More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Balto

David Balto

Posted: January 8, 2010 05:36 PM

Merger Lessons Learned: Why the DOJ Must Block Ticketmaster/Live Nation Monopoly

What's Your Reaction:

Antitrust enforcement is the bulwark to a competitive market. Unfortunately, over the past several years, there has been very little merger enforcement exerted by the Department of Justice. In fact, the DOJ has not tried a merger case for over five years.

At this point, the DOJ is facing its first significant antitrust test: will it permit the Ticketmaster/Live Nation merger with some modest restructuring, or will it go to court to block the merger?

Accepting a half-a-loaf remedy on this case would be a mistake, and the current Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Christine Varney knows that to be true. In the 1990s as a young commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission, Varney dealt with the proposed merger of Staples and Office Depot, two of the three office supply superstores. In response to FTC concerns, Staples offered to divest more than 60 superstores to the third superstore chain, OfficeMax. Four of the five Commissioners deadlocked 2-2 on whether to accept the settlement. Commissioner Varney cast the deciding vote to reject the settlement and go to court.

The decision was the right one by any measure. The FTC went to court and in a thoughtful decision that established a vital precedent the court enjoined the merger. The FTC's role as a merger enforcer was revitalized and they won several important merger trials over the next several years. The decision has been relied on by numerous other courts. Most importantly, consumers have received the benefits of aggressive competition between three superstore chains for the past 12 years, resulting in lower prices, increased numbers of stores, and improved services.

Competition works in lowering prices and providing choices, a critical lesson for the ticketing market, which has long been dominated by the Ticketmaster monopoly. Live Nation was the first company to threaten Ticketmaster's dominance when they announced they would break into the ticketing business early last year. However, monopolists, by their very definition, dislike competition, and when faced with a significant rival that it cannot drive from the market, Ticketmaster is trying to buy it out. Preventing dominant firms from buying out competitors is why our nation's antitrust laws exist in the first place. Now they must be enforced. Allowing Ticketmaster to acquire Live Nation would combine the nation's monopoly ticket provider with its only significant rival and create a behemoth of a corporation that dominates every corner of the market -- selling tickets, managing performers, ownership of amphitheaters and management of clubs and theaters, and control of ticket resales.

The merger will clearly led to higher ticket prices and less service. The impact of the merger on new services will also be substantial. In the future there may be a variety of services in the entertainment business that new firms may offer. If Ticketmaster and Live Nation join forces, they will have the leverage to prevent other firms from entering into or surviving in new product spaces that need services from Ticketmaster or Live Nation.

And as Varney saw in the Staples/Office Depot case, divestitures do not necessarily lead to less monopolistic control. For instance, there have been reports that Ticketmaster may divest Paciolan, the ticketing computer system that Ticketmaster owns and that can be used by other sites, including venues. To permit the merger based on this so-called divestiture, the DoJ would have to conclude that with Paciolan, Comcast (the reported recipient) would have the incentive and ability to fully restore competition. Comcast has a minor presence in ticketing and the idea that it would disrupt Ticketmaster's reinforced monopoly is simply fanciful.

There is good reason why more than 50 Congressmen, led by U.S. Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.), and a vast number of consumer groups have come out against the merger. The new entity would be an overwhelming force in the entertainment industry and prevent consumers from enjoying the benefits of true competition. With this merger, there will be no air supply left for consumers or competitors alike.

AAG Varney should remember the lesson of Staples/Office Depot. Sometimes a half-a-loaf is not enough, especially where consumers are involved. There is fast-growing bi-partisan support in the Congress, broad support from consumer groups, and, from almost any analysis of Internet chatter, widespread support across the country for blocking this merger. The DOJ should listen up and do just that.

David Balto is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and a former policy director of the Federal Trade Commission.


