmation process -- so that one step forward and 2 back.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
02:45 PM on 06/23/2011
That position would impact Americans more and maybe change the crony connection between Wall Street and Washington, even Washington wouldn't do it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miss Peaches
When do we stop doing nothing?
10:24 AM on 06/22/2011
I'll sign it. We need the financial regulations put back in place. They have proven they can't be trusted to regulate themselves. They have robbed us enough.
09:47 AM on 06/22/2011
CFPB another organization to do what there are already 34 federal or government organization doing. How about cutting some of these over lapping organizations. Do this through out government. Quit adding more organizations to do what there are organization in place to do. Cut the size and scope of government back to where tax payers can afford it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
10:24 AM on 06/22/2011
consumer protection....why would you have a problem with being protected from usery fees and other bad practices by banks and other corporations? Are u a bagger who just hates our President and would be against everything he says and does, I think so
11:47 AM on 06/22/2011
CFPB is a private, non-profit organization.
01:05 PM on 06/22/2011
Ooops, my bad. I was thinking of a different acronym. Duh
09:04 AM on 06/22/2011
use the rules as they exist...don't let them push you around!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:52 AM on 06/22/2011
Hang the one who dares block such an obvious appointment.
07:57 AM on 06/22/2011
Recess appointed by Bush just to stick a finger in the eye of the Democrats: John Bolton to the U.N.!

Payback time for Obama; enough is enough, the judicial vacancies have made a joke of due process.
Most of Bush's U.S. Attorneys are still on the job persecuting Democrats.
07:19 AM on 06/22/2011
The problem isn't whether Obama has the power, the problem is that he doesn't have the will. Face it, he doesn't want to appoint Elizabeth Warren. The financial industry has told him very clearly that this is a deal breaker for them and Obama listens to them far more than he listens to us.
12:06 AM on 07/15/2011
Maybe we should roll back regulations in pro-sports,... it hinders "Free Competition".
Referees can blow their whistles,.. but it won't be binding.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
01:46 AM on 06/22/2011
Does this guy really want to open up Pandora's Box? Fine. Then when there is a Republican president, and there will be, then he or she can do the exact same thing and appoint Conservatives to the, ah let's say the Supreme Court? Do you really want to start this game?
photo
Blak
Yes..I know my Micro-bio is empty.
03:29 AM on 06/22/2011
Have you been paying attention? Republicans have used every trick in the book to stall any progress in congress. What makes you think if there is a repub prez, that they will not continue with the same tactics?
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
11:41 AM on 06/22/2011
This debate is not about a normal recess. This is about the President forcing a recess in order to make a recess appointment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AdamWest1313
Hardcore Agnostic
04:04 AM on 06/22/2011
Republicans HAVE appointed conservatives to the supreme court. Liberals have appointed liberals to the supreme court. That's how politics works.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
11:42 AM on 06/22/2011
I agree. But I can't think of a time when a President invoked a recess in order to make a recess appointment.
11:57 PM on 06/21/2011
I have a feeling this doesn't mean what this Public Citizen's dude thinks it means. There's 200+ years of legal stuff since the Constitution was written and it's all pretty complicated. That's why people go to law school.

And hell no, I'm not signing your petition, I'm on enough mailing lists.
11:52 AM on 06/22/2011
Ummm, this guy did go to law school. Harvard, actually...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
adcan49
Lone Star Liberal
11:51 PM on 06/21/2011
No brainer for me, that's why I signed the petition.