 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeannie35
09:22 PM on 01/11/2010
Congress please protect us from a merger of the two. TicketMaster is a joke. It is virtually impossible to purchase concert tickets without paying extortion like "convenience" charge fees of nearly $15 a ticket, in addition to venue fees, etc. etc. I ask myself every day, "When is my government going to start doing the work of the people?" My government does not exist to protect corporations; it exists because I have asked it to provide for civilized society with rules to protect ME, not profits. We need a Teddy Roosevelt or FDR reincarnation - I thought Obama would be close, boy what a fool I was.
05:05 AM on 01/10/2010
I especially like the part where they sell part of their company to COMCAST in order to get around monopoly concerns . Comcast is turned into one of the biggest monopolies in America. I remember before there was a ticketmaster you could buy your tickets locally pretty easily. The last show I went to sold out in a couple of minutes and I had to buy a ticket from someone online . The person whom I bought the ticket from was on the other side of the country and had no intention of going to the show. He only bought the tickets to sell. He was able to buy them from ticketmaster even though it was a small venue. All they are doing is making it impossible to go to shows anymore and driving up the prices.
06:17 PM on 01/09/2010
It's about time - it has gotten out of hand with ridiculous fees and over-monopolization of the remaining core source of income for these artists. eBay and other auction/classified sites should also be cracking down on the illegal scalping of tickets. This has become a gross industry that is consistently overlooked by law officials.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbarnezz
"Round up the usual suspects"
06:08 PM on 01/09/2010
Ticketmaster adds a fee that is not in proportion to the so-called service that it provides. There is no competition in this area. Why is it that companies that claim to espouse free enterprise are anything but? Where is the alternative source for these tickets that supposedly provides competition?

Stop this merger.
05:34 PM on 01/09/2010
Ticketmaster has such control that, when a venue owned by a bank I had some money in gave "pals" like me first dibs to buy tix at lower prices, TM still got a cut and a service fee. How pathetic. Even the venues have to kiss TM's behind when the venue is selling the seats. We need some freedom from all this baloney!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThePeoplesKey
Writer/General Disreputable Rogue
04:03 PM on 01/09/2010
Thanks for this article. Unfortunately our Anti Trust Laws don't work and haven't worked for decades upon decades. That's how General Motors was able to collect all those different car brands that they can't now sell to anyone. For this reason and others I've been proposing a corporate competition tax for companies in markets that contain fewer than 5 major players for many years now. The tax would be paid by companies competing in markets with less than 5 competitors and the revenue collected could only be used as venture capital to fund start ups to compete in those markets with established companies. Why 5? Because history as proven that mature markets usually wind up with 3 or less competitors in them. Ensuring that there are at least 5 competitors in any market, ensures competition in those markets which in turn keeps prices down or at least competitive. Of course the direction this country is currently headed in with corporations enjoying the same or even more rights as human beings, unfair trade, and out sourcing all jobs that pay a living wage, it's doubtful that even this will save us from ourselves . . .
Citizen54
Conservatism is a con job!
10:47 AM on 01/09/2010
Remember when Pearl Jam tried its valiant fight against Ticketmaster? At the height of their popularity, they did a tour that boycotted TM. They couldn't book shows in the usual big places. (I saw them that year in Augusta, Maine.) Band members Stone Gossard and Jeff Ament even testified before Congress about the extensive monopolistic power of Ticketmaster.

Congress did nothing.

TicketMaster is now bigger than ever, and apparently about to get bigger. Pearl Jam now plays TicketMaster-controlled venues. At least they sell tickets thru their fan club, but everyone else has to deal with the ridiculously high "service" charges. When one company controls the market, there is no free enterprise, but that's apparently ok with Congress.
05:41 PM on 01/11/2010
I remember that very well. And Congress did nothing? Are we surprised? Congress and it's ilk are all slaves to big business.
09:17 AM on 01/09/2010
I don't care whether they merge or not. I care about enforcing the rules and regulations that make it possible for small businesses to compete with large. My local record store, or a band web site, should be able to give me the same product. Many of us will be more to send our money towards a business that supports music and musicians rather than to Ticketmonster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kendraro
deadhead echelon peacenik mom to Marley the awesom
12:05 AM on 01/09/2010
we used to mail order tickets directly from the Grateful Dead and they kept the prices down, and we could afford to go to 6 or 8 shows on a tour - but I think they had to fight ticketmaster to be able to do that
08:15 PM on 01/08/2010
This is an important issues which needs more coverage. This merger will be awful for any ticket agency just ask any concert promoter. Live nation and Ticket master will nbe worse than Live Nation and SMG. Live nation bought hundreds of artist and now control most calendar dates at all SMG facilities throughout the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miriam Breslauer
07:35 PM on 01/08/2010
Ticketmasters percentage that they charge to "process" a ticket is sometimes as much as the ticket itself. It is an obscenity that should be forced to break apart.